![سامانه نشر مجلات علمی دانشگاه تهران](./data/logo.png)
تعداد نشریات | 162 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,578 |
تعداد مقالات | 71,072 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,681,684 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,911,821 |
بررسی دیدگاههای استادان رشتۀ آموزش زبان انگلیسی ایران نسبت به پژوهش:مطالعه ترکیبی | ||
پژوهشهای زبانشناختی در زبانهای خارجی | ||
مقاله 11، دوره 6، شماره 2، مهر 1395، صفحه 501-533 اصل مقاله (377.68 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی(عادی) | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jflr.2017.229637.324 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
عصمت بابایی1؛ محمدرضا هاشمی2؛ محمد امینی فارسانی* 3 | ||
1دانشیار زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران | ||
2استادیار زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران | ||
3دانشجوی دکتری زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه خوارزمی تهران | ||
چکیده | ||
دهه ی گذشته شاهد یک پیشرفت شگرف در حوزه ی تحقیقات آموزش عالی از جمله زبان شناسی کاربردی بوده است. در این راستا، مطالعه ی حاضر به بررسی مفهوم تحقیق از دیدگاه اساتید هیأت علمی رشته ی زبان شناسی کاربردی در ایران می پردازد. در این پژوهش ترکیبی متوالی، نتایج کمی از طریق پیمایش 140 عضو هیأت علمی که بصورت نمونه ای هدفمند انتخاب شده بودند، حاصل شد. سپس نتایج کیفی از طریق مصاحبه با 12 عضو هیأت علمی جهت درک عمیق تر آن ها از مفهوم تحقیق بدست آمد. براساس نتایج کمی، اساتید تحقیقاتی که شامل "طرح های تجربی" و "روش های ترکیبی" می باشند را بیشتر به عنوان تحقیق می پذیرند. همچنین دیدگاه پاسخ دهندگان پیرامون مفهوم تحقیق بیانگر ویژگی های دقیق و سخت گیرانه ی آن ها در پارادایم های کمی، کیفی، و ترکیبی می باشد. در این مطالعه، یافته های کیفی به تبیین یافته های کمی پیرامون جایگاه تحقیق از دیدگاه اساتید هیأت علمی پرداخته است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
"اعضای هیأت علمی"؛ "تحقیقات آموزشی"؛ "روش تحقیق ترکیبی"؛ "زبان شناسی کاربردی"؛ "مفهوم تحقیق" | ||
مراجع | ||
منابع Abdollahzadeh, E., Amini Farsani, M. & Beikmohammadi, M. (in press). Argumentative writing behavior of graduate EFL learners. Argumentation, 1-21. Åkerlind, G.S. (2008). An academic perspective on research and being a researcher: An integration of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 33(1), 17–31. Amini Farsani, M., Beikmohammadi, M., & Mohehbbi, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning, goal-oriented learning and academic writing performance of undergraduate Iranina EFL learners. TESL-EJ, 18 (2), 1-19. Anani Sarab, M. R., & Amini Farsani, M. (2014). The relationship between writing strategies and personality types of graduate Iranian EFL learners. Applied Research on English Language, 3(2), 69-83. Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Topics, aims, and constraints in English teacher research: A Chinese case study. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 113–125. Borg, S. (2007). Research engagement in English language teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 731-747. Borg, S. (2008b). Investigating English language teaching and learning in Oman. Muscat: Ministry of Education, Oman. Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30, 355-388. Borg, S. (2010). Language teacher research engagement. Language Teaching, 43, 391- 429. Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2012). University teacher educators' research engagement: Perspectives from Saudi Arabia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28:3, 347-356. Borg, S., & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese College English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), 270-299. Bredo, E. (2009). Comments on Howe: getting over the methodology wars. Educational Researcher, 38, 441 Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26, 271–85. Brew, A., and Lucas, L.(2009). Academic research and researcher. New York: Open University Press. Bruce, C., B. Pham, and I. Stoodley. (2004). Constituting the significance and value of research: Views from information technology academics and industry professionals. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 219–38. بررسی دیدگاه های استادان رشتة آموزش زبان انگلیسی ایران نسبت به پژوهش: مطالعة ترکیبی 527 Burns, A. (2010). Action research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 83–100). London, England: Bloomsbury. Cornwell, S. (1999). Interview with Anne Burns and Graham Crooks. The Language Teacher, 23(12), 5-10. Creswell, J. W., & V. L. Plano Clark. ( 2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd edn. Sage Publication. Davis, A. and Elder, C. (2004). Applied linguistics subject to discipline in A. Davies and C. Elder, The handbook of applied linguistics (pp.1-17), Oxford: Blackwell. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Handbook of qualitative research (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dörnyei, Z., Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115-117. Gao, X, Barkhuizen, G, & Chow, A. (2010). Nowadays, teachers are relatively obedient: Understanding primary school English teachers' conceptions of and drives for research in China. