سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,236
تعداد مقالات67,810
تعداد مشاهده مقاله115,290,425
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,033,450
شانازی, کاروان, اعظمی, موسی. (1402). تحلیل رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب بین‌المللی زریوار در شهرستان مریوان. , 55(3), 111-130. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2023.354474.1007743
کاروان شانازی; موسی اعظمی. "تحلیل رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب بین‌المللی زریوار در شهرستان مریوان". , 55, 3, 1402, 111-130. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2023.354474.1007743
شانازی, کاروان, اعظمی, موسی. (1402). 'تحلیل رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب بین‌المللی زریوار در شهرستان مریوان', , 55(3), pp. 111-130. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2023.354474.1007743
شانازی, کاروان, اعظمی, موسی. تحلیل رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب بین‌المللی زریوار در شهرستان مریوان. , 1402; 55(3): 111-130. doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2023.354474.1007743

تحلیل رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب بین‌المللی زریوار در شهرستان مریوان

پژوهش های جغرافیای طبیعی
دوره 55، شماره 3، آبان 1402، صفحه 111-130    اصل مقاله (1.27 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله کامل
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jphgr.2023.354474.1007743
نویسندگان
کاروان شانازی1؛ موسی اعظمی* 2
1گروه ترویج و اموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان، ایران
2گروه ترویج و آموزش کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا همدان. ایران
چکیده
شناخت و ارزیابی خدمات اکوسیستم تالاب، علاوه بر انسجام اکولوژیکی می‌تواند در عرضه و پایداری خدمات در سطوح مختلف مؤثر باشد. در این راستا پژوهش حاضر به ارزیابی خدمات اکوسیستمی تالاب زریوار با به‌کارگیری رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات اکوسیستم و چارچوب ارزیابی خدمات اکوسیستم هزاره جهت پایداری و توسعه خدمات آن پرداخته است. به‌منظور ارزیابی خدمات در 4 دسته خدمت تأمینی، تنظیمی، فرهنگی و پشتیبانی از رویکرد ارزیابی سریع خدمات کنوانسیون رامسر استفاده گردید. گردآوری داده‌ها مبتنی بر ابزار مصاحبه و پرسشنامه از خبرگان محلی و کارشناسان نهادهای مرتبط با تالاب و اعضای انجمن‌های زیست‌محیطی منطقه بودند که تعداد 55 نفر از آن‌ها به‌صورت هدفمند انتخاب شدند. از شاخص خدمات اکوسیستم (ESI) برای مقایسه و امتیاز اهمیت خدمات استفاده گردید. نتایج بیانگر پتانسیل مثبت تالاب زریوار در هر 4 دسته خدمات بود به‌گونه‌ای که خدمات فرهنگی با (66/0=ESI) بالاترین پتانسیل مثبت خدمات و خدمات پشتیبانی (57/0=ESI)، تنظیمی (42/0=ESI) و تأمینی (38/0=ESI) در جایگاه بعدی قرار داشتند. مقایسه خدمات ارائه‌شده در سطوح مختلف نشان داد بیشترین خدمات ارائه‌شده در سطح محلی گزارش‌شده است. آزمون همبستگی نشان داد رابطه مثبت و معنی‌داری بین خدمات مختلف اکوسیستم تالاب وجود دارد که سبب هم‌افزایی بین خدمات آن می‌گردد. نتایج به‌کارگیری رویکرد ارزیابی سریع می‌تواند در چارچوب‌های سیاست محلی، ملی و فرآیندهای تصمیم‌گیری مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
خدمات تأمینی؛ خدمات تنظیمی؛ فرهنگی؛ خدمات پشتیبانی؛ شاخص خدمات اکوسیستم
عنوان مقاله [English]
Rapid assessment approach of Zarivar international wetland ecosystem services in Marivan County
نویسندگان [English]
karwan shanazi1؛ mousa aazami2
1Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2, Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]
 ABSTRACT
Recognition and evaluation of wetland ecosystem services and ecological coherence can be effective in the supply and sustainability of services at different levels. In this regard, the current research has evaluated the ecosystem services of Zarivar wetland by using the rapid assessment ecosystem services approach and the millennium ecosystem services assessment framework for the sustainability and development of its services. In order to evaluate the services in four categories of provisioning, regulating, cultural, and support services, the rapid evaluation approach of Ramsar Convention services was used. Data collection was based on interview tools and questionnaires from local experts, experts from wetland-related institutions, and members of environmental associations in the region, 55 of whom were purposefully selected. The Ecosystem Service Index (ESI) was used to compare and score the importance of services. The results showed the positive potential of Zarivar wetland in all 4 categories of services, such that cultural services have the highest positive potential (ESI=0.66) and supporting services (ESI=0.57), regulating services (ESI=0.42) and provisioning services (ESI=0.38) were in the next place. The comparison of services provided at different levels showed that most services were reported locally. The correlation test showed a positive and significant relationship between different wetland ecosystem services, which causes synergy between its services. The results of applying the rapid assessment approach can be used in local and national policy frameworks and decision-making processes
