تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,121,683 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,228,969 |
A Simulation-Optimization Model for Solar PV Panel Selection Under Solar Irradiance and Load Uncertainty | ||
Advances in Industrial Engineering | ||
دوره 54، شماره 2، تیر 2020، صفحه 141-164 اصل مقاله (1.21 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jieng.2021.323127.1760 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Maedeh Motalebi1؛ Mohammad Mahdi Nasiri* 1؛ Hamed Shakouri G.2؛ Hosein Taghaddos3 | ||
1School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
2ctrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) Department, University of British Columbia, Canada | ||
3School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
In this reserach, a multi-objective model is presented considering simulated behavior of high-efficiency rooftop solar PV panels in factory, which are among the largest producers of green-house gases. The paper proposes a simulation-optimization approach is used to maximize the net present value (NPV) of economic benefits along with minimizing the payback period (PBP) of the investment, and maximizing solar energy consumption rate (SECR). In addition, the solar PV panels degradation and maintenance cost, as well as the uncertainty in solar irra-diance and demand load, are also considered. The study consists of two scenarios, in the first of which both electricity tariffs and feed-in-tariffs (FiT) are fixed by a long-term contract. The second scenario investigates the situation in which subsidies on electricity tariff are removed. The best type of panels are found in each scenario considering trade-off between objective functions. The preferred trade-off solution in the first scenario, with 2% increase in PBP, achieves more than 10% growth in NPV which is about $15000 in a year. In the second sce-nario, with only about 0.2% decrease in NPV and 3% increase in PBP, the preferred solution attains 9% increase in SECR. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Simulation؛ Rooftop solar PV panels؛ Electricity tariffs policy؛ Maintenance؛ Uncertainty | ||
مراجع | ||
[1] Villarreal, S., et al., Designing a sustainable and distributed generation system for semiconductor wafer fabs. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2012. 10(1): p. 16-26.
[2] Lopez, P., et al. Effective utilization (Ue)-a breakthrough performance indicator for machine efficiency improvement. in ISSM 2005, IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 2005. 2005. IEEE.
[3] Taboada, H., et al. Exploring a solar photovoltaic-based energy solution for green manufacturing industry. in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). 2012. IEEE.
[4] Moon, J.-Y. and J. Park, Smart production scheduling with time-dependent and machine-dependent electricity cost by considering distributed energy resources and energy storage. International Journal of Production Research, 2014. 52(13): p. 3922-3939.
[5] Mousa, O.B., S. Kara, and R.A. Taylor, Comparative energy and greenhouse gas assessment of industrial rooftop-integrated PV and solar thermal collectors. Applied energy, 2019. 241: p. 113-123.
[6] Martinez-Rubio, A., F. Sanz-Adan, and J. Santamaria, Optimal design of photovoltaic energy collectors with mutual shading for pre-existing building roofs. Renewable Energy, 2015. 78: p. 666-678.
[7] Dehghani, E., et al., Resilient solar photovoltaic supply chain network design under business-as-usual and hazard uncertainties. 2018. 111: p. 288-310.
[8] Kharaji Manouchehrabadi, M., S.J.J.o.R. Yaghoubi, and S. Energy, Solar cell supply chain coordination and competition under government intervention. 2019. 11(2): p. 023701.
[9] Manouchehrabadi, M.K., S. Yaghoubi, and J.J.R.E. Tajik, Optimal scenarios for solar cell supply chain considering degradation in powerhouses. 2020. 145: p. 1104-1125.
[10] Kharaji Manouchehrabadi, M., S.J.E.S. Yaghoubi, Part A: Recovery, Utilization,, and E. Effects, A game theoretic incentive model for closed-loop solar cell supply chain by considering government role. 2020: p. 1-25.
[11] Dehghani, E., M.S. Jabalameli, and A.J.E. Jabbarzadeh, Robust design and optimization of solar photovoltaic supply chain in an uncertain environment. 2018. 142: p. 139-156.
[12] Wang, B. and X. Xia, Optimal maintenance planning for building energy efficiency retrofitting from optimization and control system perspectives. Energy and Buildings, 2015. 96: p. 299-308.
[13] Hosseinalizadeh, R., et al., Economic sizing of a hybrid (PV–WT–FC) renewable energy system (HRES) for stand-alone usages by an optimization-simulation model: case study of Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016. 54: p. 139-150.
[14] Talavera, D., et al., Levelised cost of electricity in high concentrated photovoltaic grid connected systems: spatial analysis of Spain. Applied energy, 2015. 151: p. 49-59.
[15] Belmili, H., et al., Sizing stand-alone photovoltaic–wind hybrid system: Techno-economic analysis and optimization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014. 30: p. 821-832.
[16] Talavera, D., et al., A new approach to sizing the photovoltaic generator in self-consumption systems based on cost–competitiveness, maximizing direct self-consumption. Renewable energy, 2019. 130: p. 1021-1035.
[17] Wu, B., et al., Optimal design of stand-alone reverse osmosis desalination driven by a photovoltaic and diesel generator hybrid system. Solar Energy, 2018. 163: p. 91-103.
[18] 18. Marnay, C., et al., Optimal technology selection and operation of commercial-building microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2008. 23(3): p. 975-982.
[19] Ferrari, S. and M. Beccali, Energy-environmental and cost assessment of a set of strategies for retrofitting a public building toward nearly zero-energy building target. Sustainable cities and society, 2017. 32: p. 226-234.
[20] Fan, Y. and X. Xia, A multi-objective optimization model for energy-efficiency building envelope retrofitting plan with rooftop PV system installation and maintenance. Applied Energy, 2017. 189: p. 327-335.
[21] Rysanek, A. and R. Choudhary, Optimum building energy retrofits under technical and economic uncertainty. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 57: p. 324-337.
[22] Nottrott, A., J. Kleissl, and B. Washom, Energy dispatch schedule optimization and cost benefit analysis for grid-connected, photovoltaic-battery storage systems. Renewable Energy, 2013. 55: p. 230-240.
[23] Carpinelli, G., P. Caramia, and P. Varilone, Multi-linear Monte Carlo simulation method for probabilistic load flow of distribution systems with wind and photovoltaic generation systems. Renewable Energy, 2015. 76: p. 283-295.
[24] Wang, C., et al., Robust optimization for load scheduling of a smart home with photovoltaic system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015. 102: p. 247-257.
[25] Akbari, K., et al., Optimal investment and unit sizing of distributed energy systems under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 85: p. 275-286.
[26] Murata, A., H. Ohtake, and T. Oozeki, Modeling of uncertainty of solar irradiance forecasts on numerical weather predictions with the estimation of multiple confidence intervals. Renewable energy, 2018. 117: p. 193-201.
[27] Abdelsalam, A.A. and E.F. El-Saadany, Probabilistic approach for optimal planning of distributed generators with controlling harmonic distortions. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2013. 7(10): p. 1105-1115.
[28] Tan, B., et al., Optimal selection of energy efficiency measures for energy sustainability of existing buildings. Computers & Operations Research, 2016. 66: p. 258-271.
[29] Jafari, A. and V. Valentin, An optimization framework for building energy retrofits decision-making. Building and Environment, 2017. 115: p. 118-129.
[30] Wu, Z., B. Wang, and X. Xia, Large-scale building energy efficiency retrofit: Concept, model and control. Energy, 2016. 109: p. 456-465.
[31] Liu, Y., et al., Cost-benefit analysis for Energy Efficiency Retrofit of existing buildings: A case study in China. Journal of cleaner production, 2018. 177: p. 493-506.
[32] Wang, B., X. Xia, and J. Zhang, A multi-objective optimization model for the life-cycle cost analysis and retrofitting planning of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 2014. 77: p. 227-235.
[33] Malatji, E.M., J. Zhang, and X. Xia, A multiple objective optimisation model for building energy efficiency investment decision. Energy and Buildings, 2013. 61: p. 81-87.
[34] Valdiserri, P. and C. Biserni, Energy performance of an existing office building in the northern part of Italy: Retrofitting actions and economic assessment. Sustainable cities and society, 2016. 27: p. 65-72.
[35] Mulder, G., et al., The dimensioning of PV-battery systems depending on the incentive and selling price conditions. Applied energy, 2013. 111: p. 1126-1135.
[36] Ascione, F., et al., Resilience of robust cost-optimal energy retrofit of buildings to global warming: A multi-stage, multi-objective approach. Energy and Buildings, 2017. 153: p. 150-167.
[37] Pratama, Y.W., et al., Multi-objective optimization of a multiregional electricity system in an archipelagic state: The role of renewable energy in energy system sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 77: p. 423-439.
[38] Balaban, O. and J.A.P. de Oliveira, Sustainable buildings for healthier cities: assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan. Journal of cleaner production, 2017. 163: p. S68-S78.
[39] Radhi, H., On the optimal selection of wall cladding system to reduce direct and indirect CO2 emissions. Energy, 2010. 35(3): p. 1412-1424.
[40] Fetanat, A. and E. Khorasaninejad, Size optimization for hybrid photovoltaic–wind energy system using ant colony optimization for continuous domains based integer programming. Applied Soft Computing, 2015. 31: p. 196-209.
[41] Shakouri, H., et al., Multi-objective optimization-simulation model to improve the buildings’ design specification in different climate zones of Iran. Sustainable cities and society, 2018. 40: p. 394-415.
[42] Pazouki, M., et al., A fuzzy robust multi-objective optimization model for building energy retrofit considering utility function: a university building case study. 2021: p. 110933.
[43] Vakili, M., et al., Using artificial neural networks for prediction of global solar radiation in Tehran considering particulate matter air pollution. Energy Procedia, 2015. 74: p. 1205-1212.
[44] Sobu, A. and G. Wu. Optimal operation planning method for isolated micro grid considering uncertainties of renewable power generations and load demand. in IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies. 2012. IEEE.
[45] Laronde, R., A. Charki, and D. Bigaud, Lifetime estimation of a photovoltaic module based on temperature measurement. 2nd IMEKO TC, 2011. 11: p. 15-17.
[46] Tazvinga, H., X. Xia, and J. Zhang, Minimum cost solution of photovoltaic–diesel–battery hybrid power systems for remote consumers. Solar Energy, 2013. 96: p. 292-299.
[47] Zhu, B., H. Tazvinga, and X. Xia, Switched model predictive control for energy dispatching of a photovoltaic-diesel-battery hybrid power system. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2014. 23(3): p. 1229-1236.
[48] Okido, S. and A. Takeda, Economic and environmental analysis of photovoltaic energy systems via robust optimization. Energy Systems, 2013. 4(3): p. 239-266.
[49] Mohamed, N.M., S.N.A. Zaine, and R.M. Ramli. Evaluation of CO2 emission from dye solar cell panel production process. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2016. AIP Publishing.
[50] Ming, M., et al., Multi-objective optimization of hybrid renewable energy system using an enhanced multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Energies, 2017. 10(5): p. 674.
[51] Campoccia, A., et al., Comparative analysis of different supporting measures for the production of electrical energy by solar PV and Wind systems: Four representative European cases. Solar Energy, 2009. 83(3): p. 287-297.
[52] Couture, T.D., et al., Policymaker's guide to feed-in tariff policy design. 2010, National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States).
[53] Nuño, E., et al., Simulation of transcontinental wind and solar PV generation time series. Renewable energy, 2018. 118: p. 425-436. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 611 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 597 |