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 61–81 Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of ground theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Adline. Guetterman, G. T. (2017). What distinguishes a novice from an expert mixed methods researcher? Quality and Quantity, 51(1), 377-398. Hashemi, M. R. Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: toward new research designs in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 4, 828-852. Holliday, A. (2015). Analyzing qualitative data. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 83–100). London, England: Bloomsbury. Hopkins, D.(1993). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press. Hudson, T., & Liosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 76–96. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26. 528 پژوهش های زبانشناختی در زبان های خارجی، دورة 6، شمارة 2، پاییز و زمستان 1395 Kiley, M. (2009). Isn’t research just research? What are candidates and supervisors thinking? In A. Brew & L. Lucas, (Ed.), Academic research and researcher, New York: Open University Press. Kiley, M., and G. Mullins. (2005). Supervisors’ conceptions of research: What are they? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49, 245–62. King, A. K. & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: trends, concerns, and new directions. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (supplement), 209-227. Loewen, Sh., & Plonsky, L. (2016). An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. London: Palgrave. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York: Routledge. Liu, Y. & Borg, S. (2014). Tensions in teachers’ conceptions of research: Insights from College English Teaching in China. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 37:3, 273–291. McNamara, O. (2002b). Evidence-based practice through practice-based evidence, in O. McNamara, (Ed.), Becoming an evidence-based practitioner (pp. 15–26), London: RoutledgeFalmer McDonough, J. & McDonough, S. (1990). What’s the use of research? ELT Journal, 44(2), 102–9. Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L.C., Clement, R. and Vallerand, R.J. (2001). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 33-64. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3 – 50). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. T. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report. 12(2), 281-316. Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85 – 110. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental research methods in language learning. London & New York: Bloomsbury. Phakiti, A. and Paltridge, B. (2015). Approaches and methods in applied linguistics research, in B. Paltridge and A. Phakiti, Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp.5-25). London, England: Bloomsbury. بررسی دیدگاه های استادان رشتة آموزش زبان انگلیسی ایران نسبت به پژوهش: مطالعة ترکیبی 529 Pitcher, R. (2011). Doctoral students’ conceptions of research. The Qualitative Report, 16 (4), 971-983. Quimbo, M.-A. T., & Sulabo, E. C. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1955–1971. Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative mixed-methods research: moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33-49. Riazi, A. M., and Candlin, C. (2014). Mixed methods research in language teaching and learning: opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47, 135–73. Schouteden, W., Verburgh, A., and Elen, J. (2014). Teachers' general and contextualized research conceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 251-264. Seliger, H.W. & Shohamy, E.(1989). Second language research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Shkedi, A. (1998). Teachers’ attitudes towards research: a challenge for qualitative researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(4), 559– 78. Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., and & Lonka, K. (2014). Conceptions of research: the doctoral student experience in three domains. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 251-264. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). The foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative techniques in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Usher, R. (1996). A critique of the neglected epistemological assumptions of educational research, In D. Scott & R. Usher (Ed.), Understanding educational research (pp.9- 33), New York: Routledge. Vermunt, J. (2005). Conceptions of research and methodology learning: A commentary on the special issue. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 329–334. Wagner, E. (2015). Survey research. In B. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research methods in applied linguistics: A practical resource (pp. 83–100). London, England: Bloomsbury. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,068 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 703 |