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Recognizing and evaluating wetland ecosystem services, their effective management of human and natural threats, and the ecological integrity of the wetland are crucial in the supply and sustainability of services at the local, regional, and even global levels. Wetlands are among the most productive and valuable ecosystems in the world, providing a wide range of economic, social, environmental, and cultural benefits currently classified as ecosystem services. Despite the apparent importance of wetlands, their value is routinely overlooked, and they are often suffering from poor decision-making, leading to the ongoing loss and degradation of wetlands and their services. An appropriate approach to prevent this inefficiency is intensely identifying and valuing the ecosystem services wetlands provide for the region. In this regard, the rapid assessment approach to support wetland ecosystem services was developed by identifying the practical time and resource constraints faced by operational staff and providing a simple, user-friendly, and cost-effective approach to support the systemic assessment of the full range of wetland ecosystem services. The conceptual framework of this approach assumes a dynamic interaction between people and ecosystems that changes in human conditions directly and indirectly cause changes in ecosystems, and changes in ecosystems cause changes in human well-being. An overview of related literature reveals that there are very few studies aiming to provide a methodology and an approach for integrating ecosystem services into the framework of evaluation and management of wetland ecosystems, and the focus of studies on the biophysical processes of wetlands has been more than the evaluation of ecosystem services. Therefore, the current research aims to identify and evaluate the importance of Zarivar wetland services as an international and unique wetland located in the west of Iran with the approach of rapid assessment of ecosystem services to protect and develop ecosystem services and to present practical recommendations dealing with challenges of its ecosystem services.
Methodology
In order to evaluate Zarivar wetland ecosystem services from the respondents' point of view, ecosystem service indicators were taken from the framework of evaluation of Millennium ecosystem services (2003) and Ramsar Convention (2018) in four axes, including regulating, provisioning, cultural and support sectors and the approach of rapid assessment of wetland ecosystem services. It was applied through interviews with key participants in the region. These participants consisted of selected informants from among the local leaders living in the villages on the edge of the wetland (30 people), members of the environmental associations of the Zarivar wetland (Green Chia Association and Zhivan Association) (11 people), official experts from government institutions involved in management Zarivar Wetland (14 people), and some purposefully selected local people (55 people). The list of ecosystem services in this approach was modified and adapted according to the local context through dialogue and consultation with local stakeholders who were deeply familiar with the wetland. The exact scope of the evaluated area was defined objectively by the expert evaluator based on the purpose or scope of the evaluation, which in this study was the watershed area of Zarivar wetland and the area of its wildlife refuge. A checklist of services grouped into functional categories was originally defined in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and was set as an initial structural framework. In the next step, the semi-quantitative importance of each service was scored on a scale from "significantly positive" (++) to "neutral" (0) to "significantly negative" (--), as indicated. Equation (1) was used to derive the index of comparable ecosystem services; the range of ESI is from +1 to -1, calculated for each of the four categories of ecosystem services or a combined value for all services. Positive scores and close to one indicate the significant potential and importance of the wetland in providing the desired service, and negative scores and close to one indicate the negative potential of the wetland in that service. A score of zero indicates the wetland's unimportance and lack of potential in terms of the intended service. Finally, the collected data was analyzed using spss25 and Excel software.
