تعداد نشریات | 158 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,240 |
تعداد مقالات | 67,870 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,413,250 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,183,047 |
طراحی چارچوب ارزیابی انطباق با نوپای ناب | ||
فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی توسعه کارآفرینی | ||
دوره 16، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 61، آذر 1402، صفحه 138-153 اصل مقاله (1.54 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی - کمی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jed.2023.365070.654259 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
فاطمه سلوکیان جهرمی؛ سیدهادی میرقادری* ؛ حبیب اله رعنایی کردشولی | ||
گروه مدیریت، دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: هدف این پژوهش، تعیین شاخصها و طراحی چارچوب ارزیابی انطباق با رویکرد نوپای ناب است، تا ابزار مناسبی برای تعیین میزان نوپای ناب بودن هر واحد نوپا ایجاد شود و به حرکت در مسیر ناب شدن اینگونه واحدها کمک کند. روش تحقیق: این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی با ماهیت تحلیلی است. شاخصهای جمعآوری شده از مقالات مرتبط با نوپای ناب و سنجش ناب است که با استفاده از روشهای نسبت روایی محتوایی(CVR) و CREAM، توسط خبرگان غربالگری و نهایی شدند. این شاخصها با استفاده از روش خوشهبندی سلسله مراتبی در نرمافزار MATLAB، دستهبندی و با روش بهترین-بدترین گروهی، وزندهی و اولویتبندی گردیدند. سپس مدل نهایی برای ارزیابی 35 واحد فناور پارک علم و فناوری فارس بکار گرفته شد و نتایج آن به کمک آمار توصیفی و آزمون t تحلیل شد. یافته ها: این پژوهش به یک چارچوب نهایی با 7 بُعد و 38 شاخص وزندار، برای سنجش میزان نوپای ناب بودن کسبوکارهای نوپا دست یافت. همچنین بر اساس سنجش با این چارچوب در واحدهای فناور پارک علم و فناوری فارس، ملاحظه گردید که واحدهای مورد بررسی بهطور متوسط حدود 80 درصد با نوپای ناب انطباق دارند. نتیجه گیری: در چارچوب طراحی شده بیشترین وزن مربوط به بُعد «تحلیل مشتری» و بیشترین وزن بین شاخصها مربوط به شاخص «شناسایی نیاز مشتری» است. برای انطباق بیشتر واحدهای فناور مورد بررسی، بایستی به ترتیب بُعدهای «فرایندهای داخلی»، «مودا» و «تحلیل بازار» تقویت شوند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
نوپای ناب؛ تولید ناب؛ نابسازی؛ کارآفرینی؛ پارک علم و فناوری | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Designing a Framework for Lean Start-Up Conformance | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Fateme Solookian Jahromi؛ Seyed-Hadi Mirghaderi؛ Habib Allah Ranaei Kordshouli | ||
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Objective: The concept of "Lean start-up" is intriguing but vague in its implementation. To the best of our knowledge, measuring the level of leanness of a start-up is not possible yet. However, there are some models for lean assessment in mature companies. This research aims to determine the criteria and design a framework for conforming to lean start-up criteria. The goal is to create a valuable guide for evaluating the degree of leanness of start-up businesses and pave the way for their leanness. Method: This research follows an applied and analytical approach conducted in two phases. We developed a framework for lean start-up conformance in the first phase through five steps. Initially, papers on "lean measurement" and "lean start-up" were searched and reviewed, resulting in 187 unique criteria. In the next step, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) reduced the number of criteria to 52. Subsequently, the CREAM method (acronym for "Clear," "Relevant," "Economic," "Adequate," and "Monitorable") was used to assess the quality of the remaining criteria. Only 38 criteria could pass the CREAM requirement and were qualified for remaining as final criteria. Hierarchical cluster analysis, conducted using MATLAB software, categorized the remaining criteria into 7 dimensions. Finally, the group best-worst method (G-BWM) was used to weight the criteria and dimensions. These steps were conducted through 35 rounds of expert opinion collection through 4 questionnaires and yielded in a lean start-up conformance framework. In the second phase, the created framework was applied to 35 start-up businesses in Fars Science and Technology Park, and the output data was analyzed using the one-sample t-test in SPSS software. Finding: This research developed a framework of 7 dimensions and 38 criteria to measure the degree of leanness in start-up businesses. The framework dimensions, namely "customer analysis," "quality of product manufacturing," "improvement of production system," "management and personnel," "Muda," "internal processes," and "market analysis," have been assigned respective weights of 0.256, 0.149, 0.149, 0.089, 0.076, 0.120, and 0.188. Also, applying the framework to the start-up businesses of Fars Science and Technology Park revealed the extent of their leanness and uncovered the gap to the ideal state of leanness. The average score of leanness in the investigated businesses was found to be 80 percent. Results: The designed framework is a useful guide for measuring and enhancing the degree of leanness in start-up businesses. Notably, the "customer analysis" dimension emerged with the highest weight among the dimensions, while "identifying customer needs" exhibited the highest weight among the criteria in the framework. Applying the framework highlighted the need for start-up businesses in Fars Science and Technology Park to focus on enhancing "internal processes," "Muda," and "market analysis." Future research endeavors could explore extensions of the framework using Fuzzy or gray logic or customize it according to the lifecycle of start-ups. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Lean Start-UP, Lean Manufacturing, Leanness, Entrepreneurship, Science and Technology Park | ||
مراجع | ||
Alavi Matın, Y., Morteza, A., & Farniya, M. (2009). A study of effective factors on being a lean organization (Case study). The Journal of Productivity Management, 2(4 (7)), 103-137. (In Persian) .https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.27169979.1387.2.4.5.5 Anand, G., & Kodali, R. (2010). Development of a framework for implementation of lean manufacturing systems. International Journal of Management Practice, 4(1), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMP.2010.029705 Apte, U., Kang, K. (2006). Lean six sigma for reduced cycle costs and improved readiness. Acquisition Research Sponsored Report Series, California: Naval Postgraduate School. https://www.dair.nps.edu/bitstream/123456789/2783/1/NPS-LM-06-033.pdf Berry, W. L., Christiansen, T., Bruun, P., & Ward, P. (2003). Lean manufacturing: a mapping of competitive priorities, initiatives, practices, and operational performance in Danish manufacturers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(11), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310496616 Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard business review, 91(5), 63-72. http://hbr.org/2013/05/why-the-lean-start-up-changes-everything Chengbin, W., Hongbin, W., Min, D., & Yongyan, F. (2022). Lean startup approaches (LSas): convergence, integration and improvement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121640 Cusumano, M. A. (1992). Japanese Technology Management: Innovations, Transferability, and the Limitations of" Lean" Production, Cambridge: MIT Japan Program. http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/17108/JP-WP-92-09-27478891.pdf Davies, C., & Greenough, R. M. (2010). Measuring the effectiveness of lean thinking activities within maintenance. Retrieved June, 24, 2023, Available from: http://www.plant-maintenance.com/articles/Lean_Maintenance.pdf, 2010. De Faria, V. F., Santos, V. P., & Zaidan, F. H. (2021). The business model innovation and lean startup process supporting startup sustainability. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.106 Dettmer, H. W. (2001). Beyond Lean manufacturing: Combining Lean and the Theory of Constraints for higher performance. Washington: Port Angeles. Duggan, K. J. (2018). Creating mixed model value streams: practical lean techniques for building to demand. NewYork: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12075 Emiliani, M.L. (1998). Lean behaviors. Management Decision, 36, 615-631. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810239504 Farias, L. M. S., Santos, L. C., Gohr, C. F., de Oliveira, L. C., & da Silva Amorim, M. H. (2019). Criteria and practices for lean and green performance assessment: Systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 746-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.042 Found, P., & Rich, N. (2007). The meaning of lean: cross case perceptions of packaging businesses in the UK's fast moving consumer goods sector. International Journal of Logistics research and applications, 10(3), 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560701463812 Frederiksen, D. L., & Brem, A. (2017). How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13, 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0411-x Gao, S., & Low, S. P. (2014). The Toyota Way model: an alternative framework for lean construction. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(5-6), 664-682. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.820022 Ghezzi, A. (2019). Digital startups and the adoption and implementation of Lean Startup Approaches: Effectuation, Bricolage and Opportunity Creation in practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 945-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.017 Groover, M.P. (2010). Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: Materials, Processes and Systems. (4th ed.) New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Hart, M. A. (2012). The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses Eric Ries. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(3), 508–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00920_2.x Haseli, G., Sheikh, R., Wang, J., Tomaskova, H., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2021). A novel approach for group decision making based on the best–worst method (G-bwm): Application to supply chain management. Mathematics, 9(16), 1881. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9161881 Heizer, J. H., & Render, B. (2004). Principles of operations management. Pearson Education, New Jersey, U.S. Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. International journal of operations & production management, 24(10), 994-1011. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570410558049 Hodge, G. L., Goforth Ross, K., Joines, J. A., & Thoney, K. (2011). Adapting lean manufacturing principles to the textile industry. Production Planning & Control, 22(3), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.498577 Hossain, S.S., Jubayer, S.A.M., Rahman, S., Bhuiyan, T., Rawshan, L., Islam, S. (2019). Customer Feedback Prioritization Technique: A Case Study on Lean Startup. In: Misra, S., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2019. ICCSA 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11623. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24308-1_6 Jasti, N. V. K., & Kodali, R. (2019). An empirical investigation on lean production system framework in the Indian manufacturing industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(1), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2017-0284 Jabari, Z., (2016). Lean Start-Up. Second National Conference on Management and Humanistic Science Research in Iran. Tehran, Iran (In Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/597465 Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). Assessing changes towards lean production. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 24-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579610109820 Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x Lian, Y. H., & Van Landeghem, H. (2002, October). An application of simulation and value stream mapping in lean manufacturing. In Proceedings 14th European Simulation Symposium (pp. 1-8). c) SCS Europe BVBA. Lizarelli, F. L., Torres, A. F., Antony, J., Ribeiro, R., Salentijn, W., Fernandes, M. M., & Campos, A. T. (2022). Critical success factors and challenges for Lean Startup: a systematic literature review. The TQM Journal, 34(3), 534-551. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2021-0177 Malmbrandt, M., & Åhlström, P. (2013). An instrument for assessing lean service adoption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(9), 1131-1165. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2011-0175 Maleyeff, J. (2006). Exploration of internal service systems using lean principles. Management Decision, 44, 674-689. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610668914 Maasouman, M. A., & Demirli, K. (2016). Development of a lean maturity model for operational level planning. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 83, 1171-1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7513-4 Mohanty, R. P., Yadav, O. P., & Jain, R. (2007). Implementation of lean manufacturing principles in auto industry. Vilakshan–XIMB Journal of Management, 1(1), 1-32. New, S. J. 2007. “Celebrating the Enigma: The Continuing Puzzle of the Toyota Production System.” International Journal of Production Research, 45(16), 3545–3554. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701223386 Nirwan, M. D., & Dhewanto, W. (2015). Barriers in implementing the lean startup methodology in Indonesia–case study of B2B startup. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.282 Pakdil, F., & Leonard, K. M. (2014). Criteria for a lean organisation: development of a lean assessment tool. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4587-4607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.879614 Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York: Crown Business. Rose, A. M. N., Deros, B. M., & Rahman, M. A. (10 December 2010). Development of framework for lean manufacturing implementation in SMEs. In The 11th Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference (pp. 7-10). Melaka, Malaysia Rother, M., & Shook, J. (2003). Learning to see: value stream mapping to add value and eliminate muda. Cambridge: Lean enterprise institute. Sànchez, A. M., & Pérez, P. M. (2001). Lean indicators and manufacturing strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(11), 1433-1452. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110407436 Scheuenstuhl, F., Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. (2021). How can the lean startup approach improve the innovation process of established companies? An experimental approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(03), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500298 Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of operations management, 25(4), 785-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019 Shepherd, D. A., & Gruber, M. (2021). The lean startup framework: Closing the academic–practitioner divide. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 967-998. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258719899415 Solaimani, S., van Eck, T., Kievit, H., & Koelemeijer, K. (2022). An exploration of the applicability of Lean Startup in small non-digital firms: an effectuation perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 198-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2021-0270 Thangarajoo, Y., & Smith, A. (2015). Lean thinking: An overview. Industrial Engineering & Management, 4(2), 2169-0316. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0316.1000159 Yadav, G., Luthra, S., Huisingh, D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). Development of a lean manufacturing framework to enhance its adoption within manufacturing companies in developing economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245, 118726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118726 Welter, C., Scrimpshire, A., Tolonen, D., & Obrimah, E. (2021). The road to entrepreneurial success: business plans, lean startup, or both?. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/NEJE-08-2020-0031 Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., (1996) Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster. Zayko, M.J., Broughman, D.J. and Hancock, W.M. (1997), “Lean manufacturing yields world-class improvements for small manufacturer”, IIE Solution, April, pp. 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17950/ijer/v3s11/1107 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 167 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 126 |