| تعداد نشریات | 127 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 7,194 |
| تعداد مقالات | 77,207 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 157,046,315 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 118,284,559 |
Meaningful Design of Toys | ||
| Journal of Design Thinking | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 3، شماره 2، اسفند 2022، صفحه 173-186 اصل مقاله (724.45 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jdt.2023.352811.1089 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Jesper Falck Legaard* | ||
| LAB for Play and Design. Design School Kolding, Kolding, Denmark | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Designing objects intended for excitement rather than mere satisfaction has long been a popular subject of design research. Understanding the meaning structures of objects for joy and excitement offers relevant perspectives in this regard for industrial designers. Toys, as objects of play, are pertinent representations of this category and can be an inspirational reference point. The study explores meaning in relation to product design with a particular focus on toys, utilizing the five categories of meaning as a framework for unfolding meaning structures. The aim of the study is to explicate how meaning structures may be examined and designed for, particularly (but not exclusively) in relation to toys. The study indicates that design based on meaning structures rather than exuberant design aesthetics may lead to more meaningful experiences of joyful immersion and exploration of wonder. The paper further aims to demonstrate how the design of toys – and other objects intended for joy and excitement – should (to some degree) adhere to the state of wonder, which may be aided by a focus on meaning structures. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Design؛ Meaning؛ Toys؛ Play؛ Joy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anolli, L. (2005). The detection of the hidden design of meaning. In Anolli, L., Duncan, S., Magnusson, M. S., & Riva, G. (Eds.), The hidden structure of interaction: From neurons to culture patterns. IOS Press. p. 23–50. Bakker, A. B., Hetland, J., Olsen, O. K., Espevik, R., & De Vries, J. D. (2020). Job crafting and playful work design: Links with performance during busy and quiet days. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103478 Barthes, R. (2013). Mythologies: The complete edition, in a new translation (second edition). Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/mythologies-roland-barthes/1110804031 Battarbee, K., & Koskinen, I. (2008). 19—Co-experience; Product experience as social interaction. In Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Hekkert P. (Eds.), Product Experience. Elsevier. p. 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045089-6.50022-8 Blythe, M., & Hassenzahl, M. (2003). The semantics of fun: Differentiating enjoyable experiences. In Funology: From usability to enjoyment. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2967-5_9 Buchanan, R. (2011). Keynote at IXDA. Available at February 25. https://vimeo.com/20379481 Castella, K. (2018). Designing for kids: Creating for playing, learning, and growing (1st edition). Routledge. Desmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of Product Experience. International Journal of Design. Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2009). Special issue editorial: Design & emotion. International Journal of Design. 3(2). Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction (New Ed). The MIT Press. Gadamer, H. G. (1975). Truth and Method. Seabury Press. Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108856 Gelman, S. A., & Davidson, N. S. (2016). Young children’s preference for unique owned objects. Cognition. 155, p. 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.016 Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R., & Bransford, J. (Eds.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Hanington, B. (2017). Design and emotional experience. In Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00006-9 Heljakka, K. (2019). Toys and universal guidelines for design: A designerly perspective on playability of character toys. Proceedings of Universal Design Bangkok. https://www.academia.edu/38605351/Toys_and_Universal_Guidelines_for_Design_A_Designerly_Perspective_on_Playability_of_Character_Toys Hummels, C. (1999). Engaging contexts to evoke experiences. In Overbeeke, K., & Hekkert, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference Design and Emotion. Jensen, J. L. (2012). An experiential approach for innovation. Roskilde. Jensen, J. L. (2013). Teddy bears and talking chairs: Designing from the meaning in experiences. University of Southern Denmark. Jensen, J. L. (2014). Designing for profound experiences. Design Issues. 30(3), p. 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00277 Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Pérez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies. 7(3), 33. Kennedy, G., & Nakashima, M. (2021). How squishmallows won the hearts of college students. The Crimson White. https://thecrimsonwhite.com/81847/culture/how-squishmallows-won-the-hearts-of-college-students/ Kim, C., Self, J. A., & Bae, J. (2018). Exploring the first momentary unboxing experience with aesthetic interaction. The Design Journal. 21(3), p. 417–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1444538 Krippendorff, K. (1989). On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that ‘design is making sense (of things)’. Design Issues. 5(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511512 Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. CRC Press. Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A. (2011). It’s got the look: The effect of friendly and aggressive ‘facial’ expressions on product liking and sales. Journal of Marketing. 75(3), p. 132–146. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.3.132 Laursen, L. N., & Barros, M. (2022). Timely and timeless framing _new Mini Cooper. Design Studies. 82. Leeuwen, L., & Westwood, D. (2010). If winnicott could make toys. International Journal of Arts and Technology. 3. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2010.030493 Legaard, J. F. (2020). Designing aesthetics for play (fulness). Proceedings of the NordDesign 2020 Conference. Legaard, J. F. (2022). Play, flow and wonder – Reassessing the notion of optimal experience (No. 2022120251). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202212.0251.v1 Markussen, T., & krogh, P. G. (2008). Mapping cultural frame shifting in interaction design with blending theory. International Journal of Design. 2(2), 16. McAlister, A. R., Cornwell, T. B., & Cornain, E. K. (2011). Collectible toys and decisions to share: I will gift you one to expand my set. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 29(1), p. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151010X526353 McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2006). The enchantments of technology. In Blythe, M. A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A. F., & Wright, P. C. (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 81–90. Mekler, E. D., & Hornbæk, K. (2019). A framework for the experience of meaning in human-computer interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300455 Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things (1st edition). Basic Books. Overbeeke, K., Djajadiningrat, T., Hummels, C., & Wensveen, S. (2003). Beauty in usability: Forget about the ease of use! In Pleasure with Products: Beyond Usability. Rubin, K. H., & Howe, N. (1985). Toys and play behaviors: An overview. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. 5(3), p. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112148500500302 Sicart, M. (2014). Play Matters. The MIT Press. Thibault, M. (2016). The meaning of play. A theory of playfulness, toys and games as cultural semiotic devices. University of Turin. Toy Industry Association. (2022). Toy of the year awards—TOTY winners. Toy of the year. Retrieved December 14, from https://www.toyassociation.org/toys/events/toy-of-the-year-awards-home.aspx?New_ContentCollectionOrganizerCommon=4. Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (2016). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. International Research in Early Childhood Education. 3(2). www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1933/play.htm Withagen, R., & Caljouw, S. R. (2017). Aldo van Eyck’s playgrounds: Aesthetics, affordances, and creativity. Frontiers in Psychology. 8, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01130 Zhu, Z., & Qin, S. (2021). A literature review on Design for Emotion. 26th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC). p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.23919/ICAC50006.2021.9594218 Zosh, J., M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2017). Toys are tools & science of learning—Discovery, exploration for kids. The Genius of Play. https://thegeniusofplay.org/genius/expert-advice/articles/toys-are-tools-minds-make-the-magic.aspx#.YyglniHP0-Q This article | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 850 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 968 |
||