لغو تصویب معاهده منع جامع آزمایش‌های هسته‌ای توسط روسیه و پیامدهای آن

References

1. Asada, M. (2002). “CTBT: Legal Questions Arising from Its Non-Entry-into-Force,” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 7, 1: 85-122. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/i26294324 (Accessed 9 December 2023).    
2. Aust, A. (2013). Modern Treaty Law and Practice. London: Cambridge University Press, 3^rd
3. Carlson, J. (2019). “Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Possible Measures to Bring the Provisions of the Treaty into force and Strengthen the Norm against Nuclear Testing,” vcdnp.org. Available at: https://vcdnp.org/ wp-content/uploads/2019/04/CTBT-John-Carlson-Paper.pdf (Accessed 2 May 2024).
4. Conference on Facilitating the Entry into Force of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty,” (2023). CTBT-Art.XIV/2023/INF.1, ctbto.org. Available at: https://www.ctbto.org/sites/default/files/202308/CTBT_ Art_XIV-08/CTBT_Art_XIV_2023_INF_1.pdf (Accessed 9 December 2023).
5. Crnic-Grotic, V. (1997). “Object and Purpose of Treaties in Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties,” in KO Swan Sik, et al., eds. Asian Yearbook of International Law 7: 141-174. Available at: https:// brill.com/edcollbook-oa/title/10786?language=en (Accessed 2 May 2024).
6. CTBT (Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty). (1996). Available at: https://www.ctbto.org/sites/default/files/2023- 10/2022_treaty_booklet_E. pdf.
7. (2023). “Status of Signature and Ratification” (ctbto.org) Available at: https://www.ctbto.org/our-mission/states-signatories (Accessed 9 December 2023).
8. Dörr, O; Schmalenbach, K. (2018). Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. Oxford & London: Oxford University Press.
9. Gragl, P; Fitzmaurice, M. (2019). “The Legal Character of Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 68, 3: 699-717, .
10. (2023). “What Is the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and why Russia Revoked has its Ratification?” icanw.org. Available at: https://www.icanw. org/what_is_the_nuclear_test_ban_treaty_and_why_is_russia_talking_ about_leaving (Accessed 2 May 2024).
11. International Court of Justice. (1986). “Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua, Nicaragua v. United States of America”, Judgement of 27 JUNE 1986, I. C.J. Reports 1986, p. 135, para. 269. Available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf (Accessed 9 December 2023).
12. International Court of Justice. (1996). “Advisory Opinion on Legality or Illegality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons,” ICJ Reports, p.239.para 21. Available at: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/ case-related/ 95/095-19960708-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf (Accessed 9 December 2023).
13. Jervis, R. (1982). "Security Regimes," International Organization 36, 2: 357-378, . Available at: https://www. jstor.org/stable/i346124 (Accessed 9 December 2023).
14. Koplow, D. (2023). “Russia, the CTBT, and International Law” Arms Control Today. Available at: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2023-11/features/russia-ctbt-international-law. (Accessed 9 December 2023).
15. Matsick, R. (2019). Shaking the Rust off the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty Ratification Process,” Journal of National Security Law & Policy 10, 2: 405-428. Available at: https://jnslp.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/ 04/Shaking_the_Rust_Off_the_Comprehensive_Nuclear_Test_Ban_Treaty_Ratification_Process.pdf (Accessed 2 May 2024).
16. PCIJ (Permanent Court of International Justice). (1927). “The S.S. Lotus (France v. Turkey)”, P.C.I.J., Series A, No. I0, pp. 18 and 19. Available at: https://www. worldcourts.com/pcij/eng/decisions/1927.09.07_lotus.htm.
17. Rajabi, A; Tarazi, N. (2015). “Ejrā-ye movaghat-e moāhedeh-ye man-e jāmeʿ-e āzmāyeshā-ye hasteh’ī, Provisional Application of CTBT and its Effects on Iran,” Journal of Researches Energy Law Studies 1, 2: 185-216. Available at: https://jrels.ut.ac.ir/article_57210.html?lang=en. [In Persian]
18. Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, 2010: Final Document,” (2010). Reachingcriticalwill.org. Available at: https://www.reachingcriticalwill. org/disarmament-fora/npt/ 2010 (Accessed 9 December 2023).
19. Rodriguez La Barrera, L (2024). “From Treaty to Tension: Russia's CTBT Withdrawal Explored,” (2024, January 13) Global Affairs. Available at: https://www.unav.edu/web/global-affairs/from-treaty-to-tension-russias-ctbt-withdrawal-explored (Accessed 2 May 2024).
20. Russia Withdraws Ratification of Nuclear Test   Ban Treaty,” (2023). Arms Control Association. Available at: https://www.armscontrol.org/ blog/blog/2023-11/nuclear-disarmament-monitor (Accessed 2 May 2024).
21. Russian Federation: Withdrawal of the Instrument of Ratification, C.N.463. (2023). TREATIES-XXVI.4 (Depositary Notification),” treaties.un.org. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/ CN/2023/CN.463.2023-Eng.pdf (Accessed 9 December 2023).
22. Saed, N. (2005). Hoghoogh-e bein’ol mellal and nezām-e adam-e gostāresh-e selāh’hā-ye hasteh’ī, International Law and the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Regime, Tehran: Shahre-Danesh. [In Persian]
23. Slipchenko, V. (2010). “Russia, Ratification and the CTBT’s Entry into Force,” Occasional Papers 3, vertic.org. Available at: https://www.vertic.org/media/assets/Publications/CTBT%20OP3.pdf (Accessed 9 December 2023).
24. Smith, D; Bunn. (2023). “Russia’s Potential Withdrawal from the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Underlines the Urgent Arms Control problem,” sipri.org. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/ commentary/expert-comment/2023/russias-potential-withdrawal-comprehensive-nuclear-test-ban-treaty-underlines-urgent-arms-control (Accessed 2 May 2024).
25. Summary of Practice of the Secretary-General as Depositary of Multilateral Treaties,” UN Doc ST/LEG/7/Rev.1, para 158, and Multilateral Treaties Deposited with the Secretary-General. (1994). Available at: https://treaties. un.org/doc/source/publications/practice/ pdf (Accessed 2 May 2024).