پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,194 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,207 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 157,046,401 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 118,284,619 |
Design Thinking As an Efficient Platform for Pragmatics of Educational Equipment (Case: primary School Children) | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 3، شماره 2، اسفند 2022، صفحه 261-270 اصل مقاله (477.51 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2023.360227.1095 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Shakib Alipour* 1؛ Masoumeh Rasouli2؛ Mohammad Montazeri3؛ Zahra Dehghani4؛ Hamide Torabi5؛ Mozhgan Sabzehparvar6؛ Neda Broumandi4؛ Mahdiyeh Jafarnejad Shahri7 | ||
| 1Department of Industrial Design, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Faculty of Applied Arts, Tehran University of Art, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Faculty of Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 4School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 5Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Art, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 6Department of Industrial Design, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 7School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of design thinking in enhancing primary school children's learning in the context of using educational equipment. To achieve this objective, a cross-sectional research design was utilized, which involved an examination of the theoretical underpinnings and background of the research. An online questionnaire was administered to gather the necessary information, comprising of two sections: demographic information of the respondents and questions relating to children's education and the role of educational equipment. The Likert questionnaire used a 7-point scale. The sample population included primary school teachers and parents with children aged 7 to 12 years from different cities of Iran. The sampling method was voluntary, and a total of 139 respondents completed the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha was measured at 0.865, indicating the high internal consistency of the survey. The results indicate a significant relationship between the duration of learning with the aid of educational tools and the degree of reliance on creative methods and problem-solving power. The study also found a correlation between the educational tool and the motivation to learn. In summary, this study provides evidence that design thinking is an effective approach to enhance primary school children's learning, particularly in the context of using educational equipment. The findings also highlight the importance of the type and complexity of educational tools, as well as the use of creative methods and problem-solving power, in facilitating students' motivation and willingness to use these tools. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Creativity؛ Design Thinking؛ Learning Performance؛ Educational Tools؛ Problem-Solving | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abedini Nazari, M., Rasouli, S. E., & Saffarian Hamedani, S. (2021). Identifying and developing a curriculum model for teaching philosophy to children (An exploratory-sequential mixed-method research). Thinking and Children. 11(2), p. 303-326. https://doi.org/10.30465/fabak.2021.6089 Abolhassani, Z. (2022). A phenomenological understanding of students’ lived experience of education based on design thinking: Secondary School. Journal of Design Thinking. 3(1), p. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.22059/jdt.2022.347782.1081 Abraham, I., Howard, E., & Asinyo, B. (2022). Design thinking in design innovation among small and medium textile enterprises in Ghana. Journal of Design Thinking. 3(1), p. 49-60. https://doi.org/10.22059/jdt.2022.344139.1078 Albay, E. M., & Eisma, D. V. (2021). Performance task assessment supported by the design thinking process: Results from a true experimental research. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100116 Andersen, H. V., & Pitkänen, K. (2019). Empowering educators by developing professional practice in digital fabrication and design thinking. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 21, p. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.03.001 Arbieto-Batallanos, C. E., Villanueva-Montoya, L. D., Chavez-Ponce, D. S., Alfonte-Zapana, R., & Córdova-Martínez, M. D. (2019). Mobile application based on design thinking for teaching kinematics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2555, p. 257-266. Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2020). It gives you that sense of hope: An exploration of technology use to mediate student engagement with mathematics. Heliyon. 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02945 Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. (2020). Design thinking applications in teaching programming to gifted students. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning. 3(1), p. 1-30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.671621 Badeleh, A., Nosrat, N., & Soleymani Rad, V. (2020). The effect of robotic education on problem-solving skills of high school students in physics. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 14(2), p. 331-340. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4782.2119 Cook, K. L., & Bush, S. B. (2018). Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics. 118(3-4), p. 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12268 Demartini, C., Benussi, L., Gatteschi, V., & Renga, F. (2020). Education and digital transformation: The Riconnessioni Project. IEE Access. 8, p. 186233-186256. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018189 Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control in school-age children. Educational Psychologis. 49(3), p. 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.926225 Giannakos, M. N., & Jaccheri, L. (2018). From players to makers: An empirical examination of factors that affect creative game development. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 18, p. 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.06.002 Gorev, P. M., Telegina, N. V., Karavanova, L. Z., & Feshina, S. S. (2018). Puzzles as a didactic tool for development of mathematical abilities of junior schoolchildren in basic and additional mathematical education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 14(10), em1602. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93675 Grammenos, D., & Antona, M. (2018). Future designers: Introducing creativity, design thinking & design to children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 16, p. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.10.002 Hao, L. J., & Xiao, Z. T. (2017). Research on information-based teaching in reform and practice of architectural design. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 13(7), p. 3493-3500. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00740a Hatzigianni, M., Stevenson, M., Falloon, G., Bower, M., & Forbes, A. (2020). Young children’s design thinking skills in makerspaces. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 27, p. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100216 Jahani, J., Mazaheri, R., Mohamadi, M., & Shafiei, M. (2020). The development and validation of teaching- learning process instrument in smart schools in educational system of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 14(3), p. 493-505. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4199.2021 Jebeliadeh, P., Nourian, M., & Azedolmolki, S. (2021). The critical thinking skills, dispositions and teaching methods in curricula. The Critical Thinking Skills, Dispositions and Teaching Methods in Curricula. Thinking and Children. 11(2), p. 29-62. https://doi.org/10.30465/fabak.2021.5834 Kewalramani, S., Palaiologou, I., & Dardanou, M. (2020). Children’s engineering design thinking processes: The magic of the ROBOTS and the power of BLOCKS (Electronics). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 16(3), em1830. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/113247 Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon. 6, e07309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309 Landoni, M., Rubegni, E., & Nicol, E. (2018). A comparative study into how pupils can play different roles in co-design activities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 17, p. 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2018.04.003 Lin, L., Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., & Shen, S. (2020). From knowledge and skills to digital works: An application of design thinking in the information technology course. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 36, 100646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100646 Loyola, C. C., Grimberg, C., & Colomer, Ú. B. (2020). Early childhood teachers making multiliterate learning environments: The emergence of a spatial design thinking process. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 36, 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100655 MacDonald, C., Backhaus, I., Vanezi, E., Yeratziotis, A., Clendinneng, D., Seriola, L., …, Papadopoulos, G. A. (2021). European union digital education quality standard framework and companion evaluation toolkit. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1936476 Machado, A., de, B., & Fialho, F. (2020). Interaction and interactivity process: Communication in digital education. JINAV: Journal of Information and Visualization. 1(2), p. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.jinav254 Mahmoudi, S. (2020). Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of implementing philosophy for children program on students’ intellectual skills. Thinking and Children. 10(2), p. 263-286. https://doi.org/10.30465/fabak.2020.4958 Mardazad, E., Yarigholi, B., & Piri, M. (2021). The effectiveness of teaching philosophy to children through the community of inquiry approach on students’ academic anxiety. Thinking and Children. 11(2), p. 231-255. https://doi.org/10.30465/fabak.2021.5961 Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research. 97, p. 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007 Movahedi, Y. (2019). The effect of optimal design of the learning space on creativity promoting. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 13(2), p. 379-385. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2018.3352.1856 Noel, L. A., & Liub, T. L. (2017). Using design thinking to create a new education paradigm for elementary level children for higher student engagement and success. Design and Technology Education. 22(1). Rahiem, M. D. (2021). Storytelling in early childhood education: Time to go digital. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy. 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-021-00081-x Rossano, V., Lanzilotti, R., Cazzolla, A., & Roselli, T. (2020). Augmented reality to support geometry learning. IEEE. 8, p. 107772-107780. Safaei, N., Zarei, E., & Samavi, A. (2021). Design and validation of a curriculum pattern based on creative thinking skills for elementary students. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 15(3), p. 579-590. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.5241.2191 Severino, L., Petrovich, M., Mercanti-Anthony, S., & Fischer, S. (2021). Using a design thinking approach for an asynchronous learning platform during COVID-19. IAFOR Journal of Education. 9(2), p. 145-162. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.2.09 Seyedaliyan, S. M., & Salehi, K. (2021). The effect of using educational aids and information technology to improve mathematics learning in secondary school students. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ). 15(4), p. 683-694. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2021.6700.2450 Smith, R. C., Iversen, O. S., & Hjorth, M. (2015). Design thinking for digital fabrication in education. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction. 5, p. 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.10.002 Sprenger, D. A., & Schwaninger, A. (2021). Technology acceptance of four digital learning technologies (classroom response system, classroom chat, e-lectures, and mobile virtual reality) after three months’ usage. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education volume. 18, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00243-4 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 558 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 455 |
||
سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب