پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,755 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,104,681 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,857,290 |
بررسی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار در ارتقای کیفیت‌های محیطی با استفاده از تکنیک فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای (ANP) (مطالعۀ موردی: سقز) | ||
| محیط شناسی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 41، شماره 1، فروردین 1394، صفحه 143-161 اصل مقاله (1.48 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jes.2015.53906 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرزانه ساسان پور1؛ علی موحد2؛ علی شماعی2؛ سوران مصطفوی صاحب* 3 | ||
| 1استادیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکدۀ علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشکدۀ علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، دانشکدۀ علوم جغرافیایی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| این پژوهش با هدف سنجش و تحلیل کیفیت محیط در واحد همسایگی و محله بر آن است با شناسایی و ارزیابی وضعیت کیفی مؤلفه‌های سازندۀ کیفیت در این محیط‌های شهری، علاوه بر تعیین سطح کیفیت محیط در محدودۀ مطالعاتی به اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه‌های محیطی نامطلوب محیط موردنظر بپردازد؛ از این رو بر مشترکات دو مبحث «توسعۀ پایدار محله‌ای» و «کیفیت محیط» تأکید می‌کند که دلیل این امر تدقیق بیشتر موضوع، با توجه به میزان رضایت یا نارضایتی ساکنان از کیفیت محله است. پژوهش حاضر از نظر نوع، جزء تحقیقات «کاربردی» و از نظر روش، «توصیفی- تحلیلی» با تأکید بر «نگرش سیستمی» است. شیوۀ جمع‌آوری اطلاعات میدانی بر پایۀ بررسی‌های عینی محقق و تکمیل پرسش‌نامه توسط ساکنان و مسئولان بوده است. مدل ارزیابی کیفیت محیط در قالب مؤلفه‌های «کالبدی- فضایی»، «اجتماعی- فرهنگی»، «اقتصادی»، «زیست‌محیطی» و «مدیریتی- حکمروایی» به صورت سلسله‌مراتبی و ایجاد درخت ارزش با رویکرد بالا به پایین ایجاد شده است. به منظور ارزیابی نهایی و تحلیل داده‌ها از فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای (ANP) بهره گرفته شده است. نتایج تحلیل نشان از آن دارد که محلۀ شهرک دانشگاه با امتیاز 305/0 دارای بالاترین کیفیت مطلوب نسبت به محله‌های دیگر و محلۀ تپه‌مالان با 057/0 امتیاز دارای پایین‌ترین مطلوبیت کیفیت است. از لحاظ تفاوت ابعاد کیفیتی در کل شهر، نتایج نشان می‌دهد که خوشۀ «زیست‌محیطی» با وزن 364/0 در اولویت اول و خوشۀ «اقتصادی» با وزن 058/0، خوشۀ «مدیریتی- حکمروایی» با وزن 041/0 با تفاوت آشکار در ردۀ پنجم و ششم قرار گرفته‌اند. در نهایت علاوه بر معرفی معیارهایی برای سنجش پایداری محله‌های مورد مطالعه، فرایندی در پیش‌روی تصمیم‌سازان و مدیران شهری قرار گرفته است که به‌واسطۀ آن می‌توانند به اولویت‌بندی اقدامات خود برای ارتقای کیفیت‌های محیطی منطبق بر فرایند توسعۀ پایدار بپردازند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| توسعۀ پایدار محله‌ای؛ سقز؛ کیفیت‌های محیطی؛ فرایند تحلیل شبکه‌ای (ANP)؛ محیط شهری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Review and Analysis Effective Components the Improvement of Environmental Quality by Techniques Analytic Network Process (Case Study: Saqez City) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Farzaneh Sasanpour1؛ Ali Movahed2؛ Ali Shamaee2؛ Soran Mostafavi Saheb3 | ||
| 1Assistant professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3M.A of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Geography, University of Kharazmi, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Cities and neighborhoods in Iran couldn’t adjust themselves to quick changes of the recent decades and have lost their quality in many aspects. due to poor planning and governance at the regional and urban design on physical function, rapid growth of large-scale migrations and inefficient policies and procedures in dealing with urban neighborhoods neglected urban neighborhoods as well as constructive role in promoting social identity, economic, physical of urban, neighborhoods problems are somehow unprecedented appearance . Vision of neighborhood sustainable development strengthened new approach of urban problems that return to concept that imagined neighborhoods as cells if urban living. Following, one of the approaches that emerged from increasing urbanization is environmental quality: as an approach that seeking “urban favorable living”. Present research based on share point of two topic: “neighborhood sustainable development” and “environment quality”. Because of deep study this research according residents satisfaction and non-satisfaction of residents’ neighborhood quality. Finally in edition of producing criteria to neighborhood sustainably assessment, proposed the process to the decision makers and managers to priorities action for improving environment quality consistent of sustainable development process. This paper intends to promote the environmental quality and people satisfaction of living in neighborhood by recognizing and prioritizing the main environmental quality factors which have effect on satisfaction of living in neighborhood. Neighborhoods of Saqez is decades was selected for this study. So, in this paper, the environmental quality of urban in Neighborhoods of Saqez City was evaluated from residents Perspective. In this regard, this study is to pursue the following objectives: -The evaluation of urban environmental quality of Saqez neighborhoods. -Identify the affecting factors on quality of urban environment in the neighborhood. Materials and methods According to the research objectives and components, the type of this research is practical and the methodology is descriptive- analytical. A survey of 6 neighborhoods in Saqez, according to the administrative division – is political. The sampling method was multi-stage: stage one was cluster sampling and in stage two, simple random sampling was used. First, based on the total population the number of samples was specified. Cronbach's alpha was used to obtain the reliability of the research instrument. The value of 0.86 for the tool suggests that this tool has very good reliability. To obtain validity of the questionnaire we used for factor analysis by KMO. KMO value of 0.75 for this tool indicates a good level of validity. Some of the information has been gathered from the Population Census of Housing, data from annals, organizations, and institutions concerned. For data analysis ANP model was used to evaluate the ability of neighborhoods of Saqez City. The statistical population was 38,749 people according to the 2011 census. Cochran's formula was used to determine sample size. The sample size was with 95% confidence for the 380 questionnaires. This number is collected as a percentage of the neighborhoods population. E-mail: soran.mostafavi@yahoo.com*Corresponding Author: Tel: 09188754094 Table 1. Specifications and sample size of neighborhoods elected area neighborhoods Number of households Population neighborhoods sample size area neighborhoods Number of households Population neighborhoods sample size 1 Bazar 1112 4178 41 4 koshtargah 1239 5367 53 2 Tape Malan 921 4011 39 5 Baharestan Pain 2533 11538 113 3 Shanaz 2102 9385 93 6 Shahrak Daneshgah 995 4270 41 total population 38749 Questionnaires total 380 Results and discussions Model of assessment of environmental quality based on special –physical, social- cultural, economic, environmental, management- governance components in Hierarchical methods. The Table 2 Priority components involved of assessment environmental quality in the vision of the citizens and city managers indicated. This two group most important issues lower environmental quality neighborhoods Saqez City in economic, management- governance know. Table 2. Prioritizing Clusters of assessment Environmental Quality neighborhoods Saqez City The inconsistency index is 0.0162. It is desirable to have a value of less than 0.1 0.3644 environmental 0.2007 special –physical (objective) 0.2004 special –physical(Subjective – Functional) 0.0939 social- cultural 0.0588 economic 0.0411 management- governance Based on the results obtained from the model Network Based, The final weight of the clusters show that cluster environmental with 0.364 Wight, and special –physical with 0.220 Wight have more deference according other components, and Economic cluster with 0.058, management- governance with 0.041, Have non- suitable situation with relative deference. Accordingly, by comparing results of clusters and nodes Priorities for solutions Favorable environment was found in the neighborhoods of the Saqez City. As shown in the table3: normal column, in fact Priority of each option based on the form Paired comparisons is displayed and most common method is to view the results. Ideal column values by dividing each of the numbers normal column upon largest number of columns is achieved: also value number of the selected option is always one. Weak column values directly from the super matrix are received. According to Table 3, Shahrak Daneshgah neighborhood are with0.305 Wight in first priority, Shanaz neighborhood with 0.297 Wight in second priority, And Bazar neighborhood with 0.143 Wight in third priority. Tape Malan neighborhood on the final priorities by rating the importance 0.057. It can be deduced that ANP method is more accurate and could be the basis for prioritization purposes. The results of this process with the results Intuitive insight Is coincident. According result, central neighborhood (Bazar, Shanaz, Koshtargah) than marginal neighborhoods (Tape Malan Baharestan Pain, Shahrak Daneshgah) exceptions Shahrak Daneshgah, have more suitable and environmental sustainably. According index Shahrak Daneshgah with Wight Ideals 1.000 is in best situation and high environmental quality than other neighborhoods and Tape Malan with Wight Ideals 0.187 mark is in lowest level and environmental quality. Table3. Results of the Analytic network process for assessments of environmental quality in urban neighborhood Saqez City Raw Normal Ideals Graphic Name 0.0085 0.3057 1.0000 Shahrak Daneshgah 0.0082 0.2970 0.9716 Shanaz 0.0039 0.1431 0.4681 Bazar 0.0032 0.1172 0.3835 Koshtargah 0.0022 0.0796 0.2606 Baharestan Pain 0.0015 0.0571 0.1870 Tape Malan Conclusions The results of the comparative analysis of each of the six dimensions of environmental quality in the neighborhoods studied Suggest that the Shahrak Daneshgah neighborhood 0.305 to earn points towards the points 0.057 Tape Malan. Tape Malan Neighborhood Priority action plan aimed at improving the quality of the environment in relation to the index are studied. On the other hand, environmental quality has direct relationship with satisfaction of living in neighborhoods. For prioritization of indicators، ANP quotient which shows the proportion of each factor on the environment quality was used. Then، by multiplying the ANP quotient by the proportion of each indicator in their factor، the impact of each indicator was recognized in the environment quality. In the next step, the arrangement of priority of indicators for promotion of environment quality by living in neighborhoods can be achieved. It can be said, Terms of priority areas planning that Tape Malan Neighborhood of the priority action plan with aim of improving environmental quality In relation to the index are studied. At the end، for promotion of the environmental qualities, some solutions was recommended. The main special –physical indicators that should be considered to promote the environmental qualities are including neighborhood that is well-connected with important parts of the city، aesthetic aspects of the neighborhood، mixed use، neighborhood center and sense of central location. The main social indicators are residents’ responsibility، social interaction and participation in public activities، and interaction with city managers. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| neighborhood sustainable development, Urban Environment, environmental qualities, Analytic Network Process (ANP), Saqez City | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
بهزادفر، م. حبیب، ف. فیروز‌آبادی، ا. فروزانگهر، ح. 1392. تبارشناسی هنجارهای کیفی طراحی فضاهای شهری با تأکید بر میزان پدیداری آن‌ها در عرصه‌های عمومی، نشریۀ مدیریت شهری، شمارۀ 32، صص 57- 80.
پارسی، ح. 1381. شناخت محتوای فضای شهری، نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا، شمارۀ 11، صص 41- 49.
پاکزاد، ج. 1388. مبانی نظری و فرایند طراحی شهری، چاپ سوم، انتشارات وزارت مسکن و شهرسازی، تهران.
تقوایی، ع. معروفی، س. 1389. ارزیابی نقش مساجد در ارتقای کیفیت محیط؛ مسجد امیر تهران، نشریۀ مدیریت شهری، شمارۀ 25، صص 219- 234.
حافظ‌نیا، م. 1391. مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، چاپ هجدهم، انتشارات سمت، تهران.
شریفیان‌پور، ن. فریادی، ش. 1393. امکان‌سنجی شاخص‌های کیفی در اصفهان، نشریۀۀ محیط‌شناسی، دورۀ 40، شمارۀ 1، صص 95- 106.
طبیبیان، م. فریادی، ش. 1380. ارزیابی کیفیت محیط‌زیست شهر تهران، نشریۀ محیط‌شناسی، شمارۀ 28، صص 1- 12.
کوکبی، ا. 1384. برنامه‌ریزی به منظور ارتقای کیفیت زندگی در مرکز شهرها (مطالعۀ موردی: بخش مرکزی شهر خرم‌آباد)، استاد راهنما: دکتر محمدرضا پورجعفر، پایان‌نامۀ کارشناسی ارشد شهرسازی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران.
گلکار، ک. 1379. طراحی شهری پایدار در شهرهای حاشیۀ کویر، نشریۀ هنرهای زیبا، شمارۀ 8.
گلکار، ک. 1380. مؤلفه‌های سازندۀ کیفیت در طراحی شهری، نشریۀ صفه، شمارۀ 32، صص 38- 65.
لنگ، ج. 1393. آفرینش نظریه‌های معماری، ترجمۀ عینی‌فرد، ع؛ چاپ هفتم، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
لینچ، ک. 1392. سیمای شهر، ترجمۀ مزینی، م؛ چاپ نهم، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
محمدی، ع. 1388. فرایندهای تحلیل شبکه‌ای، چاپ اول، انتشارات البرز فردانش، تهران.
مهندسین مشاور نقش پیرواش.1390. طرح تفصیلی شهر سقز.
Adriaanse, C. M .2007. Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS), J Housing Built Environ 22: 287- 304.
Campbell, S .1996. Green Cities, Growing Cities, Just Cities Urban Planning and the Contradictions of Sustainable Development, Journal of the American Planning Association, 296-312 (3(62.
Carmona, M .2003. Public places, urban spaces, Architectural press.
Ertay, T., Ruam, D., Tuzkaya, U.R .2006. Integrating Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy for the Facility Design in Manufacturing Systems, Information Sciences 176, PP. 237-262.
Johnson, D. L. Ambrose, S. H. Bassett, T. J. 1997. Meanings of environmental terms. Journal of Environmental Quality, 26, PP.581-589.
Kamruzzaman, M.A., Hossain, E.,Islam ,N., Sarwar,I .2007.Urban Environmental Qulality Mapping;A Perception Study On Chittagong Metropolitan City, Kathmandu university Journal Of Science, Engineering and Technology,1(5).
Lee, L.W., Kim, S.H .2001. Using Analytic Network Process and Goal Programming for Interdipendent Information System Project Selection, Computers and Operation Research, Volume 27, pp. 367-382.
Marans, R.W., Couper, M .2000. Measuring the quality of community life: a program for longitudinal and comparative international research, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, vol. 2. Singapore.
Pacione, M .2005. Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing-a social geographical perspective; Landscape and Urban Planning 65, pp: 18-30.
Seifollahi, M., Sh., Faryadi. 2011. Evaluating the Quality of Tehran’s Urban Environment Based on
Sustainability Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, PP: 545-554.
Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer K., Marsman, G., Hollander, A .2003. Urban environmental quality and human well-being towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts: A literature study; J. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 65, pp: 5-18.
Van poll, R .1997. The perceived quality of urban residential, PhD- thesis, center for energy and environmental studies (IVEM) university of Groningen (RUG), Netherland. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,264 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,580 |
||