صورت‌محوری گفتمانی اسطوره‌بنیان: چارچوبی نظری برای فهم سیاست خارجی غیرواقع‌گرا

References

1. Allison, G. (1985). Shive’hā-ye tasmim’giri dar siyāsat-e khārejī, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Trans.  Manouchehr Shojai. Tehran: Elmi- Farhangi. [In Persian]
2. Archer, M.S. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baily, M. (2020). “Cassirer, Fatalism and Political Myth: Historical Lessons in the Consequences of Pessimism for International Relations,” in Tim Stevens, and Nicholas Michelsen, eds., Pessimism in International Relations. New York: Palgrave.
4. Carlsnaes, W. (1992). “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis,” International Studies Quarterly 36, 3: 245-270, <DOI:10.2307/2600772>.
5. Cassirer, E. (1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume One: Language, Trans. Ralph Manheim. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
6. Cassirer, E. (2014). Falsafeh-ye sorat’hā-ye sambolik, jeldeh dovom: andisheh-ye ostoreh’ ī, The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, V. 2: Mythical Thought, Trans.  Yadollah Moqen. Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian]
7. Cottam, M. (1985).  “The Impact of Psychological Images on International Bargaining: The Case of Mexican Natural Gas,” Political Psychology 6, 3: 413-440, <DOI:10.2307/3791080 > .
8. Dessler, D. (1989). “What's at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43, 3: 441-473, <DOI:10.1017/ S0020818300032999>.
9. Esmailpour Motlaq, A. (2022). Ostoreh, bayān-e namādin, Myths: The Symbolic Expressions, Tehran: Soroush. [In Persian]
10. Evans, D. (2007). Farhang-e moghademāti-ye estelahāt-e ravānkāvi-ye lākāni, An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, Trans.  Mehdi Rafi and Mehdi Parsa. Tehran: Gam-e-No. [In Persian]
11. Fantasy,” (2019). In No Subject - Encyclopaedia of Psychoanalysis. Available at: https://nosubject.com/Fantasy#:~:text=The%20principal %20point%20for%20Lacan,in%20fulfilment%2C%20contentment%20or%20satisfaction (Accessed 12 July 2023).
12. George, A.L. (1969). “The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making,” International Studies Quarterly 13, 2: 190-222, .
13. Herrmann, R.K.; Fischerkeller, M.P. (1995). “Beyond the Enemy Image and the Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research after the Cold War,” International Organization 49, 3: 415-450, .
14. Hudson, V.M.; Vore, C.S. (1995). “Foreign Policy Analysis Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow,” Mershon International Studies Review 39, 2 suppl: 209-238, .
15. Hutchison, E. (2016). Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions after Trauma. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Janis, I. (1972). Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
17. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Jervis, R. (2019). Dolat’mardān chegoneh fekr mi’konān, How Statesmen Think: The Psychology of International Politics, Trans.  Abbas Maleki, et al. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University. [In Persian]
19. Kubalkova, V. (2013). Siyāsat-e khārejī dar jahān-e barsākhteh, Foreign Policy in a Constructed World, Trans.  Mehdi Mirmohammadi and Alireza Khosravi. Tehran: Pajoheshkadeh-ye motālë’āt rāhbordi. [In Persian]
20. Lacan, J. (1977). Ecrits: A Selection, trans. Alan Sheridan. London and New York: Routledge.
21. Lacan, J. (1998). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. Alan Sheridan. New York & London: W. W. Norton.
22. Mearsheimer, J.J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
23. Milliken, Jennifer. (2006). Motāleʿh-ye goftemān dar ravābet-e bein’ol mellal: naghd and pajohesh and ravesh, The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods, Trans.  Homeira Moshirzadeh. Pajohesh hoghogh and siyāsat, Law and Politics Research, 8: 209-253. Available at: https://qjpl.atu.ac.ir/article_ 2816.html (Accessed 1 October 2023). [In Persian]
24. Morgenthau, H.J. (1995). Siyāsat miān-e mellat’hā, Politics among Nations, Trans.  Homeira Moshirzadeh. Tehran: IPIS. [In Persian]
25. Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relation. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
26. Sasley, B.E. (2011). “Theorizing States’ Emotions,” International Studies Review 13, 3: 452-476, < DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2011.01049.x>.
27. Schweller, R.L. (1994). “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,” International Security 19, 1: 72-107, .
28. Schweller, R.L. (2014). “China’s Aspirations and the Clash of Nationalisms in East Asia: A Neoclassical Realist Examination,” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 23, 2: 1-40. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280239411 (Accessed 12 July 2023).
29. Shapiro, M.J.; Bonham, G. M. (1973). “Cognitive Process and Foreign Policy Decision-Making,” International Studies Quarterly 17, 2: 147-174, .
30. Smith, J (2017). “Textual Analysis,” in the International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, .
31. Stavrakakis, Y. (2013). Lācān and amr-e siyāsi, Lacan and the Political, Trans.  Mohammad Ali Jafari. Tehran: Ghoghnoos. [In Persian]
32. Steele, B.J. (2008). Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and IR State. London and New York: Routledge.
33. Tetlock, P; McGuire, C. (1986). “Cognitive Perspectives on Foreign Policy,” in Samuel Long, ed., Political Behavior Annual. Boulder CO: Westview Press, V. 1.
34. Walker, S; and et al. (1998). “Systematic Procedures for Operational Code Analysis: Measuring and Modeling Jimmy Carter’s Operational Code,” International Studies Quarterly 42, 1: 175-190, <DOI:10.1111/0020-8833.00074>.
35. Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
36. Wendt, A. (2005). Nazariyeh-e ejtemāʿi siyāsat-e bein’ol mellal, Social Theory of International Politics, Trans.  Homeira Moshirzadeh. Tehran: IPIS. [In Persian]
37. Wendt, A.E. (1987). "The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory." International Organization 41, 3: 335-370, .
38. Wendt, A.E. (2004). “The State as Person in International Theory,” Review of International Studies 30: 289–316, .
39. Wivel, A. (2017). “Realism in Foreign Policy Analysis,” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, <DOI:10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190228637.013 .475>. Available at:  https://oxfordre.com/ politics/ display/ 10.1093/ acrefore/ 9780190228637. 001.0001? acrefore- 80190228637-e-475.
40. Young, M.D.; Schafer, M. (1998). “Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations,” Mershon International Studies Review 42, 1: 63-96, .