پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,232 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,791 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,267,261 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,008,429 |
تحولات داخلی افغانستان و تغییر در راهبرد سیاست خارجی آمریکا | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 16، شماره 1، شهریور 1402، صفحه 99-123 اصل مقاله (656.52 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2023.340213.450064 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علیرضا خسروی* 1؛ علی‌نقی فیاض2 | ||
| 1استادیارگروه روابط بین الملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانش آموخته دکترای روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| «راهبرد ضدتروریسم» بوش، «راهبرد ضدشورش» اوباما و «راهبرد صفرپایه» ترامپ سه راهبرد جداگانۀ دولت آمریکا در سه دورۀ ریاست‌جمهوری در افغانستان است که سرانجام با خروج نیروهای آمریکایی، به پذیرش قدرت همان گروهی منجر شد که 20 سال پیش در سال 2011 با هدف نابودی دولت طالبان به روند حضور شکل داد. در این نوشتار ضمن تلاش برای ارائۀ شواهد تأییدکنندۀ این تغییر راهبرد و تعارض آن با راهبردی کلان و با کانون‌بودن یکی از سطح‌های تحلیل نظریۀ روزنا که تمرکز خود را به تحولات محیط داخلی افغانستان قرار می‌دهد؛ به‌دنبال پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که شواهد تغییر در رویکرد سیاست خارجی آمریکا پیرامون افغانستان در سه دوره یادشده کدامند و چه رابطه‌ای میان تحولات داخلی افغانستان با این تغییرها وجود دارد؟ در پاسخ این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که نقش گروه‌های معارض داخلی و قدرت‌یابی آن‌ها در این سه دوره مهم‌ترین عامل ایجاد تغییر رویکرد سیاست خارجی آمریکا در دوران بوش، اوباما و ترامپ است. یافته‌های این نوشتار با توجه به اسناد بالادستی آمریکا نشان می‌دهند که پیگیری راهبردهای متعارض با اهداف اولیه ناشی از شکست راهبردی در سیاست خارجی آمریکا در برابر اقدام‌های گروه‌های مسلح مانند طالبان ، قدرت‌یابی آن‌ها و هزینه‌های روزافزون بوده است. با توجه به رویکرد بررسی مقایسه‌ای و تمرکز بر مرحلۀ توصیفی آن، روش مورد استفاده در این نوشتار کیفی و از نوع مقایسه‌ای است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آمریکا؛ افغانستان؛ سیاست خارجی؛ راهبرد؛ اوباما؛ بوش؛ ترامپ | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Afghanistan's Iinternal Developments and the Change in the US Foreign Policy Strategy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Alireza Khosravi1؛ Ali Naqi Fayaz2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. in International Relations, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: In addition to the main and announced goals of the US government for attacking Afghanistan, including: the destruction of the Taliban and Al-Qaeda Network, advancing the process of democratization and nation-state building, strengthening the governmental and political structure, creating stability and security, there were other goals on the agenda, the most important of which was access to important mineral resources and energy transfer routes from Central Asia to South Asia, preventing Russia from regaining power and controlling China and Iran. It is obvious that the achievement of the above-mentioned goals by the United States required the existence of a grand strategy in the foreign policy of this country regarding the issue of Afghanistan. Meanwhile, a review of the actions and approaches announced and implemented by the American government during the three terms of the presidency of George Bush, Barack Obama and Donald Trump, clearly confirms this issue. Adopting different and sometimes conflicting approaches and strategies, Bush's "Anti-Terrorism and "Counterinsurgency Strategies", Obama, and Trump's "Zero Base Strategy" is at least three distinct strategies of the US government in this era, which ultimately ended in the withdrawal of the US military forces from Afghanistan after 20 years of presence in this country. Research Question: The main question of the article is what are the evidence for the change in the approach of the US foreign policy towards Afghanistan in the three mentioned periods? And what is the relationship between Afghanistan's internal developments and this change of approach? Research Hypothesis: The change in the US foreign policy approach towards Afghanistan has been affected by the internal developments of this country caused by the resistance of armed