![سامانه نشر مجلات علمی دانشگاه تهران](./data/logo.png)
تعداد نشریات | 162 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,578 |
تعداد مقالات | 71,072 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 125,698,890 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 98,931,686 |
بررسی کارایی روشهای دادهکاوی در پیشبینی تبخیر - تعرق مرجع روزانه (مطالعه موردی: ایستگاههای نوار ساحلی جنوب ایران) | ||
مجله اکوهیدرولوژی | ||
دوره 11، شماره 2، تیر 1403، صفحه 271-286 اصل مقاله (1.19 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ije.2024.375755.1816 | ||
نویسنده | ||
حلیمه پیری* | ||
دانشیار، گروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده آب و خاک، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
روابط غیرخطی، عدم قطعیت ذاتی و نیاز به اطلاعات اقلیمی فراوان در براورد تبخیر-تعرق باعث شده است پژوهشگران در دهههای اخیر از روشهای دادهکاوی برای براورد تبخیر-تعرق استفاده نمایند. هدف از این تحقیق بررسی کارایی روشهای دادهکاوی ماشین بردار پشتیبان، درخت تصمیم، جنگل تصادفی و رگرسیون فرایند گاوسی در پیشبینی تبخیر-تعرق مرجع روزانه ایستگاههای نوار ساحلی جنوب کشور میباشد. برای انجام کار با استفاده از دادههای اقلیمی 20 ساله (1400-1380) تبخیر-تعرق مرجع روزانه روش فائو-پنمن- مانتیث محاسبه شد. سپس با استفاده از این دادهها بهعنوان دادههای خروجی، 6 سناریو ترکیبی بر اساس همبستگی بین متغیرهای هواشناسی و تبخیر-تعرق مرجع به روشهای دادهکاوری مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. نتایج بررسیها نشان داد نشان داد هر چهار روش دادهکاوی در مناطق مورد مطالعه به خوبی توانستهاند مقادیر تبخیر-تعرق مرجع را براورد کنند. در هر چهار ایستگاه، روش رگرسیون فرایند گاوسی با داشتن بالاترین مقدار R2 و کمترین مقادیر RMSE و MAE براورد بهتری از مقادیر تبخیر-تعرق مرجع داشتند و روشهای جنگل تصادفی، درخت تصمیم و ماشین بردار پشتیبان بهترتیب در رتبههای بعدی قرار گرفتند. از بین الگوهای مورد بررسی در چابهار الگوی 6، در بندرعباس و بوشهر الگوی 4 و در آبادان الگوی 3 بهترین براورد را داشتند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
جنگل تصادفی؛ درخت تصمیم؛ رگرسیون فرایند گاوسی؛ ماشین بردار پشتیبان؛ مولفه های اصلی | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Maeda EE, Wiberg DA, Pellikka PKE. Estimating refrence evapotranspiration using sensing empirical models in a region with limited data availability in Kenya. Applied Geography. 2010; 31(2011): 251-258. [2] Bos MG, Kselik RG, Allen k, Molden DJ. Water Requirements for Irrigation and the Environment. Springer,
[3] Panahi S, Rezvanizadeh F, Samadianfard S. Evaluation and comparison of experimental methods for estimation of reference evapotranspiration in Tabriz station. The first international conference on Iran's natural hazards and environmental crises, solutions and challenges, 2016; 9 p. [Persian] [4] Alizadeh A. Irrigation System Design. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2002. 450pp. [Persian]. [5] Chiew FHS, Kamaladassa NN, Malano HM, MacMahon, TA. 1995. Penman- Monteith, FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class-A pan data in Australia. Agricultural Water management, 28: 9- 21. [6] Hashemi E, Ahmadpari H, Kohneh K. Comparison of different methods of estimating potential evapotranspiration with FAO Penman-Monteith method (Case study: Sepidan region). Nivar. 2017; 41, 13-22. DOI: 10.30467/nivar.2017.51886. [In Persian] [7] Samadianfard S, Panahi S. Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration using Data Mining Methods of Support Vector Regression and M5 Model Tree. Journal of Watershed Management Research. 2018; 18(10): 157-167. [Persian]. [8] Wang Z, Xie P, Lai C, Chen X, Wu X, Zeng Z, Li J. Spatiotemporal variability of reference evapotranspiration and contributing climatic factors in China during 1961– 2013. Journal of Hydrology. 2017; 544: 97-108. [9] Ansari Ghojghar M, Pourgholam-Amiji M, Bazrafshan J, Liaghat A, Araghinejad S. Performance Comparison of Statistical, Fuzzy and Perceptron Neural Network Models in Forecasting Dust Storms in Critical Regions in Iran. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research. 2020; 51(8): 2051-2063. [Persian]. [10] Pai P, Hong WCA. Recurrent support vector regression model in rainfall forecasting. Hydrological Process. 2007; 21: 819-827. [11] Kihani A, Akhundali A, Fathian H. Uncertainty analysis of parameters of SVM model for estimation of suspended sediment load and bed in Sierra Karaj station with Monte Carlo simulation method. Iran Water and Soil Research (Agricultural Sciences of Iran). 2021; 52(1): 195-212. [Persian]. [12] Breiman L. Application and analysis of random forests and machine learning. Journal of Water Management. 2001; 15(1): 5-32 [13] Pal M. M5 model tree for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2006; 27(4): 825- 831. [14] Javidan S, Sattari MT, Mehrabi A. Comparative analysis of estimating monthly reference evapotranspiration using Kernel and Tree-Based data mining models versus empirical methods. Environment and Water Engineering. 2022; 8(4): 908-922. [15] Piri H, Mobaraki M. Investigating the effectiveness of transfer functions based on machine learning methods for predicting reference evaporation and transpiration (Case study: Bushehr). Eco Hydrology. 2023; 10(3): 421-434. [Persian]. [16] Seifzadeh KH, Zare Haghi D, Samadianfard S, Neyshabouri MR, Mikaeili F. Estimation of daily evaporation from class A pan using five data mining methods (case study: tabriz synoptic station. Water and Soil Science. 