سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات161
تعداد شماره‌ها6,532
تعداد مقالات70,503
تعداد مشاهده مقاله124,121,276
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله97,228,071
زارعی محمودآبادی, احسان, طاهری تربتی, حمیدرضا, سهرابی, مهدی. (1403). مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله. , 16(4), 5-24. doi: 10.22059/jsmdl.2024.369182.1756
احسان زارعی محمودآبادی; حمیدرضا طاهری تربتی; مهدی سهرابی. "مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله". , 16, 4, 1403, 5-24. doi: 10.22059/jsmdl.2024.369182.1756
زارعی محمودآبادی, احسان, طاهری تربتی, حمیدرضا, سهرابی, مهدی. (1403). 'مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله', , 16(4), pp. 5-24. doi: 10.22059/jsmdl.2024.369182.1756
زارعی محمودآبادی, احسان, طاهری تربتی, حمیدرضا, سهرابی, مهدی. مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله. , 1403; 16(4): 5-24. doi: 10.22059/jsmdl.2024.369182.1756

مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله

رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی
دوره 16، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 5-24    اصل مقاله (1.45 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jsmdl.2024.369182.1756
نویسندگان
احسان زارعی محمودآبادی1؛ حمیدرضا طاهری تربتی* 2؛ مهدی سهرابی3
1گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران .
2گروه رفتار حرکتی ، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
3گروه رفتار حرکتی، دانشکدة علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد ، ایران.
چکیده
مقدمه: دستکاری و کنترل محیط، به بهبود مهارت‌های حرکتی، افزایش مشارکت ورزشی و مشارکت اجتماعی فعال‌تر منجر می‌شود. این عوامل به نوبة خود شایستگی جسمانی و حرکتی را افزایش می‌دهند. هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسة اثربخشی آموزش سنتی و TGFU بر شایستگی ادراک‌شده، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال دانش‌آموزان 10 تا 12 ساله بود.
روش پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع نیمه‌تجربی بود. جامعة آماری پژوهش شامل دانش‌آموزان پسر 10 تا 12 ساله شهر میبد بود که 45 نفر به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند در دسترس انتخاب شدند و به‌صورت تصادفی به سه گروه 15 نفری، شامل گروه‌های تمرین سنتی، تمرین TGFU و کنترل تقسیم شدند. برای گردآوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامة انگیزة مشارکت ورزشی، پرسشنامة ادراک شایستگی، آزمون‌های دریبل کنترلی و پاس بسکتبال ایفرد استفاده شد. برای تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس (آنکوا) و آزمون تعقیبی بنفرونی، در سطح معناداری 0/05≥P استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد که شایستگی ادراک‌شده (جسمانی، شناختی و اجتماعی)، مشارکت ورزشی و یادگیری مهارت‌های بسکتبال (پاس و دریبل) در گروه سنتی و TGFU نسبت به گروه کنترل بهتر بود (0/05≥P). همچنین این نتایج در گروه TGFU به‌طور معنا‌داری نسبت به گروه سنتی بیشتر بود (0/05≥P).
نتیجه‌گیری: معلمان و مربیان می‌توانند برای افزایش مشارکت در ورزش و بهبود شایستگی‌های دانش‌آموزان و همچنین فراهم کردن تجربة یادگیری جذاب و انگیزشی برای دانش‌آموزان از شیوة آموزش TGFU استفاده کنند. 
کلیدواژه‌ها
آموزش TGFU"؛ شایستگی"؛ "؛ مشارکت ورزشی
مراجع
Ahmadi, M., Namazi Zadeh, M., & Mokhtari, P. (2012). Perceived Motivational Climate, Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Self-Determined Motivation in Youth Male Athletes. JRSM, 2(3), 125-139. http://doi.org/10.29252/jrsm.2.3.125. (In Persian)

Alizadeh, L., & Mohammadzadeh, H. (2018). The role of manipulating task constraints on learning basketball skills and strategies by nonlinear training method. Movement behavior, 11(38), 115-128. http://doi.org/ 10.22089/mbj.2018.5450.1409 (In Persian)

Allison, S., & Thorpe, R. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education. A skills approach versus games for understanding approach. British Journal of Physical Education, 28, 9-13. http://doi.org/10.1080/02683969708409316

Almeida, C. H., Ferreira, A. P., & Volossovitch, A. (2012). Manipulating task constraints in small-sided soccer games: Performance analysis and practical implications. Open Sport Sci J, 5, 174-180. http://doi.org/ 10.2174/1875399X01205010174

Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom climate. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 161-176). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Arias-Estero, J. L., Jaquero, P., Martínez-López, A. N., & Morales-Belando, M. T. (2020). Effects of Two TGfU Lessons Period on Game Performance, Knowledge and Psychosocial Variables in Elementary Physical Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3378. http://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph17103378

Aronson, E. (2003). Social psychology. H. Shekarkan (Persian translator). Tehran: Roshd. (In Persian)

Bagoien, T. E., & Halvari, H. (2005). Autonomous motivation: involvement in physical activity, and perceived sport competence: structural and mediator models. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100(3), 3-21. http://doi.org/ 10.2466/pms.100.3.3-21

Bardid, F., De Meester, A., Tallir, I., Cardon, G., Lenoir, M., & Haerens, L. (2016). Configurations of actual and perceived motor competence among children: Associations with motivation for sports and global self-worth. Human movement science, 50, 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2016.09.001

Barkoukis, V., & Hagger, M. S. (2013). The trans-contextual model: Perceived learning and performance motivational climates as analogues of perceived autonomy support. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(2), 353-372. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0114-5

Batez, M., Petrušic, T., Bogataj, Š. & Trajkovic, N. (2021). Effects of Teaching Program Based on Teaching Games for Understanding Model on Volleyball Skills and Enjoyment in Secondary School Students. Sustainability, 13(2), 606. http://doi.org/ 10.3390/su13020606

Biddle, S., & Mutrie, N. (2008). Psychology of physical activity. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.

Braithwaite, R., Spray, C. M., & Warburton, V. E. (2011). Motivational climate interventions in physical education: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(6), 628-638. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.06.005

Buck, M. M., Lund, J. M., Harrison, J. M., & Cook, C. B. (2007). Instructional strategies for secondary school physical education. New York: McGraw Hill.

Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A Model for the Teaching of Games in Secondary Schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18(1), 5–8.

Chang, M. Y. L., Chow, J. Y., Button, C., & Tan, C. W. K. (2017). Nonlinear pedagogy and its role in encouraging 21st century competencies through physical education: A Singapore experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 483-499. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/02188791.2017.1404541

Chatzipanteli, A., Digelidis, N., Karatzoglidis, C., & Dean, R. (2015). Promoting students’ metocognitive behavior in physical education through TGfU. American Journal of Educational Science, 1(2), 28-36.

Chow, J., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araujo, D. (2007). The Role of Non-Linear Pedagogy in Physical Education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 251-278. http://doi.org/10.3102/003465430305615

Dania, A., Kossyva, I., & Zounhia, K. (2017). Effects of a Teaching Games for Understanding Program on Primary School Students’ physical Activity Patterns. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 3(3), 1-12. http://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.376336

Davids, K., Kingsbury, D., Bennett, S., & Handford, C. (2001). Information-movement coupling: Implications for the organization of research and practice during acquisition of self-paced extrinsic timing skills. Journal of sports sciences, 19(2), 117-127. http://doi.org/10.1080/026404101750095376

Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints-led approach. 1st ed. USA: Human kinetics.

De Meester, A., Barnett, L. M., Brian, A., Bowe, S. J., Jiménez-Díaz, J., Van Duyse, F., & Haerens, L. (2020). Actual and perceived motor competence levels of Belgian and US preschool children. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 23(1), 35-41. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.05.015

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian psychology/Psychologies Canadian, 49(3), 182. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Ensrud-Skraastad, O. K., & Haga, M. (2020). Associations between motor competence, physical self-perception and autonomous motivation for physical activity in children. Sports, 8(9), 120. http://doi.org/ 10.3390/sports8090120

Fox, K., and P.Wilson. (2008). Self-perceptual systems and physical activity. In Advances in sport psychology, ed. T. Horn, 3rd ed., 49–64. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362. http://doi.org/ 10.1002/job.322

Gallahue, D.L., Ozmun. J.C., Goodway. J.D. (2012).Understanding motor development: Infants, Children, Adolescents, Adults, (7th Ed). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. P: 91-2.

