پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,239 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,853 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,382,293 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,153,427 |
جنگ اوکراین و پیامدهای آن بر اتحادیۀ اروپا | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 16، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 32، اسفند 1402، صفحه 223-246 اصل مقاله (658.57 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2024.365135.450167 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین فتاحی اردکانی* 1؛ سیدمحمود حسینی2 | ||
| 1استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکدۀ علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه اردکان، اردکان، ایران | ||
| 2دانش‌آموختۀ دکتری مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدۀ حقوق و علوم سیاسی، تهران، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| جنگ روسیه و اوکراین یکی از جدی‌ترین بحران‌هایی است که اتحادیۀ اروپا پس از جنگ جهانی دوم با آن روبه‌رو بوده است. این جنگ تمام حوزه‌ها و بخش‌های سیاسی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و امنیتی این اتحادیه را زیر تأثیر قرار داده است. این جنگ با فشار ناهمتراز بحران بر کشورهای عضو این اتحادیه، بستر سیاسی‌شدن هویت‌های ملی را افزایش داده و ترکیبی از این دو عامل همراه با صلاحیت پایین نهادهای فراملی نیز بر دلایل افزوده است تا شاهد اختلاف کشورهای اروپایی برای رسیدن به یک سیاست مشترک باشیم. در این نوشتار به‌دنبال پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که پیامدهای جنگ اوکراین بر اتحادیۀ اروپا چه بوده است؟ یافته‌های این نوشتار این است که جنگ اوکراین پیامدهای زیادی بر اتحادیۀ اروپا داشته است که به واگرایی این نهاد و به‌دنبال آن، کاهش قدرت آن در نظام بین‌الملل انجامیده است. این مسئله ناشی از پررنگ‌شدن شکاف‌های درون این اتحادیه، خلأ رهبری قدرتمند و موضع‌گیری‌های متفاوت اعضا در پی بروز این جنگ بوده است. در این نوشتار ضمن توجه به دلایل و عوامل شروع جنگ اوکراین می‌خواهیم با استفاده از سناریوسازی پیامدهای جنگ اوکراین در ایجاد اختلاف میان اعضای اتحادیۀ اروپا و تضعیف جایگاه این نهاد در فضای بین‌المللی را بیشتر بررسی کنیم. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بحران؛ واگرایی؛ سیاسی‌شدن؛ روسیه؛ اوکراین؛ اتحادیۀ اروپا | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The War in Ukraine and its Consequences on the European Union | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hossein Fattahi Ardakani1؛ Seyed Mahmood Hosseini2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran | ||
| 2Ph.D. in Regional Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: The war between Russia and Ukraine is one of the most serious crises that the European Union has faced after World War II. This war has affected all political, economic, social and security sectors of this union. As a buffer country with a geopolitical and geostrategic position between three powers, namely the European Union, Russia and the United States, Ukraine is of great importance and any action and movement requires the sensitivity of these three powers and their mutual reactions. According to John Mearsheimer, the moves made by the United States to expand NATO to the east are the main reason for Russia's attack on Ukraine. This war, with the asymmetric pressure of the crisis on the member states of this union, has increased the platform for the politicization of national identities and the combination of these two factors, along with the low competence of transnational institutions, has caused differences in the views of European countries to reach a common policy. Research question: The main question of this article is what were the consequences of the Ukrainian war crisis on the European Union? Methodology and theoretical framework: The current research has used the method of future research and scenario writing. Scenario writing is one of the basic techniques of future research method that focuses on creating and reconstructing future events and trends based on the collected evidence, data and information. In scenario-based planning, several distinct scenarios must be prepared in order to cover a wide range of different futures and obtain a reliable approximation of future trends and realities. The existing limitations on the number of scenarios are mostly due to the perceptual, analytical and cognitive limitations of humans and not the limitations related to the complexities of the real world. Scenarios always contain some contents that challenges our worldview and mental structure, otherwise we will remain locked in the same old mental structure and have to face its unfortunate consequences. Results and discussion: This invasion is considered to be the largest conventional military attack on European soil since World War II and it is referred to as the new crisis of the European Union. This crisis has revealed most of the realities and weaknesses of this union in political, economic, social and security fields. The European Union is a united body in the form of economic-political regionalism and multi-level governance consisting of 27 European countries. The initiators of the European Union integration plan claimed that the national sovereignty of the governments would be replaced by collective decision-making and the independent role of the Parliament, the Commission and other EU institutions. In the past decades, this union has faced crises such as economic crisis, debt, immigration, Brexit, Corona, the discussion of the limits of the powers, competences of the European Union and its institutions towards the member states has been one of the basic issues. Although according to some experts, the emergence of challenges and crises helps to transform and strengthen the unity in this union, but the war in Ukraine and its political, economic, security and social consequences, not only did not help this process, but also highlighted the role of the state over national differences and led to the divergence of the European Union. The findings of the research indicate that the war between Russia and Ukraine and its consequences, the imposition of Western economic sanctions against Russia, have stopped the export of oil and gas to Europe and reduced the economic growth of the member countries and due to the increase in energy prices and the inability to provide energy resources and the creation of a gap between the members of this union in the way of dealing with Russia, it has led to public protests. In addition, the war in Ukraine and its consequences have changed the swing of the pendulum of this union towards statists (against transnationalists) and led to the divergence of this union. Conclusion: The findings of this article are that the crisis of the war in Ukraine has had many consequences on the European Union which has led to the divergence of this institution and as a result, the reduction of its power in the international system. This problem was caused by the deepening of the differences within this union, the vacuum of powerful leadership and the different positions of the member states after the war. In this article, an attempt has been made to investigate the causes and factors of the war in Ukraine by using the scenario writing method in order to examine the consequences of the Ukraine crisis in creating differences between the members of the European Union and weakening the position of this institution in the international scene. The Ukraine crisis has increased the differences among the EU member states with the three sides of asymmetric distribution of the crisis pressure, the politicization of national identities and the low competence of European Union institutions. This crisis has increased the differences between the member states of the Union so that the crisis management policy has been reduced from the transnational level to the national level and this issue is defined as divergence. In fact, the emergence of factors such as the emergence of monopolist nationalism, the expansion of far-right political parties or TAN (Traditional-Authoritarian-Nationalist), war and the trend towards geopolitics have challenged the process of European integration. This retreat in the process of convergence and as a result divergence at the level of the European Union has brought different scenarios and consequences. The possible future scenario of the European Union is its transformation into a confederation group with veto power for each country and one of the most important consequences is the change of the European center of gravity, the destruction of the idea of independent European defense, the dominance of the United States in the Trans-Atlantic relations and the weakening of the position of the European Union in the game of power and global leadership. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Crisis, Divergence, Politicization, Russia, Ukraine, European Union | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Aghaee, Davood and Hedayat Aghdaee (2012), “Theoretical Analysis of Turkey's Accession to European Union and Impediments Ahead”. Political Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 107-123, (doi: 10.22059/jpq.2012.35296). [in Persian]. Anghel, Veronica and Erik Jones (2022), “Is Europe Really Forged through Crisis”? Pandemic EU and the Russia–Ukraine War”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 1-21, (doi: 10.1080/13501763.2022.2140820). Chen, Wen, Bart Los, Philip McCann, Raquel Ortega, Mark Thiseen and Frank Van Oort (2018), “The Continental Divide? Economic Exposure to Brexit in Regions and Countries on Both Sides of the Channel”, Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 97, No. 1, pp. 25–54, (doi: 10.1111/pirs.12334). De Vries, Catherine (2017), “Benchmarking Brexit: How the British Decision to Leave Shapes EU Public Opinion”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 38–53, (doi:10.1111/jcms.12579). Della Sala, Vincent (2023), “Ontological Security, Crisis and Political Myth: the Ukraine War and the European Union”. Journal of European Integration, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 361-375. (doi: 10.1080/07036337.2023.2183396). Dunford, Michael (2023), “Causes of the Crisis in Ukraine”, International Critical Thought, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 89-135, (doi: 10.1080/21598282.2022.2163417). Emamian, Mohammad. Sadegh (2013), “Stability, Political Unity and the Window of Opportunity to Realize a Multi-Level Governance System”, available at: https://spri.sharif.ir/sources/stability-political-consensus-and-the-window-opportunity-for-the-realization-of-a-multilevel-sys, (Accessed on: 10/11/2023) [in Persian]. Fabbrini, Sergio, Andrea Capati, Dora Hegedus and Tiziano Zgaga (2023), “A Federal Union for Dealing with the Russian War”, EU 3D Policy Brief, Available at: https://www.eu3d.uio.no/publications/eu3d-policy-briefs/eu3d-policy-brief-3-april-2023.html., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Ferrara, Federico Maria and Hanspeter Kriesi (2021), “Crisis Pressure and European Integration”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 1351-1373, (doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1966079). Finke, Daniel and Stefanie Bailer (2019), “Crisis Bargaining in the European Union: Formal Rules or Market Pressure?” European Union Politics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 109-133, (doi: 10.1177/1465116518814949). Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza (2022), “Scenarios for the Future of the World in Light of the Ukraine Crisis”, Geopolitics, Vol. 18, No. 4, Available at: https://journal.iag.ir/article_148714_e4f5101e6da21afb6ba99877c9eab140.pdf?lang=en. (Accessed on: 10/11/2023) [in Persian]. Harati, Mohammad. Javad and Masood Moeinipour (2012), “Senario Writing and the Future of Islamic Revolution of Iran”, Politics Quarterly, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 59-78, (doi: 10.22059/JPQ.2012.29987). [in Persian]. Hillion, Christophe (2018), “Withdrawal Under Article 50 TEU: An Integration-Friendly Process”, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 55, pp. 29-56, (doi: 10.54648/cola2018059). Howorth, Jolyon (2023), “The Ukraine War and Its Implications for European Security”, Wildfried Marten Center for European Studies, pp. 1-23, Available at: https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/ces-policy-brief-the-ukraine-war-web.pdf., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Hutt, David (2022), “How European Countries Stand on 2% of GDP Defence Spending”, Available at: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/07/20/ how-european-countries-stand-on-2-of-gdp-defence spending, (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Jedrych, Jacqueline (2022), “The EU Needs Alternatives to Russian Energy”, Available at: https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/eu-needs-alternatives-russian-energy-heres-plan, (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Krastev, Ivan and Mark Leonard (2023), “Fragile Unity: Why Europeans Are Coming Together on Ukraine (and What Might Drive them apart)”, ECFR Policy Briefs, Available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/fragile-unity-why-europeans-are-coming-together-on-ukraine/, (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Lefebvre, Maxime (2023), “The European Union and the War in Ukraine: the Liberal Power and Its Limits, European Issues”, Fondation Robert Schuman, Available at: https://www.robert-schuman.eu/en/european-issues/0651-the-european-union-and-the-war-in-ukraine-liberal-power-and-its-limits., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Mitrova, Tatiana & Tim Boersma (2018), “The Impact of US LNG on Russian Natural Gas Export Policy”, Center on Global Energy Policy, Available at: https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/pictures/Gazprom%20vs%20US%20LNG_CGEP_Report_121418_2.pdf. (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Moravcsik, Andrew (2005), “The European Constitutional Compromise and the Neofunctionalist Legacy”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 349–386, (doi: 10.1080/13501760500044215). Mudde, Cas (2022), “The Far-Right Threat in the United States: A European Perspective”, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 699, No. 1, pp. 101-115 (doi: 10.1177/00027162211070060). Prohorovs, Anatolijs (2022), “Russia’s War in Ukraine: Consequences for European Countries’ Businesses and Economies”, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 15, No. 295, (doi: 10.3390/jrfm15070295). Puglierin, Jana and Jeremy Shapiro (2023), “The Art of Vassalisation: How Russia s War on Ukraine Has Transformed Transatlantic Relations”, Policy Brief, pp. 1-21. Available at: https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/The-art-of-vassalisation-How-Russias-war-on-Ukraine-has-transformed-transatlantic-relations.pdf., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Ráczová, Orsolya (2023), “The Lingering War in Ukraine: Security Implications in Europe”, Globsec, Available at: https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/ publications/lingering-war-ukraine-security-implications-europe (Accessed on: 10/11/2023).Rogers, Dan and Richard Nelson and Nina Howell (2018), “An Overview of LNG Import Terminals in Europe”, King & Spalding, pp.1-32, Available at: https://www.kslaw.com/attachments/000/006/010/original/LNG_in_Europe_2018_An_Overview_of_LNG_Import_Terminals_in_Europe.pdf?1530031152., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Sabbaghian, Ali (2022), “Evolution of Mechanisms Regulating EU Relations with the Countries of the South Caucasus”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 157-181, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2022.299331.449908). [in Persian]. Schimmelfennig, Frank (2018), “European Integration (Theory) in Times of Crisis. A Comparison of the Euro and Schengen Crises”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 969-989, (doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1421252). Selden, Zachary (2022), “Will Finland and Sweden Joining NATO Deepen the Alliance’s Problems?”, War on the Rocks, Available at: https://warontherocks.com/2022/05/will-finland-and-swedenjoining-nato-deepen-the-alliances-problems/, (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Vasilopoulou, Sofia (2018), “The Party Politics of Euroscepticism in Times of Crisis: The Case of Greece”, Politics, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 311-326, (doi: 10.1177/0263395718770599). Vidnyanskyj, Stepan (2022), “Ukraine–European Union: A New Phase of Relations in the Context of the 2014-2022 Russia–Ukraine War”, International Relations of Ukraine: Scientific Searches anf Finding, Vol. 31, pp. 10-37, (doi: 10.15407/mzu2022.31.010). Wodak, Ruth (2018), “Discourse and European Integration”, KFG Working Paper Series, No. 86, pp. 1-27, available at: https://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/ transformeurope/publications/working_paper/wp/wp86/WP_86_Wodak_Druck_und_Web.pdf., (Accessed on: 10/11/2023). Zalli, Nader (2012), “Strategic Foresight and Regional Policy with Emphasis on Scenario Planning Approach”, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 54, pp. 33-54, (doi: 20.1001.1.17350727. 13 90. 14.54.2.0). [in Persian]. Zhou, Xi, Gang Lu, Zhicheng Xu, Xiaoging Yan, Soon Khu, Junfeng Yang and Jian Zhao (2023), “Influence of Russia-Ukraine War on the Global Energy and Food Security”, Resources, Conversation and Recycling Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 188, (doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106657). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 119 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 162 |
||