 Equation (1) ESI=
 
Results and discussion
The study's results showed the positive potential of wetlands in all four intended categories of services, which indicates the potential for positive contributions of wetlands to human well-being. Perhaps the most important services provided by the wetland, from the respondents' point of were cultural services with an ecosystem service index (ESI = 0.66), supporting services with an ecosystem service index (ESI = 0.57), and regulating services with an ecosystem service index (ESI= 0.42) and provisioning services with ecosystem service index (ESI = 0.38). The findings of the contribution of Zarivar wetland ecosystem services at the local, regional, and global levels showed that 34 of the 36 classified services are provided locally and support most wetland residents. Zarivar has also provided 10 services at the regional level, 5 of which are in the regulating dimension (regulating air quality, pollination, reducing the risk of floods and storms, and purifying outgoing water), three services in the cultural dimension (cultural heritage, tourism, and recreation, education, and research) and two cases in the provisioning dimension (genetic resources and medicinal plants). According to the acquired results, at the global level, Zarivar has provided five important services as protection of genetic resources, global climate regulation with carbon storage and sequestration, tourism and recreation, education and research, and habitat provision for biodiversity and protection of rare species. The results of the applied correlation test between Zarivar wetland ecosystem services show a positive and significant correlation between all five main services (sig= 99% level). In other words, it can be concluded that there is a kind of convergence between Zarivar wetland ecosystem services, which will change with tangible changes in each service. In the meantime, support services are highly correlated with other services. Some management strategies seem to weaken the provision of valuable services in this area.
 
Conclusion
The comprehensive management and integrated planning of wetlands with emphasis on good governance is necessary to develop the participation and accountability of various stakeholders and achieve win-win goals. Finally, some increasing economic development activities and goals should be targeted by recognizing the value of sustainable use of ecosystem services and using payment methods for ecosystem services to maintain and sustain services.
 
Funding
There is no funding support.
 
Authors’ Contribution
All of the authors approved the content of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work.
 
Conflict of Interest
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
 
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all the scientific consultants of this paper.
 
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Provisioning Services, Regulating Services, Cultural Services, Supporting Services, Ecosystem Service Index
مراجع
  1. اسعدی، محمدعلی؛ وکیل پور، محمدحسن؛ مرتضوی، سید ابوالقاسم و عبدالهی، کامران. (1400). کاربرد مدل نظریه بازی چندهدفه در تعیین تعادل اقتصادی-محیط‌زیستی حوضه آبخیز دریاچه زریبار مریوان. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، 11(44)، 203-219. doi:10.30495/jzpm.2021.4329
  2. براری، محمدحسین؛ باقری، علی و هاشمی، سید مختار. (1395). تحلیل مسائل دریاچه زریبار در بستر مدیریت یکپارچه منابع آب حوضه آبریز آن با استفاده از رویکرد مشارکت گروداران. تحقیقات منابع آب ایران، 12(2)، 1-12.
  3. تبد، محمد عارف؛ جلیلیان، نسترن. (1394). مطالعه اتنوبوتانیکی گیاهان دارویی منطقه زریوار شهرستان مریوان، نشریه گیاهان دارویی،14(54)، 55-75.‎  dor:20.1001.1.2717204.2015.14.54.5.8
  4. حسینی، سید محمد و جاویدی دلجوان، سمیرا. (1398). نقش مدیریت منابع آب در کنترل تغییرات کمی و کیفی منابع آب ناشی از تغییرات اقلیمی حوضه آبریز تالاب زریوار. فصلنامه محیط‌شناسی، 45(2)، 377-361.  DOI:10.22059/jes.2019.279790.1007847
  5. خراسانی، محمدامین و سعدی، سیما. (1399). واکاوی پایداری در مناطق روستایی اطراف اکوسیستم تالاب با توجه به الگوی اکوویلج (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای پیرامون تالاب زریوار). مجله مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، 15(51)، 250-231. dor:20.1001.1.25385968.1399.15.2.13.1
