پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,501 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,115,883 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,220,311 |
Reproductive Right in Islamic Law | ||
| Classical and Contemporary Islamic Studies (formerly known as Journal of Contemporary Islamic Studies) | ||
| دوره 4، شماره 2، مهر 2022، صفحه 221-233 اصل مقاله (576.59 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Scholary | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jcis.2022.333353.1232 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Muhadditha Muinifar* | ||
| Assistant Professor, Department of Jurisprudence and Islamic Law Principles, Faculty of Islamic Sciences and Research, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Bearing a child has always been one of the most magnificent matters of mankind. Naturally speaking, making a decision about it relies on its pros and cons. By the development of modern assisted reproductive technologies and contraceptive methods in recent decades, the issue of human reproduction has gained more importance in Islam (and Islamic law) and in other religions. In this paper, we use the document analysis and descriptive-analytical research methods to figure out the conditions and status of mankind’s reproductive rights according to Islamic law. The purpose of this article is to show the perspective of Islamic law toward the nature of reproductive rights. By considering this issue, we can decide better about other issues in this realm such as the aspects of reproductive rights, the right-holders, and the duty-bearers. In conclusion, according to the standpoint of the Qur’ān and the traditions about the permission to practice ‘azl (withdrawal or coitus interruptus), we might maintain that human reproduction is a right rather than a commandment (ḥukm); moreover, it is a mixture of duty and right, because is not sufficient to only take rights into consideration. Thus, according to this right, obligations or duties must be imposed against other opposing parties (persons or the government), as it is not possible to imagine rights without responsibilities. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| reproductive right؛ right؛ commandment؛ Islamic law؛ obligation؛ duty | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al-Baḥrānī, Y. (n.d.), Al-Ḥadā’iq al-nādira. Qom, Islāmī.
Al-Būṭī, M. S. R. (n.d.), Mas’ala taḥdīd al-nasl wiqāya wa ‘ilāja. Damascus, Maktaba al-Fārābī.
Al-Ghazālī, A. (2004), Iḥyā’ al-‘ulūm al-dīn. Cairo, Dār al-Āfāq al-‘Arabīyya.
Al-Qasṭalānī, A. (1905), Irshād al-sārī li-sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Bukhārī. Egypt, Al-Maktaba al-Kubrā al-Amīrīyya.
Al-Ḥillī, J. (1982), Al-Mukhtaṣar al-nāfī. Tehran, Bi‘that.
Al-Ḥillī, Ḥ. (1997), Qawā‘id al-aḥkām. Qom, Islāmī.
Al-Jawzīyya, I. (1994), Zād al-ma‘ād. Beirut, Al-Risāla.
Al-Juba‘ī al-‘Āmilī, Z. (1992), Masālik al-afhām fī sharḥ sharāyi‘al-Islām. Qom, Ma‘ārifi Islāmī.
Al-Kāshānī, A. (1988), Badāyi‘al-ṣanāyi‘. Pakistan, Al-Maktaba al-Ḥabībīyya.
Al-Marghīnānī, B. (n.d.), Al-Hidāya. Beirut, Dār al-Iḥyā al-Turāth al-‘Arabī.
Al-Makkī al-‘Āmilī, M. J. (1990), Al-Lum‘a al-Dimashqīyya. Qom, Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Nawawī, Y. (n.d.), Al-Majmū‘ sharḥ al-muhaḍḍab. Beirut, Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Qudūrī, A. (n.d.), Al-Kitāb. N.p., n.p.
Al-Ṣadr, M. B. (2008), Al-Ḥaqq wa al-ḥukm wa al-shakhṣīyya al-ma‘nawīyy a iqtiṣādīyya. Qom, Madyan.
Al-Sharbāṣī, A. (1965) Al-Dīn wa al-tanẓīm al-Usra. Beirut, Al-‘Alāqāt al-‘Āmma bil-Shu’ūn al-Ijtimā’īyya.
Al-Uthaymeen, M. (2000), Silsila leqāt al-bāb al-maftūḥ. n.p., n.p.
Al-Zubayr, Z. J. (1991), Moughf al-Sharī‘a al-Islāmīyya min tanẓīm al-nasl. Beirut, Dār al-jail.
Baḥr al-‘Ulūm, S. M. (1983), Bulqāt al-Faqīh. Tehran, Maktabah al-Sadiq.
Fāḍil Abi, Z. (1987), Kashf al-rumūz fi sharḥ al-mukhtaṣar al-nāfi‘. Qom, Islamī.
Qanawātī, J., & Ḥ. Jāwar (2012), “Privacy, Right or Award.” Islamic Law, No. 31, 7-32.
Ḥaram Panāhī, M. (1997), “Artificial insemination.” Journal of Fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt, No. 9, 136-151.
