پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 163 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,762 |
| تعداد مقالات | 72,833 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 131,770,406 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 103,494,617 |
A Data-Driven Model for Ranking Airlines Using Multicriteria Decision-making and Sentiment Analysis | ||
| Industrial Management Journal | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 4، 2024، صفحه 560-596 اصل مقاله (647.59 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/imj.2024.373514.1008133 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Fateme Fazeli1؛ Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan* 2؛ Jalil Heidary Dahooie3 | ||
| 1MSc. Student, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Prof., Department of Socio-economic Systems, Faculty of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Prof., Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Industrial Management and Technology, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Objective Analyzing customer feedback from airline websites is more effective than traditional questionnaire-based methods, as these websites provide highly accurate and comprehensive information. Using big data technology, these websites collect and analyze millions of passenger reviews, offering more accurate information about customer experiences. Online reviews, as an open platform, provide the opportunity for employers to receive criticisms and suggestions, and due to their high volume and widespread dissemination, they can serve as a valuable source for analyzing customer sentiments and needs. Therefore, this study aims to propose a data-driven framework for ranking airlines, combining Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods with Sentiment Analysis (SA) at the aspect level. The main objective of this research is to evaluate the quality of airline services and rank them based on the reviews recorded on the SKYTRAX website from the users' sentiments hidden in their reviews. Methods The proposed framework consists of three stages: Stage (1): After collecting the data and preprocessing the text, airline features were extracted using the High Attribute Clustering (HAC) algorithm. Stage (2): Sentiment orientation in each airline was identified to calculate the performance scores for each airline. Stage (3): Airlines were ranked using the TOPSIS method based on intuitive fuzzy numbers, considering the scores obtained in the second stage. Intuitive Fuzzy Sets (IFS) were used to represent effective customer opinions, including hesitant phrases in the decision matrix. Also, the criteria weights were determined through the entropy method. Results The performance of 10 airlines was analyzed, and ranked accordingly. The results show that for economy class airlines, with a weight of 0.17, features such as customer service, legroom, flight delays, and security inspection, each with a weight of 0.11, are equally important to passengers as other features. According to the results, Middle East Airlines demonstrates the highest performance among the ten airlines (Saudi Arabian Airlines, Kuwait Airways, Oman Air, Iran Air, Egyptair, Royal Jordanian Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Pegasus Airlines, flydubai, and Air Arabia) i.e. it has the closest distance to the positive ideal solution of the fuzzy intuitive set and the farthest distance from the negative ideal solution of the fuzzy intuitive set. While Pegasus Airlines has the closest distance to the negative ideal solution and the farthest distance from the positive ideal solution, its performance is the lowest among the four airlines. Conclusion This research greatly assists Middle Eastern airlines in seeking areas for improvement and in comparing their performance with their competitors to achieve a better competitive advantage in the market. The data from this research can be used to create a recommendation system for travelers helping them choose airlines that best align with their expectations, preferences, and travel goals. This can take into account factors such as budget, destination, and flight class, which can help airline managers better understand and meet customer needs. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Intuitive fuzzy sets؛ Multi-criteria decision making؛ Online reviews؛ Sentiment analysis | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
محتشمی، ملیکا؛ حسین‌زاده کاشان، علی و حیدری دهوئی، جلیل (1401). تبیین الگوی تصمیم‌گیری داده‌محور برای شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر رضایت معامله‌گران صرافی‌های برخط با استفاده ازنقشه شناختی فازی (مورد مطالعه: گوگل پلی و اپ استور(. فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، 80، 157-180.
References Agrawal, A.K., Jagannathan, M. & Delhi, V.S.K. (2021). Control Focus in Standard Forms: An Assessment through Text Mining and NLP. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000441. Antons, D., Grünwald, E., Cichy, P. & Salge, T. O. (2020). The application of text mining methods in innovation research: current state, evolution patterns, and development priorities. R&D Management, 50(3), 329-351. Atanassov, K.T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets., Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3. Bakır, M., Akan, Ş. & Durmaz, E. (2019). Exploring Service Quality of Low-Cost Airlines in Europe: an Integrated MCDM Approach., Economics and Business Review, 5(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.2.6. Ban, H. J., Kim, H. S. (2019). Understanding customer experience and satisfaction through airline passengers. online review. Sustainability, 11(15), 4066. Çalı, S. & Balaman, Ş.Y. (2019). Improved decisions for marketing, supply and purchasing: Mining big data through an integration of sentiment analysis and intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria assessment., Computers and Industrial Engineering, 129, 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.051. Chow, C.K.W. (2014). Customer satisfaction and service quality in the Chinese airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 35, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman. 2013.11.013. Eirinaki, M., Pisal, S. & Singh, J. (2012). Feature-based opinion mining and ranking., Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 78(4), 1175–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss. 2011.10.007. Farzadnia, S. & Vanani, I.R. (2022). Identification of opinion trends using sentiment analysis of airlines passengers' reviews. Journal of Air Transport Management, 103, 102232. Greer, C.R. & Lei, D. (2012). Collaborative Innovation with Customers: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00310.x. Gupta, H. (2018). Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.06.001. Hashemkhani Zolfani, S. & Derakhti, A. (2020). Synergies of text mining and multiple attribute decision making: a criteria selection and weighting system in a prospective MADM outline. Symmetry, 12(5), 868. Hassani, H., Beneki, C., Unger, S., Mazinani, M. T. & Yeganegi, M. R. (2020). Text mining in big data analytics. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(1), 1. Heidary Dahooie, J. Raafat, R., Qorbani, A. R. & Daim, T. (2021). An intuitionistic fuzzy data-driven product ranking model using sentiment analysis and multi-criteria decision-making. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121158 Heidary Dahooie, J., Husseinzadeh Kashan, A., Shoaei Naeini, Z., Vanaki, A. S., Zavadskas, E. K. & Turskis, Z. (2022). A hybrid multi-criteria-decision-making aggregation method and geographic information system for selecting optimal solar power plants in Iran. Energies, 15(8), 2801. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15082801 Hu, J., Zhang, X., Yang, Y., Liu, Y. & Chen, X. (2020). New doctors ranking system based on VIKOR method. International Transactions in Operational Research, 27(2), 1236-1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12569 Hung, C. C. & Chen, L. H. (2010). A multiple criteria group decision making model with entropy weight in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Intelligent automation and computer engineering, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3517-2_2 Husain, S., Ahmad, Y. & Alam, M. A. (2012). A study on the role of intuitionistic fuzzy set in decision making problems. International journal of computer applications, 48(0975-888), 35-41. Hussain, R., Al Nasser, A. & Hussain, Y.K. (2015) Service quality and customer satisfaction of a UAE-based airline: An empirical investigation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2014.10.001. Kaya, T. & Öztürk, Z. K. (2020). Feature analysis for multi-criteria rating values of airline companies. Mühendislik Bilimleri ve Tasarım Dergisi, 8(2), 333-344. Kumar, G. & Parimala, N. (2020). An Integration of Sentiment Analysis and MCDM Approach for Smartphone Recommendation, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 19(4), 1037–1063. https://doi.org/10.1142/S021962202050025X. Li, Y., Zhang, Y. & Xu, Z. (2020). A Decision-Making Model Under Probabilistic Linguistic Circumstances with Unknown Criteria Weights for Online Customer Reviews, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 22, 777–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-020-00812-1. Liang, R. & Wang, J. Q. (2019). A Linguistic Intuitionistic Cloud Decision Support Model with Sentiment Analysis for Product Selection in E-commerce, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21, 963–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-019-00606-0. Liang, X., Liu, P. & Wang, Z. (2019). Hotel selection utilizing online reviews: A novel decision support model based on sentiment analysis and DL-VIKOR method, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(6), 1139–1161. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede. 2019.10766. Liu, P. & Teng, F. (2019). Probabilistic linguistic TODIM method for selecting products through online product reviews, Information Sciences, 485, 441–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.022. Mohtashamimaali, M., Hoseinzade Kashan, A. & Heidary, J. (2023). The data-driven decision-making model to identify the factors affecting the satisfaction of traders of online exchanges: A study of Google Play and Apple Store. Iranian journal of management sciences, 17(68), 157-180. (in Persian) Nosrati Malekjahan, A., Husseinzadeh Kashan, A. & Sajadi, SM. (2024). A novel sequential risk assessment model for analyzing commercial aviation accidents: Soft computing perspective, Risk Analysis. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14486. Oum, T.H., Yu, C. &Fu, X. (2003). A comparative analysis of productivity performance of the world’s major airports: Summary report of the ATRS global airport benchmarking research report – 2002. Journal of Air Transport Management, 9(5), 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6997(03)00037-1. Ravi, K. & Ravi, V. (2015). A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications, Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015. Sahoo, S. K. & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A comprehensive review of multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) Methods: advancements, applications, and future directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25-48. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. Sharma, H., Tandon, A., Kapur, P. K. & Aggarwal, A. G. (2019). Ranking hotels using aspect ratings based sentiment classification and interval-valued neutrosophic TOPSIS. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 10(5), 973-983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00827-4 Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2022). The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review. Applied Soft Computing, 126, 109238. Taherdoost, H. & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. Vanani, I. R. & Majidian, S. (2020). Meta-Heuristic Algorithms: A Concentration on the Applications in Text Mining. In Big Data, IoT, and Machine Learning (pp. 113-132). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429322990-6 Vlachos, I.K. & Sergiadis, G.D. (2007). Intuitionistic fuzzy information - Applications to pattern recognition, Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2006.07.004. Wan, Y. & Gao, Q. (2016). An Ensemble Sentiment Classification System of Twitter Data for Airline Services Analysis, in Proceedings - 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, ICDMW 2015, 1318–1325. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.7. Wang, L., Wang, X. K., Peng, J. J. & Wang, J. Q. (2020). The differences in hotel selection among various types of travellers: A comparative analysis with a useful bounded rationality behavioural decision support model. Tourism management, 76, 103961. Wright, K.B. (2005) Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x. Wu, C. & Zhang, D. (2019). Ranking products with IF-based sentiment word framework and TODIM method, Kybernetes, 48(5), 990–1010. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2018-0029. Yang, Z., Xiong, G., Cao, Z., Li, Y. & Huang, L. (2019). A Decision Method for Online Purchases Considering Dynamic Information Preference Based on Sentiment Orientation Classification and Discrete DIFWA Operators, IEEE Access, 7, 77008–77026. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921403. Yang, Z., Ouyang, T., Fu, X. & Peng, X. (2020). A decision-making algorithm for online shopping using deep-learning–based opinion pairs mining and q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction Heronian mean operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 35(5), 783–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22225. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X. Zeleny, M. (1976) Attribute-Dynamic Attitude Model (Adam). Management Science, 23(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.23.1.12. Zhang, C., Tian, Y. X., Fan, L. W. & Li, Y. H. (2020). Customized ranking for products through online reviews: a method incorporating prospect theory with an improved VIKOR, Applied Intelligence, 50(6), 1725–1744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01577-3. Zhang, D., Li, Y. & Wu, C. (2020). An extended TODIM method to rank products with online reviews under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(2), 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2018.1545519. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 356 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 267 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب