پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,103,262 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,209,539 |
Explaination of personnel selection model in private IT companies | ||
| Journal of Information Technology Management | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 7، شماره 3، آذر 2015، صفحه 595-614 اصل مقاله (530.61 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jitm.2015.54756 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Amir Roodi* 1؛ Ahmad Khalili Jafarabad2 | ||
| 1MSc, Information Technology Management, University Of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2PhD Student, Information Technology Management, University Of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Maintain and enhance the quality of human resources and achieve maximum value from IT industry employees is the most important concern of managers. Most of researches in this area focus on companies’ endeavour to recruiting qualified experts in the IT industry in the next decade. The selection of qualified personnel for organizations which focus on human resouces as a strength, will be a major issue. Therefore, in this study, companies active in the field of information technology as one of the technology companies, have been examined for optimal absorption of manpower. In the present study, multi-criteria decision-making is used. IT active companies are studied in the current research. In order to design the proper employment model of this companies and due to a variety of quantitative and qualitative parameters, TOPSIS multi attribute decision making (MADM) model is used for prioritization of employment alternatives. Moreover Meta synthesis method is employed to extract the effective indices in the scientific literature. Among authentic researches, finally 7 indices are selected for TOPSIS weighted measure. According to the model, 33 alternatives are investigated at a sample active company. The model is used for three types of professions: IT project manager, information systems analyst and computer programmer. Our model is compared with the traditional methods of personnel selection. The results, shows the consistency between the model and traditional methods. At the end, cause of some contradictions is discussed. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Human Resource؛ Information Technology؛ personnel selection؛ TOPSIS | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aggarwal, R. (2014). Identifying and Prioritizing Human Capital Measurement Indicators for Personnel Selection Using Fuzzy MADM. Third International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 427-439). Springer India.
Askounis, D. & Kelemenis, A. (2009). A New TOPSIS-based Multi-Criteria Approach to Personnel Selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 37 (7): 4999-5008.
Azam Vaziri, S., Mansouri, H. & Adiban, A. (2009). Identify and Prioritize The Factors Affecting Labor Productivity Using MADM Techniques Case Study of Hormozgan Ministry of Education. Talim Tarbiat, (100): 135-159. (in Persian) Azar, A. & Rajabzadeh, A. (2002). Applied Decision Making. Tehran: Negah Danesh. (in Persian)
Baschab, J., Carr, N. & Piot, J. (2007). The Executive's Guide to Information Technology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons.
Bazrpash, M. & Ansari, G. (2007). Application of Multi Attribute Decision Making Models of Meritocracy Brokers Islamic Republic of Iran. Modiriate Farda, (18): 41-54. (in Persian)
Bench, S. & Day, T. (2010). The User Experience of Critical Care Discharges: a Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(4): 487-499.
Canós, L. & Liern, V. (2008). Soft Computing-Based Aggregation Methods for Human Resource Management. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3): 669-681.
Chen, C. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1): 1-9.
Chen, L. & Cheng, C. (2005). Selecting IS Personnel Use Fuzzy GDSS Based on Metric Distance Method. European Journal of Operational Research, 160(3): 803-820.
Chien, C., & Chen, L. (2008). Data Mining to Improve Personnel Selection and Enhance Human Capital: A Case Study in High-Technology Industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1): 280-290.
Childs, K. (2003). The IT Industry Learning Cycle. Certification Magazine, 5(5):16.
CIO.GOV. (2011). Information Technology Workforce Capability Assessment. Chief Inforation Officers Council, https://cio.gov/wp-content/uploads/downloads /2012/09/2011_ITWCA_Results_Report_Final_5.31.11.pdf.
Eckle, J. (2005). Most-Sought IT Skills. Computerworld, 39(11): 49.
Eskandari, A. (2008). Topsis MADM Techniques Used in Capital Budgeting Method. Qazvin: Qazvin Azad University. (in Persian)
Ghodsipoor, S. (2002). Discussions on Multi-Criteria Decision. Tehran: Amir Kabir University. (in Persian)
Grossman, R. (2006). HR’s Rising Star in India. HR Magazine, 51(9): 46.
Güngör, Z., Serhadlıog˘lub, G. & Kesen, S. (2009). A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection Problem. Applied Soft Computing, 9(2): 641-646.
Harvey, M., Novicevic, M. & Garrison, G. (2004). Challenges to Staffing Global Virtual Teams. Human Resource Management Review, 14 (3): 275-294.
Hough, L. & Oswald, F. (2000). Personnel Selection: Looking Toward the Future and Remembering the Past. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1): 631-664.
