سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات162
تعداد شماره‌ها6,578
تعداد مقالات71,072
تعداد مشاهده مقاله125,695,716
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله98,924,991
مطلبی, قاسم, میرغلامی, مرتضی, حق بیان, رسول. (1403). تحلیل پیچیدگی‌ها و ابهامات چیستی مفهوم شهر هوشمند. , 56(4), 15-31. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2023.350092.1008554
قاسم مطلبی; مرتضی میرغلامی; رسول حق بیان. "تحلیل پیچیدگی‌ها و ابهامات چیستی مفهوم شهر هوشمند". , 56, 4, 1403, 15-31. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2023.350092.1008554
مطلبی, قاسم, میرغلامی, مرتضی, حق بیان, رسول. (1403). 'تحلیل پیچیدگی‌ها و ابهامات چیستی مفهوم شهر هوشمند', , 56(4), pp. 15-31. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2023.350092.1008554
مطلبی, قاسم, میرغلامی, مرتضی, حق بیان, رسول. تحلیل پیچیدگی‌ها و ابهامات چیستی مفهوم شهر هوشمند. , 1403; 56(4): 15-31. doi: 10.22059/jhgr.2023.350092.1008554

تحلیل پیچیدگی‌ها و ابهامات چیستی مفهوم شهر هوشمند

پژوهشهای جغرافیای انسانی
دوره 56، شماره 4، دی 1403، صفحه 15-31    اصل مقاله (1.39 M)
نوع مقاله: بنیادی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jhgr.2023.350092.1008554
نویسندگان
قاسم مطلبی* 1؛ مرتضی میرغلامی2؛ رسول حق بیان2
1گروه معماری، دانشکده پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2گروه شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه هنر اسلامی تبریز، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
در دهه‌های اخیر، مفهوم شهر هوشمند در پاسخ به مسائل و چالش‌های شهری در گفتمان شهرسازی بسیار رایج و پرطرفدار گردیده است. بااین‌حال ابهامات و پیچیدگی‌هایی درباره تعریف مفهوم شهر هوشمند وجود داشته و شهر هوشمند حاوی مفاهیم و معناهای مختلفی برای فعالین حوزه شهری ازجمله متخصصین، سیاست‌گذاران و سایر کنشگران مؤثر در هدایت و کنترل شهر است. بر این اساس پژوهش حاضر به دنبال روشنگری و کاهش ابهامات و پیچیدگی‌های مفهوم شهر هوشمند بوده است. به‌نحوی‌که سعی نموده معناها و مفاهیم اصلی رایج برای مفهوم شهر هوشمند را استخراج و تحلیل نماید. پاسخگویی به هدف پژوهش با تکیه بر روش کیفی و فراترکیب (فرا تحلیل) پژوهش‌های معتبر نگاشته شده در موضوع شهر هوشمند (68 مقاله منتخب) که عمدتاً در یک دهه اخیر انجام شدند، صورت پذیرفت. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که اصلیترین مفاهیم شهر هوشمند که نیروی محرکه اصلی شهر هوشمند نیز به‌حساب می‌آیند، استفاده از فناوری‌های اطلاعاتی و ارتباطی در کنار سرمایه انسانی و اجتماعی است که وظیفه جلو بردن برنامه‌های یک شهر هوشمند را بر عهده دارند. علاوه بر آن، اینگونه نیروی‌های محرکه هستند که موجب ایجاد سایر مفاهیم اصلی شهر هوشمند مثل نوآوری و خلاقیت، افزایش کارآیی و کارآمدی نظام شهری می‌شوند. وضعیت کنونی مفهومی شهر هوشمند که با افزایش نگاه انسان‌محورانه و پیوند بیش‌تر آن با مفاهیمی همچون کل‌نگری، پایداری و انعطاف‌پذیری همراه است، ضمن کلان‌تر و جامع‌تر نمودن این مفهوم، قابلیت سنجش هوشمند بودن یک شهر را سخت‌تر و پیچیده‌تر نموده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
شهر هوشمند؛ فناوری‌های اطلاعاتی و ارتباطی؛ پایداری
مراجع
  1. عابدی جعفری، عابد و امیری، مجتبی (1398). فراترکیب، روشی برای سنتز مطالعات کیفی. فصلنامه روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، 25(99)، 73-87.
  2. Abedi Jafari, A & Amiri, M (2019). Meta-Synthesis as a Method for Synthesizing Qualitative Researches. Methodology of Social Scince and Humanities, 25(99), 73-87. [In Persian].‌
  3. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?. Cities, 60, 234-245.‌
  4. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of urban technology, 22(1), 3-21.
  5. Allam, Z., & Newman, P. (2018). Redefining the smart city: Culture, metabolism and governance. Smart Cities, 1(1), 4-25.‌
  6. Angelidou, M. (2017). The role of smart city characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(4), 3-28.‌
  7. Anthopoulos, L. G. (2017). Understanding smart cities: A tool for smart government or an industrial trick? (Vol. 22). Cham: Springer International Publishing.‌
  8. Arafah, Y., & Winarso, H. (2017). Redefining smart city concept with resilience approach. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol.70, No.1, 1-13). IOP Publishing.‌
  9. Ayala, A. L., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism?. Urban Studies, 52(12),1-12.‌
  10. Baraniewicz-Kotasińska, S. (2020). Smart city. Four approaches to the concept of understanding. Urban Research & Practice, 1-24.‌
  11. Bashynska, I., & Dyskina, A. (2018). The overview-analytical document of the international experience of building smart city. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 228-241.‌
  12. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., ... & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518.‌
  13. Baykurt, B., & Raetzsch, C. (2020). What smartness does in the smart city: From visions to policy. Convergence, 26(4), 775-789.
  14. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of urban technology, 18(2), 65-82.‌
  15. Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J. R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., ... & Scholl, H. J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In 2012 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2289-2297). IEEE.‌
  16. ChuanTao, Y., Zhang, X., Hui, C., JingYuan, W., Daven, C., & Bertrand, D. (2015). A literature survey on smart cities. Science China Information Sciences, 58(10), 1-18.‌
  17. Cocchia, A. (2014). Smart and digital city: A systematic literature review. In Smart city (pp. 13-43). Springer, Cham.
  18. Colding, J., Colding, M., & Barthel, S. (2020). The smart city model: A new panacea for urban sustainability or unmanageable complexity?. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(1), 179-187.‌
  19. Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: a comprehensive proposal. international Journal of computers & technology, 11(5), 2544-2551.
  20. Dameri, R. P., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (2014). Smart city and value creation. In Smart city (pp. 1-12). Springer, Cham.‌
  21. de Wijs, L., Witte, P., & Geertman, S. (2016). How smart is smart? Theoretical and empirical considerations on implementing smart city objectives–a case study of Dutch railway station areas. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), 424-441.‌
  22. Echebarria, C., Barrutia, J. M., & Aguado-Moralejo, I. (2020). The Smart City journey: a systematic review and future research agenda. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 34(2), 159-201.
  23. Eremia, M., Toma, L., & Sanduleac, M. (2017). The smart city concept in the 21st century. Procedia Engineering, 181, 12-19.‌
  24. Esashika, D., Masiero, G., & Mauger, Y. (2020). An investigation into the elusive concept of smart cities: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-13.
  25. Fernandez-Anez, V. (2016). Stakeholders approach to smart cities: A survey on smart city definitions. In International conference on smart cities (pp. 157-167). Springer, Cham.‌
  26. Fernandez-Anez, V., Fernández-Güell, J. M., & Giffinger, R. (2018). Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities, 78, 4-16.‌
  27. Gaffney, C., & Robertson, C. (2018). Smarter than smart: Rio de Janeiro's flawed emergence as a smart city. Journal of Urban Technology, 25(3), 47-64.‌
  28. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Pardo, T. A., & Nam, T. (2015). What makes a city smart? Identifying core components and proposing an integrative and comprehensive conceptualization. Information Polity, 20(1), 61-87.
  29. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 524-534.‌
  30. Glasmeier, A., & Christopherson, S. (2015). Thinking about smart cities. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 3-12.‌
  31. Greco, I., & Cresta, A. (2015). A smart planning for smart city: the concept of smart city as an opportunity to re-think the planning models of the contemporary city. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 563-576). Springer, Cham.‌
  32. Grossi, G., & Pianezzi, D. (2017). Smart cities: Utopia or neoliberal ideology?. Cities, 69, 79-85.‌
  33. Gupta, P., Chauhan, S., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2019). Classification of smart city research-a descriptive literature review and future research agenda. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 661-685.‌
  34. Haarstad, H. (2017). Constructing the sustainable city: Examining the role of sustainability in the ‘smart city’discourse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(4), 423-437.‌
  35. Ho, E. (2016). Smart subjects for a Smart Nation? Governing (smart) mentalities in Singapore. Urban Studies, 54(13), 1-17.‌
  36. Hollands, R. G. (2008). Will the real smart city please stand up? Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?. City, 12(3), 303-320.‌
  37. Ingwersen, P., & Serrano-López, A. E. (2018). Smart city research 1990–2016. Scientometrics, 117(2), 1205-1236.‌
  38. Ji, T., Chen, J. H., Wei, H. H., & Su, Y. C. (2021). Towards people-centric smart city development: Investigating the citizens’ preferences and perceptions about smart-city services in Taiwan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102691.
  39. Kirimtat, A., Krejcar, O., Kertesz, A., & Tasgetiren, M. F. (2020). Future trends and current state of smart city concepts: A survey. IEEE Access, 8, 86448-86467.‌
  40. Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 8(1), 131-136.‌
  41. Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Panori, A., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2018). Smart city planning from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(2), 3-20.‌
  42. Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Smart cities in the innovation age. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 93-95.‌
  43. Kumar, H., Singh, M. K., Gupta, M. P., & Madaan, J. (2018). Moving towards smart cities: Solutions that lead to the Smart City Transformation Framework. Technological forecasting and social change, 153, 1-16.‌
  44. Kummitha, R. K. R. (2018). Entrepreneurial urbanism and technological panacea: Why Smart City planning needs to go beyond corporate visioning?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 1-10.‌
  45. Kummitha, R. K. R., & Crutzen, N. (2017). How do we understand smart cities? An evolutionary perspective. Cities, 67, 43-52.‌
  46. Lara, A. P., Da Costa, E. M., Furlani, T. Z., & Yigitcanla, T. (2016). Smartness that matters: towards a comprehensive and human-centred characterisation of smart cities. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2(2), 8.
