
تعداد نشریات | 162 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,625 |
تعداد مقالات | 71,559 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 126,938,926 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 99,978,333 |
تبیین ایده در دستنگارههای هنری زنان براساس باور معرفتشناختی علمی با نقش میانجی بار شناختی در آموزش طراحی معماری | ||
زن در فرهنگ و هنر | ||
دوره 16، شماره 1، خرداد 1403، صفحه 61-84 اصل مقاله (1.33 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jwica.2024.362411.1943 | ||
نویسنده | ||
فرهاد کاروان* | ||
استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، واحد همدان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، همدان، ایران | ||
چکیده | ||
روند طراحی در معماری، یکی از برنامههای درسی رشتۀ معماری است که در سطوح متفاوت آموزشی تدریس میشود. برای برنامهریزی مطلوب آموزشی، شناسایی متغیرهای مرتبط با آن ضروری است. از جمله متغیرهای مرتبط با روند و شیوۀ طراحی، باورهای معرفتشناسی و بار شناختی فراگیران است. هدف پژوهش حاضر، بررسی رابطۀ باورهای معرفتشناختی علمی و بار شناختی با دستنگاره در روند طراحی دانشجویان معماری است. این پژوهش با رویکرد ترکیبی کمی (روش توصیفی-همبستگی) و کیفی (تحلیل نمونۀ دستنگارههای دانشجویان) انجام گرفت. جامعۀ آماری شامل کلیۀ دانشجویان دختر رشتۀ معماری در دانشگاههای همدان است. نمونۀ مورد نظر به تعداد 120 نفر به شیوۀ دردسترس انتخاب شدند. از پرسشنامههای باور معرفتشناسی علمی، بار شناختی و مقیاس ارزیابی ایده در دستنگارۀ طراحی استفاده شد. دادههای پژوهش با روش آمارتوصیفی (میانگین، انحراف معیار و آمارههای کجی و کشیدگی توزیع متغیرها) و آمار استنباطی (همبستگی پیرسون و تحلیل مسیر با محاسبۀ پیش فرضهای آن) تحلیل شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان میدهد بین باورهای معرفتشناسی علمی و بار شناختی با ایده در روند طراحی دانشجویان معماری رابطه وجود دارد و چارچوبی را برای تشخیص و تشریح روابط نظری بین مؤلفههای باورهای معرفتشناختی علمی، بار شناختی و شاخصههای دستنگارهها فراهم کرده است. درنتیجه باور معرفتشناختی علمی و تعادل شناختی یا بار شناختی مطلوب، تبیین و پیشبینیکنندۀ خوبی برای سنجش ایده در دستنگارۀ دانشجو است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ایده؛ بار شناختی؛ باور معرفتشناسی علمی؛ زن؛ دستنگارۀ هنری | ||
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
مراجع | ||
Alipour, L. (2019). Improving precedent-based architectural design ideation with action research methodology. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 24(3), 47-60. (In Persian) Amini, S., Falamaki, M. M., & Keramati, G. (2019). Typology of imagination in the process of architectural design. The Monthly Scientific J. of Bagh-e Nazar, 16(72), 53-64. (In Persian) Amir Timuri, M. H., & Zare, M. (2014). Cognitive load and multimedia education. Tehran: Allameh Tabatabai University. (In Persian) Biyabangard, I. (2011). Educational psychology. Tehran: Virayesh. (In Persian) Bolkhari, H. (2010). Women and Art. Women's Strategic Studies, 12(47), 171-196. (In Persian) Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61. Conley, M. A., Pintrich, R. P., Vekiri, L., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204. De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research and instructional designs: some food for more thought. Instructional Science, 38, 105-134. De Koning, N. (2021). Could Combining Growth Mindset and Task Complexity Affect Motivation, Cognitive Load, and Performance? An Experimental Study. Master Educational Sciences. Open University. Deng, A., & Chen, A. (2023). Contributions of tasks with different cognitive load to high school students’ in-class physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 42(4), 684-695. Dimov, B. C., Atanasoska, T., Iliev, D., Trajkovska, D. A., & Kuzmanovska, M. S. (2015). Importance of investment in research's of students and teachers epistemological and pedagogical beliefs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1299-1303. Hofer, B., & Pinterich, P. R. (2002). The developmental epistemological theories: belief about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 88-140. Jiang, D., & Kalyuga, S. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis of cognitive load ratings supports a two-factor model. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16(3), 216-225. Kadkhodaee, M., & Soleimani, A. (2015). Comparing the effect of synectics and lecturing teaching methods on increasing the creativity of the third grade of elementary school students (considering Zarinshahr Schoolgirls and Schoolboys). Research in Curriculum Planning, 45, 119-130. (In Persian) Kalyuga S. (2012). Managing cognitive load in adaptive multimedia learning. New York: Hershey. Lang, J. (2014). Creation of architectural theory: The role of behavioral sciences in environmental design. Translated by: A. Ainifar. Tehran: Tehran University Press. (In Persian) Lawson, B. (2012). How designers think: Demystifying the design process. Translated by: H. Nadimi. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. (In Persian) Liu, Q., Yu, S., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Xu, S. (2021). The effects of an augmented reality based magnetic experimental tool on students' knowledge improvement and cognitive load. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 645-656. Mesrabadi, J., & Ashrafzade, T. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Epistemological Beliefs and Academic Performance. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 9(17), 71-90. (In Persian) Moameni Mahmouei, H., & Aujineghad, A. R. (2010). The Impact of Syntactic Teaching Model on Improving Students Creativity in Composition Lessons. Educational Psychology, 1(2), 90-102. (In Persian) Nadimi, H., & Shariat Rad, F. (2012). Sources of architectural design ideation a reflection on the ideation process of eight iranian professional architects. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 17(2), 5-14. (In Persian) Niusha, B., Pakdaman, A., & Ovaysi, Z. (2013). Investigating the roll of synectics teaching pattern on art creativity and its differences between girls and boys. Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 2(4), 159-176. (In Persian) Orgun, F., Karaoz, B. (2013). Epistemological beliefs and the self-efficacy scale in nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 34(6), 37-40. Özbay, H. E., & Köksal, M. S. (2021). Middle school students’ scientific epistemological beliefs, achievements in science and intellectual risk-taking. Science & Education, 30(5), 1233-1252. Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 115-121.
Pappas, C. (2014). Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design - eLearning Industry. Educational Technology for Learning. Pass, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychology, 38, 1-4. Perchtold, S., Corinna, M., Rominger, C., Papousek, I., & Fink, A. (2023). Women and men have a similar potential for malevolent creativity – But their underlying brain mechanisms are different. Brain Research, 1801. Rahnama, A., Norouzi, M., & Jahani Javanmardi, F. (2018). Investigate the relationship between epistemological beliefs with elements of teaching faculty (Shahed University Study). Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, 6(10), 151-169. (In Persian) Rashidi, E., & Shahrari, M. (2008). A study of the relationship between creativity with locus of control. innovation in management education. Journal of Modern Thoughts in Education, 3(3), 81-99. (In Persian) Rasouli, M., Shadmehri, N., & Angouti, Z. (2023). A study of the Effectiveness of a LEGO computer game on the creative thinking of preschool girls and boys. Thinking and Children, 14(1), 131-148. (In Persian) Saif, A.A. (2011). Educational measurement, assessment and evaluation (6th Ed.). Tehran: Duran Publishing House. (In Persian) Salama, A. (2005). Skill-based/knowledge-based architectural pedagogies: An argument for creating humane environments. The 7th International conference Humane Habital-ICHH. Salden, R. J., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2006). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 321-333. Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides., & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). New York. Schommer, M. (1992). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. A Doctoral Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana. Seif, D., & Marzooghi, R.A. (2009). The relationship between the dimensions of epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy and academic achievement in physical sciences among guidance school students. Daneshvar Raftar, 15(33), 1-14. (In Persian)
Sharif, H. R., & Nadimi, H. (2013). Ideation versus idea processing in architectural design thinking. Soffeh, 23(3), 19-26. (In Persian) Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2021). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: a new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review. Smith, C. L., & Wenk, L. (2006). Epistemologies of science Relations among three aspects of first‐year college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(8), 747-785. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Sons, Inc. Sweller J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 9-31. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 61–292. Szulewski, A., Howes, D., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2021). From theory to practice: the application of cognitive load theory to the practice of medicine. Academic Medicine, 96(1), 24-30. Tenenhaus, M., & Amato, S. (2004). A global Goodness–of–Fit index for PLS structural equation modelling. ESIS (European Satisfaction Index System. Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106316. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. Wu, Y‐T., & Tsai, C‐C. (2011). High school students’ informal reasoning regarding a socio‐scientific issue, with relation to scientific epistemological beliefs and cognitive structures. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 371-400. Zareh, M., & Houmayoni, A. (2019). Modeling Structural Relationships Between Epistemological Beliefs and Mediating Learning Strategies on Anxiety in English Students. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 12(2), 1-10. (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 107 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 153 |