Ghavami, A., Ghari, B., Mohammadzadeh, H. & Samadi, H. (2016). Dynamics of skill acquisition. Tabriz: Fadya Publications. (In Persian)

Gil-Arias, A., Claver, F., Pra ́xedes, A., Del Villar, F., & Harvey, S. (2020). Autonomy support, motivational climate, enjoyment and perceived competence in physical education: Impact of a hybrid teaching games for understanding/sport education unit. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 36–53. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X18816997

Gil-Arias, A., Diloy-Peña, S., Sevil-Serrano, J., García-González, L., & Abós, Á. (2021). A hybrid tgfu/se volleyball teaching unit for enhancing motivation in physical education: A mixed-method approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 110. http://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijerph18010110.

Gil-Arias, A., Harvey, S., Cárceles, A., Práxedes, A., & Del Villar, F. (2017). Impact of a hybrid TGfU-Sport Education unit on student motivation in physical education. PLoS One, 12(6), e0179876. http://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0179876

Gill, S. J., Lowenberg, M. H., Neild, S. A., Crespo, L. G., Krauskopf, B., & Puyou, G. (2015). Nonlinear dynamics of aircraft controller characteristics outside the standard flight envelope. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 38(12), 2301-2308. http://doi.org/ 10.2514/1.G001268

Gonzalez-Villora S, Garcia-Lopez L-M, Gutierrez-Diaz Del Campo D, Contreras-Jordan O-R.(2010).    Tactical awareness and decision making in youth football players (12 years): a descriptive study. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 33(4):489-501. http://doi.org/ 10.1174/021037010792215240

Grehaigne, J.F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (2001). The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports. Quest, 53(1), 59–7. http://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2001.10491729

Griffin, L.L., Brooker, R., Patton, K. (2005) Working toward legitimacy: Two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10(3): 213–223. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/17408980500105073

Fahimi H, Balali M, Parvinpour S. (2021). The effect of linear and non-linear training on individual and team creativity in futsal. Motor Behavior, 13(45): 159-84. (In Persian).

Hadavi F, Farahani A, Yazidi A. (2012).Measurement, assessment and evaluation in physical education. Definitive publications. (In Persian).

Holt NL, Strean WB, Bengoechea EG. Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: New avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching Physical Education. 2002; 21: 162–176. http://doi.org/ 10.1123/jtpe.21.2.162

Hopper, T. (2002). Teaching games for understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 73(7), 44-48. http://doi.org/ 10.1080/07303084.2002.10607804

Hortigüela Alcalá D, Hernando Garijo A. Teaching Games for Understanding: A Comprehensive Approach to Promote Student’s Motivation in Physical Education. J Hum Kinet. 2017 Oct 20; 59:17-27. http://doi.org/ 10.1515/hukin-2017-0119

Ibrahim, M. (2021). Effects of teaching games for understanding (tgfu) on primary school students’ fitness, emotion and enjoyment: an approach to teaching and learning. Paper presented at the International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. http://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1902534

Jarrett, K., Eloi, S., & Harvey, S. (2014). Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) as a positive and versatile approach to teaching adapted games. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 7(1), 6-20. http://doi.org/ 10.5507/euj.2014.001

Machado, J. C., Alcântara, C., Palheta, C., Santos, J. O. L. D., Barreira, D., & Scaglia, A. J. (2016). The influence of rules manipulation on offensive patterns during small-sided and conditioned games in football. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 22(04), 0290-0298. http://doi.org/ 10.1590/S1980-6574201600040012

MacPhail, A., Kirk, D., & Griffin, L. (2016). The impact of a sport education intervention on students’ perceptions of skill development in primary physical education. European Physical Education Review, 22(4), 465-483. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X15613968

 Mandigo, J. I., Holt, N. L., & Mandigo, J. (2000). The inclusion of optimal challenge in teaching games for understanding. Physical and Health Education Journal, 66(3), 14-21.

Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach for ages 7 to 18. Human Kinetics.

Morales-Belando, M. T., & Arias-Estero, J. L. (2017). Effect of teaching races for understanding in youth sailing on performance, knowledge, and adherence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 88(4), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2017.1376032

Nathan, S., & Haynes, J. (2013). A move to an innovative game teaching model: Style E-Tactical (SET). Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(3), 287-302. http://doi.org/10.1080/18377122.2013.836769.