  6. شانازی، کاروان و اعظمی، موسی. (1402). ارزیابی وضعیت شاخص‌های حکمرانی خوب در اکوسیستم‌های تالابی (مطالعه تالاب زریوار، شهرستان مریوان)، نشریه محیط‌زیست طبیعی، 76(1)، 131-117. Doi:10.22059/jne.2022.346262.2457
  7. طرح حفاظت از تالاب‌های ایران. (1397). طرح مدیریت جامع تالاب زریوار. تهران: نشر طلایی
  8. ظاهری، محمد و سعدی، سیما. (1397). تحلیل پایداری زیست‌محیطی در جوامع روستایی حاشیه اکوسیستم تالاب بر اساس الگوی بوم روستا مطالعه موردی: روستاهای حاشیه تالاب زریوا. محیط‌شناسی،44(2)، 275-257. Doi:10.22059/jes.2018.252203.1007597
  9. محمدی، سعدی و رستمی، شابختی. (1399). مکان‌یابی دفن زباله در یک ناحیه روستایی (روستاهای اطراف دریاچه زریبار- شهرستان مریوان). نشریه محیط‌زیست و توسعه، 11(21)، 20-5.  Dor:20.1001.1.2008921.1399.11.21.1.0
  10. Aazami, M., & Shanazi, K. (2020). Tourism wetlands and rural sustainable livelihood: The case from Iran. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour, 30, 100284 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2020.100284
  11. Amini, A., & Qishlaqi, A. (2020). Spatial distribution, fractionation and ecological risk assessment of potentially toxic metals in bottom sediments of the Zarivar freshwater Lake (Northwestern Iran). Limnologica, 84, 125814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2020.125814
  12. Adamus, P. R. (2016). Manual for the Wetland Ecosystem Services Protocol (WESP). People, oregonstate.edu/~Adamusp.
  13. Asadi, M.A., Vakilpour, M.H., Mortazavi, S.A., & Abdulahi, K. (1400). The application of the multi-objective game theory model in determining the economic-environmental balance of the watershed of Zaribar Lake, Marivan. Regional Planning Quarterly, 11(44), 203-219. Doi:10.30495/jzpm.2021.4329 [In Persian].
  14. Barari, M.H., Bagheri, A., & Hashemi, S.M. (2016). Analysis of the issues of lake ZREBAR in a context of integreted water resources management using a stakeholders' Participatory Approch in a Bsain Scale. Iran-Water Resources Research, 12(2), 1-12 [In Persian].
  15. Bagstad, K.J., Semmens, D.J., Waage, S., & Winthrop, R. (2013). A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosyst. Serv. 5, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004
  16. Beuel, S., Alvarez, M., Amler, E., Behn, K., Kotze, D., Kreye, C., Leemhuis, C., Wagner, K., Willy, D. K., Ziegler, S., & Becker, M. (2016). A Rapid assessment of anthropogenic disturbances in East African wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 67, 684-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.034
  17. Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., & Collen, B., (2010). Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science, 328, 1164–1168. DOI: 10.1126/science.1187512
  18. Clarkson, B. R., Ausseil, A. G. E., & Gerbeaux, P. (2013). Wetland ecosystem services. Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, 1, 192-202.
  19. Davidson, N. C. (2018). Ramsar convention on wetlands: scope and implementation. In The Wetland Book I: Structure and function, management, and methods (pp. 451-458). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_113
  20. Davidson, N. C., Dinesen, L., Fennessey, S., Finlayson, C. M., Grillas, P., Grobicki, A., et al. (2019). Wetland ecological status and changes: A meta-analysis. Marine and Freshwater Research, 71(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF18329.
  21. Davidson, N.C. (2014). How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshwater Res, 65 (10), 934–941. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF14173
  22. De Groot, R., Brander, L., van der Ploeg, S., Costanza, R., Bernard, F., Braat, L., Christie, M., Crossman, N., Ghermandi, A., Hein, L., Hussain, S., Kumar, P., McVittie, A., Portela, R., Rodriguez, L. C., Brink, P., & Beukering, P. (2012) Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services, 1 (1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005
  23. Everard M., & Waters R. (2013). Ecosystem services assessment: How to do one in practice (Version 1, October 13 2013). Institution of Environmental Sciences, London.
