پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,992,018 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,660,999 |
ارتباط میان چابکی نیروی کار و نوآوری محصول جدید (مطالعۀ موردی: شرکتهای کوچک، متوسط و بزرگ در صنعت فناوری بالا) | ||
| مدیریت بازرگانی | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 2، 1395، صفحه 245-258 اصل مقاله (300.41 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله علمی پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jibm.2016.58690 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| محمد مهدی ابریشم کار* 1؛ یزید ابوبکر عبدالهی2 | ||
| 1استادیارگروه مدیریت، دانشگاه اسکس، انگلستان | ||
| 2استاد گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه کینگستون، لندن، انگلستان | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در دنیای امروز پیچیدگی، بیثباتی و پیشبینیناپذیری تغییرات محیطی، رهیافتها و مفاهیم طراحی سنتی، سازمانها را تحت تأثیر قرار داده است. از این رو سازمانها باید بتوانند به این تغییرات پاسخ دهند و تلاش کنند نیروی کار خود را به سمت چابکشدن سوق دهند. پیشرفتن در مسیر چابکی، میتواند سازمانها را به سمت بهرهبرداری بهتر از نیروی کار هدایت کند و بهرهبرداری بهتر، بهبود و پیشرفت عملکرد کارکنان را به همراه دارد و در نتیجه موجب دستیابی سازمانها به ایده‌های جدید و بهدنبال آن، موجب تسهیل نوآوری در سطح شرکت و سازمان می‌شود. هدف این پژوهش، بررسی ارتباط بین چابکی نیروی کار و نوآوری محصول جدید است. جامعۀ آماری آن 170 شرکت بزرگ، کوچک و متوسط در سطح کشور است که همگی در صنعت فناوری بالا فعالیت میکنند. بهمنظور جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. پایایی کل پرسشنامه با محاسبۀ ضریب آلفای کرونباخ 811/0 بهدست آمد. داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده با استفاده از روش معادلات ساختاری و نرم افزار Smart PLS2.0 بررسی شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد بین چابکی نیروی کار و نوآوری محصول جدید ارتباط مثبتی وجود دارد. علاوهبراین، مؤلفههای چابکی نیروی کار، یعنی کنشگرایی، انعطاف پذیری و تابآوری، نیز با نوآوری محصول جدید رابطۀ مثبتی برقرار میکنند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| چابکی نیروی کار؛ انعطاف پذیری؛ کنشگرایی؛ تابآوری؛ نوآوری محصول جدید | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The relationship between Workforce Agility and New Product Innovation in High-tech | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mohammad Mahdi Abrishamkar1؛ Dr Yazid Abubakar Abdullahi2 | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In today's world of complexity, uncertainty and unpredictable environment Bvdntghyyrat approach and traditional design concepts, organizations are affected. Therefore, organizations must be able to respond to these changes and try to push your workforce to liven. Agility can go forward on the path towards better utilization of labor organizations guide. This operation can be better used in improving the performance of employees. Thereby achieving organizations are looking to new ideas and facilitate innovation throughout the company and the organization. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between agility and innovation of new products pay for labor. The population consisted of 170 large companies, small and medium enterprises in the country that are working all the high-tech industry. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient 811/0. The data was analyzed using structural equation modeling software and Smart PLS2.0 were studied. The results indicate that the positive relationship between agility labor and innovation of new products there. In addition, components of labor activism agility, flexibility and resilience are also positively correlated both with the innovation of new products. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Workforce Agility, Flexibility, activism, resilience, New product innovation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
References
Acs, Z. J. (2002). Innovation and the Growth of Cities. E. Elgar: Cheltenham.
Alberts, D. & Hayes, R. E. (2003). Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age (Information Age Transformation Series). CCRP: Publication, United States.
Baker, G., Gibbs, M. & Holmstrom, B. (1994). The internal economics of the firm: evidence from personnel data. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 881-919.
Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F. & Neubaum, D.O. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of business venturing, 20(5): 663-687.
Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M. & Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce agility: the new employee strategy for the knowledge economy. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1): 21-31.
Chin, W. W., Gopal, A. & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4): 342–367.
Coad, A. (2007). Firm Growth: A Survey. Papers on Economics and Evolution 2007-03. Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group.
Co-operation, Organization for Economic & Development. (2010). The OECD Innovation Strategy: getting a head start on tomorrow: OECD Publishing.
Dove, R. (2001). Response ability: the language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise. John Wiley & Sons.
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39–50.
Forsythe, C. (1997). Human factors in agile manufacturing: a brief overview with emphasis on communications and information infrastructure. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1): 3-10.
Gmelin, H. & Seuring, S. (2014). Determinants of a sustainable new product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69(1): 1-9.
Goldman, S.L, Nagel, R.N. & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer. New York, NY: Van Norstand Reinhold.
Gopalakrishnan, M., Libby, T., Samuels, J. A. & Swenson, D. (2015). The effect of cost goal specificity and new product development process on cost reduction performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 42(1): 1-11.
Greiner, L. (2005). Handbook of Management Consulting. The Contemporary Consultant Insights from World Experts. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Pub
Griffin, B. & Hesketh, B. (2003). Adaptable behaviours for successful work and career adjustment. Australian Journal of psychology, 55(2): 65-73.
Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K. & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(2): 675-686.
Hoxha, D. & Capelleras, J.L. (2010). Fast-growing firms in a transitional and extreme environment: are they different? Journal of small business and enterprise development, 17(3): 350-370.
Lawrence, M.R. (1998). High-tech industries drive global economic activity. National Science Foundation, 7(20): 319-322.
Luzzini, D., Amann, M., Caniato, F., Essig, M. & Ronchi, S. (2015). The path of innovation: purchasing and supplier involvement into new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 47(1): 109-120.
Mehta, V. & Shah, H. (2004). Characteristics of a work organization from a lean perspective. Engineering Management Journal, 17(2): 14-20.
Meyer, C. B. & Stensaker, I. G. (2006). Developing capacity for change. Journal of Change Management, 6(2): 217-231.
Mohaghar, A., Razavi, M. & Mirkazemi, M. M. (2015). Simulating the effects of Knowledge co-creation policies in supply chain on NPD performance using system dynamics. Journal of Business Management. 7(3): 737-760. (in Persian) Mosavi, N. S. (2016). The describe of moderating role of product performance in brand vision and positioning effect on brand equity in Iran food industry. Journal of Business Management, 8(1): 229-243. (in Persian)
OECD (2007). High Growth Enterprises and Gazelles. Paris, OECD.
Parker, S. K., Wall, T. D. & Cordery, J. L. (2001). Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 74(4): 413-440.
Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing a lean and agile work force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1): 11-20.
Porter, M. E., Ketels, C.H.M. & Britain, G. (2003). UK Competitiveness: moving to the next stage. DTI Economics Paper. Available in: http://digital.library. lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:sif604cig.
Qin, R. & Nembhard, D. A. (2010). Workforce agility for stochastically diffused conditions—A real options perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 125(2): 324-334.
Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z. (1999). A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organizations: An introduction. International journal of production economics, 62(1): 7-22.
Sherehiy, B. & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3): 466-473.
Sherehiy, B., Karwowski, W. & Layer, J. K. (2007). A review of enterprise agility: Concepts, frameworks, and attributes. International Journal of industrial ergonomics, 37(5): 445-460.
Williams, T., Worley, C. G. & Lawler III, E. E. (2013). The agility factor. strategy+ business, Available in: http://www.strategy-business.com/article/00188?gko =6a0ba.
World Bank. (2008). Iran. from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran.
Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean, James W. & Lepak, D.P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of management Journal, 39(4): 836-866. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,787 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 3,970 |
||