پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 154 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 5,828 |
| تعداد مقالات | 63,996 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 106,237,883 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 83,138,469 |
شناسایی نارسایی طرح‌های محلی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی استان آذربایجان شرقی در بستر نظریه غیربازنمایی | ||
| پژوهشهای روستائی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 19 بهمن 1401 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jrur.2023.344811.1751 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حسین کریم زاده* 1؛ عقیل خالقی2 | ||
| 1هیات علمی گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی دانشگاه تبریز | ||
| 2دکترای جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران، محقق پسادکتری صندوق حمایت از پژوهشگران و فناوران کشور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تئوری‌های غیربازنمایی بر جغرافیای روستایی تأثیر گذاشته و جغرافی‌دانان نه‌تنها به‌صورت گفتمانی، بلکه به‌عنوان بخشی از مجموعه‌ای از عناصر تجسم‌یافته، تمرین‌شده و تجربه‌شده زندگی با مسائل روستایی درگیر هستند. طرح‌های محلی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی از جمله مسائل مهم روستایی بوده و شناسایی نارسایی‌ها و نابسندگی‌های این طرح‌ها در استان آذربایجان شرقی هدف تحقیق حاضر است. تحقیق در بستر نظریه غیربازنمایی به‌عنوان یک شیوه تفکر استقرایی توأمان به‌صورت ترکیبی از روش کیفی (پدیدارشناسی با نرم‌افزار مکس‌کیودا) برای کشف گزاره‌ها؛ از روش آمیخته (روش پژوهش کیو) برای ذهنیت‌سنجی و کشف الگوهای ذهنی و در نهایت از روش کمی (معادلات ساختاری به روش لیزرل) برای تعیین عوامل نهایی مؤثر در برنامه‌ریزی محلی روستایی استفاده نموده است. «فقدان یک نظام مدیریتی مشخص برای روستا» (مدیریت محلی محور)؛ «عدم توجه به شیوه تولید محلی» (دانش‌بنیان‌محور)؛ «ضعف در نظام تهیه (ضعف علمی مهندسان مشاور در شناخت نیازهای روستاییان)» (ارزیاب‌محور)؛ «ابهام فرایندی و محتوایی در چگونگی تدوین سیاست‌ها و برنامه‌ها» (صریح‌نگر)؛ و «عدم توجه به دانش بومی محلی و مشارکت روستاییان در برنامه‌ریزی محلی» (مشارکت‌گرا و بوم‌محور) به‌عنوان پنج دیدگاه یا الگوی ذهنی درباره مهم‌ترین نارسایی‌های برنامه‌ریزی محلی توسعه روستایی شناسایی شد. مقایسه و اعتبار‌سنجی نهایی روش‌های کمی و کیفی نشان داد «فقدان یک نظام مدیریتی مشخص برای روستا» و «ضعف در نظام تهیه طرح‌های محلی» به‌عنوان اصلی‌ترین نابسندگی‌ها، دو گزاره مهمی هستند که متخصصان استانی، مدیران محلی و افراد جامعه محلی روستایی در مورد آن‌ها توافق و اشتراک‌نظر دارند.مشارکت ذینفعان در تمام مراحل برنامه‌ریزی و ایجاد نظام مدیریتی روستایی واحد جهت برنامه‌ریزی صحیح توسعه پیشنهاد می شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| نظریه غیربازنمایی؛ توسعه محلی؛ روش آمیخته؛ کیو؛ معادلات ساختاری | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Identifying the shortcoming of local plans of rural settlements in East Azerbaijan province in the context of non-representation theory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hossein karimzadeh1؛ Aghil Khaleghi2 | ||
| 1tabriz | ||
| 2. PhD in Geography & Rural Planning, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran. Postdoctoral Researcher in Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Non-representational theories have influenced rural geography, and geographers are dealing with rural issues not only discursively, but also as part of a set of embodied, practiced, and experienced elements of life. Local plans of rural settlements are among the important rural issues and the present study aims to identify the shortcomings and inadequacies of these plans in East Azerbaijan province. Research in the context of NRT as a mixed inductive thinking method has used a qualitative method (phenomenology with MAXQDA) to discover propositions; From the mixed method (Q) to subjectivize and discover mental patterns and finally the quantitative method (SEM by LISREL method) to determine the final effective factors in rural local planning. "Lack of a clear management system for the village" (local management); "Lack of attention to local production methods" (knowledge-based); "Weakness in the procurement system (scientific weakness of consulting engineers in recognizing the needs of the villagers)" (evaluation-oriented); "Process and content ambiguity in how policies and programs are formulated" (explicit); And "Lack of attention to local indigenous knowledge and rural participation in local planning" (participatory and eco-oriented) were identified as five perspectives or mental models on the most important shortcomings of local rural development planning. The final comparison and validation of quantitative and qualitative methods showed that "lack of a clear management system for the village" and "weakness in the local planning system" as the main shortcomings are two important propositions that provincial experts, local managers, and members of the