سامانه پشتیبانی خدمات اطلاعات

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات158
تعداد شماره‌ها6,252
تعداد مقالات68,009
تعداد مشاهده مقاله116,078,237
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله90,848,405
Rafiei, Mohammad Taghi, Darboui, Hossein, Rezaeenia, Masoud. (1402). A Comparative Study of Calculation Method of the Monetary Damages in International Arbitration.. , (), -. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.93722
Mohammad Taghi Rafiei; Hossein Darboui; Masoud Rezaeenia. "A Comparative Study of Calculation Method of the Monetary Damages in International Arbitration.". , , , 1402, -. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.93722
Rafiei, Mohammad Taghi, Darboui, Hossein, Rezaeenia, Masoud. (1402). 'A Comparative Study of Calculation Method of the Monetary Damages in International Arbitration.', , (), pp. -. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.93722
Rafiei, Mohammad Taghi, Darboui, Hossein, Rezaeenia, Masoud. A Comparative Study of Calculation Method of the Monetary Damages in International Arbitration.. , 1402; (): -. doi: 10.22059/ier.2023.93722

A Comparative Study of Calculation Method of the Monetary Damages in International Arbitration.

Iranian Economic Review
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 12 شهریور 1402
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2023.93722
نویسندگان
Mohammad Taghi Rafiei* 1؛ Hossein Darboui1؛ Masoud Rezaeenia2
1Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Iran
2LL.M. in International Trade Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
Different factors contribute to the assessment of monetary damage whose ignoring results in an inaccurate evaluation of monetary damage. One such factor is the approach used to calculate monetary damages. Concrete and abstract methods of calculation, namely, have been adopted for this purpose. Applying one of the aforementioned methods may result in no monetary compensation for the aggrieved party, whereas the other method may result in substantial monetary damages. Articles 75 and 76 of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods 1980 Vienna (CISG) have embraced both of these methods. Nonetheless, the Convention does not specify the priority or prerequisites for applying these methods, which has led the tribunal to employ them arbitrarily. A circumstance that not only renders the rights of the aggrieved party unpredictable, but also causes inconsistency in the application of the Convention. This article is descriptive and analitical which analyzes these methods and their application conditions and concludes that the concrete method for calculating monetary damages has precedence over the abstract method. When the abstract method’s prerequisites are not met, it is utilized.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Calculation of Monetary Damages؛ Mitigation of Monetary damages؛ CISG؛ PECL؛ UPICC
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 61


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب