
تعداد نشریات | 163 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,762 |
تعداد مقالات | 72,830 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 131,678,546 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 103,443,914 |
بررسی اعلام الوهیت نرام-سین | ||
مطالعات باستان شناسی | ||
دوره 17، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 36، خرداد 1404، صفحه 173-198 اصل مقاله (1.26 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jarcs.2024.379595.143280 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حسین بادامچی* 1؛ سید شهروز توکلی2 | ||
1دانشیار گروه تاریخ، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران (نویسندۀ مسئول). | ||
2دانشجوی کارشناسیارشد دکتری تاریخ، گروه تاریخ، دانشکدۀ ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
یکی از انواع مشروعیت پادشاهان در دوران باستان، مشروعیت الوهی است. فرمانروا در این چارچوب، پا را از ادعای نمایندگی خدا و تبار الهی فراتر میگذارد و خود را یک خدا معرفی میکند. بنابر اسناد و مدارک، بهنظر میرسد که نخستین نمونۀ رسمی از اعلام الوهیت شاهان در بینالنهرین، در دوران حکومت اکد و بهدست نرام-سین (حدود 2261-2206پ.م.) صورتگرفته است. در دوران حکومت اکد یا همان سلسلۀ سارگنی، برای نخستینبار تلاش میشود که یک حکومت سیاسی یکپارچه در بینالنهرین تأسیس شود؛ از اینرو، مطالعۀ اعلام الوهیت پادشاه در بستر کسب مشروعیت حکومت حایز اهمیت است. نرام-سین، نخستین نمونۀ رسمی از این ایدئولوژی در بینالنهرین است که باعث شد موجی، هرچند سطحی از اعلام الوهیت شاهان شکل گیرد. منابع مربوط به پادشاهی الوهی نرام-سین در مقایسه با شاهان بینالنهرینی که پس از او اعلام خدایی کردند کمتر است. بهعلاوه، عمدۀ مطالعات جدید بر سنت متأخر تمرکز دارند. پژوهش حاضر، برای جبران این نقص، بر پادشاهی الوهی نرام-سین و جوانب مختلف آن تمرکز میکند. در این پژوهش تلاش میشود تا آن فرآیند سیاسی که به ادعای الوهیت نرام-سین منجر گردید، جایگاه و وضعیت الوهی وی، اهداف کلی وی از این اقدام، ریشهها و عواملی که موجب این ادعا شدند، پیامدهای این ایدئولوژی و تأثیرات بلندمدت آن، بررسی شده و به این پرسش که آیا ادعای الوهیت در دوران اکد، تنها به نرام-سین منحصر است یا خیر(؟)، پاسخ داده شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
نرام-سین؛ اکد؛ پادشاهی الوهی؛ بینالنهرین؛ مشروعیت | ||
مراجع | ||
- Andersson, J., (2012). Kingship in the Early Mesopotamian Onomasticon 2800–2200 BCE. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia 28. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet. - Barjamovic, G., (2012). “The Mesopotamian Empires”. In: P.F Bang and W. Sheidel. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Ancient State in the Ancient Near East and the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 120–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195188318.013.0005 - Beaulieu, P-A., (2018). A History of Babylon 2200 BC–AD 75. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119257561 - Bernbeck, R., (2008). “Royal deification: an Ambiguation Mechanism for the Creation of Courtier Subjectivities”. In: N. Brisch. (ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute Seminars 4. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. 157–166. - Blocher, F., (1999). “Wann wurde Puzur-Eštar zum Gott?”. In” J. Renger. (ed.), Babylon: Focus Mesopotamischer Geschichte, Wiege früher Gelehrsamkeit, Mythos in der Moderne. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker. 253–269. - Brisch, N., (2006). “The Priestess and the King: The Divine Kingship of Šu-Sîn of Ur”. In: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 126: 161–176. - Brisch, N., (2013). “Of gods and kings: divine kingship in Ancient Mesopotamia”. In: Religion Compass, 7: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12031 - Cooper, J. S., (1983). The Curse of Agade. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. - Cooper, J. S. (1993). “Paradigm and propaganda: the dynasty of Akkade in the 21st century”. In: M. Liverani.(ed.), Akkad: the first world empire: structure, ideology, traditions. History of the Ancient Near East, Studies 5. Padua: Sargon srl. 11–23. - Cooper, J. S., (2008). “Divine kingship in Mesopotamia, A Fleeting Phenomenon”. In: N. Brisch (ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute Seminars 4. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. 261–265. - Fischer, C., (2002). “Twilight of the sun-god”. Iraq, 64: 125–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/4200522 - Foster, B. R., (1982). Ethnicity and Onomastics in Sargonic Mesopotamia. Orientalia, 51(3): 297–354. - Foster, B. R., (1993). “Management and Administration in the Sargonic Period”. In: M. Liverani (Ed.), Akkad, the First Universal Empire: Structure, Ideology, Traditions. History of the Ancient Near East/Studies 5 (pp. 25–38). Padua: Sargon. - Foster, B. R., (2016). The Age of Agade: Inventing Empire in Ancient Mesopotamia. New York: Routledge. - Frayne, D., (1993). Sargonic and Gutian Periods (2234–2113 BC). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. - Frayne, D., (1997). Ur III Period (2112–2004 BC). Toronto: University of Toronto Press. - Frayne, D. R., Stuckey, J. H., & Beaulieu, S. (2021). A Handbook of Gods and Goddesses of the Ancient Near East: Three Thousand Deities of Anatolia, Syria, Israel, Sumer, Babylonia, Assyria, and Elam. Philadelphia: Penn State University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781646021291-008 - Gelb, I. J., Steinkeller, P., & Whiting Jr., R. M. (1991). Earliest Land Tenure Systems in the Near East: Ancient Kudurrus. Oriental Institute Publications 104. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. - Glassner, J. J., (2004). Mesopotamian Chronicles. Atlanta: Society for Biblical Literature. (Originally published as Chroniques Mésopotamiennes, Paris: Les Belle Lettres, 1993). - Hallo, W. W., (1957). “Early Mesopotamian Royal Titles: A Philologic and Historical Analysis”. American Oriental Series, Vol. 43. New Haven: American Oriental Society. - Hansen, D. P., (2003). “Art of the Akkadian Dynasty”. In: J. Aruz (Ed.), Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus (pp. 189–198). New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. - Liverani, M., (1993). “Model and Actualization. The Kings of Akkad in the Historical Tradition”. In: M. Liverani (Ed.), Akkad: The First World Empire. Structure, Ideology, Traditions. History of the Ancient Near East, Studies 5 (pp. 41–67). Padua: Sargon srl. - Liverani, M., (2014). The Ancient Near East: History, Society and Economy. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315879895 - Machinist, P., (2006). “Kingship and Divinity in Imperial Assyria”. In: G. Beckman & Th. J. Lewis (Eds.), Text, Artifact, and Image: Revealing Ancient Israelite Religion (pp. 152–188). Providence, RI: Brown Judaic Studies. - Michalowski, P., (2008). “The Mortal Kings of Ur: A Short Century of Divine Rule in Ancient Mesopotamia”. In: N. Brisch (Ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute Seminars 4 (pp. 33–45). Chicago: The Oriental Institute. - Michalowski, P., (2020). “The Kingdom of Akkad in contact with the world”. In: K. Radner, N. Moeller, & D. T. Potts (Eds.), The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East (Vol. 1, pp. 686–764). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190687854.003.0011 - Milano, L., & Westenholz, A., (2015). The “Šuilisu Archive” and other Sargonic texts in Akkadian. Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology, Vol. 27. Bethesda: University Press of Maryland. - Nissen, H., (1988). The Early History of the Ancient Near East, 9000–2000 B.C. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226182698.001.0001 - Ornan, T., (2013). “A Silent Message: Godlike Kings in Mesopotamian Art”. In: B. Brown & M. Feldman (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art (pp. 569–596). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510352.569 - Pitts, A., (2015). The Cult of the Deified King in Ur III Mesopotamia. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. - Porter, A., (2013). “When the Subject is the Object: Relational Ontologies, the Partible Person and the Images of Naram-Sin”. In: B. Brown & M. H. Feldman (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art (pp. 597–617). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510352.597 - Reichel, C., (2008). “The King is Dead, Long Live the King: The Last Days of the Šu-Sîn Cult at Ešnunna and its Aftermath”. In: N. Brisch (Ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute Seminars 4 (pp. 133–155). Chicago: The Oriental Institute. - Renger, J., (1995). “Institutional, communal and individual ownership or possession of arable land in ancient Mesopotamia from the end of the fourth to the end of the first millennium BC”. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 71: 269–319 - Sallaberger, W., (1999). “Ur III-Zeit”. In: P. Attinger & M. Wäfler (Eds.), Mesopotamien: Akkade-Zeit und Ur III-Zeit. OBO 160/3 (pp. 121–390). Freiburg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz. - Sallaberger, W., & Schrakamp, I., (2015). “Philological Data for a Historical Chronology of Mesopotamia in the 3rd Millennium”. In: W. Sallaberger & I. Schrakamp (Eds.), Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean. Vol. 3: History & Philology (pp. 1–136). Turnhout: Brepols. - Scheil, V., & Legrain, L., (1913). Textes élamites-sémitiques: cinquième série. Paris: Ernest Leroux, Éditeur. - Schrakamp, I., (2020). “The Kingdom of Akkad: A View from Within”. In: K. Radner, N. Moeller, & D. T. Potts (Eds.), The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East. Vol. 1 (pp. 612–685). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190687854.003.0010 - Selz, G., (1998). “Über Mesopotamische Herrschaftskonzepte. Zu den Ursprüngen mesopotamischer Herrscherideologie im 3. Jahrtausend”. In: M. Dietrich & O. Loretz (Eds.), dub-sar anta-men: Studien zur Altorientalistik. Festschrift für Willem H. Ph. Römer. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 253 (pp. 281–344). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. - Selz, G., (2008). “The Divine Prototypes”. In: N. Brisch (Ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute Seminars 4 (pp. 13–31). Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. - Steinkeller, P., (1999a). “Land-tenure conditions in southern Babylonia under the Sargonic Dynasty”. In: B. Böck, E. Cancik-Kirschbaum, & Th. Richter (Eds.), Munuscula Mesopotamica: Festschrift für Johannes Renger. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 267 (pp. 553–571). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. - Steinkeller, P., (1999b). “On Rulers, Priests and Sacred Marriage: Tracing the Evolution of Early Sumerian Kingship”. In: K. Watanabe (Ed.), Priests and Officials in the Ancient Near East: Papers of the Second Colloquium on the Ancient Near East – The City and Its Life (pp. 103–137). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter. - Steinkeller, P., (2003). “An Ur III Manuscript of the Sumerian King List”. In: W. Sallaberger, K. Volk, & A. Zgoll (Eds.), Literatur, Politik und Recht in Mesopotamien: Festschrift für Claus Wilcke (pp. 267–292). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. - Steinkeller, P., (2013). “An Archaic ‘Prisoner Plaque’ from Kiš”. In: M. G. Biga, J.-M. Durand, & D. Charpin (Eds.), Mélanges Paolo Matthiae. Revue d’Assyriologie, 107 (pp. 131–157). Paris. https://doi.org/10.3917/assy.107.0131 - Steinkeller, P. (2017a). “Appendix 2: The Roundlet of Naram-Suen”. In: History, Texts and Art in Early Babylonia: Three Essays (pp. 158–164). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504778-005 - Steinkeller, P., (2017b). “The Divine Rulers of Akkade and Ur: Toward a Definition of the Deification of Kings in Babylonia”. In: History, Texts and Art in Early Babylonia: Three Essays (pp. 107–157). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504778-004 - Steinkeller, P., (2017c). “Writing, Kingship and Political Discourse in Early Babylonia: Reflections on the Nature and Function of Third Millennium Historical Sources”. In: History, Texts and Art in Early Babylonia: Three Essays (pp. 7–81). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504778-002 - Steinkeller, P., (2021). “The Sargonic and Ur III Empires”. In: P. F. Bang, C. A. Bayly, & W. Scheidel (Eds.), The Oxford World History of Empire. Vol. 2: The History of Empires. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532768.003.0002 - Suter, C., (2014). “Human, Divine or Both? The Uruk Vase and the Problem of Ambiguity in Early Mesopotamian Visual Arts”. In: B. Brown & M. Feldman (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Ancient Near Eastern Art (pp. 545–568). Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614510352.545 - Van de Mieroop, M., (2016). A History of the Ancient Near East, ca. 3000–323 BC (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1515/janeh-2016-0010 - Van Dijk, L., (1970). “Les contacts ethniques dans la Mésopotamie et les syncrétismes de la religion sumérienne”. In: S. S. Hartman (Ed.), Syncretism (pp. 171–206). Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksel. https://doi.org/10.30674/scripta.67038 - Westenholz, A., (1999). “The Old Akkadian Period: History and Culture”. In: P. Attinger & M. Wäfler (Eds.), Mesopotamien: Akkade-Zeit und Ur III-Zeit. OBO, 160/3 (pp. 17–117). Freiburg: Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz. - Westenholz, A. (2000). “Assyriologists, Ancient and Modern, on Naramsin and Sharkalisharri”. In: J. Marzahn, H. Neumann, & A. Fuchs (Eds.), Assyriologica et Semitica: Festschrift für Joachim Oelsner (pp. 545–556). Münster: Ugarit-Verlag. - Winter, I. J., (1996). “Sex, Rhetoric, and the Public Monument: The Alluring Body of Naram Sîn of Agade”. In: N. B. Kampen (Ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art: Near East, Egypt, Greece, and Italy (pp. 11–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. - Winter, I. J., (2008). “Touched by the Gods: Visual Evidence for the Divine Status of Rulers in the Ancient Near East”. In: N. Brisch (Ed.), Religion and Power: Divine Kingship in the Ancient World and Beyond. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago (pp. 75–101). Chicago: The Oriental Institute. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 420 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 36 |