بررسی ابزارهای سیاستی موردنیاز برای همکاری بنگاه‌های جدید فناوری نانو و شرکت‌های صنعتی

1- جعفری مقدم، سعید، زالی، محمدرضا و ثنایی پور، هادی، 1394، سیاستگذاری توسعه کارآفرینی در گردشگری: مطالعه تطبیقی کشورهای برگزیده، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 1، شماره 4، صفحه 27 -48.

2- خوشبویی، زهرا، حسینی، محمد و ابوترابی، محمدعلی، 1396، مداخله‌های دولت در بازار هنرهای نمایشی ایران: تجربیات و دلالت‌های سیاستی، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 3، شماره 3، صفحه 9 -33.

3- ستاد ویژه توسعه فناوری نانو، گزارش عملکرد پیشرفت فناوری نانو در ایران، 1395.

4- سلطانی، علی‌محمد، خوشنویس، یاسر و رضا اسدی فرد، 1397، مجموعه مقالات منتخب سیاستگذاری در حوزه­های فناوری­های نوظهور، نشر رسا (در حال چاپ).

5- مهدوی، ابوالقاسم و محمدلو، حمید عزیز، 1395، بررسی تأثیر ساختار سیاستگذاری صنعتی بر کیفیت و کارکرد سیاست‌های طراحی شده در حوزه صنایع کوچک و متوسط ایران، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 2، شماره 3، صفحه 57 -77.

6- Aaboen, L., Dubois, A., & Lind, F. (2013). Strategizing as networking for new ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(7), 1033-1041.

7- Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41-56.

8- Ansari, S. S., & Krop, P. (2012). Incumbent performance in the face of a radical innovation: Towards a framework for incumbent challenger dynamics. Research policy, 41(8), 1357-1374.

9- Bers, J. A., Dismukes, J. P., Mehserle, D., & Rowe, C. (2014). Extending the Stage-Gate Model to Radical Innovation-the Accelerated Radical Innovation Model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(4), 706-734.

10- Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological forecasting and social change, 80(8), 1513-1522.

11- Ciabuschi, F., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2012). Assembling resources when forming a new business. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 220-229.

12- Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among Five approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

13- Dahler-Larsen, P. (2018). Evaluability of policy instruments: A case study of Danish work place assessments under EU directive 89/391.

14- Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., & Kale, P. (2008). Splitting the pie: rent distribution in alliances and networks. Managerial and Decision Economics, 29(2‐3), 137-148.

15- Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research policy, 41(10), 1757-1769.

16- Eisenhardt, K.M., Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50(1), 25-32.

17- Eppinger, S., & Ulrich, K. (2015). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

18- European Commission, (2011). Key Enabling Technologies. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict/files/kets/hlg_report_final_en.pdf, Accessed: 6th January 2018.

19- Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research policy, 40(5), 702-713.

20- Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage.

21- Fogelberg, H., & Sandén, B. A. (2008). Understanding reflexive systems of innovation: An analysis of Swedish nanotechnology discourse and organization.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 65-81.

22- GEM, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Global Report, 2016. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report, access date: 2017/08/17.

23- Gesseneck, J., Toffanin, R.,Gesseneck, J. (2018). Innovation system foresight and systemic innovation for the overseas countries. foresight, (just-accepted), 00-00.

24- Given, L.M. (Ed.), (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks California.

25- Givoni, M., Macmillen, J., Banister, D., & Feitelson, E. (2013). From policy measures to policy packages. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 1-20.

26- Hennicke, P. (2004). Scenarios for a robust policy mix: The final report of the German study commission on sustainable energy supply. Energy Policy, 32(15), 1673–1678.

27- Howlett, M. (2017). The criteria for effective policy design: character and context in policy instrument choice. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-22.

28- Howlett, M., & del Rio, P. (2015). The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1233-1245.

29- Justen, A., Fearnley, N., Givoni, M., & Macmillen, J. (2014). A process for designing policy packaging: Ideals and realities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 9-18.

30- Knight, F. H. (2012). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Courier Corporation.

31- La Rocca, A., & Snehota, I. (2014). Relating in business networks: Innovation in practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(3), 441-447.

32- Liao, Z. (2018). Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputation of enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 1111-1117.

33- Linnarson, H. (2005). Patterns of alignment in alliance structure and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(2), 161-181.

34- Mangematin, V., & Walsh, S. (2012). The future of nanotechnologies, Technovation, 32 (3-4), pp.157-160.

35- Milkman, K. L., Mazza, M. C., Shu, L. L., Tsay, C. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Policy bundling to overcome loss aversion: A method for improving legislative outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 158-167.

36- Nikulainen, T. (2010). Identifying nanotechnological linkages in the Finnish economy–An explorative study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 22(5), 513-531.

37- Pérez, L, J Florin and J Whitelock (2012). Dancing with elephants: The challenges of managing asymmetric technology alliances. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 23(2), 142–154.

38- Prange, C., Eng, T. Y., & Li, J. (2015). Collaborative new product alliances: A review of the literature and research perspectives. Strategic Change, 24(4), 351-371.

39- Prashantham, S. and Birkinshaw, J. (2008), “Dancing with gorillas: How small companies can partner effectively with MNCS”, California Management Review, 51(1), pp. 6–23.

40- Sarkar, S., Osiyevskyy, O., & Clegg, S. R. (2017). Incumbent capability enhancement in response to radical innovations. European Management Journal.

41- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of management review, 25(1), 217-226.

42- The Global Innovation Index, (2016). Availible at: www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2016.pdf

43- Wasserman, N. O. A. M. (2006). Rich versus king: strategic choice and the entrepreneur. Best Paper Proceedings, Academy of Management, Harvard Business School.

44- Whitbread, S., Linnane, K., & Davidson, A. (2017). Policy innovation New thinking. New skills. New tools.

45- Yin, R., K., (2014). Case Study Research: design and Methods. 5th Edition. Sage Publication.