پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,757 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,115,431 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,882,381 |
چالش‌های دیپلماسی فرهنگی ایران و ترکیه در آسیای مرکزی | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 2، اسفند 1401، صفحه 289-313 اصل مقاله (587.87 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2020.305304.449939 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| الهه کولایی1؛ یوسف باقری* 2 | ||
| 1استاد گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2دکتری مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| با فروپاشی اتحاد شوروی، آسیای مرکزی به‌عنوان پاره‌ای مهم از این نظام سیاسی، در معرض تغییر و تحولات جدی قرار گرفت. اقتصادهای ورشکسته، تداوم الگوها و سنت‌های فرسوده، کنش سیاسی و بنیان‌های هویتی ازهم‌گسیخته، جمهوری‌های آسیای مرکزی را در همان ابتدای دهۀ 1990 دچار آشفتگی ساخت. جمعبندی نخبگان سیاسی این کشورها، استقبال از الگوهای پیشنهادی بازیگران خارجی برای برون‌رفت از این بن‌بست بود. جمهوری اسلامی ایران و ترکیه دو همسایه‌ای بودند که بیشتر از دیگران به ذهن رهبران این جمهوری‌ها می‌آمدند. با توجه به پاره‌ای از میراث مشترک فرهنگی- هویتی این دو کشور با این جمهوری‌ها، هر دو قدرت با بهره‌گیری از چاشنی فرهنگ برای نفوذ بر این منطقه می‌کوشیدند. اما سیاستهای فرهنگی تهران و آنکارا به‌تدریج با موانعی جدی روبه‌رو شد. در این پژوهش به‌دنبال پاسخ به این پرسش هستیم که چالش مهم پیش روی دیپلماسی فرهنگی ایران و ترکیه در آسیای مرکزی چیست؟ در پاسخ این فرضیه مطرح می‌شود که برای ایران امنیتی‌شدن دستور کارهای فرهنگی این کشور و برای ترکیه زمزمۀ نوعثمانیگری و هراس از تسلط منطقه‌ای ترکیه، چالش اساسی فراروی دیپلماسی فرهنگی آن در آسیای مرکزی است. به‌نظر می‌رسد در این دورۀ سی ساله در عرصۀ کنشگری فرهنگی دو کشور در آسیای مرکزی، سرانجام نتیجۀ آن، ناکامی نسبی بوده است. روش این نوشتار کیفی با رویکرد توصیفی- تحلیلی از نوع پس‌رویدادی و شیوۀ گردآوری دادهها بر اساس دادههای استنادی و مجازی است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آسیای مرکزی؛ اتحاد شوروی؛ ایران؛ ترکیه؛ دیپلماسی فرهنگی؛ میراث فرهنگی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Iran and Turkey's Cultural Diplomacy Challenges in Central Asia | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Elaheh Koolaee1؛ Yousef Bagheri2 | ||
| 1Professor, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Ph. D, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: After the disintegration of the USSR, Central Asia as an important part of this political system was exposed to serious changes and developments. Bankrupt economies, the persistence of outdated patterns and traditions of political action, and fragmented identity foundations plagued the Central Asian republics in the early 1990s. Regarding the issue of identity, during the Soviet era, Moscow worked to suppress the emergence of any ethnic (Turkish, Persian) or religious (Islamic) identities that would pose a threat to the ideology of Communism. But with the collapse of this union, the Central Asian republics were in a position in which Iran and Turkey were trying to use identity-based foreign policies to invest in new geographies. In the meantime, the political elites of the Central Asian countries decided to accept the models presented by the international actors to get out of this impasse. The Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey were two neighbors that were mentioned more than others in the minds of the leaders of these republics. Considering some common cultural-identity heritages of these two countries with these republics, both of these powers tried to penetrate this region by using cultural elements. But the cultural policies of Tehran and Ankara gradually faced serious obstacles. Research Question: What is the main challenge facing the cultural diplomacy of Iran and Turkey in Central Asia? Research Hypothesis: For Iran, the securitization of its cultural agendas and for Turkey, the whisper of Ottomanism and fear of Turkey's regional dominance is the main challenge for their cultural diplomacy toward Central Asia. Methodology (and theoretical framework if there are): This research is applied based on purpose and descriptive based on data collection. Also, this research was done after the event. This means that the researcher studies the possible cause of the dependent variable and the independent and dependent variables that occurred in the past. In this article, Public and cultural diplomacy have been selected as the theoretical framework and will be explained subsequently. Results and Discussion: With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Central Asian republics underwent serious changes. The fundamental question is "Who am I?" Or, to be more precise, the identity crisis has been raised as an important challenge for these republics. Moscow could not give them a new identity, and therefore the identity crisis was formed in parallel with the political, economic, and security crises in the new republics. In this situation, these countries sought to create an identity from the very beginning of their independence, so that it would be a solid foundation for them to form a nation-state. The near horizon of these republics was Iran and Turkey, with whom they had identity and cultural affinity more than others. With the knowledge of the elites of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Republic of Turkey about this loss, the revival and consolidation of cultural relations along with political, economic and security relations were put on the agenda of Tehran and Ankara. Iran entered into cultural relations with these republics based on categories such as cultural, linguistic (in a more limited dimension), religious and historical commonalities. But the main issue for Iran was the security perspective. Turkey defined Central Asia as a land for its cultural influence due to some important factors such as extensive linguistic and religious commonalities and pursued diplomacy and cultural efforts towards this region in the 1990s. Turkey also faced challenges in the way of advancing its cultural policies. Turkish imperialism and the arrogance of Central Asian Turks is the key to understanding Turkey's cultural challenges in this region. Iran's cultural foreign policy officials should be aware of the sensitivities and security concerns of Central Asian leaders and remove the perception of "other" from Iran in all their cultural activities in these republics. To improve the status of Iran's cultural diplomacy in Central Asia, this article suggests that Iran should follow strategies at three national, regional, and global levels. Conclusion: With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the countries of Central Asia faced deep identity crises and were unable to establish their nation-states. Also the Central Asian republics were exposed to serious changes and developments. The basic question "Who am I?" Or to put it more precisely, the identity crisis has emerged as an important challenge for these republics. With these developments, the arena was available for actors like Iran and Turkey more than others. Because both Iran and Turkey had characteristics that made it possible for them to be active in Central Asia. However, due to the lack of proper understanding of the Central Asian environment, Iran and Turkey made some strategic mistakes. Ultimately, they failed to capitalize on the Central Asian identity crisis. However, Turkey was a little more successful compared to Iran. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Central Asia, Iran, Turkey, Cultural Diplomacy, Collapse, Soviet Union, Cultural Heritage | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adami, Ali and Mahsa Noori (2013), “Turkish Cultural Diplomacy in Central Asia: Opportunities and Challenges Facing”, Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 19, No. 83, pp. 1-27, Available at: http://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_12319.html, (Accessed on: 3/5/2019), [in Persian]. Aras, Bulent (2000), “Turkey’s Policy in the Former Soviet South: Assets and Options”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 1, No, 1. pp. 36-60, (doi.org/10.1080/ 14683840008721220). Atal, Subodh (2003), “Central Asian Geopolitics and U.S. Policy in the Region: The Post-11 September Era”, Mediterranean Quarterly, Vol. 5. No. 2, pp. 95-109, Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/42955/summary#info_wrap. (Accessed on: 3/6/2019). Ataov, Turkkaya (1997), “Central Asia on the Threshold of the 21th Century”, Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 66-75, Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/0c8621a2390296830b747a3ab6bf728d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1036373, (Accessed on: 3/5/2019). Balci, Bayram and Thomas Liles (2018), “Turkey’s Comeback to Central Asia”, Insight Turkey, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 11-26, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/ stable/pdf/26542170.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ae7bee17cc432895586d70d71394fec89&ab_segments=&origin=&acceptTC=1, (Accessed on: 3/7/2019). Brill Olcott, Martha, Anders Aslund and Sherham W. Granett (1995), Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States, Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, (doi: 10.25253/99.2018204.06). Brzezinski, Zbigniew (1998), The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York: Basic Books. Cengiz, Sinem (2018), Turkey Carves Out a New Role for Itself in Central Asia, Available at: https://www.arabnews.com/node/1296696, (Accessed on: 12/05/ 2020). Dehshiri, Mohamad Reza (2014), Cultural Diplomacy of Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran: Elmi Farhangi Publishers. Dewdney, Jc. (1993), “The Turkic Peoples of the USSR”, in: Bainbridge, Margaret, The Turkish Peoples of the World, London: Kegan Paul. Edwards, Mattew (2003), “The New Great Game and the New Great Gamers: Disciples of Kipling and Mackinder”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 83-102, (doi:10.1080/0263493032000108644). Fidan, Hakan (2010), “Turkish Foreign Policy towards Central Asia”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 109-121, (doi:10.1080/ 19448950903507560). Freire, Maria and Roger Kanet (2010), Key Players and Regional Dynamics in Eurasia: The Return of the ‘Great Game’, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Gharabaghi, Kiaras (1994), “Development Strategies for Central Asian in the 1990s: In Search of Alternatives”, The World Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 103-121, (doi:10.1080/01436599408420366). Hale, William (2000), Turkish Foreign Policy 1774–2000, London: Frank Cass, (doi:10.4324/9780203102022). Hamilton, Keith and Richard Langhorne (1995), The Practice of Diplomacy. Its Evolution, Theory, and Administration. New York: Routledge, (doi:10.4324/ 9780203841891). Hunter, Shireen (2003), “Iran’s Pragmatic Regional Policy”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 133-147, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357722, (Accessed on: 17/7/2019). Kavalski, Emilian (2010), The New Central Asia: The Regional Impact of International Actors. World Scientific. Kebriaee, Ali (2011), “Political Islam in Central Asia: A Study of the Opportunities and Challenges of the Islamic Republic of Iran”, Cultural Relations, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 56-80, (doi:10.22059/jcep.2018.207347.449647), [in Persian]. Kinross, Patrick (1964), Ataturk: The Rebirth of a Nation. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Koolaee, Elaheh and Seyed Mehdi Nabavi (2020), “Cultural Factors Affecting the Future of Iran-Turkey Relations”, Quarterly Journal of Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 160-184, (Available at: http://journal.iiwfs.com/article_113112.html), (Accessed on: 29/7/2019). [in Persian]. Koolaee, Elaheh and Mohammad Moaddab (2009), Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO), Achievements and Prospects, Tehran: University of Tehran Press. Koolaee, Elaheh and Others, Iran’s Science Diplomacy in the South Caucasus, Tehran: Center for Scientific International Collaboration, 2016-2017 Landau, Jacob (1974), Radical Politics in Modern Turkey. Leiden: Brill, (doi:10.4324/9781315628448). Mackinder, Halford (2004), “The Geographical Pivot of History”. The Geographical Journal, Vol. 170, No. 4, pp. 298-321, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3451460, (Accessed on: 29/8/2019). Malashenko, Alexei (1998), “Turning Away from Russia: New Directions for Central Asia”, in: Bruno CopPieters and Others, Commonwealth and Independence in Post-Soviet Eurasia, London: Frank Cass. Matsuura, Koïchiro (2005), "Appendix I UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity”, Vol. 52, No. 1, (doi:10.1177/039219210505061). Menashri, David (1998), Central Asia Meets the Middle East, London: Frank Cass, (doi:10.4324/9781315037493). Milton, Cummings (2003), Cultural Diplomacy and the United States Government: A Survey, Washington: Center for Arts and Culture. Mirfakhraee, Seyyed Hasan and Majid Firoozmandi-e Bandpey (2011). “Iranian Cultural Diplomacy in Central Asia and the Caucasus; Opportunities and Challenges”, Central Eurasian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp 443-448, (doi:10.22059/jcep.2018.207347.449647), [in Persian]. Pajtinka, Erik (2014), “Cultural Diplomacy in Theory and Practice of Contemporary International Relations”, Politické vedy, No. 4, pp. 95-108, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269763112, (Accessed on: 01/05/ 2020). Peyrouse, Sebastien and Sadykzhan Ibraimov (2010), “Iran’s Central Asia Temptations”, Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, Vol. 10. pp. 87-101, (Available at: https://www.hudson.org/content/researchattachments/attachment/ 1290/peyrouse_ibraimov.pdf), (Accessed on: 01/02/2020). Poulton, Hugh (1997), Top Hat, Grey Wolf, and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic. New York: New York University Press. Sadri, Houman A (1999), An Islamic perspective on Non-Alignment: Iranian Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice, Journal of Third World Studies, Vol, 16. No. 2, 193-217, (doi: 10.1057/9780230286429_8). Sajjadpour, Seyed Mohammad (1992), "Current Attitudes in the West on Iran's Relations with the Soviet Republics", Central Asian and Caucasus Studies, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 97-116 [in Persian]. Sanaee, Mehdi (2011), Relations between Iran and Central Asia: Trends and Prospects, Tehran: Institute for Political and International Studies, [in Persian]. Senol, Korkut (2016), “The Diyanet of Turkey and Its Activities in Eurasia after the Cold War, Journal of Acta Slavica Iaponica, Vol. 28, pp.117-139, (doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.). Smith, Steve and John Baylis (2004), Globalization of Politics: International Relations in the New Age: Historical Background and Theories, Structures and Processes, Translated by: Abolghasem-e Rah Chamani, Tehran: Tehran International Studies and Research Institute, [in Persian]. Suvankulov, Farrukh and Yunus Guc (2012), “Who Is Trading Well in Central Asia? A Gravity Analysis of Exports from the Regional Powers to the Region”, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 21-43, Available at: https://www.ejbe.org/EJBE2012Vol05No09p021SUVANKULOV-GUC.pdf, (Accessed on: 01/05/2019). Wastnidge, Edward (2014), “Pragmatic Politics: Iran, Central Asia and Cultural Foreign Policy”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 1-13, Available at: file:///C:/Users/Alpacino/Downloads/pragmatic-politics-iran-central-asia-and-cultural-foreign-policy.pdf, (Accessed on: 09/05/2020). Wastnidge, Edward (2016), Diplomacy and Reform in Iran: Foreign Policy under Khatami, Bloomsbury Publishing. Wastnidge, Edward (2017), Central Asia in the Iranian Geopolitical Imagination, Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, No 1. At: http://oro.open.ac.uk/id/ eprint/49201, (Accessed on: 14/04/2020). Winrow, Gareth (1992), “Turkey and Former Soviet Central Asia: National and Ethnic Identity”, Central Asian Survey, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 101-111, (doi:10.1080/02634939208400782). Yazdani, Enayatollah and Seyyed Ahmad-e Fattahi (2008), “The Impact of The Islamic Revolution of Iran on Islamic Movements in Central Asia”, Matin Researches, No. 39, pp. 119-144, Available at: https://www.sid.ir/paper/458142/ fa#downloadbottom, (Accessed on: 3/6/2020), [in Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 494 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 356 |
||