نقش بازخورد زبانشناختی و غیر مستقیم در جنبه های گفتمانی متون استدلالی

Al-Haq, F. A.-A., & Ahmed, A. S. E. A. (1994). Discourse problems in argumentative writing. World Englishes, 13(3), 307–323.

Arndt, V. (1993). Response to writing: Using feedback to inform the writing process. In M. Brook & L. Walters (Eds.), Teaching composition around the Pacific Rim: Politics and pedagogy (pp. 90-116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257. 

Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effects of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13(2), 111-127.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006).Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 4–18.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010).Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207–217.

Blakemore, D. (2001). Discourse and relevance theory. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 45-60). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Cardelle, M., & Corno, L. (1981). Effects on second language learning of variations in written feedback on homework assignments. TESOL Quarterly, 15(3), 251-261.

Chandler, J, (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12, 267-296.

Cherry, L., & Cooper, M. (1981). A study of the use of cohesion across grades. Research in the Teaching of English, 19(3), 217-236.

Connor, U. (2002). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication, 17, 301-321.

Crewe, W.J. (1990). The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal, 44, 316-325.

Crismore, A., Markannen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39–71.

Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at Three Grade Level. Research in the Teaching of English, 2(2), 185-201.

Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics,36, 1807–1825.

Diab, R. (2005). Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about responding to ESL writing: A case study. TESL Canada Journal, 23, 28-43.

Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT, 63(2), 97-107.

Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-­371.

Ellis, S., Tod, J. (2018). Promoting positive relationships in the classroom. London: Routledge

Ferris, D. R. (1995).Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53.

Ferris, D. R. (2001). Teaching writing for academic purposes. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 298-314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The "grammar correction" debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.

Ferris, D. R.  (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 165-193. 

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.

Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., &Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher written commentary on student writing: Descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155182.

Gulcat, Z., & Ozagac, O. (2004). Correcting and giving feedback to writing. Retrieved February 15, 2019 from http://www.buowl.boun.edu.tr/teachers.

Guzzo, R. A., Jette, R. D., & Katzell, R. A. (1985). The effects of psychologically based intervention programs on worker productivity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 38(2), 275-291.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hartshorn, K.J., Evans, N.W., Merrill, P.F., Sudweeks, R.R., Strong Krause, D., & Anderson, N.J. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 84-­109.

Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388.

Hinkel, E. (2002). Second language writers’ text: Linguistic and rhetorical features. Mahwah, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: OUP.

Hsu, W., Chen, M., Wang, T., & Sun, S. (2008). Coping strategies in Chinese social context. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(2), 150-162.

Hughes, R. (1998). From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 263-287.

Hyland, F. (1998).The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255-286.

Hyland, F. (2000). EFL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33-54.

Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16(3), 233-247.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 133–151.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83-101.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185-212.

Hyland K, & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177.

Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419-469. 

Kepner, C.G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. The Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435-449. 

Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285-312. 

Lee, I. (2008). Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 62(3), 1-10.

Leinonen-Davies, M. (1984). Toward textual error analysis with special reference to Finnish learners of English. Unpublished M. Phil. thesis, Exeter University.

Levin, B. B. (2015). The development of teachers' beliefs. In H. Fives & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.

Liu, C. H., & Robinett, B. W. (1990). Cohesive devices in the paragraph contrastive Chinese English use: ELT in China. In Papers presented at the International Symposium on Teaching English in the Chinese Context. Beijing, Foreign Language Teaching and Research Papers.

Mawlawi Diab, N. (2015). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter? Assessing Writing, 24, 16–34.

Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research, a philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.

Moran, C. (1991). We write, but do we read? Computers and Composition, 8, 51-61.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

Richards, J. (1998). Beyond training. Cambridge: CUP.

Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-­analysis of the research. In J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-­164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Saito, H. (1994). Teachers’ practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 4670.

Sasaki, M. (2002). Building an empirically-based model of EFL learners writing processes. In S. Ransdell & M.-L. Barbier (eds.), New directions for research in L2 writing (pp. 49-80). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-­283.

Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013).The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 286-306.

Skott, J. (2015). The promises, problems, and prospects of research on teachers' beliefs. In H. Fives, & M. G. Gill (Eds.), International hand book of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 13-30). New York: Routledge Stipek, D. J. (1988). Motivation to learn: From theory to practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 

Song, M., & Xia, W. (2002).Teaching text and cohesive devices in English writing. Foreign Language World, 22(6), 40-44.

Spada, N. (2015). SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language Teaching, 48, 69–81.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

Tardy, C. M., & Swales, J. M. (2014). Genre analysis. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 165-187). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

Tarone, E. (1980). Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage. Language Learning, 30, 417-428.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-­272.

Truscott, J. (2010). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38(2), 329–335.

Truscott, J., & Hsu, A. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(4), 292–305.

Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2012). Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1–41.

Vygotsky, L. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Widdowson, H. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Xu, Y. (2000). The co-relationship between lexical cohesion and the quality of writing. Foreign Language Teaching Abroad, 2, 33-37.

Yung, B. H.-W. (2002). Same assessment, different practice: Professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers' practice in a school-based assessment scheme. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9(1), 97-117.

Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 29-48.