groups, especially the Taliban, against US policies and the failure of the announced and implemented programs of this country during the presidency of Bush, Obama and Trump. Methodology and Theoretical Framework: Since the first question of the article seeks to provide evidence of the change in the strategy of the United States regarding Afghanistan in the three terms of the presidency, by adapting the methodology of a comparative study at the descriptive level, the most important features that support the change in these three periods should be mentioned. Next, by focusing on the second question, we will investigate the relationship between two variables: the change in the US approach with the internal developments of this country from a descriptive and inferential point of view and analyzing the logic governing this change of approach, focusing on one of the causes mentioned in the systemic theory of James Rosena Results and Discussion: The findings show that the US diplomatic system did not follow the same approach in Afghanistan during the two terms of Bush's presidency and unlike the 2002 strategy, which sought a combination of ideological and strategic goals from its presence in Afghanistan, in the 2006 strategy, the security aspect of these goals was dominant got more priority. In the Obama administration, the revival of the US global influence and the destruction of terrorist groups required a transition from a counter-terrorism strategy to a counter-insurgency. In the Obama administration, the restoration of the US global influence and the destruction of terrorist groups required a transition from anti-terrorism strategy to counter-insurgency. From this point of view, both the weakening of Bush's anti-terrorism strategy and the clarification of Obama's counter-insurgency strategy clearly indicate the role of Afghan internal groups in the failure of America's policies and successive changes in strategy. Conclusion: Apart from the ups and downs of the US relations with Afghan government officials, there are three other reasons: the rise of Al-Qaeda and the Taliban during the time of the US presence, the emergence of many internal problems in Afghanistan and the disgust of a large part of the Afghan people with the US government due to its inability to reduce insecurity. There are three reasons all of which confirm the prominent role of internal developments, especially the confrontation of groups such as the Taliban with the US policies. This means that even armed local groups with minimal facilities, if they stand up, can force them to make continuous changes in their strategy in addition to the failure of the policies of the great and superior powers. It is not possible simply by relying on the established approaches of power in the paradigm of realism. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| USA, Afghanistan, Bush, Obama, Trump, Foreign Policy, Strategy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Almukhtar, Sarah and Rod Nordland (2019), “What Did the U.S. Get for $2 Trillion in Afghanistan?”, New York Times, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/ interactive/2019/12/09. (Accessed on: 4/6/2022). Bilems. J. Linda (2013), The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan: How Wartime Spending Decisions Will Constrain Future National Security Budgets, Harvard Kenndy School Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272555074_ The_Financial_Legacy_of_Iraq_and_Afghanistan, (Accessed on: 5/22/2020). Callahan, Patrick (2008), The Logic of American Foreign Policy, Translation Mahmod Yazdznfam, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies, [in Persain]. Cordesman, Anthony H. (2017), “The Trump Transition and The Afghan War: The Need for decisive Action”, Available at: CSIS, https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/170105_Afghanistan_in_ Transition.pdf (Accessed on: 4/13/2023). Dehsheiar, Hosain (2011), US Foreign Policy in Afghanistan, Tehran: Mizan Publisher, [in Persian]. Department of Defense (2020), Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan, Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2021/Apr/23/2002626546/-1/-1/0/ ENHANCING-SECURITY-AND-STABILITY-IN-AFGHANISTAN.PDF, (Accessed on:12/05/2022). Document: Office of the Press