Nathan S. (2016). Badminton instructional in Malaysian schools: A comparative analysis of TGfU and SDT pedagogical models. Springer Plus, 5(1): 1215.

Nikolaev, G. M., & Fedorova, S. N. (2021). Methods of Sports Selection of Young Athletes. European Proceedings, 9(2), 1351. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.135

Norouzi Seyed Hoseini, E., & Norouzi Seyed Hossieni, R. (2017). Effects of TGFU Teaching Method on Self-Determine Motivation and Learning of Volleyball Serve in Adolescent Students. Motor behavior, 9(29), 183-198. http://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2017.4342.1516. (In Persian)

Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17(2), 231-43. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.17.2.231

Payne, V. G., & Isaacs, L. D. (2012). Human motor development: a lifespan approach. 8th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Humanities; 352- 380.

Perlman, D. J. (2012). The influence of the Sport Education model on developing autonomous instruction. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(5), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.594430

 Pestano, R. D. (2021). Sports-Teachers’ Coaching Style, Behavior, Competency and Student-Athletes Performance in Sports. Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 5(1), 9-16. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4056-7629

Práxedes, A., Del Villar, F., Pizarro, D., & Moreno, A. (2017). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on decision-making and execution in Youth Soccer Players according to game actions. Journal of human kinetics, 62(1), 185-198. http://doi.org/ 10.1515/hukin-2017-0169

Qari, B. (2016). The effect of non-linear training models (TGfU, SET, PP) on behavioral-psychological outcomes, performance and learning of basketball skills. Dissertation for receiving a doctorate in the field of physical education and sports sciences, Daneshglah Urmia. https://doi.org/10.22089/mbj.2017.3672.1444. (In Persian).

Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K. M. (2013). Changing up the routine: intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 41(1), 64-70. http://doi.org/ 10.1097/JES.0b013e318259beb5

Renshaw, I., Oldham, A. R., & Bawden, M. (2012). Nonlinear pedagogy underpins intrinsic motivation in sports coaching. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 5, 88-99. DOI: 10.2174/1875399X01205010088.

Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902791586

Rinaldo, R., Tarigan, B., & Juliantine, T. (2021). Review: The Effect of the Teaching Game for Understanding Model on Cognitive Ability. Kinestetik: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Jasmani, 5(2), 375–380DOI: 10.33369/jk.v5i2.13828

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

 Sallis, J. F., Prochaska, J. J., & Taylor, W. C. (2000). A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 32(5), 963-975. http://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200005000-00014

Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21‐month prospective study. European journal of social psychology, 32(3), 395-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.98

Shafizadeh, M. (2006). Determining the validity and reliability of sports participation motivation questionnaire. Research Institute of Physical Education and Sports Sciences. (In Persian).

Sheridan, C. L., & Radmacher, S. A. (1992). Health psychology: Challenging the biomedical model. John Wiley & Sons.

Smith, L., Harvey, S., Savory, L., Fairclough, S., Kozub, S., & Kerr, C. (2014). Physical activity levels and motivational responses of boys and girls: a comparison of direct instruction and tactical games models of games teaching in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 93-113. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X14555293.

Sonstroem, R. J. (1978). Physical estimation and attraction scales: Rationale and research. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 10(2), 97-102.

Taylor, I., Ntoumanis, N., & Smith, B. (2009). The social context as a determinant of teacher motivational strategies in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(2), 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.09.002

Vermeij, W. (2018). Relationships between perceived motor competence, motivation and motor skill performance in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen).

Whitehead, M. (2010). Physical literacy: Throughout the lifecourse. Routledge.

Yaali, R., Teymoori, A., Bagheri, S. (2019). The Effect of Training Method (Linear and Nonlinear) on Student Participation Motivation in Physical Education Class. Studies in Sport Psychology, 8(30), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2019.7880.1850 (In Persian)

Yuldashov, I. (2022). Physical Education in Higher Education Institutions. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 2(04), 52-57. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/eijmrms/article/view/23791

Zartoshtiyan, S., Noroziseyedhoseini, R., & Azadi, A. (2012). The Effect of Coaches’ Leadership Styles on Motivational Climate and Achievement Goals of Female Basketball Players of Premier League of Iran. Journal of Sports Management, 4(12), 179-199. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2012.28608. (In Persian).

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 231
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 196


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب