ارزیابی دسترسی به دادگستری در نظام دادرسی مدنی ایران

الف) فارسی

1. قاری سیدفاطمی، سید محمد (1388). حقوق بشر در جهان معاصر، دفتر دوم: جستارهایی تحلیلی از حق‌ها و آزادی‌ها، تهران: شهر دانش.

2. محسنی، حسن (1396). «اصل دسترسی به عدالت و حق دادخواهی دولت»، فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ 47، ش 3.

3.---------- (1389). ادارۀ جریان دادرسی مدنی، شرکت سهامی انتشار.

4.---------- (1387). «عدالت آیینی: پژوهشی پیرامون نظریه‌های دادرسی عادلانۀ مدنی»، فصلنامۀ حقوق، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دورۀ 38، ش 1.

 

ب) خارجی

5. Adams, J. S . (1965). “Inequity in social exchange”, Advances in experimental social psychology ,Vol. 2.

Available at: http://anthonydamato.law.northwestern.edu/Papers-1/D96-take-resp.html.

6. Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1987). Interactional fairness judgments: the influence of causal accounts. Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 2.

7. Brand A. R, (2012). “Access to Justice Analysis on a due Process Platform”, Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming U. of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-01. at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=198465.

8. Carr, C. L. (1981). The concept of formal justice. Philosophical Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3.

9. CEPEJ (2011). “Access to Justice in Europe”, reported by the research team on enforcement of court decisions, 8^th meeting.

10. Coleman, J. (2003). Risks and wrongs. Oxford: Oxford UP.

11. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). “On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 3.

12. Cotter, T. F. (1996). Legal Pragmatism and the Law and Economics Movement. Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 84, No. 6.

13. Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S., (2003). “The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 4.

14. Dolan, p. & Loomes, G. & Peasgood, T. & Tsuchiya, A., (2005). “Estimating the Intangible Victim Costs of Violent Crime”, The British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 45, Issue 6, 1 No. 2005, pp. 958–976.

15. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., & Eavey, C. L. (1987). “Laboratory Results on Rawls’s distributive justice”, British Journal of political Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 1.

16. Gramatikov, M. & Barendrecht, M. & Laxminarayan, M & Verdonschot, J. H. & Klaming, L & Zeeland, C. V., (2009). A Handbook of Measuring the Cost and Quality of Paths to Justice, Maklu & Tilburg Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems, Maklu- Publishers.

17. Gramatikov, M., (2012). Costs and Quality of Online Dispute Resolution, Maklu publishers.

18. Greenberg, J. (1987). “Using diaries to promote procedural justice in performance appraisals”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 1, No. 2.

19. Klaming, L. & Giesen, I., (2008). Access to Justice: the Quality of the Procedure, TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems, No. 002/2008, February, 2008, Version: 1.0.

20. Konow, J. (2003). “Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 41, No. 4.

21. Lamm, H., & Schwinger, T. (1980). “Norms concerning distributive justice: Are needs taken into consideration in allocation decisions ?”, Social psychology of proceduraljustice, Vol. 43, No. 4.

22. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). “The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations”, Advances in experimentalsocial psychology, Vol. 9.

23. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York: Plenum.

24. Lind, E. A., Maccoun, R. J., Ebener, P. A., Felstiner, W. L. F., Hensler, D. R., Resnik, J., & Tyler, T, R. (1990). “In the eye of the beholder: tort litigants’ evaluations of their experiences in the civil justice system”, Law and Society Review, Vol. 24, No. 4.

25. Lind, E. A., Kulik, C. T., Ambrose, M., & De Vera Park, M. V. (1993). “Individual and corporate dispute resolution: using procedural fairness as a decision heuristic”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2.

26. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). “The Role of Injustice in the Elicitation of Differential Emotional Reactions”, Pers Soc Psychol Bull, Vol. 24, No. 7.

27. Mohseni, H., (2008). Procedural Justice: A Study on Fair Civic Justice Theories, Journal of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 1. (in Persian)

28. Novemsky, N., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2004). What Makes Negotiators Happy? The Differential Effects of Internal and External Social Comparisons on Negotiator Satisfaction, p. 8. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=524805.

29. O’Hear, M. M. (2008). “Plea bargaining and procedural justice”, Georgia Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 2.

30. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of Justice, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

31. Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H., & Barry, B. (1994). “Explanations: what factors enhance their perceived adequacy?”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 58, Issue. 3.

32. Tyler, T. R. (1984). Op. cit., p. 56; Tyler, T. R. (1996). “The relationship of the outcome and procedural fairness: how does knowing the outcome influence judgments about the procedure?”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 9, No. 4.

33. Tyler, T. R. (1984). “The role of perceived injustice in defendants’ evaluations of their courtroom experience”, Law and Society Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, 51-74.

34. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

35. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. (1996). “The consistency rule and the voice effect: the influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgments and performance”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 26, No. 3.

36. Verdonschot, J. H., Barendrecht, M., Klaming, L. & Kamminga, P., (2008), Measuring Access to Justice: The Quality of Outcomes, TISCO Working Paper Series on Civil Law and Conflict Resolution Systems No. 007/2008 November 10, 2008, Version: 1.0 & Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 014/2008.

37. Wenzel, M. (2006). “A letter from the tax office: compliance effects of informational and interpersonal justice”, Social Justice Research, Vol. 19, No. 3.