local rural community agree on them. 1. Introduction Rural plans and projects, which he refers to as "rural development plans and the expansion of capitalist relations", due to the predominance of non-participatory nature, they do not provide a fully compatible and indigenous model with existing capacity and potential for local and regional development. Therefore, the study of the results and consequences of the mentioned local rural development plans and programs in East Azerbaijan province as a study area shows that these development plans have not achieved their ideal goal in their rural settlements. They have not achieved much and have always faced failures and failures. The main purpose of this study is to assess the mental patterns of the local community of these deficiencies and also to provide a structural model with generalizability in the context of non-representational theory. 2. Methodology In this study, in order to subjectivize and study the mental patterns of the local community, the inadequacies of local development plans and projects of rural settlements in East Azerbaijan province in the context of non-representational theory as a method of inductive thinking have been used quantitatively and qualitatively as a mixed method. This study has three stages: The first stage is based on the phenomenological method. This stage is a qualitative method in which 26 experts in the field of regional planning at the provincial level form panel members to extract the "options" of the second phase of the research. MAXQDA software is used for axial data encoding. In the second step, the Q method is used. The number of propositions obtained from the results of the first stage is 36 and for scoring the members of the next panel, which consists of 26 local managers, are provided and the factors are identified using factor analysis. In this part of the research, the quasi-normal distribution is used as the standard form of the proposition ranking table in Q methodology. The key factors for the final review and determination of the final influencing factors have been provided to the informed people of the local community in the form of a researcher-made questionnaire. This phase has 130 respondents who use the easy sampling method of non-probability sampling to determine the sample size. SEM using LISREL software is used to process the findings of this step. 3. Results Finally, 5 factors or views with a total cumulative total of 66.014 percent have been identified. Based on the calculated factor loads, five factors or perspectives are observed, so that out of a total of 26 panel members, 7 (27%) of the participants in the perspective of group one, 6 (23%) in group two, 6 (23%)) in group three, 5 people (19%) in group four and finally 2 people (8%) in the view of group five. The criterion for determining the fit of the whole model is the root of the mean power of the approximation error, which appears as (RMSEA) in the output file. When the value of this statistic is between 0.05 to 0.08, the fit will be acceptable, which 0.051 in this output indicates an acceptable fit of this model. The amount of Chi-square (1031.18) is also in the desired range compared to the degree of freedom (256) and the result is 4.2 for accepting the model and it is acceptable. All explicit variables except the variable "neglect of the ability of non-governmental actors and actors and non-governmental organizations (with a value of 1.14)" are confirmed with values of t greater than 1.96. 4. Discussion In all five perspectives, the statements "lack of a clear management system for the village, lack of link between annual budgets and plans, ambiguities in how reports are presented, use of the local community as a source of information not as participants in the local planning process, entrepreneurship management and lack of strengthening creative areas, especially in rural industrial areas of knowledge-based "are the top propositions. . The general results of the structural equation model for the effective variables show the propositions: - Lack of a clear management system for the village "(local management); 5. Conclusion Final comparisons and validations show that the statements "lack of a clear management system for the village" and "weakness in the procurement system (scientific weakness of consulting engineers in recognizing the needs of villagers)" are important shortcomings that provincial specialists, local managers and local rural communities' address. They agree and share. In line with the research results, the following suggestions are made: | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| non-representation theory, Local development, Mixed method, Q method, SEM | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 72 |
||