  24. Everard, M., Kangabam, R., Tiwari, M. K., McInnes, R., Kumar, R., Talukdar, G. H., ... & Das, L. (2019). Ecosystem service assessment of selected wetlands of Kolkata and the Indian Gangetic Delta: multi-beneficial systems under differentiated management stress. Wetlands Ecology and management, 27(2), 405-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-019-09668-1
  25. Everard, M., Kataria, G., Kumar, S., & Gupta, N. (2021). Assessing livelihood-ecosystem interdependencies and natural resource governance in a tribally controlled region of India’s north-eastern middle Himalayas. Environment Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 7772-7790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00945-1
  26. Everard, M., & McInnes, R.J. (2013). Systemic solutions for multi-benefit water and environmental management. Sci. Total Environ, 461, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.010
  27. Faulkner, S., (2004). Urbanization impacts on the structure and function of forested wetlands. Urban Ecosyst, 7, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UECO.0000036269.56249.66
  28. Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21, 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
  29. Ghermandi, A., Van Den Bergh, J.C., Brander, L.M., De Groot, H.L., Nunes, P.A. (2010). Values of natural and human-made wetlands: a meta-analysis. Water Resour. Res, 46 (12), https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009071
  30. He, Q., Bertness, M.D., Bruno, J.F., Li, B., Chen, G., Coverdale, T.C., Altieri, A.H., Bai, J., Sun, T., Pennings, S.C., Liu, J., Ehrlich, P.R., Cui, B. (2014). Economic development and coastal ecosystem change in China. Sci. Rep, 4, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05995
  31. Hein, L., Van Koppen, K., De Groot, R.S., & Van Ierland, E.C. (2006). Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ, 57 (2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005
  32. Hosseini, S. M., Javidi Deljovan, S. (2018). The role of water resources management in controlling the quantitative and qualitative changes water resources due to climate changes in the Zarivar lagoon watershed. Environmental Quarterly, 45(2), 377-361. Doi:10.22059/jes.2019.279790.1007847 [In Persian].
  33. Huq, N., Pedroso, R., Bruns, A., Ribbe, L., & Huq, S. (2020). Changing dynamics of livelihood dependence on ecosystem services at temporal and spatial scales: an assessment in the southern wetland areas of Bangladesh. Ecol. Indic, 110, 105855, 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105855
  34. Iran wetlands protection plan. (2017). Zarivar Wetland Comprehensive Management Plan, Tehran: Talai Publication [In Persian].
  35. Kakuru, W., Turyahabwe, N., & Mugisha, J. (2013). Total economic value of wetlands products and services in Uganda. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.1-14 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/192656
  36. Khorasani, M.A., & Saadi, S. (2019). Analysis of sustainability in rural areas around the wetland ecosystem according to the ecovillage model case study: villages around the Zarivar wetland. Journal of Human Settlements Planning Studies, 15(51), 231-250. Dor:20.1001.1.25385968.1399.15.2.13.1 [In Persian].
  37. Li, Z., Deng, X., Jin, G., Mohmmed, A., & Arowolo, A.O. (2019). Tradeoffs between agricultural production and ecosystem services: a case study in Zhangye. Northwest China. Sci. Total Environ, 136032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136032
  38. Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Geng, Y., Li, R., Dong, H., Xue, B., Yang, T., Wang, S. (2019). Toward sustainable crop production in China: an emergy-based evaluation. J. Clean. Prod, 206, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.183
  39. Maltby, E. (Ed.). (2009). Functional assessment of wetlands: towards evaluation of ecosystem services. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, UK. 672pp.
  40. Maltby, E., & Ormerod, S. (2011). Freshwaters—Openwaters, wetlands and floodplains. In: UK National Ecosystem Assessment Technical Report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, pp. 295–360. https://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/16133/1/Ch9Freshwaters.pdf
  41. McInnes, R. J., & Everard, M. (2017). Rapid assessment of wetland ecosystem services (RAWES): an example from Colombo, Sri Lanka. Ecosystem Services, 25, 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.024
  42. McInnes, R.J. (2013). Recognising wetland ecosystem services within urban case studies. Mar. Fresh. Res, 64, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF13006
  43. McInnes, R.J. (2013). Recognizing ecosystem services from wetlands of international importance: an example from Sussex, UK. Wetlands, 33 (6), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0458-1
  44. Milcu, A.I., Hanspach, J., Abson, D., Fischer, J. (2013). Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Soc, 18 (3), 31-44.
  45. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington (D.C.). 78pp.
  46. Mohammadi, S., & Rostami, S. B. (2020). Locating Landfill Site in A Rural Area (Villages Around Zribar Lake - Marivan County). Environment and Development, 11(21), 5-20. Dor:20.1001.1.2008921.1399.11.21.1.0 [In Persian].
  47. Müller, F., & Burkhard, B. (2012). The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001
  48. Pedersen, E., Weisner, S.E.B., Johansson, M. (2019). Wetland areas’ direct contributions to residents’ well-being entitle them to high cultural ecosystem values. Sci. Total Environ, 646, 1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.236
  49. Ramsar Convention. (2018). Resolution XIII.17: Rapidly assessing wetland ecosystem services. In 13th meeting of the conference of the contracting parties to the Ramsar convention on Wetlands.
  50. Ramsar Information Sheet. (2019). Iran (Islamic Republic of) Zarivar wetland.
  51. Russi, D., ten Brink, P., Farmer, A., Badura, T., Coates, D., Forster, J., Kumar, R., & Davidson, N., (2013). The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for Water and Wetlands. IEEP, London and Brussels: Ramsar Secretariat, Gland. 84pp.
  52. Salata, S., Garnero, G., Barbieri, C. A., & Giaimo, C. (2017). The integration of ecosystem services in planning: An evaluation of the nutrient retention model using InVEST software. Land, 6(3), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6030048
  53. Sandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E., & Ward, B. P. (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem services, 12, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007
  54. Shanazi, K., & Aazami, M. (2023). Assessing the status of good governance indicators in wetland ecosystems (case study: Zarivar wetland, Marivan county). Journal of Natural Environment, 76(1), 117-131. doi:10.22059/jne.2022.346262.2457 [In Persian].
  55. Sharma, B., Rasul, G., & Chettri, N. (2015). The economic value of wetland ecosystem services: Evidence from the Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 12, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.007
  56. Sun, J., Yuan, X., Liu, G., Tian, K. (2019). Emergy and eco-exergy evaluation of wetland restoration based on the construction of a wetland landscape in the Northwest Yunnan plateau, China. J. Environ. Manag, 252, 109499.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109499
  57. Sun, T., Lin, W., Chen, G., Guo, P., & Zeng, Y. (2016). Wetland ecosystem health assessment through integrating remote sensing and inventory data with an assessment model for the Hangzhou Bay, China, Science of the Total Environment, 566-567, 627-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.028
  58. Tabad, M.A., Jalilian, N. (2014). Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants in Zarivar region of Marivan city. Journal of medicinal plants, 14(54), 41-55. Dor:20.1001.1.2717204.2015.14.54.5.8 [In Persian].
  59. TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis Available at: http://www.teebweb.org
  60. Turyahabwe, N., Kakuru, W., Tweheyo, M., & Tumusiime, D. M. (2013). Contribution of wetland resources to household food security in Uganda. Agriculture & Food Security, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2048-7010-2-5
  61. Vihervaara, P., Rönkä, M., Walls, M. (2010). Trends in ecosystem service research: early steps and current drivers. Ambio, 39 (4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0048-x
  62. Waage, S., Stewart, E. (2008). Ecosystem Services Management: A Briefing on Relevant Public Policy Developments and Emerging Tools. Fauna & Flora International.
  63. Xu, X., Chen, M., Yang, G., Jiang, B., & Zhang, J. (2020). Wetland ecosystem services research: A critical review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e01027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01027
  64. Zaheri, M., & saadi, S. (2018). Environmental Sustainability Analysis in Rural Communities on the Rim of the Ecosystem of the Lagoon Based on the Ecovillage Model Case study: villages in the margin of Zarivar Wetland. Journal of Environmental Studies, 44(2), 257-275, doi:10.22059/jes.2018.252203.1007597 [In Persian].
  65. Zhang, F., Yushanjiang, A., Jing, Y. (2019). Assessing and predicting changes of the ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in Ebinur Lake Wetland National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang, China. Sci. Total Environ, 656, 1133–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.444
  66. Zhu, H., Guan, Z., & Wei, X. (2016). Factors influencing farmers’ willingness to participate in wetland restoration: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 8(12), 1325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8121325
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 160
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 80


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب