پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,240 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,867 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,410,361 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 90,179,755 |
واکاوی تطبیقی جایگاه چین در رویکرد نگاه به شرق در سیاست خارجی احمدی نژاد و روحانی | ||
| مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی | ||
| دوره 15، شماره 1، شهریور 1401، صفحه 127-155 اصل مقاله (632.35 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcep.2022.338889.450060 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| بهاره سازمند* 1؛ مریم گودرزی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2دکتری مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| نگاه به شرق، برآمده از نقش متغیر تصمیم‌سازان داخلی متأثر از ساختار نظام بین‌الملل در سیاستخارجی ایران است. با پیروزی احمدی‌نژاد، نیاز به تجدیدنظر در اولویت‌بندی سیاستخارجی احساس شد و در نشست‌های علمی و اجرایی بحث «نگاه به شرق» تقویت شد. تبیین می‌شد که از ظرفیت‌های موجود در سیاستخارجی به‌خوبی استفاده نشده و حرکت به‌سوی شرق و ایجاد اتحاد راهبردی با چین یکی از ظرفیت‌هایی است که به تقویت جایگاه ایران منجر می‌شود. در این دوره، تلاش شد جایگاه چین ارتقا یابد. با پیروزی روحانی در انتخابات ریاست‌جمهوری، تلاش شد در قالب مذاکرات هسته‌ای با آمریکا دوباره، تعامل با غرب همانند دوران اصلاحات و سازندگی در اولویت قرار بگیرد. اما از نیمۀ دولت روحانی، به‌ویژه پس از خروج آمریکا از برجام و کاربست سیاست فشار حداکثری، بار دیگر تجدیدنظرهایی در سیاستخارجی ایجاد شد و اولویت به روابط فعالانه با چین مورد توجه قرار گرفت. در این نوشتار با روش مقایسه‌ای به‌دنبال پاسخ به این پرسش هستیم که کدام مؤلفۀ تصمیم‌سازان داخلی و ساختار نظام بین‌الملل، در جایگاه چین در این دو دوره برای ایران مؤثر بوده است؟ برای پاسخ به این پرسش از چارچوب نظری واقع‌گرایی نوکلاسیک و روش مقایسه‌ای استفاده کردیم. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد روابط ایران با چین در هر دو دوره به‌شدت متأثر از ساختار نظام بین‌الملل بوده است و دردورۀ روحانی بیش از دورۀ احمدی‌نژاد، جایگاه چین در نگاه به شرق برجسته شده است. همین ساختار، نگرش تصمیم‌سازان داخلی را به چین معطوف کرده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ایران؛ چین؛ سیاست خارجی؛ ساختار نظام بین‌الملل؛ نگاه به شرق | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A Comparative Analysis of China’s Position in Ahmadinejad and Rouhani look East Policy | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Bahareh Sazmand1؛ Maryam Goudarzi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| 2Ph. D, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction: The look to east is the result of oscillating role of internal decision makers influenced by the international structure in Iran’s foreign policy. With Ahmadinejad’s victory, a need to reconsider prioritizations in foreign policy was felt and the topic “look to east” was highlighted in scientific and executive circles pointing out that the existing capacity in foreign policy had not been exploited properly. Thus, a move toward the east and forming a strategic alliance with China was known as one of the capacities which would lead to a more powerful status for Iran. At that period, efforts were made to enhance the place of China in foreign policy. With Rouhani’s election victory, attempts were aimed at focusing on interaction with the West one more time, just like when Executives of Construction Party and Popular Party of Reforms were in power. Since the middle of Rouhani’s government, however, particularly due to the United States withdrawing JCPOA and applying maximum pressure policy, revisions to the foreign policy were made once again and the preference of proactive relationship with China was taken into consideration. During the last 40 years, Iran has been passing a trend full of tension with the West and in the last two decades, regional players have taken a trend of convergence with the West against Iran. Such contradiction is caused Iran to consider a look east approach in order to get rid of isolation in its foreign policy, reduce the impact of sanctions, and increase multilateralism. Ahmadinejad’s coming to power coincided the deadlock in nuclear negotiation with the EU and when the EU proposals were considered by the Iranian authority in opposition to the negotiations in Khatami’s period between the two sides, problems emerged. These factors justify the look to east in foreign policy both in affirmative and negative terms. From negative point of view, these principles are against the structure of the international system and USA approaches. China in spite, did not follow a trend based on convergence with Iran due to the pressure of that same structure. In Rouhani’s time, with the suspension of sanctions and signing JCPOA, the ground was ready for modifying the role of international system structure in Iran’s foreign policy and the trend of approaching the west began. With USA withdrawing JCPOA, maximum pressure policy and reinforcing regional unions against Iran, Rouhani’s government, also affected by the pressure from international system structure, followed a China-centered look east policy. Iran is facing problems regarding its foreign policy which considers international system structure undesirable. This issue became more obvious with the increase of various sanctions during Ahmadinejad and Rouhani’s time including post JCPOA in a way that governments considered finding ways of escaping from pressure of the structure for example by means of shifting foreign relations to some countries or deepening relations with others. Iran-China relation in these governments is affected by these structural situations dominating Iran which is the topic of present study. Research Question: which factors have influenced the place of China in Iran’s look east policy for internal decision makers and international system structure during Ahmadinejad and Rouhani presidency? Research Hypothesis: it is hypothesized that Iran-China relation in both presidents’ periods has been heavily influenced by the international system structure, and the place of China in look east policy has been highlighted more in Rouhani’s period compared to Ahmadinejad’s. In addition, that same structure has in fact turned the attention of internal decision makers toward China. Methodology (and Theoretical Framework if there are): The present study makes use of compare and contrast methodology. In this article, neoclassical realism has been selected as the theoretical framework and will be explained subsequently. Results and discussion: This article addresses the following factors as giving “look east policy” priority in Ahmadinejad’s period: increasing tension between Iran an Persian Gulf Arabs, counter hegemony balancing, increased deterrence and economic requirements, fighting against international system structure. Furthermore, Iran-China relation during Ahmadinejad’s period in political, economic and military areas has been addressed. Political, economic and military relations of Iran and China in this period was influenced by Iran’s nuclear issue and Western sanctions against Iran. The level of relations reveal that it was Iran who most of the time had the tendency to develop relations with China while China mostly followed political considerations of the western powers. In the following, Rouhani’s foreign policy has been investigated in short and factors leading look east policy out of the focus of foreign policy have been addressed namely, criticizing the relations with east in Ahmadinejad’s government, enhancing the relations with Arab countries in the region, revisioning the relations with west, solving the nuclear issue and desecuritization of Iran which led the look east policy out of the priority of foreign policy in Rouhani’s period. Then, the relation of Iran and China in political, economic and military areas during Rouhani’s presidency has been addressed. The level and quality of the relation of Iran and China was better than that in Ahmadinejad’s period due to the signing of JCPOA. Conclusion: in fact, our look to east in the last four governments were mostly influenced by structural pressures giving direction to the foreign policy. Thus, our interactions particularly in relation to powers of the east have always had a tactical aspect rather than strategic. As a result, we lacked a pragmatic foreign policy based on internal capabilities and international limitations. Regarding the logic of the look to east and the type of Iran’s relation with China and Russia in last 16 years, it seems that look east policy for Iran at least in this period of time has not been a principal and strategic approach. 16 years of experience has shown that the portion of pressure of international system structure was heavier than the approaches of the governments of this time and such development of relations was not so much dependent on internal factors compared to structural factors. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Look to east, international system structure, foreign policy, Iran, China | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdollahi, Mohsen (2018), “Challenges of Iran's Foreign Policy during Rouhani's Presidency”, Sixth International Congress on the Development and Promotion of Basic Sciences and Technologies in Society, Tehran [in Persian]. Al-qahtani, Saad (2021), “Will the Sino-Iranian Agreement Serve the Ambitious Geopolitical Interests of China?” Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/sada/85122, (Accessed on: 2/9/2021). Arghavani Pirsalami, Fariborz (2016), “Iran-China Relations under Ahmadinejad: The Look to East Policy and Structural”, Research Letter of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 32, pp. 9-41 [In Persian]. Available at: http://prb.iauctb.ac.ir/article_521448.html?lang=en, (Accessed on: 2/12/2021). Arghavani Pirsalami, Fariborz and Javad Salahi (2014), “China's Balanced Action Policy and Iran's Nuclear Program”, World Politics Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 99-133, Available at: https://interpolitics.guilan.ac.ir/ article_282.html?lang=en. (Accessed on: 2/9/2021) [in Persian]. Azad, Shirzad (2017), Iran and China: A New Approach to their Bilateral Relations, Lanham: Lexington Press. Bayar, Tugba (2019), “Multiple Dualities: Seeking the Patterns in Iran’s Foreign Policy”, All Azimuth Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 37-54 (doi:10.20991/ allazimuth.456272). Bar, Sshmuel (2015), “Iran and the Middle East after the Nuclear Agreement”?” Available at: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/ search?q=cache:CjdmcqzZNM0J; http://www.friendsofisraelinitiative.org uploads/papers/pdf/FOI_Paper32.pdf%2Bnuclear+agreement+with+iran+2015+and+saudi+arabia+pdf&hl=en-IR&gbv=2&ct=clnk, (Accessed on: 3/10/2019 ). Chen, Wen – Sheng (2011), “China’s Oil Strategy: "Going Out to Iran"”, Asian Politics and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 39-54. (doi:10.1111/ j.1943-0787.2009. 01166.x). Cordesman Anthony H (2011), “U.S. and Iranian Strategic Competition; Competition Involving China and Russia”. Washington DC, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-and-iranian-strategic-competition-4, (Accessed on: 6/10/2021). Cordesman, Anthony H and Sam Khazai (2014), Iraq in Crisis, Washington DC, Center for Strategic and International Studies CSIS Press. Available at: https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/ files/publication/140513_Cordesman_IraqInCrisis_Web.pdf, (Accessed on: 6/10/2021). Delpech, Therese (2011), Iran and the Bomb, the Abdication of International Responsibility, New York: Columbia University Press. Dehghani Firoozabadi, Seyed Jalal (2011), "Neoclassical Realism and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran", Foreign Policy Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 275-294, Available at: http://fp.ipisjournals.ir/article_9462.html, (Accessed on: 5/9/2021). [in Persian]. Dergham, Raghida (2021), “Will the China-Iran Deal Change the Middle East?” Available at: https://www.thenationalnews.com/opinion/comment/ will-the-china-iran-deal-change-the-middle-east-1.1196284, (Accessed on: 5/7/2021). Ebadizadeh, Rahil (2015), Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the Syrian Crisis, Master Thesis, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University. [in Persian]. Elias, Arne (2021), “25-Year China - Iran Strategic Agreement Charts China – Iran Economic Corridor: Architecture & Implications”, Available at: https://www.nrci.no/External/25year_China_Iran_Strategic.pdf, (Accessed on: 5/8/2021). Ezzati, Ezzatullah (2014), “Shiite Geopolitics: Iran and the Shiite Crescent”, Tehran: Geographical Organization of the Armed Forces. [in Persian]. Forough, Mohammad Bagher (2020), “Iran and China: Ideational Nexus Across of the BRI”, in: Forced to Go East? Iran’s Foreign Policy Outlook and the Role of Russia, China and India, eds. by Azadeh Zamirirad, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs. (doi: 10.18449/2020WP03). Fulton, Janathan (2019), “China’s Great Game in the Middle East”, Available at: https://ecfr.eu/publication/china_great_game_middle_east/, (Accessed on: 6/2/2020). Garver, John, W. (2011), “Is China Playing a Dual Game in Iran?” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 75-88, (doi:10.1080/ 0163660X.2011.538296) Garver, John (2016), “China and Iran: An Emerging Partnership Post-Sanctions”, Available at: https://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/ publications/Garver_ChinaIran.pdf, (Accessed on: 3/7/2019). Gentry, James Brandon (2018), “China’s Role in Iran’s Anti-Access / Area Denial Weapons Capability Development”, Middle East Institute, Available at: https://www.mei.edu/publications/chinas-role-irans-anti-access-area-denial-weapons-capability-development, (Accessed on: 2/6/2021). Greer, Lucille (2020), “Last among Equals: The China-Iran Partnership in a Regional Context”, Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/ default/files/media/uploads/documents/MEP_200831_OCC%2038%20v3%20%281%29.pdf, (Accessed on: 2/2/2021). Harold, Scott W.; Nader, Alireza (2012), China and Iran: Economic, Political, and Military Relations, RAND Corporation, Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/occasional_papers/OP351.html, (Accessed on: 2/2/2022). Hong, Zhao (2014), “China's Dilemma on Iran: between Energy Security and a Responsible Rising Power”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 23, No. 87, pp. 408-424, (doi: 10.1080/10670564. 2013.843880) Hunter, Shireen T. (2010), Iran's Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era, Santa Barbara: Praeger. ISNA, "Step by Step with Rouhani; from East to West", Available at: https://www.isna.ir/news/96122714755, (Accessed on: 12/10/2018). [in Pearsian]. ISNA, "What will be the Result of the 25-year Agreement between Iran Katzman, Kenneth (2020), “U.S.-Iran Conflict and Implications for U.S. Policy”, Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/R45795.pdf, (Accessed on: 2/6/2021). Kemenade, Willem (2013), “Iran’s Relations with China and West: Cooperation and Confrontation in Asia”, The Hague, Netherland Institute for International Relations, Klingender Diplomacy Papers No. 24, Available at: https://www.clingendael.org/, (Accessed on: 5/9/2021). Khosravi, Malektaj (2017), “Iran’s Foreign Policy Approach towards Middle East Regional Order and Security under 11th Government”, Research Letter of International Relations, Vol. 10, No. 39, Serial Number 39, pp. 31-58, Available at: http://prb.iauctb.ac.ir/article_535765_00.html? lang=en, (Accessed on: 2/8/2021). [in Persian]. Kapur, Saloni (2019), Securitization in the Non-West, London: Routledge. Koolaee, Elaheh and Afifeh Abedi (2018), “Geopolitical Components of the Russian Foreign Policy”, International Quarterly of Geopolitics. Vol.14, No, 49, pp: 1-15 Available at: http://ensani.ir/fa/article/391688/, (Accessed on: 5/21/2022). [in Persian]. Lecky, James (2017), “China- Iran: A limited Partnership”, Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/China-Iran--A%20Limited%20Partnership.pdf, (Accessed on: 2/3/2020). Lynch, Mark (2012), The Arab Uprising: The Unfinished Revolutions of the New Middle East. New York: Public Affairs. Lee, Steven (2020), “Defying U.S., China and Iran Near Trade and Military Partnership”, Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/11/world/ asia/china-iran-trade-military-deal.html, (Accessed on: 10/5/2020). Mahdian, Mohammad Hossein (2014), Results of the Eleventh Government in the Effort to Get the Country Out of Securitization, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [in Persian]. Malus, Katherine (2018), “From “Atoms for Peace” to “JCPOA”: History of Iranian Nuclear Development”, Available at: https://k1project.columbia.edu/content/atoms-peace-jcpoa-history-iranian-nuclear-development (Accessed on: 17/03/2021). Maloney, Suzanne (2012), “The Self-limiting Success of Iran Sanctions”, International Affairs, Vol. 87, No. 6, pp. 21-40. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011. 01037.x). OEC (2020), “China (CHN) and Iran (IRN) Trade”, Available at: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/irn, (Accessed on: 17/03/2021). Razani, Ehsan (2014), “Iran's Conventional Military Relations with China under Ahmadinejad (2005-2013)”, International Journal of Advanced Studies in Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 1-9, Available at: http://www.ijashss.com/article_83545.html, (Accessed on: 12/03/2022). Roth, Taylor (2021), “China-Iran Relations: A Limited but Enduring Strategic Partnership”, Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/ files/2021-06/China-Iran_Relations.pdf, (Accessed on: 11/12/2021). Sabouri, Ziauddin; Salehian, Tajoddin (2017), “Strategic Review of Economic Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Case Study: Eleventh and Twelfth Governments”, International Relations Research, Vol. 7, No. 24, pp. 133-158, [in Persian], Available at: http://www.iisajournals.ir/article_53757.html?lang=en (Accessed on: 11/12/2021). Salehi, Seyed Javad and Fariborz Arghavani-Pir Salami (2012), "Nuclear Program and the Future of Iran's Foreign Policy Challenges: Regional and International Levels", in: Mojtaba Maghsoudi, Iran, Politics and Futurology, Tehran: Institute of University Publishing. [in Persian]. Safavi, Hamze and Ali Mohamad Khaksar (2018), “Analyzing Isis's Impact on Middle East's Political-Security Equationsations”, Geopolitical Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 39-50, (doi: 10.29252/geores.33.1.39), [in Peasian] Shariatinia, Mohsen (2012), "Iran-China-US Triangle", in: Asia 7: Iran-China Relations by Hossein Asgarian, Tehran: Abrar Moaser. [In Persian]. Shariatinia, Mohsen (2012), “Determinants of Iran-China Relations”, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 210-179, [in Persian]. Soltani, Mohammad Javad (1399), The Riddle of Iran-Saudi Arabia Competition, Tehran: Andisheh Sazan Noor. [In Persian]. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) (2012). UN Embargo on Iran. Available at: https://www.sipri.org/databases/ embargoes/un_arms_embargoes/iran (Accessed on: 12/03/2021). Sadjadpour, Kazem. (2011), “The Battle of Dubai: The United Arab Emirates and the US- Iran Cold War”, Available at: http://www.carnegieEndowment.org/pubs. (Accessed on: 12/03/2021). Trade Map, (2012), Trade Competitiveness Map, Countries Trade Statistics (Islamic Republic of Iran-China), International Trade Center. Taliaferro, Jeffery, Steven Lobell and Norrin Pips Man (2009), “Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy”, in: Lobell, Steven E. et al. Neoclassical Realism, the State and Foreign Policy, London: Cambridge University Press, (doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511811869). Temiz, Kadir (2021), Chinese Foreign Policy toward the Middle East, London: Routledge, (doi:10.4324/9781003180333). UNCTADstat (2016), “General Profile: Iran”, Available at: http://unctadstat.unctad.org/countryprofile/generalprofile/en-gb/364/ index.html, (Accessed on: 3/7/2020). Vatanka, Alex (2021), “Making Sense of the Iran-China Strategic Agreement”, Available at: https://www.mei.edu/publications/making-sense-iran-china-strategic-agreement, (Accessed on: 12/03/2021). Warnaar, Maaike (2013), Iranian Foreign Policy during Ahmadinejad, New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press (doi:10.1057/ 9781137337917). Zhang, Sheng (2020), “The 25-Year Agreement between China and Iran: A Continuation of Previous Policy”, Available at: https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/pdf/view/1060/en, (Accessed on: 12/12/2021). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 634 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 411 |
||