الف) کتاب‌ها
- امیرارجمند، اردشیر (1386). رابطة حقوق بشردوستانه و حقوق بشر. مجموعه مقالات همایش اسلام و حقوق بین‌الملل بشردوستانه، گروه نویسندگان، چ اول، تهران: جمعیت هلال‌احمر.
ب) مقالات
- البرزی ورکی، پرویز (1386). حقوق بشر و حقوق بشردوستانه. فصلنامة حقوق اساسی، (8)، 17-41.
- رامین‌نیا، مژگان (1393). جایگاه عامل زمان در تفسیر معاهدۀ بین‌المللی. فصلنامة پژوهش‌های حقوقی، 26(13). 159-196.
- محبی، محسن و رضادوست، وحید(1394). تفسیر تکاملی معاهدات در حقوق بین‌الملل در پرتو قضیۀ اختلاف در خصوص کشتیرانی و حقوق مربوط به آن (کاستاریکا علیه نیکاراگوئه)، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی، (53)، 9-30.
- انگلیسی
- A) Articles
- Borelli, S. (2015). The (Mis)-Use of General Principles of Law: Lex Specialisand the Relationship Between International Human Rights Law and the Laws of Armed Conflict. In: Pineschi, L. (eds) General Principles of Law - The Role of the Judiciary. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol 46. 265-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19180-5_13 .
- Droege, C. (2008). Elective affinities? Human rights and humanitarian law. International Review of the Red Cross,.90. 501-548. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1560775508000084.
- Kalderimis, Daniel. Systemic Integration and International Investment Law – Some Practical Reflections (July 6, 2012). Society of International Economic Law (SIEL), 3rd Biennial Global Conference Working Paper No. 2012/46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2101772.
- Kammerhofer, J. (2010). “Systemic Integration, Legal Theory and the International Law Commission”. In J. Klabbers (Ed.). Finnish Yearbook of International Law, (19), 157–182.
- Kolb, Robert. (1998). The relationship between international humanitarian law and human rights law: A brief history of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1949 Geneva Conventions, International Review of the Red Cross. 38(324), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002086040009121X
- Kwiecień, R. (2017). General Principles of Law: The Gentle Guardians of Systemic Integration of International. Polish Yearbook of International Law, (37), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.7420/pyil2017k.
- Mclachlan, C. (2005). The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(2), 279-320. https://doi.org/1093/iclq/lei001
- McLachlan, C. (2008). Investment treaties and general international law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57(2).361-401. https://doi.org/1017/S0020589308000225
- Peters, A. (2017). The refinement of international law: From fragmentation to regime interaction and politicization. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 15(3), 671–704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2823512
- Rachovitsa, A. (2017). The principle of systemic integration in human rights law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 66(3), 557-588. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589317000185
- Simma, Bruno. (2009), Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner. European Journal of International Law, 20(2), 265–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chp028
- Taiwo, Ogunnaike O. (2018). Two is Better than One: Systemic Integration of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law to Boko Haram Conflict. American University International Law, Review, 33(3), 637-666.
- Todeschini, V. (2018). The Impact of International Humanitarian Law on the Principle of Systemic Integration. Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 23(3), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/kry028
- B) Documents
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (adopted 27 June 1981).
- Final Act of the International Conference on Human Rights, UN Doc. A/Conf.32/41, 22 April–13, May 1968
- General Comment no 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant HRCtee Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13 (26 May 2004) 11.
- International Law Commission, Conclusions of the Work of the Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, UN Doc. A/res/61/34, para. 1(1).
- Report on Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflict, UN Doc. A/7720, 20 November 1969, espch 3.
- American Convention on Human Rights (adopted 22 November 1969) 1144 UNTS 144
- Report on Respect for Human Rights in Armed Conflict, paras. 20–29, annex 1, UN Doc. A/8052, 18 September 1970
- Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties art. 31(3)(c), opened for signature May 23, 1969, 1155 U.N.T.S. 340.
- <http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CCPR/GCArticle6/GCArticle6_EN.pdf> accessed 8 February 2018.
Cases
- Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Judgment, I.C.J., Reports 2009.
- Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) (Merits), ICJ Rep. 2003.
- Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion ICJ Rep. 1996.
- Aegean Sea Continental Shelf case, Judgment, ICJ Reports 1978.
- Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion of 21 June 1971.
- South West Africa (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Second Phase, Judgment of 18 July 1966, (Judge Jessup, Dissenting Opinion).
- Prosecutor v. Katanga (Judgment), ICC-01/04-01/07 [7 March 2014].
- Rodríguez Vera et al (The Disappeared from the Palace of Justice) v. Colombia, IACtHR, Series C no. 287 (14 November 2014).
- Anto Domingo Massacre v. Colombia, IACtHR Series C, no 259 (30 November 2012).
- Mapiripán Massacre v. Colombia (Merits, Reparations, and Costs), IACtHR Series C. no. 134 (15 September 2005).
- Serrano-Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador (Preliminary Objections), IACtHR, Series C no. 118 (23 November 2004).
- Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala (Merits), IACtHR, Series C no 70 (25 November 2000) 209.
- Palmeras v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections), IACtHR, Series C no. 67 (4 February 2000).
- Hassan v. United Kingdom, ECtHR, App. no 29750/09 (16 September 2014)
- Massacres of El Mozote and Nearby Places v. El Salvador (Merits, Reparations and Costs), IACtHR, Series C no. 252 (25 October 2012).
- Molina (Ecuador-Colombia) (Admissibility), IAComHR Report no. 112/10 (21 October 2010).
- Avilan v. Colombia, IAComHR Report no 26/97 (30 September 1997).
- Saavedra v. Peru, IAComHR Report no 38/97 (16 October 1997) 59.
- Abella v. Argentina, IAComHR Report no 55/97 (18 November 1997
- General Comment no 35: Article 9 (Liberty and security of person), HRCtee, Doc. CCPR/C/GC/35 (16 Dec Comment no 36 on article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, on the right to life, Revised Draft Prepared by the Rapporteur (August 2017).
- Draft General Comment no 36: Article 6 (Right to Life), HRCtee, Doc. CCPR/C/GC/R.36/Rev.2 (2 September 2015).
|