Secretary (2005), Joint Declaration of the United States-Afghanistan Strategic Partnership, United States White House Press Office, available at: https://2001-2009.state.gov/p/sca/rls/pr/2005/46628.htm, (Accessed on:10/02/2023). Dorani, Sharifullah (2019), “The Foreign Policy Decision Making Approaches and Their Applications, Case Study: Bush, Obama and Trump’s Decision Making towards Afghanistan and the Region”, Journal of Politics and Development, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 69-87, Available at: https://www.academia.edu/39978817/ The_Foreign_Policy_Decision_Making_Approaches_and_Their_Applications, (Accessed on: 5/1/2023). Ettinger, Aaron (2017), “U.S. National Security Strategies: Patterns of Continuity and Change”, 1987–2015, Comparative Strategy, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 115-128, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318033016_US_ national_security_strategies_Patterns_of_continuity_and_change_1987-2015, (Accessed on: 5/1/2023). Jafari, Ali Akbar and javad Shafaghatnia Abad (2022), “Influential Factors on Russia’s Decision Making toward Israel”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 27-51, Available at: https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_88653_ aa4f60adba224e068beb487494bf5e27.pdf (Accessed on: 5/6/2023). Jafari, Atiqullah (2018), The Changing Foreign Policy of the United States of America in Afghanistan after September 11, 2001, Kateb Scientific-Research Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 67-99, Available at: https://research.kateb.edu.af/ dari/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/.pdf (Accessed on: 5/6/2021). Jafari, Mohammad Moussa (2017), Analysis of the Foreign Policy during the Presidency of Hamid Karzai from the Perspective of the Theory of Rosena, Kateb Scientific-Research Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 73-97, Available at: https://research.kateb.edu.af/dari/wp-content/uploads/sites/ (Accessed on: 2/06/ 2018). Khalilzad, Zolmay (2016), Sent, Translation Haron Najafizadeh, Kabul: Azem Publisher [in Persian]. Keyvan Hosseini, Seyed Asghar and Mohsen Habibzadeh (2019), “America and the Challenge of Afghanistan; From the Minimum Battle to Principled Realism”, World Politics Scientific Quarterly, Vol. 8 No. 4. pp. 121-150. Available at: https://interpolitics.guilan.ac.ir/article_3911.html (Accessed on:5/1/2023). Khosravi, Alireza (2021), “Policy Making in Afghanistan; Challenging Dualities and Strategic Consequences for the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Tehran: Ayandeh Pazhohi, Vol. 12, No. 63, pp. 3-5[in Persian] Available at: https://iran-futures.org.mahsolat.mahnameh, (Accessed on: 5/1/2023). Kissinger, Hrenry (2004), U. S. Diplomacy in 21St Century, Translation Abulqasm Rahchamani, Tehran: Institute of Abrar Moaser, [in Persain]. Koles, Cowper (2012), Behind the Scenes of West's Invasion of Afghanistan, Translation Mehdi Goljan, Tehran: Amir Kabir Publisher, [in Persain]. Kuntzsch, Felix (2008), “Afghanistan’s Rocky Road to Modernity: Non-State Actors and Socio-Political Entities in the Process of State- and Nation-Building, Programmed Peace and Security International”, Institute Quebecois des international Studies, Available at: http://www.psi.ulaval.ca/fileadmin/psi/ documents/Documents/Travaux_et_recherches/Afghanistan_s_Rocky_Road_to_Modernity.pdf. (Accessed on:4/10/2023). Hayes, Stephen (2009), “A War Grows in Afghanistan”, Weekly Standard, August 17. Available at: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2009/08/10/ a_war_grows_ in_afghanistan_219280.html, (Accessed on:4/10/2023). Haqpanah, Jafar and Mohammad Rahimi Sardar, (2011), Geopolitics of Afghanistan and Regional Developments in West Asia, Tehran: Imam Sadiq University, [in Persain]. Hassanzadeh, Ahmed (2013), Explaining the Influencing Factors on Afghanistan's Foreign Policy after September 11, 2001, Master's thesis, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, [in Persain]. Lee, N. Kelly (2017), Full Transcript: Donald Trump Announces His Afghanistan Policy, Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/ 537552, (Accessed on:4/6/2023) Lynch, Th. F. (2016). South Asia, in: R. D Hooker, ed, Charting a Course: Strategic Choices for a New Administration, Washington: National Defense University Press. Mackenzie, Frank (2021), Afghanistan's Downfall Was Rooted in Trump's Deal with the Taliban, Available at: https://per.euronews.com/2021/09/30/pentagon. (Accessed on:2/2/2023) Majedi, Sadeq (2021), Kissinger's Story from America's Great Defeat, Available at: https://www.eghtesadnews.com/57/435829, (Accessed on: 2/5/2022). Mullen, Mike (2011), USA Has Long Term Commitment to Afghanistan, Available at: http://www.gmic.gov.af/216. (Accessed on: 5/1/2020). Nixon, Richard (1992), Find the Opportunity, Translation Hosain Vafsinejad, Tehran: Tarh now Publisher, [in Persain]. Norland, Rod and Joseph Goldstein (2015), Afghan Taliban’s Reach Is Widest Since 2001, Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/12/world/asia/ afghanistan-talibanunitednations. (Accessed on:1/5/2011). Record, Jeffry (2005), “The Bush Doctrine and the Iraq Dilemma”, Translation Ehsan Movahedeian, in: America after 9/11, Editor Mahmod Yazdanfam, Tehran: Institute for Strategic Studies, [in Persain]. Rashid, Ahmed (2010). Falling into Chaos: The United States and the Failure of Nation-Building in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Central Asia; Translated by Hasan Rezai, Shah Mohammad Book Company, Kabul. Rosenau, James (1966), “Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy”, in: R. B Farrell, ed, Approaches to Comparative and International Politics, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. Rozen, Laura (2009), Waite House Defines AFPAK Benchmarks, the Document, Available at: W.W.W. Politico.Com/blogs/2009/09/16, (Accessed on:1/2/2020) Rashid, Mohsen (2018), Factors of Government Inefficiency in Afghanistan, University of Tehran, Doctoral Dissertation. Sanger, David and William Broad (2018), “A Russian Threat on tow Fronts Meets a US Strategic Void”, New York Times, 6 March, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/05/us/politics/trump-nuclear-russia-containment.html. (Accessed on:1/5/2023). Schmitt, Eric and Scott Shane (2009), “Crux of Afghan Debate: Will More Troops Curb Terror?”, New York Times, Sept. 7, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/world/asia/08terror.html (Accessed on: 4/5/2023). Shafii, Nozer (2010), Explaining the New Policy of the Obama Administration in Afghanistan and Pakistan, International Quarterly of Foreign Relations, Vol. 2, No. 5, Available at: http://frqjournal.csr.ir/article_123518.html (Accessed on: 4/6/2023). Shafiei, Nozer (2016). Explaining the Factors Influencing the Adoption of Trump's Strategy towards Afghanistan, International Relations Research Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 24, pp. 109-132 Available at: http://www.iisajournals.ir/ article_53756_63133954d1d85118a99c8fb9081f46b8.pdf (Accessed on: 4/5/2023). Starr, Harvey (1988), “Rosenau, Pre-Theories and the Evolution of the Cmparative Study of Foreign Policy”, International Interactions, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 3-15, (doi.org/10.1080/03050628808434686). The Asia Foundation (2016), Afghanistan in 2016, Available at: https://asiafoundation.org/where-wework/afghanistan/survey. (Accessed on: 1/4/2023). The White House (2016), Enhancing Security and Stability in Afghanistan, June 7–9. Available at: https://media.defense.gov/2020/Jul/01/2002348001/-1/-1/1/ENHANCING_SECURITY_AND_STABILITY_IN_AFGHANISTAN.PDF (Accessed on: 4/5/2023). U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS 2002), Available at: https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss2002.pdf. (Accessed on: 1/5/2023). U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS 2006), Available at: https://history.defensnje.gov/Portals/70/Documents/nss/nss2006.pdf. (Accessed on: 1/6/2023). U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS 2010), Available at: https://obamawhitehouse archives, (Accessed on: 4/5/2023). U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS 2017), Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2017/12.pdf (Accessed on: 4/5/2023). Whitlock, Craig (2019), “At War with the Truth”, Washington Post, Dec. 9, Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com. (Accessed on: 1/6/2023). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 500 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 325 |
||