Hughes, C. (2014). Information Technology: Education Versus Experience. Retrieved from http://worklife.roberthalf.com.au/career/information-technology-education-versus-experience.
Hwang, C. & Kwang, Y. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Berlin: Springer Varlag.
irannsr. (2014). The Report of Informatics Engineering Wage Rate. Tehran: Irannsr. http://www.irannsr.org//parameters/irannsr/modules/cdk/upload/content/nsr_Rules/114/Tarefeh%2093-06-15%20%20last%20version.pdf. (in Persian)
ITAA. (2005). Adding Valuey...Growing Careers: The Employment Outlook in Today’s Increasingly Competitive Job Market. Information Technology Association of America, http://www.pr.viu.ca/techcomm/documents/04 workforcestudy.pdf.
Chaghooshi, A. J., Janatifar, H., & Dehghan, M. (2014). An Application of AHP and Similarity-Based Approach to Personnel Selection. International Journal of Business Management and Economics, 1(1), 24-32.
Jereb, E., Rajkovic, U. & Rajkovic, V. (2005). A Hierarchical Multi-Attribute System Approach to Personnel Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3): 198-205.
July, F. & Mir Abdollah Yani, R. (2010). Decision Making Theory. Tehran: Nasr Publication. (in Persian)
Karsak, E. (2000). A Fuzzy Multiple Objective Programming Approach for Personnel Selection. International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (3): 2007-2012. DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2000.886409.
Kelemenis, A., Ergazakis, K. & Askounis, D. (2010). Support Managers’ Selection Using an Extension of Fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3): 2774-2782.
Keršulienė, V. & Turskis, Z. (2014). A Hybrid Linguistic Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Selection of a Chief Accounting Officer. Business Economics and Management, 15(2): 232-252.
Liang, G. & Wang, M. (1992). Personnel Placement in a Fuzzy Environment. Computers and Operations Research, 19(2): 107-121.
Mahdavi Amiri, N., Heidarzadeh, & Nourifar. (2008). Designing a Model of Fuzzy TOPSIS in Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 206 (2): 607-617.
Mehrabad, & Brojeni. (2007). The Development of an Expert System for Effective Selection and Appointment of the Jobs Applicants in Human Resource Management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(2): 306-312.
META Group. (2002). U.S. 2002 IT Staffing and Compensation Guide: Human Capital Canagement Best Practices and Trends. META Group, Inc.
Noblit, G. & Hare, R. (1988). Meta –Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. Sage.
Nouri, G. & Tabatabaiyan, S. (2005). Sensitivity Analysis of the MADM Problems Based on Applied Method. Tehran: University of Tehran, (56): 129-141. (in Persian) Patterson, B., Thorne, Calnan, C., & Jillings, C. (2001). Meta-Study of Qualitative Health Research: a Practical Guide to Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis, Sage, (3).
Razmi, Z., Khadivar, A., & Agha Babaei, S. (2012). Design Of Fuzzy Decision Supprt System For Personnel Selection. Research of Human Resource Management, 2(2):45-67. (in Persian)
Saghafian, & Hejazi. (2005). Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Using a Modified Fuzzy TOPSIS Procedure. International Conference on Computational Intelligence For Modelling, Control and Automation, and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce, (2):215-221.
Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer.
Saremi, Mousavi, & Sanai. (2009). TQM Consultant Selection in SMEs With TOPSIS Under Fuzzy Environment. Expert Systems with Applications, (36): 2742-2749.
Seol, L. & Sarkis, J. (2005). A Multi-Attribute Model for Internal Auditor Selection. Managerial Auditing Journal, (28): 876-892.
Shih, H., Shyur, H. & Lee, E. (2007). An Extension of TOPSIS For Group Decision Making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 45(7): 801-813.
Storey Hooper, R., Galvin, T., Kilmer, R. & Liebowitz, J. (1998). Use of an Expert System in a Personnel Selection Process. Expert Systems with Applications, 14(4): 425-432.
Yeh, C. (2003). The Selection of Multiattribute Decision Making Methods for Scholarship Student Selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4): 289-296.
Zarei, A. (2000). Design of a Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) Model for the Determination of the Factors Affecting the Branch Performance of Bank Refah Kargaran. Industrial Management, Tarbiat Modarres University. (in Persian)
Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative Meta-Synthesis: a Question of Dialoguing With Texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(3): 311-318.
Zolfani, S. & Banihashemi, S. (2014). Personel Selection Based on a Novel Model of Game Theory and MCDM Approaches. 8th International Scientific Conference Business and Management. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University,Lithuania. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,970 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,981 |
||