الف) کتاب‌ها
- ذوالعین، پرویز (1383)، مبانی حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، تهران: وزارت امور خارجه.
- فلسفی، هدایت‌الله (1395)، حقوق بین‌الملل معاهدات، تهران: نو.
- کاسسه، آنتونیو (1391)، حقوق بین‌الملل، ترجمة حسین شریفی طرازکوهی، تهران: میزان.
- کلسن، هانس (1387)، نظریة حقوقی ناب، ترجمة اسماعیل نعمت‌اللهی، تهران: سمت
- موسی‌زاده، رضا (1395)، حقوق معاهدات بین‌المللی، تهران: میزان.
ب) مقالات
- زمانی، قاسم (1377)، «جایگاه قاعدة آمره در میان منابع حقوق بین‌الملل»، مجلة حقوقی بین‌المللی، ش 22، ص 363-317.
- گلنون، مایکل (1388)، «پوچی قاعدة آمره در حقوق بین‌الملل»، ترجمة صابر نیاورانی، فصلنامة تحقیقات حقوقی، ش 49، ص 5717-557.
ج) پایان‌نامه‌ها
- گلچین، سهیل (1397)، «تحولات قواعد آمره در حقوق بین‌الملل؛ رویکرد کمیسیون حقوق بین‌الملل و رویة دولت‌ها»، پایان‌نامة کارشناسی‌ارشد، استاد راهنما رضا موسی‌زاده، استاد مشاور حسین سادات میدانی، ص 1-242.
- A) Books
- Alexidze, Levan (1981), Legal nature of jus cogens in contemporary international law, Recueil des cours 172(3).
- Cassese, Antonio (2012), Realizing utopia: the future of international law: For an enhanced role of jus cogens, Oxford University Press.
- Falsafi, Hedayatollah (2016), International Treaty Law, Tehran: Farhang Nashre Now Publication.
- Jacovides, Andrew (2011), International Law and Diplomacy: Selected Writings by Ambassador Andrew Jacovides, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff.
- Jorgensen, Nina (2000), The responsibility of states for international crimes, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
- Kolb, Robert (2015), Peremptory International Law-Jus Cogens: A General Inventory, Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Koskenniemi, Martti (2006), From apology to utopia: the structure of international legal argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Koskenniemi, Martti (2011), The politics of international law, Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Nematollahi, Esmail (2008), Pure Theory of Law, Hans Kelsen, Tehran: SAMT Publication.
- Orakhelashvili, Alexander (2006), Peremptory Norms in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Reza, Mousazadeh (2016), International Law of Treaties, Tehran: Mizan Legal Foundation Publication.
- Sharifi Tarazkouhi, Hossein (2012), International Law, Antonio Cassese, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation Publication.
- Zoleyn, Parviz (2003), The Bases of International Law, Tehran: IPIS Publication.
- B) Articles
- Criddle, Evan J., & Evan Fox-Decent (2009), “A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens.”, The Yale Journal of International Law, Vol. 34, pp. 331.
- Hameed, Asif (2013), “Unravelling the Mystery of Jus cogens in International Law.”, The British Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 84, No.1, pp. 52-102.
- Kadelbach, Stefan (2006), “Chapter II. Jus Cogens, Obligations Erga Omnes and Other Rules - the Identification of Fundamental Norms” In: Tomuschat, C. and Thouvenin, J.M. eds, The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order, Berlin Workshop, Brill Publishers, pp. 21-40.
- Kritsiotis, Dino (2010), “On the Possibilities of and for Persistent Objection.” The Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 121-142.
- Nahlik, S (1990), “Peremptory Norms (jus cogens) in International Law: HistoricalDevelopment, Criteria, Present Status”, By Lauri Hannikainen, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 84, pp. 779-782.
- Niavarani, Saber (2009), "Peremptory Nonesense, Michael J. Glennon", Law Research Magazine, Vol. 12, Issue 49.
- Tladi, Dire, & Dlagnekova, Polina (2006), “The Will of the State, Consent and International Law: Piercing the Veil of Positivism.”, SA Publiekreg=SA Public Law (Sabinet), Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 111-122.
- Tunkin, Grigory (1971), “Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law.”, University of Toledo Law Review, Vol. 3, pp. 107-112.
- Verdross, Alfred (1937), “Forbidden Treaties in International Law”, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 31, pp. 571.
- Zamani, Ghasem (1998), "The Status of Peremptory norm among the sources of international law", International Law Review Journal, Vol. 16, Issue 22, pp. 317-344.
- C) Dissertations
- Golchin, Soheil (2018), "The Evolution of Peremptory Norms in International Law: the approach of International Law Commission and States Practice", M.A Thesis at the School of International Relations, pp. 1-242.
- C) Awards
- International Court of Justice (1951), Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on Genocide.
- International Court of Justice (1996), Advisory opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.
- International Court of Justice (2007), Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro).
- International Court of Justice (2012), Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy: Greece Intervening).
- International Court of Justice (2012), Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v Senegal). Judgment.
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (1998). Prosecutor v. Furundžija, Judgment.
- European Court of Human Rights, (2001), Al-Adsani v the United Kingdom.
- European Court of Justice (2005), Yassin Abdullah Kadi v. Council of the EU & Commission of the European Communities.
- Inter-American Court of Human Rights (2003), Advisory Opinion on Juridical Condition and Rights of the Undocumented Migrants.
- Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (2002), Michael Domingues v. United States, Report No. 62/02, Merits.
- United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (2008), Belhas v. Ya'Alon.
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (2005), In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation.
- United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2009), Sabbithi v. Al Saleh.
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (1996), Smith v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
- United States Courts of Appeals, 9th Cir (1992), Siderman de Blake v. Republic of Argentina.
- Supreme Court of Canada (2014), Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran.
- Supreme Court of the Philippines (2012), Bayan Muna Case.
- High Court of Zimbabwe (2008), Mann v Republic of Equatorial Guinea.
- Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, (2007), Nada (Youssef) v State Secretariat for Economic Affairs and Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Administrative appeal judgment.
- D) Documents
- International Law Commission (1966), “Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with commentaries.”
- International Law Commission (2006), “Fragmentation of international law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law.”, A/CN.4/L.682, Geneva, Report of the Study Group.
- International Law Commission (2006), “Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, with commentaries thereto.”, Vol. II, Part 2.
- International Law Commission (2016), “Report of the International Law Commission.” 66th Session, A/69/10, Geneva, pp. 274-286.
- International Law Commission (2014), “Report of the International Law Commission on the Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation.”, A/69/10, No. 10.
- International Law Commission (2001), “The Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries.”
- International Law Commission (1958), “Documents of the tenth session including the report of the Commission to the General Assembly”, Yearbook of the International Law Commission, A/CN.4/115, Vol. II.
- International Law Commission (2016), “First Report of the Special Rapporteur on Jus cogens by Tladi, Dire, A/CN.4/693, Geneva.
- International Law Commission (2017), “Second Report of the Special Rapporteur on Jus cogens by Tladi, Dire, A/CN.4/706, Geneva.
|