Hārūnī Ḥasanī, A. (n.d.), Sharḥ al-Tajrīd fi Al-fiqh Al-Zaydīyya. Yemen, Yemen’s Center of Research.
Ḥasanī Ghamārī, A. (2002), Tanẓīm al-nasl fi al-Sharī‘a al-Islāmīyya. Dubai, Office of Awqāf & Islamic Affairs.
Ḥaydar, K. A. (2004), Silsila muḥāḍirāt al-amārāt moughf al-Islāmein min mushkilāt al-sukanya wa taḥdīd al-nasl. Abu Dhabi, Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research.
Ḥusaynī Rawḥānī, M. Ṣ. (1997), Minhāj al-fuqāha. Beirut, al-‘Ilmīyya.
‘Ibād, A. (n.d.), Sharḥ Sunan Abī Dāwūd. n.p., n.p.
‘Ibāda, Ḥ. A. M. (2011), Taḥdīd al-nasl wa takśirihi wa madā sulṭa al-dawla fi man' al-injāb dirāsa moghāranah. Alexandria, Dar al-Fikr al-jāmei'.
Ibn Mufliḥ, I. (2003), Al-Mubdi' Sharh al-Muqni'. Riyadh, Dār ʻĀlam al- Kutub.
Ibn Qudāma, A. (n.d.), al-Mug̲h̲nī. Beirut, Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī.
Iṣfahānī (Faḍl Hindī), M. (1995), Kashf al-lisām ‘an qawā‘id al-aḥkām. Qom, Islamī.
Islāmī, S. Ḥ. (2005), “Human cloning from the perspective of Shia scholars: Review four perspectives.” Journal of Fiqh, No. 45, 3-66.
Jamal, A. M. A. (2009), Ameen –ul-Umat min manẓūr maqāṣid al-Sharī‘a. Egypt, Dār al-Salām.
Jandārī, A. (n.d.), Sharḥ al-Azhār. Yemen, Qazmān Maktaba.
Maghribī, N. (1963), Daāem al-Islām. Cairo, Dār al-Ma‘ārif.
Muḥsinī, M. Ā. (2003), Al-Fiqh wa al-masa’il al-ṭibā‘ī. Qom, Būstāni Kitāb.
Mu’min, M. (2003), A word about human reproduction in the wedlock of couples. Translated by M. Dānish (Ja‘farzāda), Proceedings of the New Methods of Human Reproduction from the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Law, Tehran, Avicenna Research Center.
Mūsawī Khu’ī, A. (n.d.), Miṣbāḥ al-fiqāha fī al-mu‘āmilāt. Qom, Dāwarī.
Mūsawī Khumaynī, R. (2000), Book of sale Kitāb al-bay'. Tehran, Mu’assisiyi Nashri Āthāri Imām Khumaynī.
Nā’īnī, M. Ḥ. (1997), Manīʻah al-ṭālib. Qom, Islamī.
Najafī, M. Ḥ. (1984), Jawāhir al-kalām fī sharḥ sharāyi‘ al-Islām. Tehran, Islamī.
Qā’inī, M. (2006), Al-Mabsūṭ fī fiqh al-masā’il al-mu‘āṣira. Qom, Markazi Islāmīyi A’imiyi Aṭhār (a).
Raḍawī, M. Ḥ. (2010), Fiqh al-ṭibb. Qom, Fadak.
Rehman, Javaid (2007), “The Sharī‘a, Islamic family laws and international human rights law: Examining the theory and practice of polygamy and ṭalāq.” International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, … 21 (1), 108-127.
Roberts, D. E. (1995), “Social justice, procreative liberty, and the limits of liberal and the limits of liberal theory: Robertson’s children of choice.” Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1005-1021.
Sabziwārī, M. B. (2002), Kifāyat al-aḥkām. Qom, Islamī.
Shams al-Dīn, M. M. (n.d.), Al-Islām wa tanẓīm al-wāldiah min al-Islām wa tanẓīm al- Usrah. Beirut, Al-Dār al-Muttaḥida lil-Nasher.
Shaybānī, M. (1985), Al-Jāmi‘ al-kabīr, al-jāmi‘ al-ṣaghīr. Beirut, ʻĀlam al-Kitāb.
Ṭabāṭabā’ī Yazdī, M. K. (1958), Ḥāshīya al-Makāsib. Qom, Isma'ilis.
Tabrīzī, J. (1995), Ṣirāṭ al-najāh. Qom, Barguzīda.
Yazdī, M. (1996), “Artificial fertility and its jurisprudential ruling.” Journal of Fiqh of Ahl al-Bayt, Vol. 2, No. 5-6, 97-122. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 260 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 292 |
||