الف) فارسی
- آذری، هاجر و طباطبایی حصاری، نسرین (1396). چالشهای نظام حقوقی ایران در الحاق به معاهدات حقوق بشری از دیدگاه حقوق بینالملل. مجلۀ حقوق تطبیقی، 8 (1)، 24-1.
- الشریف، محمدمهدی و آرایی، حمید (1396). پلورالیسم استدلال حقوقی در پرتو تفسیرهای متعارض. حقوق تطبیقی، جلد سیزدهم، 1 (پیاپی 107)، 26-3.
- انصاریپور، محمدعلی (1399). پایان حضانت با بلوغ است یا بلوغ و رشد؟ فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، 50 (4)، 663-647.
- بندرچی، محمدرضا (1383). حضانت در فقه و قانون- بحثی در مادۀ 1169 قانون مدنی، نشریۀ فقه اهل بیت. (37)، بهار، 146-131.
- توحیدی، احمدرضا و کیخسروی، مهدی (1397). دستیابی به حقوق بشر کودکان از رهگذر برررسی تفصیلی مفهوم بهترین مصلحت کودک در آموزههای حقوقدانان بینالمللی. فصلنامۀ تحقیقات حقوقی معاهده، (3)، 171-191.
- روشن، محمد و حمدی، حسن (1398). مصالح عالیه کودک در حقوق و رویه قضایی ایران و کنوانسیون حقوق کودک. فصلنامۀ حقوق کودک، سال اول (1)، بهار، 36-11
- سعیدی گراغانی رحمتالله و کیخا محمدرضا (1397). بررسی فقهی و حقوقی عنصر مصلحت در قانون حمایت خانواده مصوب 1391. فصلنامۀ پژوهشهای فقه و حقوق اسلامی، سال چهاردهم، (52)، تابستان، 110-9.
- غنیزاده بافقی، مریم (1398). نسبتسنجی وضعیت کودکان دارای معلولیت با مصالح عالیۀ کودک در پرتو قوانین ایران و اسناد بینالمللی. مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، 10(2)، 616-598.
- صفایی، سید حسین؛ عراقی، سید عزتالله؛ امامی، اسدالله؛ قاسمزاده، سید مرتضی؛ صادقی، محمود؛ برزویی، عباس؛ حمیدزاده، احمد و آهنی، بتول (1387). بررسی تطبیقی حقوق خانواده. موسسۀ انتشارات و چاپ دانشگاه تهران، چاپ دوم.
- محسنی، مهدی (1396). نقش داوری و مراکز مشاوره خانواده در فرایند طلاق با تاکید بر آرای قضایی. پایاننامۀ کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه آزاد واحد نراق.
- هدایتنیا، فرجالله (1395). طرح تلفیق داوری و مشاوره در دادگاه خانواده. فصلنامۀ تخصصی دین و قانون، (13)، پاییز.
ب) انگلیسی
- Ackerman, M. J. (2006). Clinician’s Guide to Child Custody Evaluations. Published by John Wiley & Sons, inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
- Al-Sharif, M and Araei, H (2016). "Pluralism of legal reasoning in the light of conflicting interpretations", Comparative Law, Volume 13, Number 1 (107 series), pp. 26-3 (In Persian).
- Ansaripour, M (2019) "Does custody end with maturity or maturity and growth?", Private Law Studies Quarterly, Volume 50, Number 4, pp. 663-647 (In Persian).
- Azari, H and Tabatabai-Hissari, N (2016). "Challenges of Iran's legal system in joining human rights treaties from the perspective of international law", Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 8, Number 1, pp. 1-24 (In Persian).
- Babb, B. A., Danziger, G., Moran, J. D., & Mack, W. A. (2009). Child Custody Evaluations : Review of the Literature and Annotated Bibliography. Available at SSRN 2496930
- Bailey, R., Dana, D., Bailey, E., & Davis, F. (2020). The Application of the Polyvagal Theory to High Conflict Co-Parenting Cases. Family Court Review, 58(2), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12485
- Bandarchi, M (2004). "Custody in jurisprudence and law - a discussion on Article 1169 of the Civil Code", Ahl al-Bayt Fiqh Journal, No. 37, Spring, pp. 131-146 (In Persian).
- Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2002). a Critical Review of Child Custody Evaluation Reports. Family Court Review, 40(2), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00827.x
- Donohue, W. O., & Bradley, A. R. (1999). Conceptual and Empirical Issues in Child Custody Evaluations, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice,V6, N3, Fall.
- Emery, R. E., Otto, R. K., & Donohue, W. T. O. (2005). Psychologicals Science in the Public Interesr. A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations Limited Science and a Flawed System. 6(1), 1–29. DOI: 1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00020.x
- Fidler, B. J., & Bala, N. (2020). Guest Editors’ Introduction to the 2020 Special Issue on Parent–Child Contact Problems: Concepts, Controversies & Conundrums. Family Court Review, 58(2), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12471
- Fischel-wolovick, L. (2020). Battered mothers and children in the courts : A lawyer’s view, 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.1669
- Garber, B. D. (2020). Special Issue : Parent-Child Contact Problems : Concepts, Controversies, & Conundrums Case Evaluation and Response Sherlock Holmes and the Case Of Resist / Refuse Dynamics : Confirmatory Bias and Abductive Inference In Child Custody Evaluations, 58(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12478
- Gardner, R. A. (2004). Articles Commentary On Kelly And Johnston's “The Alienated Child : A Refomulation Of Prental Alienation Syndrome”, Family Court Review , 39 (3), July 2001. 42(4).
- Ghanizadeh Bafghi, M (2018). "Relativity of the situation of children with disabilities with the best interests of the child in the light of Iranian laws and international documents", Comparative Law Studies, Volume 10, Number 2 (In Persian).
- Gould, J. W. (1999). Part lbo : A Paradigm for Forensic Evaluation of Child Custody Determination, 37(2), 159–178.
- Hartenstein, J. L. (2016). Tender Years Doctrine. Encyclopedia of Family Studies, October, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs449.
- Hedayat-Niya, Faraj-Allah (2015) "A plan to combine arbitration and counseling in the family court", Specialized Quarterly Journal of Religion and Law, No. 13, Autumn (In Persian).
- Hysjulien, C., & Benjamin, G. A. H. (1994). Child Custody Evaluation A Review of Methods Used in Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution. 32(4), 466–489.
- Jaffe, G., P., Crooks, C. V., & Bala, N. (2009). A Framework for Addressing Allegations of Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes. July, https://doi.org/10.1080/15379410903084517
- Kelly, J. B. (2010). Commentary on “Family Bridges: Using Insights From Social Science To Reconnect Parents and Alienated Children”, (Warshak, 2010). Family Court Review, 48(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2009.01289.x.
- Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differenti Among Types OF Intimate Partner Violence : Research Update AND Implications For Internentions. 46(3), 476–499.
- Kelly, R. F., & Ramsey, S. H. (2009). Child Custody Evaluations : Social Science Child Custody Evaluations : The Need For Systems- Level Outcome Assessments,*. 47(2), 286–303.
- (1994). The determination of child custody, The Future of Children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, 4(1), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602481.
- Massimillo Webster, A. (2022). Specific Factors Influencing Child Custody Evaluations,(Vol. 7, Issue 2).
- Max Werner. (1987). A C0mprehensive Child Custody Evaluation Protocool By Max Werner *. 25(21), 1–7.
- Mohseni, M (2016) "The role of arbitration and family counseling centers in the divorce process with an emphasis on judicial decisions", Master's thesis, Naraq Branch Azad University (In Persian).
- Quinnell, F. A., & Bow, J. N. (2001). Psychological Tests Used In The Child-Custody-Evaluations, Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19: 491-501.
- Rešetar, B., & Emery, R. E. (2008). Children’S Rights in European Legal Proceedings: Why Are Family Practices So Different From Legal Theories?, Family Court Review, 46(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00193.x.
- Roshan, Mand Hamdi, H (2018) "The rights of the child in Iranian law and judicial procedure and the Convention on the Rights of the Child", Children's Rights Quarterly, 1st year, 1st issue, Spring (In Persian).
- Safai, H; Iraqi, S; Emami, A,; Sadeghi, M; Barzoui, Abbas; Hamidzadeh, Ahmad and Ahani, Betul (2007). omparative study of family law, Publishing and Printing Institute of Tehran University, second edition (In Persian).
- Saidi-Graghani R and Kikha M (2017) "Jurisprudential and legal review of the element of expediency in the family support law approved in 2018", Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research Quarterly, 14th year, number 52, summer, pages 9-110 (In Persian).
- Saidi-Graghani R and Kikha M (2017) "Jurisprudential and legal review of the element of expediency in the family support law approved in 2018", Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research Quarterly, 14th year, number 52, summer, pages 9-110 (In Persian).
- Simon, R. A., & Stahl, P. M. (2014). Analysis in Child-Custody-Evaluation Reports : A Crucial Component Analysis in Child-Custody-Evaluation Reports : A Crucial Component", September.
- Stark, D., Choplin, J., & Wellard, S. (2019). Properly Accounting for Domestic Violence in Child Custody Cases: An Evidence-Based Analysis and Reform Proposal. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 26(26.1), 1. https://doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.26.1.properly.
- Tahidi, A and Keikhosravi, M (2017). "Achieving children's human rights through a detailed review of the concept of the best interest of the child in the teachings of international lawyers", Treaty Legal Research Quarterly, No. 3 (In Persian).
- Virtue, Frances. M. (2011). Applying Case Study Methodology To Child Custody Evaluations. Family Court Review, Vol. 49,(2), 336-347.
|
