تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,116,896 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,221,735 |
تأثیر کشت مخلوط بر کارآیی مصرف آب، عملکرد کمی و کیفی ارزن و سویا در رژیمهای مختلف آبیاری | ||
علوم گیاهان زراعی ایران | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 49، شماره 4، اسفند 1397، صفحه 97-113 اصل مقاله (1012.35 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijfcs.2017.230808.654302 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
گودرز احمدوند* 1؛ سمیه حاجی نیا2 | ||
1معاونت تحصیلات تکمیلی دانشگاه بو علی سینا همدان | ||
2دانشجوی دکتری فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلیسینا، همدان | ||
چکیده | ||
به منظور بررسی اثر کشت مخلوط بر عملکرد کمی و کیفی ارزن و سویا در رژیمهای مختلف آبیاری، آزمایشی در مزرعه تحقیقاتی دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه بوعلیسینا در سال 1394، بهصورت کرتهای خردشده در قالب طرح پایه بلوکهای کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار اجرا شد. عامل اصلی رژیمهای آبیاری در سه سطح (آبیاری پس از 60، 90 و 120 میلیمتر تبخیر تجمعی آب از تشت تبخیر) و عامل فرعی الگوی کشت مخلوط جایگزینی در پنج سطح (33 درصد ارزن+ 67 درصد سویا (67 سویا: 33 ارزن)، 50 درصد ارزن+ 50 درصد سویا (50 سویا: 50 ارزن)، 67 درصد ارزن+ 33 درصد سویا (33 سویا: 67 ارزن) و تککشتی سویا و ارزن) بودند. نتایج نشان داد بیشترین غلظت فسفر دانه ارزن (35/0 درصد) در نسبت (50 سویا: 50 ارزن) در رژیم آبیاری 60 میلیمتر تبخیر و کمترین میزان آن (12/0 درصد) در کشت خالص ارزن در رژیم آبیاری 120 میلیمتر تبخیر، مشاهده شد. بیشترین غلظت فسفر دانه سویا (27/0 درصد) در نسبت (50 سویا: 50 ارزن) مشاهده شد که 4/14 درصد در مقایسه با کشت خالص سویا، بیشتر بود. غلظت فسفر و روغن دانه سویا در رژیم آبیاری 120 میلیمتر تبخیر در مقایسه با رژیم آبیاری 60 میلیمتر تبخیر بهترتیب 7/40 و 14/26 درصد کاهش یافت. کشت مخلوط غلظت پروتئین دانه ارزن را افزایش داد. کشت مخلوط کارآیی مصرف آب ارزن و سویا را افزایش داد. نسبت کاشت (50 سویا: 50 ارزن) در رژیم آبیاری 60 میلیمتر تبخیر، بیشترین نسبت برابری زمین 14/1 را به خود اختصاص داد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
آبیاری؛ الگوی کاشت؛ پروتئین؛ فسفر؛ نسبت برابری زمین | ||
مراجع | ||
10. Darbaghshahi, M. N., Banitaba, A. & Bahari, B. (2012). Evaluating the possibility of saffron and chamomile mixed culture. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(20), 3060-3065. 11. Doorenbos, J., & Kassam, A. (1979). Yield response to water. Irrigation and drainage paper, 33, 257. 12. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2010). Biodiversity: Agricultural Biodiversity in FAO. Retrieved 2010, from http://www.fao.org/biodiversity. 13. Farnia, A., Noormohammadai, G., Naderi, A., Darvish, F. & Majidi-Hervan, I. (2006). Effect of drought stress and strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum on grain yield and associated characteristics in soybean in Borujerd. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 8(3), 201-214. 14. Gao, Y., Duan, A., Sun, J., Li, F., Liu, Z., Liu, H. & Liu, Z. (2009). Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 111, 65-73. 15. Ghosh, P. K., Tripathi, A. K., Bandyopadhyay, K. K. & Manna, M. C. (2009). Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 43-50. 16. Grumberg, G. B. C., Urcelay, C., Shroeder, M. A., Vargas-Gil, S. & Luna, C. M. (2015). The role of inoculum identity in drought stress mitigation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soybean. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 51, 1-10. 17. Haberle, J., Svoboda, P. & Raimanova, I. (2008). The effect of post-anthesis water supply on grain nitrogen concentration and grain nitrogen yield of winter wheat. Plant Soil and Environment, 54, 304-312. 