بررسی اثر هم‌زمانی رفتاری بر انتخاب جبران در تصمیم‌گیری ترتیبی نوجوانان و جوانان

References

Abbaspour, Z., & Ghanbari, Z. (2019). The study of the direct and indirect effect of sexism on marital satisfaction mediation with perceived aquity. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 9(4), 127-140. https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2019.71006 (In Persian)

Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2010). Fairness and the development of inequality acceptance. Science, 328(5982), 1176–1178. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187300

Arora, P., Logg, J., & Larrick, R. (2016). Acting for the greater good: Identification with group determines choices in sequential contribution dilemmas. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 29(5), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1892

Baranowski-Pinto, G., Profeta, V. L. S., Newson, M., Whitehouse, H., & Xygalatas, D. (2022). Being in a crowd bonds people via physiological synchrony. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04548-2

Carnes, N. C., & Lickel, B. (2018). Moral binding: How emotions, convictions, and identity fusion shape progroup behavior. Self and Identity, 17(5), 549-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2018.1451362

Chernyak, N., Leimgruber, K. L., Dunham, Y. C., Hu, J., & Blake, P. R. (2019). Paying back people who harmed us but not people who helped us: Direct negative reciprocity precedes direct positive reciprocity in early development. Psychological Science, 30(9), 1273–1286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619854975

Chvaja, R., Kundt, R., & Lang, M. (2020). The effects of synchrony on group moral hypocrisy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 3475. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.544589

Corbit, J., Dockrill, M., Hartlin, S., & Moore, C. (2022). Intuitive cooperators: Time pressure increases children's collective decisions in a modified public goods game. Developmental Science, 26(4), e13344. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13344

Cross, L., Atherton, G., Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2017). Imagined steps: Mental simulation of coordinated rhythmic movements effects on pro-sociality. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 01798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01798

Cross, L., Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2016). How moving together brings us together: When coordinated rhythmic movement affects cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 01983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01983

Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 111–116. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/002075900399402

Englander, Z. A., Haidt, J., & Morris, J. P. (2012). Neural basis of moral elevation demonstrated through inter-subject synchronization of cortical activity during free-viewing. PloS One, 7(6), e39384. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039384

Erev, I., & Rapoport, A. (1990). Provision of step-level public goods: The sequential contribution mechanism. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34(3), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002790034003002

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785–791. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02043

Fisher, S. A., & Mandel, D. R. (2021). Risky-choice framing and rational decision-making. Philosophy Compass, 16(8), e12763. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12763

Fujiwara, K., Nomura, K., & Eto, M. (2023). Antiphase synchrony increases perceived entitativity and uniqueness: A joint hand-clapping task. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1069660. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1069660

Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2010). Sequential vs. simultaneous contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence. Journal of Public Economics, 94(7–8), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.03.002

Gutiérrez-Roig, M., Gracia-Lázaro, C., Perelló, J., Moreno, Y., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Transition from reciprocal cooperation to persistent behaviour in social dilemmas at the end of adolescence. Nature Communications, 5, 4362. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5362

Guzmán, A., Villegas-Palacio, C., & Wollbrant, C. (2013). Social information and charitable giving: An artefactual field experiment with young children and adolescents (Working Paper No. 564). University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/32625

Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., & Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336922

Harbaugh, W. T., & Krause, K. (2000). Children’s contributions in public good experiments: The development of altruistic and free-riding behaviors. Economic Inquiry, 38(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00006.x

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (1st ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Link

Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015

Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1

Launay, J., Tarr, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large‐scale human social bonding. Ethology, 122(10), 779–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12528

Majdabadi Farahani, Z., Shahraray, M., Davarpanah, F., & Javadi, S. Y. (2014). School context, identity and problem behaviors in early adolescence. Journal of Applied Psychological Research. 5(3), 173-190. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1374055/ (In Persian)

Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. A. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.009

Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In T. Postmes & J. Jetten (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 215–236). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211946.n12

Rapoport, A. (1985). Provision of public goods and the MCS experimental paradigm. American Political Science Review, 79(1), 148-155. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956124

Rapoport, A. (1987). Research paradigms and expected utility models for the provision of step-level public goods. Psychological Review, 94(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.74

Reinero, D. A., Dikker, S., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2021). Inter-brain synchrony in teams predicts collective performance. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa135

Rennung, M., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). Prosocial consequences of interpersonal synchrony: A meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000252

Schunk, D., & Zipperle, I. (2023). Fairness and inequality acceptance in children and adolescents: A survey on behaviors in economic experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 37(5), 1715-1742. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12553

Shaw, A., Barakzai, A., & Keysar, B. (2019). When and why people evaluate negative reciprocity as more fair than positive reciprocity. Cognitive Science, 43(8), e12773. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/cogs.12773

Van de Kragt, A. J., Orbell, J. M., & Dawes, R. M. (1983). The minimal contributing set as a solution to public goods problems. American Political Science Review, 77(1), 112-122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956014

Wan, Y., & Zhu, L. (2022). Understanding the effects of rhythmic coordination on children's prosocial behaviours. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2282. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2282

Wiltermuth, S. S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.x

Zlobina, A., & Dávila, M. C. (2022). Preventive behaviours during the pandemic: The role of collective rituals, emotional synchrony, social norms and moral obligation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(4), 1332-1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12539