2023; 33(4): 167-184. [Persian]. [17] Sattari MT, Nahrin F, Azimi V. Prediction of daily reference evapotranspiration using artificial neural network model and M5 tree model (Case study: Bonab Station). Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 2013; 1(7): 104-113. [Persian]. [18] Siaser H, Dindarlou A. Estimation of daily reference evaporation and transpiration using deep learning model, random forest and decision tree (case study: Sistan plain). Iranian Water Research, 2019; 14(1): 108-99. [19] Izadyar M, Samadianfard S, Majnooni Heris A, Sadraddini AA. Estimating Pan Evaporation in Three Different Climates using Data-Driven. Water and Soil Science, 2024; 34(1): 113-132. [Persian]. [20] Integrated Management Plan for Iran's Coastal Areas (Process and Achievements), Deputy Director of Port Development and Equipment, General Directorate of Coastal and Port Engineering. 2013. [Persian]. [21] Tabari H., Grismer M. E., Trajkovic S. Comparative analysis of 31 reference evapotranspiration methods under humid conditions. Irrigation Science. 2013; 31: 107-117. [22] Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration. Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1998; 300 pp. [23] Farshadfar A. Multivariate statistical principles and methods. Publications of Razi University of Kermanshah.
[24] Azimi A, Rangzan K, Kaboulizade M, Khoramian M. Estimating of evapotranspiration using remote sensing, artificial neural network and comparison with the experimental method (Penman-Monteith-FAO). Journal of RS and GIS for Natural Resources. (2016); 6(4): 61-75. [25] Burges C.J. A. tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data mining and knowledge discovery. 1998; 2: 121-167 [26] Norouzi Ghoshbalagh H, Nadiri A, Asghari Moghaddam A, Qarahkhani M. Comparison of the efficiency of artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic and random forest in estimating the aquifer transfer capability of Malekan plain. Echo Hydrology. 2018; 5(3): 739-751. [Persian] [27] Nosrati Karizak F, Movahedi Naeni SA. Hezarjaribi A. Using Artificial Neural Networks to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity from easily available soil properties. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production. 2012; 2(1): 95-110. [Persian]. [28] Wosten JHM, Pachepsky Ya A, Rawls WJ. Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology. 2001; 251: 123–150. [29] Debeljak M, Džeroski S. Decision Trees in Ecological Modelling. In: Jopp, F., Reuter, H., Breckling, B. (eds), Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics. 2011; (197-209). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [30] Wang Y, Witten I.H. Inducing model trees for continuous classes. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Conference on Machine Learning. 1997; 128-137. [31] Breiman L. Application and analysis of random forests and machine learning. Journal of Water Management. 2001; 15(1): 5-32 [32] Siasar H, Honar T. The application of support vector machine, chaid and random forest models in estimating daily reference transpiration evaporation in the north of Sistan and Baluchistan province. Iran Irrigation and Drainage. 2018; 2(13): 378-388. [Persian]. [33] Joudy AR, Sattari MT. Estimation of scour depth of piers in hydraulic structures using Gaussian process regression. Irrigation and Drainage Structures Engineering Research 2015; 16(65): 19-36. [Persian]. [34] Kuss M. Gaussian process models for robust regression, classification, and reinforcement learning. Ph. D. dissertation, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany. 2006. [35] Saghebian M, Roushangar K. Prediction of total and bedform roughness coefficient in alluvial channels based on experimental data via Gaussian process regression method. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 2019; 2: 437-499. [Persian]. [36] Mouneskhah V., Samadian Fard S., Mouneskhah M.H. Evaluation of Data Mining Methods and Experimental Temperature-Radiation-Based Models in Estimating Evaporation from the Pan (Case Study: East of Urmia Lake). Iran water and soil research. 2020; 51(9): 2348-2337. [37] Seifzadeh KH, Zare Haghi D, Samadianfard S, Neyshabouri MR, Mikaeili F. Estimation of Daily Evaporation from Class A Pan Using Five Data Mining Methods (Case Study: Tabriz Synoptic Station). Water and Soil Science. 2023; 3(4): 167-184. [38] Bidabadi M, Babazadeh H, Shiri J, Saremi A. Estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) using artifcial intelligence model in an arid climate with external data. Applied Water Science. 2024; 14: 3. [39] Soltani A, Mirltifi M, Dehghani Sanij H. Estimation of reference evapotranspiration using limited meteorological data in different climatic journal. Water and soil. 2013; 26(1): 139-149 [40] Mousavi Baighi M. Erfanian M, Sarmad M. Using minimum meteorological data to estimate reference plant evapotranspiration and provide correction coefficient (case study: Razavi Khorasan province). Water and Soil Journal. 2018; 23(1): 91-99 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 131 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 112 |