الف) مقالات
- احمدی‌نژاد، مریم؛ امین‌الرعایا، یاسر (1398)، «تحلیل دکترین حاشیة انعطاف تفسیر در معاهدات غیر حقوق بشری با تأکید بر معاهدات تجاری و سرمایه‌گذاری»، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 60.
- ---------------------- (1395)، «ماهیت حقوقی دکترین حاشیة مجاز تفسیر»، فصلنامة سیاست خارجی، ش 30.
- شریفی طرازکوهی حسین؛ مبینی، جواد (1393)، «دکترین حاشیة مجاز تفسیر در رویة دادگاه اروپایی حقوق بشر»، فصلنامة پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال شانزدهم، ش 44 .
- عبدی، ایوب؛ زمانی، سید قاسم ( 1396)، «حاشیة صلاحدید دولت‌ها در آزادی دین در پرتو رویة دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، ش 55.
- انگلیسی
- A) Books
- Legg, A (2012), The Margin of Appreciation in international Human Right law, Deference and proportionality.
- Raz.Y (1979), The Authority of Law, Oxford,Clarendon Press.
- Yourow.C.H (1996), Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights, Hague, Martinus Nijhoff Publisher.
- B) Articles
- Benvenisti, Eyal (1998), "Margin Of Appreciation, Consensus, And Universal Standards", New York University Journal of International Law And Politics ,Vol. 31, No.4.
- Brauch, J.A, (2005), “The Margin of Appreciation and the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights: Threat to the Rule of Law”, Columbia Journal of European Law,Vol.11, No.1.
- Butler, Petra (2008), "Margin Of Appreciation – A Note Towards A Solution For The Pacific?" , Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, Vol.39, No.4
- Greer, S, (2008), “What's Wrong with the European Convention on Human Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly,Vol.80,No.4
- Keller, P,(1998), “Re-thinking Ethnic and Cultural Rights in Europe”, 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.18, No.1
- Macklem.P, (2006), "Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination", International Journal of Constitutional Law,Vol.4, No.3.
- Shany, Y,(2005), “Toward a General Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in International Law?” European Journal of International Law , Vol.16, No.4
- Shuibhne,N, (2009),"Margins of Appreciation: National Values, Fundamental Rights and EC Free Movement Law" European Law Review, Vol 32, No.2.
- Wahlish, Martin (2014),"ECtHR Chamber Judgment Case Of S.A.S. V. France: Banning Of Burqas And Niqabs Legal?," Cambridge International Law Journal , available at: http://cjicl.org.uk/2014/07/21/echr-chamber-judgment-case-s-s-v-france-banning-burqas-niqabs-legal/
- C) Cases
- Campte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, ECtHR,1982,( Judgment of 23 June)
- Case Concerning Oil Platforms Between Islamic Republic of Iran and United States of America,ICJ,2003,(Judgement of 6th November)
- Case of S.A.S. vs France, ECtHR,2014,(Judgement of 1st July)
- Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, ECtHR,1982,(Judgement of 22nd October)
- Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet ECJ,2007, (Judgement of 12 June)
- Marckx v. Belgium, ECtHR,1979,(Judgment of 13th June)
- McGuiness v. United Kingdom, ECtHR ,1999,(Judgement of 8th June)
- Oberschlick v. Austria, ECtHR ,1994,(Judgement of 23rd May 1991)
- Omega Spielhallen und Automatenaufstellungs-GmbH v Oberbürgermeisterin der Bundesstadt Bonn,ECJ,2004,(Judgement of 14th October)
- Schmidberger v Austria,ECJ, 2003,(Judgement of 12th June)
- Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden v. Bulgaria, ECtHR ,2001,( Judgement of 2nd October)
- United Communist Party of Turkey and others v. Turkey, ECtHR, 1998,(Judgment of 30th January)
- D) Documents
- Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), (1950)
- European Union(2004)EC Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States
- E) Opinions of Judges
- Judge Buergenthal (2003), Separate Opinion on Oil platforms Case before ICJ
- Judge Koojimans (2003)Separate Opinion on Oil platforms Case before ICJ
|
