پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,766 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,218,189 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,964,769 |
سوءبرداشت‌های پوتین و جنگ ۲۰۲۲ اوکراین | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 2، اسفند 1401، صفحه 265-288 اصل مقاله (693.25 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2023.349531.450103 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| سعید شکوهی* | ||
| استادیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| دیدگاه‌ها و تحلیل‌های متفاوتی از حملۀ سال ۲۰۲۲ روسیه به اوکراین مطرح شده است. برخی از این تحلیل‌ها، دلیل حملۀ روسیه را فشار غرب، گسترش ناتو به مرزهای روسیه و نادیده‌گرفتن دغدغه‌های مسکو می‌پندارند و برخی دیگر بر این باورند که جاه‌طلبی‌های شخصی پوتین، فرهنگ راهبردی متفاوت روسیه و مسائل داخلی عامل اصلی متوسل‌شدن کرملین به جنگ با کی‌یف هستند. در این نوشتار به‌دنبال پاسخ این پرسش هستیم که سوءبرداشت‌های پوتین از شرایط داخلی و معادله‌های منطقه‌ای و بین‌المللی چه تأثیری بر رویکرد او نسبت به اوکراین گذاشتند؟ برای پاسخ به آن، یک چارچوب مفهومی ترکیبی و برگرفته از آرای مارتین وایت و جک لوی، از دانشوران برجستۀ جهانی در زمینۀ سیاست بین‌الملل، طراحی کردیم و به‌کار گرفتیم. رویکرد این مطالعه از نوع تبیینی است و روش پژوهش به‌کارگرفته‌شده، روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی جهت‌دار است. در این روش براساس متغیرهای مشخص‌شده در چارچوب مفهومی، داده‌های مورد نیاز با مراجعۀ مستقیم و غیرمستقیم به آرا و دیدگاه‌های پوتین و دیگر نخبگان را به‌دست آورده، رمزگذاری و تفسیر کردیم. یافته‌های نگارنده نشان می‌دهند که پوتین در سه بعد دچار سوءبرداشت بنیادین شد. این سوءبرداشت‌ها همراه با دو عامل پررنگ در فرهنگ راهبردی روسیه یعنی «غرور» و «ترس»، مانند تسهیلگری موجب تسریع و توجیه جنگ با اوکراین شد. این سه دسته سوءبرداشت از این قرارند: ۱. سوءبرداشت در برآورد میزان قدرت خود و دشمن؛ ۲. سوءبرداشت در زمینۀ نیت‌های خصمانۀ دشمن و ۳. سوءبرداشت در زمینۀ واکنش طرف‌های سوم. این سوءبرداشت‌ها در کنار اطلاعات نادرست و سوءمحاسبه‌ها و ترکیب آن‌ها با غرور و ترس، نقش مهمی در تصمیم پوتین برای جنگ داشته‌اند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اوکراین؛ پوتین؛ روسیه؛ جنگ؛ فرهنگ راهبردی؛ سوءبرداشت | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Putin's Misperceptions and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine in 2022 | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saeed Shokoohi | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law & Political Sciences, University of Allameh Tabataba’i | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: In late 2021, Western intelligence services began issuing warnings about Moscow's readiness to invade Ukraine, although Russian elites, including Putin, denied the claim. But to the dismay of observers and the concern of Western nations, he ordered an invasion in February 2022. At first, this action was supposed to be a short and decisive operation with the aim of overthrowing the Zelenskyi government. But the field calculations were wrong and Moscow admitted that every war has its own path and does not necessarily follow the pre-planned path and the plan of the military commanders. The 2022 Russian war on Ukraine sparked different and even contradictory analyses. Some believe that because of NATO's eastward expansion and Ukraine's desire to join this security alliance, the Kremlin is opposed to any option except war. Other scholars believe that Putin attacked Ukraine because of Moscow's strong desire to be recognized and respected as a "great power" or because of elements of Russia's strategic culture. Other studies have focused on Putin's personal characteristics and ambitions as the main source of the attack. This article examines the role of Putin's perceptions and miscalculations in relation to the issue of war. Research Question: The key question of the study is: How have Putin’s misperceptions affected his policy towards Kyiv? There are also a few minor questions, such as: How Putin understands the international position of Russia and its relations with other countries, and how he perceives the intentions of other great powers. Research Hypothesis: This study hypothesizes that Putin's misperceptions of Russia's military might, Ukraine's will and power to resist, his misperception of Ukraine's intentions and his misunderstanding of the reactions of third parties critically contributed to and precipitated his decision to go to war. Methodology (and theoretical framework if there are): To determine the main variables of the research, a conceptual framework, based on the findings of some key scholars of the psychology of International Politics, namely Jack Levy and Martin White, has been adopted. According to the conceptual framework, 3 main categories of misperceptions play an important role in leading countries to war: 1) Misperception of oneself and enemy’s military capabilities; 2) Misperception on the enemy’s intentions and the degree of its animosity, and 3) Misperception on the intentions and reactions of the third parties. The second tier of the conceptual framework includes two key elements of Russian strategic culture, “fear” and “arrogance” which according to Martin White, are the main elements of a war. All of these factors could pave the way for a costly and all-out war. To investigate the role of these factors in the 2022 war in Ukraine, the research method of qualitative content analysis has been used. Directed qualitative content analysis, unlike conventional inductive approaches, is a comparative research approach. In this method, the researcher uses the existing theory and literature to determine the key concepts and variables. Based on those concepts and variables, the researcher begins to collect, code, decode and analyze the data. In the current study, according to the variables of the conceptual framework, the author has directly and indirectly pointed out Putin's views in this field in order to extract his possible misconceptions about Ukraine crisis. In collecting information related to Putin's words, the writer has referred to the interviews and documents published by the Russian Foreign Ministry. To strengthen the reliability of the research, the findings of the existing literature have also been examined. The collected data has been coded, decoded and analyzed in the conceptual framework. Results and Discussion: Cognitive and psychological factors have played a significant role in creating the ground for the war in Ukraine. There is some evidence that highlights the role of the misperceived Russian elites, mainly Putin, in the war against Kyiv. These misconceptions are: 1) Misunderstanding of Ukraine's own and military capabilities, a) overestimating Moscow’s military capabilities and b) underestimating Ukraine's military capabilities 2) Misperception on the intentions of Kyiv; including a) Overestimating the animosity and evil intentions of Ukraine, and b) Underestimating the enemy’s will and courage to resist and 3) Misunderstanding of EU and US response to ongoing events, mainly underestimating their harsh and long-term response. These misconceptions, combined with two key elements of Russian strategic culture, fear and arrogance, led Russia to escalate the crisis into an all-out war. These findings contribute to the literature by articulating a meaningful conceptual framework. Combining cognitive factors with elements of Russian strategic culture can be useful for explaining some fascinating and illusory issues of Russian foreign policy. Conclusion: Russia invaded Ukraine for a variety of reasons. Geopolitical, geo-economics, geo-strategic and even geo-cultural factors played a role in pushing Moscow on the path to war. These factors had taken roots for a long time and didn’t appear suddenly. The findings of this paper help to explain why Putin chose the war path despite previous restraints. Elements of Russia's strategic culture highlighted Moscow's perceived threats and called for an immediate response. In the process of orchestrating a credible and decisive response to threats, elements of this misperception helped significantly to convince Putin that the time had come for a military strike. The role of these misconceptions in the form, tactics, and objectives of the initial mobilization of Russian forces is quite clear. In short, Putin and other military elites’ misperceptions, along with fear and arrogance, paved the way for his war in Ukraine. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Ukraine, Russia, Strategic Culture, Putin, War, Misperceptions | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Barbashin, Anton and Hannah Thoburn (2014), “Putin’s Brain: Alexander Dugin and the Philosophy Behind Putin’s Invasion of Crimea”, Foreign Affairs, March 31, Available at: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/141080/anton-barbashin-and-hannah-thoburn/putins-brain, (Accessed on: 3/09/2022). Beliakova, Polina (2022), “Russian Military’s Corruption Quagmire”, Available at: https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-military-corruption-quagmire/ (Accessed on: 16/07/2022). Booker, Christopher (2014), “Fresh Evidence of How the West Lured Ukraine into Its Orbit.” Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/vladimir-putin/11023577/Fresh-evidence-of-how-the-West-lured-Ukraine-into-its-orbit.html, (Accessed on: 23/08/2022). Charap, Samuel and Keith Darden (2013), “Kiev Isn’t Ready for Europe”, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/21/opinion/kiev-isnt-ready-for-europe.html, (Accessed on: 26/08/2022). Chotiner, Isaac (2022), “Is the Russian Military a Paper Tiger?”, New Yorker, 21 April 2022, Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/is-the-russian-militarya-paper-tiger, (Accessed on: 23/08/2022). Dalsjö, Robert, Michael Jonsson and Johan Norberg (2022), “A Brutal Examination: Russian Military Capability in Light of the Ukraine War”, Survival, Vol. 64, No.3, pp. 7-28, (doi: 10.1080/00396338.2022.2078044). Daneshnia, Farhad and Maral Marabi (2016), “The Constructivist Confrontation of Russia and USA in Ukraine”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 231-248, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2016.60539), [in Persian]. Duncan, Allan (2021), “Myths and Misconceptions in the Debate on Russia: How They Affect Western Policy, and What can Be Done?”, Chatham House Report, Available at: https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/05/myths-and-misconceptions-debate-russia, (Accessed on: 14/08/2022). Flockhart, Trine and Elena Korosteleva (2022), “War in Ukraine: Putin and the Multi-Order World”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 466-481, (doi: 10.1080/13523260.2022.2091591). Fortuin, Egbert (2022), “Ukraine Commits Genocide on Russians: the Term “Genocide” in Russian Propaganda”, Russian Linguistics, )doi.org/10.1007/ s11185-022-09258-5(. Galeotti, Mark (2022), “The Interfering Tsar: Why Putin Is Ukraine’s Best Hope of Victory”, Available at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/theinterfering-tsar-why-putin-is-ukrainesbest-hope-of-victory-lfhm7hp38, (Accessed on: 23/08/2022). Götz, Elias and Jørgen Staun (2022), “Why Russia Attacked Ukraine: Strategic Culture and Radicalized Narratives”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 482-497, (doi: 10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633). Grove, Thomas (2022), “Russia’s Military Chief Promised Quick Victory in Ukraine, but Now Faces a Potential Quagmire”, Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/russias-military-chief-promised-quick-victory-in-ukraine-but-now-faces-a-potential-quagmire-11646582366, (Accessed on: 21/08/2022). Haar, Roberta (2022), “Putin’s Misperceptions about Waging War on Ukraine”, Available at: https://www.ewmagazine.nl/americandreamers/opinie/2022/05/ putins-misperceptions-about-waging-war-on-ukraine-886141, (Accessed on: 13/08/2022). Harris, Shane and Paul Sonne (2021), “Russia Planning Massive Military Offensive against Ukraine Involving 175,000 Troops, U.S. Intelligence Warns”, Washington Post, Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/russia-ukraineinvasion/2021/12/03/98a3760e-546b11ec-87692f4ecdf7a2ad_story.html, (Accessed on: 23/08/2022). Jervis, Robert (1968), “Hypotheses on Misperception”, World Politics, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 454-479, (doi: 10.2307/2009777). Jervis, Robert (1976), Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton University Press. Jervis, Robert (2017), How Statesmen Think: The Psychology of International Politics, Princeton University Press. Koolaee, Elaheh and Mohammad Sedaghat (2017), “Ukraine Crisis and the Russian Military Doctrine”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol.10, No. 1, pp. 205-220, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2017.62908), [in Persian]. Kormych, Borys (2022), “Putin’s Miscalculations”, Available at: https://www. wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/putins-miscalculations, (Accessed on: 13/08/2022). Larson, Deborah and Alexi, Shevchenko (2014), “Russia Says No: Power, Status, and Emotions in Foreign Policy”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3-4, pp. 269–279, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/ 48610401, (Accessed on: 13/08/2022). Levy, Jack (1983), “Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical linkages and Analytical Problems”, World Politics, Vol. 36, No. 01, pp. 76-99, (doi: 10.2307/2010176). McFaul, Michael (2014), “Moscow’s Choice.” Foreign Affairs, November/ December. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/eastern-europe-caucasus/2014-10-17/faulty-powers, (Accessed on: 21/06/2022). Mearsheimer, John (2014), “Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault?”, Foreign Affairs, September/October, Available at: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/141769/john-h-mearshimer/why-the-ukraine-crisis-is-the-wests-fault, (Accessed on: 21/08/2022). Mearsheimer, John (2022), “Playing with Fire in Ukraine: The Underappreciated Risks of Catastrophic Escalation”, Foreign Affairs, Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/playing-fire-ukraine, (Accessed on: 21/09/2022). Medvedev, Dimitry (2008), “Medvedev Doubts Effectiveness of OSCE/NATO-Based Security System.” ITAR-TASS, June 11. Available at: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/CBO9781139179072.019, (Accessed on: 21/07/2022). Minzarari, Dumitru (2022), “Failing to Deter Russia’s War against Ukraine: The Role of Misperceptions”, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Available at: https://www.swp-berlin.org/10.18449/2022C33/, (Accessed on: 21/07/2022). Muraviev, Alexey (2022), “Vladimir Putin Knows a Quick Victory in Ukraine has Become Impossible - Now He's Settling in for the Long Haul”, Available at: https://www.skynews.com.au/world-news/analysis-vladimir-putin-knows-a-quick-victory-in-ukraine-has-become-impossible-now-hes-settling-in-for-the-long-haul/news-story/e90cb0e181b2b5ba608df7c297d6bb1b, (Accessed on: 20/07/2022). Persson, Gudrun (2021), “On War and Peace: Russian Security Policy and Military-Strategic Thinking”, in: Putin’s Russia: Economy, Defence and Foreign Policy, Ed. Steven Rosenfielde, Chapel Hill: World Scientific, (doi: 9789811212680). Putin, Vladimir (2014), “Address by President of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Kremlin.” March 18, Available at: http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/6889, (Accessed on: 3/07/2022). IA Novosti (2006), “Georgia, Ukraine NATO Accession May Cause Geopolitical Shift – FM.” RIA Novosti, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24909881, (Accessed on: 3/08/2022). Rogozin, Dmitry (2008), “Global Security and Propaganda”, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/opinion/01iht-edrogozin.1.14130220.html, (Accessed on: 3/07/2022). Sestanovich, Stephen (2014), “How the West Has Won?”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, pp. 171-175. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/eastern-europe-caucasus/2014-10-17/faulty-powers, (Accessed on: 14/011/2022). Shokoohi, Saeed (2016), “The Role of Elites’ Perception in Iran and Saudi Arabia Tensions”, World Politics, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 39-63 [in Persian]. Available at: https://interpolitics.guilan.ac.ir/article_2179.html, (Accessed on: 19/012/2022). Snyder, Timothy (2014), “Putin’s New Nostalgia”, New York Review of Books, Available at: http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/nov/10/putin-nostalgia-stalin-hitler/, (Accessed on: 21/08/2022). Snyder, Timothy (2014), “Ukrainian Extremists Will Only Triumph if Russia Invades.” The New Republic, April 17. Available at: https://newrepublic.com/authors/timothy-snyder, (Accessed on: 21/08/2022). Stanovaya, Tatiana (2022), “Russia-Ukraine War: What the West Gets Wrong About Russian President Vladimir Putin”, Foreign Policy, Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/06/01/putin-war-ukraine-west-misconceptions/, (Accessed on: 16/08/2022). Stein, Arthur (1982), “When Misperception Matters”, World Politics, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 505-526, (doi: 10.2307/2010332). Stent, Angela (2019), Putin’s World: Russia against the West and with the Rest, Twelve Books Publication. Suslov, Dmitry (2018), “Militarizing the Confrontation: Risks of the New US Nuclear Posture Review”, Valdai Discussion Club, Available at: http://valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/militarizing-the-confrontation-risks/, (Accessed on: 11/07/2022). Sussex, Mathew (2022), “Russia's Invasion of Ukraine has Exposed Vladimir Putin's Three Critical Miscalculations”, Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/ 2022-02-28/invasion-ukraine-russia-putin-three-critical-miscalculations/100859778, (Accessed on: 13/08/2022). Talmazan, Yuliya (2022), “Putin Orders Russian Military to Increase its Forces as Ukraine War Passes the Six Months Mark”, Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/putin-orders-increase-russian-armed-forces-ukraine-war-rcna44774, (Accessed on: 29/09/2).022). Treisman, Daniel (2014), Putin’s popularity: Why did Support for the Kremlin Plunge, then Stabilize? International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development, Los Angeles: University of California. Tsygankov, Andrei (2022), “The Russia-Ukraine War: Why the Hawks Prevailed”, Available at: https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/the-russia-ukraine-war-why-the-hawks-prevailed, (Accessed on: 15/09/2022). Tsygankov, Andrei (2014), “The Frustrating Partnership: Honor, Status, and Emotions in Russia’s Discourses of the West”, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3-4, pp. 345 – 354. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0967067X14000622, (Accessed on: 15/12/2022). White, Ralph (2004), “Misperception and War”, Peace and Conflict, Vol. 10, No. 04, pp. 399-409 Available at: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/ s15327949pac1004_9, (Accessed on: 15/12/2022) | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,103 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 638 |
||