پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,966,342 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,640,157 |
آشکارسازی روند تغییرات کاربری اراضی و تآثیر آن بر دبی و بار معلق شبیه سازی شده با مدل SWAT (مطالعه موردی: آبخیز گالیکش استان گلستان) | ||
| نشریه علمی - پژوهشی مرتع و آبخیزداری | ||
| مقاله 15، دوره 71، شماره 2، شهریور 1397، صفحه 489-504 اصل مقاله (1.13 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrwm.2018.139221.947 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ایوب مرادی* 1؛ علی نجفی نژاد2؛ مجید اونق3؛ چوقی بایرام کمکی4؛ مهرانگیز فولادی منصوری5 | ||
| 1دانش آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 3استاد گروه آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار گروه آبخیزداری، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان،گرگان، ایران | ||
| 5دانش آموختۀ کارشناسی ارشد آبخیزداری، دانشگاه ملایر،، ملایر، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| شیوههای بهرهبرداری اراضی، تخریب مناطق جنگلی و مرتعی، رهاسازی اراضی و توسعۀ مناطق مسکونی از جمله عواملی هستند که بر شدت جریان آب، شدت فرسایش و تولید رسوب اثر میگذارند. به همین دلیل آگاهی ازمیزان اثر تغییرات کاربری اراضی بر روی دبی و بار معلق یک ضرورت اجتنابناپذیر است. در مطالعۀ حاضر برای بررسی این اثرات از مدل نیمه توزیعی SWAT در آبخیز گالیکش استان گلستان به مساحت تقریبی 39 هزار هکتار استفاده شد. مدل مذکور برای شبیهسازی، واسنجی و اعتبارسنجی و در نهایت بهینهسازی پارامترهای مؤثر بر دبی و بار معلق در یک دورۀ 27 ساله مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نقشههای کاربری اراضی از سه تصویر ماهوارۀ لندست سالهای 1987، 2000 و 2013 تهیه شدند. در این مطالعه از روش SUFI2 برای واسنجی و اعتبارسنجی مدل استفاده شد. معیار ناش- ساتکلیف (NS) به عنوان تابع هدف در مرحلۀ واسنجی (1990- 2007) برای دبی و بار معلق به ترتیب 63/0 و 61/0 بهدست آمد که با توجه به دامنههای تفسیری مورد استفاده در تحقیقات گذشته، قابل قبول ارزیابی شد. برای بررسی اثر تغییرات کاربری اراضی بر مقدار رواناب و رسوب تمام ورودیهای مدل به غیر از کاربری اراضی ثابت فرض شد و نتایج نشان داد که تغییرات کاربری اراضی از سال 1987 تا 2013 موجب افزایش ارتفاع رواناب سطحی به میزان 40/1 میلیمتر و افزایش غلظت رسوب به میزان 2 تن در هکتار در سال شده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| لندست؛ تغییر کاربری؛ بار معلق؛ مدل SWAT؛ گالیکش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Landuse changes detection and evaluation of their effects on simulated discharge and sediment yield using SWAT model (Case Study: Galikesh Watershed, Golestan Province) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| ayoub moradi1؛ Ali Nakafinejad2؛ Majid Ownagh3؛ Choghi Bairam Komaki4؛ mehrangiz foladi mansouri5 | ||
| 1gorgan u | ||
| 2Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciencesand Natural Resources | ||
| 3Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciencesand Natural Resources | ||
| 4Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciencesand Natural Resources | ||
| 5university if malayer | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Indiscriminate land utilization methods, forest and rangeland degradation, land abandonment and development of residential areas contribute to the changes in flow intensity, erosion rate and sedimentation. Therefore, having knowledge on the effect of land use changes on discharge flow and sediment yield has been found necessary. The present research aims at investigating the effects of these factors by means of the semi-distributed Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in Galikesh watershed, Golestan province (as a tributary of the River Gorganroud), in an area covering approximately 39000 hectares. This model was used in a 27-year period for simulation, calibration, validation and optimization of the parameters affecting flow and sediment yield. Land-use maps were prepared form the Landsat imageries dated 1987, 2000 and 2013. The SUFI2 model was used for model calibration and validation. Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) index was used as the objective function during model calibration (1990-2007) for the simulation of discharge and suspended load, which resulted in 0.63 and 0.61 that could be interpreted as satisfactory compared to the standards set in previous research. To evaluate the effect of land use changes on runoff and sediment yield, all model inputs, other than land use, were assumed constant. The results demonstrated that land use changes since 1987 to 2013 have led to an increase in annual runoff height by 1.40 mm and annual sediment concentration by 2 t.ha-1. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Landsat, Land Use Change, Sediment yield, SWAT Model, Galikesh | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
]1] Abbaspour, K.C. (2009). SWAT-CUP, SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs, Version 2 (user manual), EAWAG, 105p. ]2] Akbari, H., A. Bahremand., A. Najafinejad and V. Berdisheykh. (2013). Sensitivity analysis SWAT model in the watershed Chehelchai. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources. 18(67):279-287.(in Persian) ]3[ . Arefi, a., A. Najafinejad, F. Kyani and A. Mahini. (2013). Simiulation runoff and Sediment by use SWAT model Data (Case Study: Chehelchai Watershed, Golestan Province). Jurnal of Rangeland and Watershed. 66(3): 433-446.(in persian) ]4[ . Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S. and Williams, J.R. (1998). Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J. American Water Resources Association 34 (1): 73-89. ]5] Bailey, D. J. (2015). Sing SWAT (Soil Water and Assessment Tool) to Evaluate Streamflow Hydrology in a Small Mountain Watershed in the Sierra Nevada, Ca. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Geography, GIS Program. California State University, Northridge. 68 pp. ]6] Bathurst, J.C., Ewen, J., Parkin, G., Oconnell, PE. and Copper, J.D. (2004). Validation of Catchment models of Pridicting Land-Use and Climate Change impact .3. Blind Validation for internal and Outlet responses. J. Hydro, 287: 74-94. ]7] Bingner, R.L., J. Garbrecht, J.G. Arnold and R. Srinivasan. (1997). Effect of watershed subdivision on simulation runoff and finesediment yield. Trans. ASAE. 40, 1329- 1335. ]8] Birhanu, BZ., Ndomba, PM., and Mtalo, FW. 2007. Application of SWAT Model for Mountainous Catchment. FWU Water Rescource Publications: Volume No: 06/2007.ISSN No. 1613-1045: pp 182-187. ]9] Bouraoui, F., Benabdallah, S., Jrad, A. and Bidoglio,G. 2005. Application of the SWAT model on the Medjerda River basin (Tunisia). Phys. Chem. Earth 30(8- 10): 497- 507. ]10] Faramarzi, M., Abbaspour, K., Schulin, R. and Yang, H. 2009. Blue and Green water resources in Iran. Hydrol. Process. 23, 486–501 (2009). ]11] Fohrer, N., Eckhardt, K., Haverkamp, S. and Frede, H. G. (2001). Applying the SWAT Model as a Decision Support Tool for Land Use Concepts in Peripheral Regions in Germany, 10th International Soil Conservation Organizatio Meeting: 994-999. ]12] Ghaffari, G., J. Ghodousi and H. Ahmadi. (2009). Investigating the hydrological effects of land use change in catchment (Case study: Zanjanrood basin). Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, Vol. 16(1): 163-180. ]13] Ghodousi. M., M. Delavar and S. Marid. (2013). The effect of land use changes on watershed hydrology Ajichay and its entrance to Urmia Lake. Journal of Iran Soil and Water Research. 45(2):123-133. ]14] Golami, SH. (2003). Sediment simulation model by using distributed model SWAT in mountainous areas (watershed Amameh). Journal of Research and Construction. 59: 28-33.(in Persian) ]15] Hantush, M. M. and L. Kalin. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of runoff and sediment yield in a small agricultural watershed with KINEROS2. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (6): 1151-1172. ]16] Hematjo, M.H. (2008). Planning, land use sub-watershed Zayandehrud by using the SWAT model and land evaluation. MSC Thesis. Of the soil science-Faculty of Agriculture-University of Esfihan Technology. ]17] Izadi, M., KH. Azhdari, S. Akhavan and S. Emamgholizadeh. (2013). Assesing Then application SWAT2009 in Simulation Discharge on Shirindareh River. First international conference Challenges Water Resourses and Agriculature, Azad Khorasegan-Esfahan University.2013.(in persian). ]18] Jaleh, A. (2007). Evaluation of runoff and sediment estimation in Vanak watershed from northern Karun using SWAT2000. MS. Isfahan University of technology, Isfahan. (In Farsi). ]19] Kavian, A., M. Golshan, H, Rohani and A, Esmali. (2013). Mazandaran Haraz River watershed runoff and sediment load simulation using the SWAT model. Journal of Physical Geography. 47(2):197-211.(in Persian) ]20] Li, C., Ql, J., Feng, Z., Yin, R., Zou, S. and Zhang, F. 2010. Parameters optimization based on the combination of localization and auto-calibration of SWAT model in a small watershed in Chinese Loess Plateau. Earth Sci. China: 4(3): 296–310. ]21] Li, K.Y., M.T. Coe, N. Ramankutty and R. De Jong. (2007). Modeling thehydrological impact of land-use change in West Africa. Journal of Hydrology, 337:258-268. ]22] .Luzio, M.Di., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J.G., and Neitsch, S.L. 2002. ArcView Interface for AVSWAT, User’s Guide 245p. ]23] Lin, Z., and Radcliffe, D. E. (2006). Automatic calibration and predictive uncertainty analysis of a semidistributed watershed model. Vadose Zone J. 5(1): 248‐260. ]24] Marcos, H.C., B. Aurelie and A.C. Jeffrey. (2003). Effects of large-scale changes in land cover on the discharge of the Rocantins River, Southeastern Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology. 283: 206-217. ]25] Mello, C.R., M.R. Viala, L.D. Norton, A.M. Silva and F.A. Weimar. (2008) "Development and application of a simple hydrologic model simulation for a Brazillian headwater basian". Catena 75 (2008): 235-247. ]26] Moriasi, D. N., J. G. Arnold, M. W. Van Liew, R. L. Binger, R. D. Harmel and T. Veith. (2007). Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 50 (3): 885-900. ]27] Morgan, R.P.C. (2005). Soil erosion and conservation. Black well publication. 304Pp. ]28] Narayan, K.Sh., P.C. Shakti and G. Pabitra. (2010). Calibration and Validation of SWAT Model for Low Lying Watersheds: A Case Study on the Kliene Nete Watershed, Belgium. HYDRO Nepal journal, 6: 46-51. ]29] Ndomba, PM. and Birhanu, BZ. (2008). Problems and Prospects of SWAT Model Applications in NILOTIC Catchments: A Review, Nile Basin Water Engineering Scientific Magazine: 1: 41-52. ]30] Neitsch, S.L., J.G. Arnold, J.R. Kiniri & J.R. Williams. (2005). Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2005. Grassland, Soil and water research laboratory, Agricultural research service. 476p. ]31] Omani, N., Tajrishy, M. and Abrishamchi, A.( 2007). Modeling of a river basin using SWAT model and GIS. International conference on managing rivers on the 21 century, Reversid Kuching, Saravak, Malaysia: 510-517. ]32] Ouyang, W., F.H. Hao, X.L. Wang and H.G. Cheng. (2008). Nonpoint Source Pollution Responses Simulation for Conversion Cropland to Forest in Mountains by SWAT in China. Environmental Management, 41: 79–89. ]33] Pikounis, M., E. Varanou, E. Baltas, A. Dassaklis and M. Mimikou. (2003). Application of the SWAT Model in the pinos river basin under different Scenarios. International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology. 5 (2): 71-79. ]34] Pohlert, T., Huisman, J. A., Breuer, L. and Freude, H.G. (2007). Integration of a detailed biogeochemical model into SWAT for improved nitrogen predictions: Model development, sensitivity, and GLUE analysis. Ecol. Model. 203(3‐4): 215‐228. ]35] Rosenthal, W. D., Shrinivasan, R., Arnold, J. G. (1996). Alternative river managementusing a linked GIS hydrology model. Trans. ASAE 38 (3), 783–790 ]36] Rostamian, R., S.F. Mosavi, M. Haidarpour, M. Afioni and K. Abbaspour. (2006). Assessment of runoff and sediment in Beheshtabad watershed, Northern Karun by SWAT 2000. M.Sc. Thesis. Irrigation and drainage Faculty, Isfahan University of Technology. 192pp. ]37] Saleh, DK., Kratzer, CR., Green, CH. and Evans, DG. ( 2009). Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to Simulate Runoff in Mustang Creek Basin, California, Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5031, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, the American water resources association: 44(1): 48-61. ]38] Salmani, H., M. Mohseni Saravi, H. Rouhani and A. Salajeghe. (2012). Evaluation of Land Use Change and its Impact on the Hydrological Process in the Ghazaghli Watershed, Golestan Province. Kurnal Journal of Watershed Management Research. 3(6): 43-60. ]39] response to converting natural grassland into bluegum (Eucalyptus globulus) in Nilgiris watersheds of south India. Journal of Hydrology, 270 (1-2), pp 12–26. ]40] Schuol, J., K.C. Abbaspour, H. Yang, P. Reichert, R. Srinivasan, Ch. Schar and A.J.B. Zehnder. (2006). Estimation of freshwater availability in the West Africa subcontinent. Journal of Hydrology. 254, 58-69. ]41] Thampi, SG., Raneesh, KY., Surya, TV. (2010). Influence of scale on SWAT model calibration for streamflow in a river basin in the humid tropics. Water Resour Manag 24:4567–4578. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9676-y. ]42] Ustin S. (2004). Remote sensing for natural resource management and environmental monitoring. Third Edition, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. USA, 736 p. ]43] Wang, Z. H., Zhao, D. Z., Cao, B. & Liang, D. Y. (2014). Research on simulation of non-point source pollution in Qingjiang river basin based on SWAT model and GIS. J. Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute 27 (1), 57–61. ]44] Winchell, M., R. Srinivasan, M.Di. luzio and J. Arnold. (2009). ArcSWAT 2.3 Interface for SWAT 2005, User, s guide, Black land research center, 465p. ]45] Yang, J., P. Reichert, K.C. Abbaspour, J. Xia and H. Yang. (2008). Comparing uncertainty analysis techniques for a SWAT application to the Chaohe Basin in China. Journal of Hydrology, 358: 1–23. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 522 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 350 |
||