18. Hashemi Dezfuli, A., Abdali, A. & Siadat, S. A. (2000). Study of corn-sunflower intercropping ratios in different dates of planting affecting on quantitative and qualitative forage kernel yields in Ahvaz region. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 2(2), 1-18. (In Farsi) 19. Horwitz, W., Chichilo, P., & Reynolds, H. (1970). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 20. Inal, A., Gunes, A., Zhang, F. & Cakmak, I. (2007). Peanut maize intercropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 20, 1-7. 21. Jahansooz, M. R., Yunusa, I. A. M., Coventry, D. R., Palmer, A. R. & Eamus, D. (2007). Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal of Agronomy, 26, 275-282. 22. Keeney, D., Nelson, D., & Page, A. (1982). Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In: A. L. Page., R. H. Miller. & D. R. Keeney (Eds), Methods of soil analysis. Part. 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. (pp. 643-693) American Society of Agronomy. 23. Khajehpour, M. (2007). Principle of Agronomy. Industrial University of Esfahan Publication. (In Farsi) 24. Koocheki, A., Seyyedi, S. M. & Gharaei, S. (2016). Evaluation of the effects of saffron–cumin intercropping on growth, quality and land equivalent ratio under semi-arid conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 201, 190-198. 25. Kusaka, M., Lalusin, A. G. & Fujimura, T. (2005). The maintenance of growth and turgor in pearl millet(Pennisetum glaucum (L.)Leeke)cultivars with different root structures and osmoregulation under drought stress. Plant Science, 168, 1-14. 26. Li, W., Li, L., Sun, J., Guo, T., Zhang, F., Bao, X., Peng, A. & Tang, C. (2005). Effects of intercropping and nitrogen application on nitrate present in the profile of an Orthic Anthrosol in Northwest China. Agricultural Ecosystem and Environment, 105, 483-491. 27. Lithourgidis, A. S., Vlachostergios, D. N., Dordas, C. A. & Damalas, C. A. (2011). Dry matter yield, nitrogen content, and competition in pea cereal intercropping systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 287-294. 28. Maffei, M. & Mucciarelli, A. (2003). Essential oil yield in peppermint/soybean strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 84, 229-240. 29. Marshner, H. (1995). Mineral Nutrient of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London. 30. McDonald, G. K. (1992). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on the growth, grain yield and grain protein concentration of wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 43, 946-967. 31. Mohsenabadi, G. H. R., Jahansooz, M. R., Chaichi, M. R., Rahimian Mashhadi, H., Liaghati A. M. & Savaghebi. G. R. (2008). Evaluation of barley-vetch intercrop at different nitrogen rates. Journal of Agriculture Science Technology, 10, 23-31. 32. Morris, R. A. & Garrity, D. P. (1993). Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crops Research, 34, 303-317. 33. Rankulatile, H., Homma, K., Horie, T., Kurusa T. & Inamura, T. (1998). Land equivalent ratio of groundnut-finger millet intercrops as affected by plant combination ratio, and nitrogen and water availability. Plant Production Science, 1(1), 39-46. 34. Reddy, A. R., Chaitanya, K. V. & Vivekanandan, M. (2004). Drought induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal Plant Physiology, 161, 1189-1202. 35. Saghatoleslami, M., Haravan, M., Nourmohmadi, G. & Darvish, F. (2007). Effect of drought stress in growth different stages on yield and water use efficiency of five millet genotypes in South Khorasan. Science and Technology of griculture and Natural Resources, 11, 215-225. 36. Sasani, S., Jahansooz, M. & Ahmadi, A. (2004). The effects of deficit irrigation on water-use efficiency, yield, and quality of forage pearl millet. Agronomy and Plant Breeding. University of Tehran, 150. 37. Sekiya, N. & Yano, K. (2004). Do pigeonpea and sesbania supply ground water to intercropped maize through hydraulic lift? Hydrogen stable isotope investigation of xylem waters. Field Crop Research, 86, 167-173. 38. Shaker-Koohi, S., Nasrollahzadeh, S., & Raei, Y. (2014). Evaluation of chlorophyll value, protein content and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) intercropping. International Journal of Biosciences, 4(8), 136-143. 39. Sharma, O. P. & Gupta, A. K. (2002). Nitrogen-phosphorus nutrition of pearl millet as influenced by intercrop legumes and fertilizer levels. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 25, 833-842. 40. Sinaki, J., MajidiHeravan, M., Shirani Rad, A. H., Noor Mohammadi, G. & Zarei, H. (2007). The effects of water deficit during growth stages of canola (Brassica napus L.). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, 2, 417-422. 41. Szumigalski, A. R. & Van Acker, R. C. (2006). Nitrogen yield and land use efficiency in annual sole crops and intercrops. Agronomy Journal, 98, 1030-1040. 42. Tavassoli, A. Ghanbari, A., Ahmadi, M. M. & Heydari, M. (2010). The effect of fertilizer and manure on forage and grain yield of and bean in intercropping. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Research, 8 (2), 96-114. (In Farsi) 43. Tsubo, M., Walker, S. & Ogindo, H. O. (2005). A simulation model of cereal legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions I. Model development. Field Crops Research, 93, 10-22. 44. Waling, I., Vark, W. V., Houba, V. J. G. & Vanderlee, J. J. (1989). Soil and Plant Analysis, A Series of Syllabi. Plant Analysis Procedures. Wageningen Agriculture University, the Netherland. 45. Walker, S. & Ogindo, H. O. (2003). The water budget of rainfed maize and bean intercrop. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28, 919-926. 46. Xu, B., Shan, L., Zhang, S., Deng, X. & Li, F. (2008). Evaluation of switch grass and sainfoin intercropping under 2:1 row-replacement in semiarid region, northwest China. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7, 4056-4067. 47. Yadav, O. P. & Bhatnagar, S. K. (2001). Evaluation of indices for identification of pearl millet cultivars adapted to stress and non-stress conditions. Field Crops Research, 70, 201-208. 48. Yang, G., Aiwang, D., Jingsheng, S., Fusheng, L., Zugui, L., Hao, L. & Zhandong, L. (2009). Crop coefficient and water-use efficiency of winter wheat/spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research, 111(2), 65-73. 49. Zare-Abyaneh, H., Gasemi, A., Marofi, S. & Bayat-Varkeshi, M. (2010). Determination of water requirement, single and dual crop coefficients of garlic in cold semi-arid climate. Water and Soil Science, 20, 111-122. 50. Zhang, F. and Li, L. (2003). Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency. Plant and Soil, 248, 305-312. 51. Zhang, Y., Chen, F., Li, L., Chen, Y., Liu, B. R., Zhou, Y. L., Yuan, L. X., Zhang, F. S. & Mi, G. H. (2012). The role of maize root size in phosphorus uptake and productivity of maize/faba bean and maize/wheat intercropping systems. Research Paoer, 55, 993-1001. 52. Zheng, H. F., Chen, L. D., Yu, X. Y., Zhao, X. F. Ma, Y. & Ren, Z. B. (2015). Phosphorus control as an effective strategy to adapt soybean to drought at the reproductive stage: evidence from field experiments across northeast China. Soil Use and Management, 31, 19-28.
| ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 519 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 429 |