روند یابی سیل با استفاده از روش ماسکینگام خطی چندبازه‌ای و الگوریتم شکارچیان دریایی

Akan, O. (2006). Open Channel Hydraulics. In Open Channel Hydraulics. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-6857-6.X5000-0

Ayvaz, M. T., & Gurarslan, G. (2017). A new partitioning approach for nonlinear Muskingum flood routing models with lateral flow contribution. Journal of Hydrology, 553, 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.07.050

Barati, R. (2013). Closure to “Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Muskingum Models Using Nelder-Mead Simplex Algorithm” by Reza Barati. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18(3), 367–370.

Bayrami, M., Vatankhah, A., & Nazi Ghameshlou, A. (2019). Flood Routing using Muskingum Model with Fractional Derivative. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 50(7), 1667–1676.  (In Farsi) https://doi.org/10.22059/ijswr.2019.275566.668120

Bazargan, J., & Norouzi, H. (2018). Investigation the Effect of Using Variable Values for the Parameters of the Linear Muskingum Method Using the Particle Swarm Algorithm (PSO). Water Resources Management, 32(14), 4763–4777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2082-6

Chagas, P., & Souza, R. (2005). Solution of Sanin Venant’s Equation to Study Flood in Rivers, through Numerical Methods. Hydrology Days, 55, 205–210.

Cunge, J. A. (1969). On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (musklngum method). Journal of Hydraulic Research, 7(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686909500264

Faramarzi, A., Heidarinejad, M., Mirjalili, S., & Gandomi, A. H. (2020). Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Systems with Applications, 152, 113377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377

Hadi Norouzi and Jalal bazargan. (2020). Flood routing by linear Muskingum method using two basic fl oods data using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. 1897–1908. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.099

Hasanpour, F., & Sheykhalipour, Z. (2014). Comparison of the Artificial Intelligence Techniques and the Muskingum Methods in Flood Routing Estimation. (In Farsi)

Hosseini, S. M. (2009). Application of spreadsheets in developing flexible multiple-reach and multiple-branch methods of Muskingum flood routing. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 17(4), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20234

Karahan, H., Gurarslan, G., & Geem, Z. W. (2013). Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum Flood-Routing Model Using a Hybrid Harmony Search Algorithm. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)he.1943-5584.0000608

Kim, J. H., Geem, Z. W., & Kim, E. S. (2001). Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model using harmony search 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(5), 1131–1138.

Mahmoudinia, S., Javan, M., & Eghbalzade, A. (2014). Comparison of different objective function on estimation of linear and non-linear Muskingum model optimum parameters. WEJ, 7(20), 29–42. http://wej.miau.ac.ir/article%7B%5C_%7D498.html

Mohammad Rezapour Tabari, M., & Emami Dehcheshmeh, S. A. (2018). Development of Nonlinear Muskingum Model Using Evolutionary Algorithms Hybrid. Iran-Water Resources Research, 14(1), 160–167. http://iwrr.sinaweb.net/article%7B%5C_%7D51333.html

Mohan, S. (1997). Parameter estimation of nonlinear Muskingum models using genetic algorithm. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123(2), 137–142.

Norouzi, H., & Bazargan, J. (2020). Flood routing by linear Muskingum method using two basic floods data using particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Water Supply, 20(5), 1897–1908.

O’donnell, T. (1985). A direct three-parameter Muskingum procedure incorporating lateral inflow. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 30(4), 479–496.

Oladghaffari, A., Fakheri-Fard, A., Nazemi, A. H., & Ghorbani, M. A. (2010). Hydraulic Flood Routing Using Dynamic Wave Method and Comparison with Linear and Nonlinear Hydrologic Muskingum Routing Methods (Case Study: Lighvan-Chai). Water and Soil Science, 20(3), 47–60. https://water-soil.tabrizu.ac.ir/article%7B%5C_%7D1331.html

Ponce, V. M., & Lugo, A. (2001). Modeling looped ratings in Muskingum-Cunge routing. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6(2), 119–124.

Rahmani, M. (2017). Comparative evaluation of linear and nonlinear hydrological methods for river flood routing. University of Lamali Gorgani, Gorgan.

Samani HMV, S. G. (2004). Hydrologic flood routing in branched river systems via nonlinear optimization. Journal of Hydraulical Researches, 24(1), 55–59.

Swief, R. A., Hassan, N. M., Hasanien, H. M., Abdelaziz, A. Y., & Kamh, M. Z. (2021). Multi-Regional Optimal Power Flow Using Marine Predators Algorithm Considering Load and Generation Variability. IEEE Access, 9, 74600–74613. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3081374

Vijay P. Singh. (1988). hydrologic systems.

Yang, W., Wang, J., Sui, J., Zhang, F., & Zhang, B. (2019). A Modified Muskingum Flow Routing Model for Flood Wave Propagation during River Ice Thawing-Breakup Period.

Yoo, C., Lee, J., & Lee, M. (n.d.). Parameter Estimation of the Muskingum Channel Flood-Routing Model in Ungauged Channel Reaches. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001507.

Yoon, B. J., & Padmanabhan, G. (1994). P a r a m e t e r e s t i m a t i o n of l i n e a r and nonlinear muskingum models. 119(5), 600–610.