سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,225
تعداد مقالات67,685
تعداد مشاهده مقاله114,924,925
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله89,603,382
Rasaei, Z., Mohajer, R.. (1398). Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province. , 24(1), 13-21. doi: 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72431
Z. Rasaei; R. Mohajer. "Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province". , 24, 1, 1398, 13-21. doi: 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72431
Rasaei, Z., Mohajer, R.. (1398). 'Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province', , 24(1), pp. 13-21. doi: 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72431
Rasaei, Z., Mohajer, R.. Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province. , 1398; 24(1): 13-21. doi: 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72431

Comparision of fertility capability and taxonomic classification systems to classify the soil map units in some parts of Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari province

Desert
مقاله 2، دوره 24، شماره 1، شهریور 2019، صفحه 13-21    اصل مقاله (536.13 K)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdesert.2019.72431
نویسندگان
Z. Rasaei1؛ R. Mohajer* 2
1Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
2Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, 19395‑4697 Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Although fertility capability classification (FCC) has high performance in land evaluation and soil maps interpretation, so far it has been less attended in land evaluation studies. Therefore, qualitative (FCC method) and quantitative (Riquer index) land fertility capability evaluation for Wheat and Rice cultivation and comparison of Soil Taxonomy and WRB classification with FCC were chosen as this study objective. After field and laboratory studies, the soil map was prepared with the scale of 1: 50,000. Then, FCC and Riquer methods were used to determine the land fertility capability for Wheat and Rice cultivation for each of the soil map unites. Investigations showed that the FCC and Riquer methods have presented similar results and well interpreted and classified soils. The results of Riquer method indicated that the fertility capability of these lands is good except in gravelly and shallow parts, thus Wheat and Rice can be cultivated in these soils. A comparison of the current soil classification systems and the FCC results showed that the problems and inherent characteristics of studied soils were pointed well by the FCC system, whereas they have been expressed differently in Soil Taxonomy and WRB classifications. Gleyic condition, dryness and subsoil gravel are the most limitative factors to Wheat and Rice cultivation in this area.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Chaharmahal-va-Bakhtiari Province: FCC method: Riquer index: Soil Taxonomy and WRB؛ Gleyic condition
اصل مقاله

Anusontpornperm, S., S. Nortcliff, I. Kheoruenromne,
     2009. Interpretability Comparison between Soil
     Taxonomic and Fertility Capability Classification
     Units: A Case of Some Major Cassava Soils in
     Northeast Thailand. Kasetsart Journal, 43; 9 -18.

Bera, R., A. Seal, T. H. Das, D. Sarkar, A. K. Chatterjee
     2014. Application of Fertility Capability
     Classification System in Rice Growing Soils of
     Damodar Command Area, West Bengal, India. J
     Recent Adv Agr., 2; 330-337.

Blake, G.R., K.H. Hrtge, 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute
     A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis, part1, physical
     and mineralogycal methods, Agronomy SSSA,
     Madison, WI. pp. 363-375.

Dent, F.G., 1978. Land suitability classification. In:
     International rice research institute, (IRRI), soils and
     rice. Los Banos, Philippines. P. 273-295.

FAO, 1979. Yield response to water. Irrigation and
     drainage paper. NO. 33. Rome. 42 p.

Gee, G. W., J.W. Bauder, 1986. Particle size analysis. In
     A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis (pp. 383–
     411). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.

IUSS Working Group WRB, 2014. World Reference
     Base for Soil Resource. World Soil Resource Reports
     No. 103. FAO, Rome.

Nelson, R. E., 1982. Carbonate and gypsum. In A. L.
     Page (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis (pp. 181–197).
     Madison: American Society of Agronomy.

Orimoloye, J.R., 2016. Fertility Capability Classification
     of Some Flood Plain Soils in Kogi State, Central
     Nigeria. Life Science Journal, 13; 48-55.

Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, D.R. Keeny, 1992. Methods of


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     soil analysis. Part II. 2th Ed. Soil Society of America,
     Madison, Wisconsim USA. 593 p.

Rhoades, J.D., 1982. Soluble Salts. In: A.L. Page (ed.)
     Methods of soil analysis, Part 2 Chemical and
     microbiological properties, 2nd edition. Agronomy,
     9; 149-157.

Riquer, J., D.L. Bramao, J.B. Cornet, 1970. A new
     system of soil appraisal in terms of actual and
     potential productivity. FAO Soil Resources,
     Development and Conservation Service, Land and
     Water Development Division. FAO. Rome. 38 p.

Sanchez, P.A., C.A. Palm, S.W. Buol, 2003. Fertility
     Capability Soil Classification. A tool to help access
     soil quality in the tropics. Geoderma, 114; 157-185.

Sarkar, A., K. Banasree, D. Madhurima, P. Banik, 2012.
     Appraisal and mapping of soil resources of selected
     blocks (Hooghly district) in the Bengal basin region
     of India using GIS and Remote Sensing. International
     Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3; 1-5.

Schoeneberger, P.J., D.A. Wysocki, E.C. Benham, W.D.
     Broderson, 2002. Field book for describing and
     sampling soils. Version 2.0. Natural Resources
     Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center.
     Lincoln, NE.

Soil Survey Staff, 2014. Soil Taxonomy: A basic
     systems of soil classification for making and
     interpreting soil surveys. 12th Edition. NRCS. USDA.

Tabi, F.O., E.S.C. Ngobesing, G.S. Yinda, A. Boukong,
     D. Omoko, M. Bitondo, D. Mvondo Ze, 2013. Soil
     fertility capability classification (FCC) for rice
     production in Cameroon lowlands. African Journal of
     Agricultural Research, 8; 1650-1660.

Vasu, D., S.K. Singh, K. Karthikeyanand, V.P.
     Duraisami, 2016. Fertility Capability Classification
     (FCC): A case study in rainfed soils of semi-arid
     Deccan plateau. Agropedology, 26; 22-28.

Thomas G.W., 1982. Exchangable cations. In: Page A.L.
     (Ed.), pp:159–164. Methods of Soil Analysis.
     American Society of Agronomy, Vol. 2. SSSA,
     Madison, WI.

Verma, G., V.K. Sharma, 2011. Evaluation of soil
     productivity potentials and land capability
     classification of Mandh watershed in North-West
     Himalayas. Agropedology, 21; 17-24.

Walkley, A., I.A. Black, 1934. An examination of
     degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter
     and a proposed modification of chromic acid in soil
     analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal,
     79; 459–465.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 470
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 465


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب