منابع
الف) فارسی
ب) خارجی
- Ajogwu, Fabian (2014). Dealing with Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration- which tools for Counsel and Arbitrator. KIAC International Arbitration Centre’s 2014 Conference.
- Berger, Klaus Peter; J. Ole Jensen (2016). “Due process paranoia and the procedural judgment rule: a safe harbour for procedural management decisions by international arbitrators”, Arbitration International, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiw020. (Accessed 12 March 2022).
- Bruckschweiger, Christoph (n.d.). “Possibilities of Arbitral Tribunals to Sanction “Guerril la Tactics” by Counsel in the Absence of a Respective Agreement by the Parties, pp.1-32. from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjy86HR67H1AhUR14UKHaMjBl8QFnoECAIQAQ&url=https://wgb-law.li/sites/default/files/news/2018-04/Possibilities of Arbitral Tribunals_CAS Research Paper_0.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0Pv9Ava3vpMV-byHbKlMMc. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Esdaile, Charles J. (2004). Fighting Napoleon: Guerrillas, Bandits and Adventurers in Spain, 1808-1814. Yale University Press.
- Halprin, Peter & SMatai, iddharth (2020). “Adverse Inferences as a Means of Addressing Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration”, Dispute Resolution Journal, Vol. 75 No. 1. pp. 37 – 50, https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Dispute+Resolution+Journal/75.3/DRJ2020004. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Hilgard, Mark & Brude, Elisa (2014). “Unauthorized Amiable Compositeur?” , Dispute Resolution International, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 51-62, https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/disreint8&div=9&id=&page=. (Accessed 12 March 2022).
- Horvath, Gunther J & Wilske, Stephan (2013). Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration. International Arbitration Law Library, International Arbitration Law Library, Vol. 28.
- HWANG, MICHAEL (2013). Why is there still resistance to arbitration in Asia? In: “Selected essays on international arbitration”, Academy Publishing (Singapore Academy of Law).
- Polkinghorne, Michael & Ainsley Gill, Benjamin (2017). “Due Process Paranoia: Need We Be Cruel to Be Kind”, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol.6, No .34, pp. 935-945.https://kluwerlawonline.com/journalarticle/Journal+of+International+Arbitration/34.6/JOIA2017044. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Queen Mary University & White & Case (2015). International Arbitration Survey 2015: “Improvements and Innovations in International Arbitratio”, Queen Mary University. Pp. 1-58, http://www.arbitration.qmul.ac.uk/research/2015. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Rab, Ajar (2020). “Appointment of Sole Arbitrator: Can a Modfied Asymmetrical Arbitration Clause Avoid Court Appointment?”, Kluwer Law International, from http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/01/08/appointment-of-sole-arbitrator-can-a-modified-asymmetrical-arbitration-clause-avoid-court-appointment/. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Redfern, Alan (2015). The Changing World of International Arbitration, Oxford University Press.
- REED, Lucy (2013). Sanctions Available for Arbitrators to Curtail Guerilla Tactics. In Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration (G. Horvath and S. Wilske, International Arbitration Law Library, 2013)
- Sussman, Edna. (2010). “All’s Fair in Love and War – Or Is It? The Call for Ethical Standards for Counsel in International Arbitration”, Transnational Dispute Management (TDM), Vol.7, No.2, pp. 611-623, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2372346. (Accessed 12 March 2022)
- Vilhjálmsdóttir, Agla Eir (2019). Combating Dilatory Tactics in International Arbitration and the Impact of Due Process Paranoia on Efficiency, Thesis (Master's), Reykjavík University, School of Social Sciences, Department of Law, http://hdl.handle.net/1946/33134. (Accessed 12 March 2022).
|