  47. Leary, H., & Walker, A. (2018). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis methodologies: Rigorously piecing together research. Tech Trends, 62(5), 525-534.‌
  48. Lecomte, P. (2019). What is smart? A real estate introduction to cities and buildings in the digital era. Journal of General Management, 44(3), 128-137.‌
  49. Lim, Y., Edelenbos, J., & Gianoli, A. (2019). Identifying the results of smart city development: Findings from systematic literature review. Cities, 95, 1-13.‌
  50. Meijer, A., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. international review of administrative sciences, 82(2), 392-408.‌
  51. Mora, L., Bolici, R., & Deakin, M. (2017). The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(1), 3-27.
  52. Mora, L., Deakin, M., & Reid, A. (2018). Smart-City Development Paths: Insights from the First Two Decades of Research. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions, Green Energy and Technology. Springer, 403-427.
  53. Myeong, S., Jung, Y., & Lee, E. (2018). A study on determinant factors in smart city development: An analytic hierarchy process analysis. Sustainability, 10(8), 1-17.‌
  54. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291).‌
  55. Nesti, G. (2018). Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: Insights from four European cases. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 1-18.‌
  56. Nilssen, M. (2018). To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation. Technological forecasting and social change, 142, 1-7.‌
  57. Nunes, S. A., Ferreira, F. A., Govindan, K., & Pereira, L. F. (2021). “Cities go smart!”: A system dynamics-based approach to smart city conceptualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 127683.
  58. Nye, E., Melendez‐Torres, G. J., & Bonell, C. (2016). Origins, methods and advances in qualitative meta‐synthesis. Review of Education, 4(1), 57-79.‌
  59. Ogra, A. (2020). Conceptualization of Smart City: A Methodological Framework for Smart Infrastructure, Smart Solutions and Smart Governance. In Data-driven Multivalence in the Built Environment (pp. 57-72). Springer, Cham.‌
  60. Praharaj, S., & Han, H. (2019). Cutting through the clutter of smart city definitions: A reading into the smart city perceptions in India. City, Culture and Society, 18, 1-10.‌
  61. Ruhlandt, R. W. S. (2018). The governance of smart cities: A systematic literature review. Cities, 81, 1-23.‌
  62. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV‐positive women. Research in nursing & health, 26(2), 153-170.‌
  63. Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697-713.‌
  64. Thompson, E. M. (2016). What makes a city ‘smart’?. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(4), 1-14.‌
  65. Thorne, S. E. (2015). Qualitative meta synthesis: a technical exercise or a source of new knowledge?. Psycho-oncology, 24(11), 1347-1348.‌
  66. Trindade, E. P., Hinnig, M. P. F., Moreira da Costa, E., Marques, J. S., Bastos, R. C., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017). Sustainable development of smart cities: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3(3), 11.‌
  67. Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(2), 204-211.‌
  68. Wang, C. H., Steinfeld, E., Maisel, J. L., & Kang, B. (2021). Is your smart city inclusive? Evaluating proposals from the US Department of Transportation's Smart City Challenge. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103148.
  69. Wilson, B., & Chakraborty, A. (2019). Planning smart (er) cities: The promise of civic technology. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(4), 29-51.‌
  70. Yigitcanlar, T. (2015). Smart cities: an effective urban development and management model?. Australian Planner, 52(1), 27-34.‌
  71. Yigitcanlar, T., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2018). Does smart city policy lead to sustainability of cities?. Land Use Policy, 73, 49-58.‌
  72. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E. M., & Yun, J. J. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities, 81, 145-160.
  73. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E., & Ioppolo, G. (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustainable cities and society, 45, 1-51.‌
  74. Zelkowitz, M. V., & Wallace, D. (1997). Experimental validation in software engineering. Information and Software Technology, 39(11), 735-743.
  75. Zhao, F., Fashola, O. I., Olarewaju, T. I., & Onwumere, I. (2021). Smart city research: A holistic and state-of-the-art literature review. Cities, 119, 103406.
  76. Zheng, C., Yuan, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., & Shao, Q. (2020). From digital to sustainable: A scientometric review of smart city literature between 1990 and 2019. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 1-24.‌
  77. Zhu, S., Li, D., & Feng, H. (2019). Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50, 1-14.‌
  78. Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta‐synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of advanced nursing, 53(3), 311-318.‌
  79. Zubizarreta, I., Seravalli, A., & Arrizabalaga, S. (2016). Smart city concept: What it is and what it should be. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(1), 04015005.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 269
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 77





سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب