پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,757 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,111,122 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,871,710 |
کلیشه های جنسیتی و اطلاق جنسیت به یک اثر هنری: مطالعه موردی "نقاشی رئال و انتزاعی" | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| دوره 27، شماره 1، خرداد 1401، صفحه 63-70 اصل مقاله (579.58 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfava.2021.303746.666483 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| آزیتا شکوهی زادگان1؛ رضا افهمی* 2؛ مهدی کشاورز افشار3 | ||
| 1کاندیدای دکتری پژوهش هنر، گروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران. ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار گروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران ، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار گروه پژوهش و تاریخ هنر، دانشکده هنر، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| شکل گیری کلیشه های جنسیتی ماحصل برداشت از تفاوت زیستی بین جنسها است که منجر به واگذاری نقشها به جنسی خاص می شود و در پی آن ترجیحات و انتظارات از جنسها را به وجود میآورند که به عنوان نوعی پیش زمینه تمامی مناسبات اجتماعی و فرهنگی را تحت تاثیر قرار می دهد و موجب عدم قضاوت صحیح آن ها میگردد. این پدیده در دنیای هنر نیز امکانپذیر است. در پژوهش حاضر بازتاب تقابل دو شیوه فکری منطقی و احساسی در دو سبک نقاشی انتزاعی و رئالیستی مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد تا با تکیه بر این امر به این مقوله دست یابد که تا چه میزان کلیشه های جنسیتی در انتساب یک اثر هنری به زنان یا مردان تأثیرگذار است؟ روش پژوهش حاضر از نوع پیمایشی و میدانی و با اتکا به روشهای تجربی و به شیوه کمی است و به منظور سنجش فرضیه پژوهش از ابزار گمانه زنی جنسیت خالق اثر هنری استفاده شده است. تحلیل عاملی پرسشنامه مزبور نشان میدهد که در انتساب سبک اثر هنری به جنسیتی خاص (آثار انتزاعی به مردان و آثار رئالیستی به زنان)، پیش زمینه های فکری و کلیشه های جنسیتی مؤثر است و اطلاق جنسیت به پدیدآورنده اثر هنری با هیچ یک از عوامل جمعیت شناختی همبستگی معناداری ندارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کلیشه های جنسیتی؛ اطلاق جنسیت؛ نقاشی؛ نقاشی رئال؛ نقاشی انتزاعی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Gender Stereotypes And The Relation Of Gender To A Work Of Art (Casestudy: Real and Abstract paintings) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Azita Shokoohizadegan1؛ Reza Afhami2؛ Mehdi Keshavarz afshar3 | ||
| 1 Ph.D Candidate of Research of Art, Department of Research and Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Research and Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Department of Research and Art History, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Gender Differences Arise From The Interaction Between Gender Physics And The Economic And Social Aspects Of Societies. This Approach Leads To The Emergence Of Characteristics Unique To Each Sex, Psychologically And Physically, And Ultimately The Acceptance Of These Characteristics By The Sexes Themselves, Societies And Cultures, Stereotypes And Gender Axioms. They Bring. Adopting These Stereotypes, Gender Patterns As A Background Affect All Relationships, Behaviors, And Social And Cultural Norms Of The Sexes. Behavioral Stereotypes That Always Exist In Evaluating The Performance Of Men And Women In Society Are The Differences Between The Way Of Thinking Of These Two Sexes And The Attribution Of Rational Behavior To Male Gender And Emotional Behavior To Female Gender. In Art, The Difference Between These Two Ways Of Thinking Is Reflected In Abstract And Realistic Works. Based On These Two Dimensions Of Mental Stereotypes In Society,It Seems That More Abstract And Geometric Works Are Considered Masculine And Realistic Works That Express A Kind Of Feeling Are Considered More Feminine. While Men And Women Do Not Differ Much In Terms Of Orientation Towards Different Arts And Also The Degree Of Success In Achieving Their Goals In Art. Based On This Assumption, In Addition To The Existence Of Various Styles And Artistic Tendencies, The Main Core Of The Present Study Is The Study Of Works With Realistic Style And Abstract Works To Help Achieve This Category Of Whether Gender Stereotypes In Attribution Is A Work Of Art Effective For A Man Or A Woman? The Present Research Method Is Of Survey And Field Type And Has Been Done By Relying On Experimental Methods And Quantitative Method As Well As Studying And Reviewing Scientific Documents. In Order To Measure The Research Hypothesis (Gender And Social Maps Affect The Attribution Of Works Of Art To Men And Women), The Scale Of Speculation Of The Gender Of The Creator Of The Work Was Used. Findings Show That In The Application Of A Work Of Art To A Particular Genre, It Is Influenced By The Audience, Stereotypes Or Gender Ideas, As Well As Gender Roles. For Example, The Adaptation Of The External Space To Men And The Internal Space To Women Is Due Same Mental Stereotypes In Assigning Social Roles To Gender. In Other Words, Audience Of The Work, By Default, Imagines Women In The Home And Indoor Environment, Which Depends On The Descriptive And Obligatory Aspects Of Gender Roles That Are Accepted Among Some Cultures And Societies That Women Are Involved In Housework And Affairs. They Are Closely Related To Breeding. Another Common Attitude In Judging Gender Is Color. Participants Attributed Most Of The Works With Limited Color Spectrum To Men, As Opposed To Those With A Wide Range Of Colors And Red, Pink, And Orange. This Stereotypical Behavior Towards Men And Women Can Be The Result Of Accepting Superficial Differences Between The Sexes; Basically, Men Recognize A Limited Range Of Colors, While Women Tend To Be Pink, Red, And Orange, And Have A High Degree Of Color Recognition. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Gender Stereotypes, Relation Of Gender, painting, Real painting, Abstract painting | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abele, A. E (2003), The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: findings from a prospective study. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(4),pp 768-776. Adams, R., Kräussl, R., Navone, M. & Verwijmeren, P (2017), Is gender in the eye of the beholder? Identifying cultural attitudes with art auction prices. Bakan, D (1966), Isolation and communion in western man: The duality of human existence. Boston: Beacon. Bennett, D. S (2019), Targeted Advertising for Women in Athenian Vase-Painting of the Fifth Century BCE. Arts. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,8(2),pp 1-52. Bloomfield, E. A (2015), Gender role stereotyping and art interpretation. Boyatzis, C. J. & Eades, J (1999), Gender differences in preschoolers' and kindergartners' artistic production and preference. Sex Roles, 41, pp 627-638. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. & Rosenkrantz, P. S (1972), Sex‐role stereotypes: A current appraisal1. Journal of Social issues, 28,pp 59-78. Cameron, L., Goetzmann, W. N. & Nozari, M (2017), Art and gender: market bias or selection bias? Journal of Cultural Economics,43 pp 279-307. Cialdini, R. B. & Trost, M. R (1998), Social influence: Social norms, conformity and complianc,pp151-192. Cinamon, R. G. & Rich, Y (2002), Gender differences in the importance of work and family roles: Implications for work–family conflict. Sex roles, 47,pp 531-541. Crandall, C. S. & Stangor, C (2005), Conformity and prejudice. On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport, pp 295-309. Evans, C. D. & Diekman, A. B (2009), On motivated role selection: Gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), pp 235-249. Fiske, A. P., Haslam, N. & Fiske, S. T (1991), Confusing one person with another: What errors reveal about the elementary forms of social relations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60, 656. Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T. & Lindzey, G (2010), Handbook of social psychology, John Wiley & Sons. Newport, F (2001), Americans see women as emotional and affectionate, men as more aggressive: Gender specific stereotypes persist in recent Gallup poll. Retrieved September, 10, 2006. Nowell, A. & Chang, M. L (2014), Science, the media, and interpretations of Upper Paleolithic figurines. American Anthropologist, 116, pp 562-577. Piirto, J (1991), Why are there so few?(Creative women: Visual artists, mathematicians, musicians). Roeper Review, 13, pp 142-147. Prislin, R. & Wood, W (2005), Social Influence in Attitudes and Attitude Chang, pp 671-705. Quinn, K. A. & Macrae, C. N (2005), Categorizing others: the dynamics of person construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), pp 467-479. Spence, J. T. & Buckner, C. E (2000), Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of women quarterly, 24, pp 44-62. Stangor, C., Lynch, L., Duan, C. & Glas, B (1992), Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), pp 207-218. Vandenbos, G. R (2009), APA college dictionary of psychology, American Psychological Association. Wang, Y (2019), Watching and Being Watched: Gender and Space in the Painting of the Qianlong Emperor’s Southern Inspection Tour with a Comparative View. KnE Social Sciences, pp 307–318. Wood, W., Christensen, P. N., Hebl, M. R. & Rothgerber, H (1997), Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect, and the self-concept. Journal of personality and social psychology , 73(3),pp 523-535. Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H (2002), A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological bulletin, 128(5), pp 669-727. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 880 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 526 |
||