ابطال رأی داوری در ایکسید به‌سبب تجاوز آشکار از حدود اختیارات‏

1. الهویی نظری، حمید؛ بهاره احمدپور؛ محمدرضا شکیب (1398). بررسی امکان تجدیدنظر در داوری‌های سرمایه‌گذاری بین‌المللی. فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق عمومی، زمستان، 94(4)، 1191-1210 در:

10. Abedian, H.(2011). judicial Review of Arbitral Awards in International Arbitration – A Case for an Efficient System of Judicial Review. Journal of International Arbitration, 28 (6), 553 – 590, at: www.kluwerlawonline.com (Accessed: 13 may 2022)

11. Banifatemi,Y. (2018). The Law Applicable in Investment Treaty   Arbitration. at: www.shearman.com (Accessed:9 may 2022)

12. Blair,W., Grace, U., gokce, C., & Yang, Z. (2022). Arbitrating financial disputes—are they different and what lies ahead?. Arbitration International, 38(1-2), 3–20, at: www.kluwerlawonline.com,, (Accessed:10 may 2022)

13. Chan, D., Louis, L., & Yi, H. (2021). Proper characterisation of the parol evidence rule and its applicability in international arbitration. Arbitration International, e 37(4), 805–833,at: www.kluwerlawonline.com,, (Accessed: 15 may2022)

14. Crema, L. (2010). Disappearance and New Sightings of Restrictive Interpretation(s). The European Journal of International Law. 21(3), 681–700, www.ejil.org

15. Dijk, M. V. (2014). Is foreign investment good for development?. at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259624208

16. Drahzal, Christopher R (2008). private ordering and international commericial arbitration. Pennsylvania state law review, 113, 1028-1047, (Accessed: 10 may 2022)

17. Gal-Or, N. (2008). The Concept of Appeal in International Dispute Settlement. The European Journal of International Law, 19 (1), 43–65, at: www.ejil.org (Accessed: 12 may 2022)

18. Gaillard, E. (2014). The Extent of Review of the Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration. IAI Series international arbitration, 1, 223-241, athttps://www.iaiparis.com/: (Accessed: 11 may 2022)

19. Fauchald, O. K. (2008). The Legal Reasoning of ICSID Tribunals – An Empirical Analysis. The European Journal of International Law, 19. (2), 301–364, at: www.ejil.org, (Accessed:11 may 2022)

20. Hamby, C. (2016). the court that rules the world buzz feed news (28 august 2016). at: www. Buzzfeed.com/chrishamby/super-court, (Accessed: 13 mat 2022)

21. Lalive, P. (2010). On the Reasoning of International Arbitral Award. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(1), 55–65, www.kluwerlawonline.com, (Accessed: 12 may 2022)

22. L. Smit Duijzentkunst, B., & Sophia L.A, D.. Arbitrary Peace? Consent Management in International Arbitration. The European Journal of International Law, 26(1), 139-168, at: www.ejil.org, (Accessed: 11 may 2022)

23. mayer, P. (2021). Must Justice be a Goal for the Arbitrator?. Arbitration International, 37(2), 503–513, at: www.kluwerlawonline.com,, (Accessed: 15 may 2022)

24. Moltke, K. V. (2018). An International Investment Regime? Issues of Sustainability. international institute for sustainable development, at:   https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225883584, Accessed :14 may 2022

25. Nordlund, F. (2022). Determining the applicable law to the arbitration agreement in the absence of a choice of law clause under Hong Kong Law: a call for renewed. internationalism, Arbitration International, 38(1-2), 43–57, at: www.kluwerlawonline.com, (Accessed: 13 may 2022)

26. Paparinskis, M. (2013). Investment Treaty Arbitration  and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. The European Journal of International Law 24(2), 617– 674, at: www.ejil.org, (Accessed:  12 may 2022)                                                                                                                                   

27. Pham, Huy. T, Christopher, Gan& Baiding, Hu (2022). Causality between Financial Development and Foreign Direct Inv

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328513943estment in Asian Developing Countries. Risk Financial Manag, 15(195), 2-6, at: (Accessed: 15 may 2022)  

28. Platt, R. (2013). The Appeal of Appeal Mechanisms in International Arbitration: Fairness over Finality?. Journal of International Arbitration, 30(5), 531 – 560, www.kluwerlawonline.com, (Accessed: 11 may 2022)

29. Plave, K. (2020). The Law Applicable to the Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements Revisited, Plavec. 82 University of Vienna Law Review, 4, 82-127

30. Puig, S., & Strezhnev, A. (2017). The David Effect and ISDS. The European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 731–761, at: http:/ejil.org, (Accessed: 13 may 2022)

31. Shankar, S. R. (2016). Selection & Determination of Applicable laws in International Commercial Arbitration1. law senate, pp.1-10, This Paper was presented in the international Conference on “ Challenges in International and Domestic Arbitration” organised by Indian Institute of Technical Arbitrators in Chennai on 23rd and 24th of September 2016

32. Schreuer Commentary The ICSID Convention: a Commentary, Cambridge University Press, 2001, at: https://www.cambridge.org/ir/academic/subjects/law/arbitration (Accessed: 13 may 2022)

33. Schreuer, C. (2014). Jurisdiction and Applicable Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Mcggil journal of dispute resolution, 1(1), 1-25, at: www.lawjournal.mcgill.ca,, (Accessed: 14 may 2022)

Documents

34. Commentary on the Draft Convention on Arbitral Procedure Adopted by the International Law Commission at its Fifth Session, prepared by the Secretariat, 1955

35. Updated Background Paper on Annulment for the Administrative Council of ICSID, May 5, 2016 the model rules, appears in Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1958, vol. II

36.UNCTAD,2003, EDM/Misc.232/Add.2

37.UNCTAD, 2000, /OSG/DP/146 on FOREIGN INVESTMENT IN

38.DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

39.Does it Crowd in Domestic Investment?

40. UNCTAD, 2019, Handbook of Statistics, TD/STAT. 44,

41. OECD,2015, Policy Framework for Investment

AWARDS

‌42.Amco Asia Corporation and others v. Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/1)

43. Klöckner Industrie-Anlagen GmbH and others v. United Republic of Cameroon and Société Camerounaise des Engrais (ICSID Case No. ARB/81/2

44. Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. Republic of Guinea (ICSID Case No. ARB/84/4)

‌45. Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3)

‌46. Víctor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No ARB/98/2)

47. Wena Hotels Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/4)

48. Patrick Mitchell v. Democratic Republic of the Congo (ICSID Case No. ARB/99/7)

‌49. Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3

MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/7)

50. CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8)

51. Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12)

52. Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v. United Arab Emirates (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/7)

‌53. CDC Group plc v. Republic of Seychelles (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/14)

‌54. El Paso Energy International Company v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/15)

‌55. Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/25

56. Total S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/1)

‌57. Daimler Financial Services AG v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1)

‌58. Rumeli Telekom A.S. and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S. v. Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16)

‌59. Helnan International Hotels A/S v. Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/19)

‌60. Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula and others v. Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20)

61. Vestey Group Ltd v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/4)

62. Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11)

63. Tza Yap Shum v. Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/6)

‌64. Iberdrola Energía, S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/5)

65. Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited v. Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/20)

66. TECO Guatemala Holdings, LLC v. Republic of Guatemala (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/23)