پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 161 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
| تعداد مقالات | 70,504 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,122,823 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,231,045 |
Estimating groundwater inflow into Dorud-Khorramabad railway tunnel using analytical and numerical methods | ||
| International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering | ||
| دوره 55، شماره 1، شهریور 2021، صفحه 33-41 اصل مقاله (582.63 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijmge.2020.306044.594856 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ebrahim Ghorbani1؛ Saleh Ghadernejad* 1؛ Dorna Emami2؛ Hamidreza Nejati3 | ||
| 1School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Petroleum Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Rock Mechanics Division, School of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The main objective of this study is to estimate the amount of groundwater inflow into Dorud-Khorramabad railway tunnel. To this end, in the first place, existing approaches of predicting groundwater inflow into tunnel was reviewed. According to the literature, up to now, a wide range of approaches have been proposed in order to predict the groundwater inflow into tunnel which can be classified into three distinct groups including, analytical solutions, empirical equations, and numerical modeling. Analytical solutions and empirical equations are mainly developed based on the given hypotheses and specific data sets, respectively, and should be applied in similar conditions. On the other hand, results obtained from numerical modeling are generally dependent on a wide range of parameters. Literature review revealed that one of the most effective parameters on the numerical modeling results is model extent, which controls not only final results but also numerical runtime. Hence, a sensitivity analysis is performed in order to investigate the effect of model extent on numerical results. The results demonstrated that increasing model extent decreases the groundwater inflow rate, and for a large model extent (greater than 1000), the amount of groundwater inflow tends to a constant value. In the second part, analytical solutions and finite element numerical modeling are applied for estimating the amount of groundwater inflow into Dorud–Khorramabad railway tunnel. The results indicate that the groundwater inflow into the tunnel, based on analytical methods, gives higher values than the numerical modeling. Assumptions and simplifications may justify this difference in analytical methods, accordingly, it can be inferred that if an appropriate model extent selected, the results of the numerical model based on the fact in the project can be more reliable. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Groundwater Inflow؛ Numerical Modeling؛ Analytical Solution؛ Railway Tunnel | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Coli M, Pinzani A. Tunnelling and hydrogeological issues: a short review of the current state of the art. Rock mechanics and rock engineering. 2014; 47(3): 839-851.
[2] Gong Q, Yin L, Ma H, Zhao J. TBM tunnelling under adverse geological conditions: an overview. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2016; 57: 4-17.
[3] Rostami J. Performance prediction of hard rock Tunnel Boring Machines (TBMs) in difficult ground. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2016; 57: 173-182.
[4] Culí L, Pujades E, Vázquez-Suñé E, Jurado A. Modelling of the EPB TBM shield tunnelling advance as a tool for geological characterization. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2016; 56: 12-21.
[5] Zarei H, Uromeihy A, Sharifzadeh M. A new tunnel inflow classification (TIC) system through sedimentary rock masses. Tunnelling and underground space technology. 2013; 34: 1-12.
[6] Goodman RE, Moye DG, Van Schalkwyk A, Javandel I. Ground water inflows during tunnel driving: College of Engineering, University of California, 1964.
[7] Lei S. An analytical solution for steady flow into a ttonnel. Groundwater. 1999; 37(1): 23-26.
[8] El Tani M. Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunnelling and underground space technology. 2003; 18(1): 49-55.
[9] Kolymbas D, Wagner P. Groundwater ingress to tunnels–the exact analytical solution. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2007; 22(1): 23-7.
[10] El Tani M. Water inflow into tunnels. Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress ITA-AITES1999. p. 61-70.
[11] Fernandez G, Moon J. Excavation-induced hydraulic conductivity reduction around a tunnel–Part 1: Guideline for estimate of ground water inflow rate. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2010; 25(5): 560-566.
[12] Freeze R, Cherry J. 1979, Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1979.
[13] Heuer RE. Estimating rock tunnel water inflow. Proceedings of the rapid excavation and tunneling conference: Ssciety for mining, metallogy & exploration, INC, 1995. p. 41-60.
[14] Huangfu M, Wang M-S, Tan Z-S, Wang X-Y. Analytical solutions for steady seepage into an underwater circular tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2010; 25(4): 391-396.
[15] Hwang J-H, Lu C-C. A semi-analytical method for analyzing the tunnel water inflow. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2007; 22(1): 39-46.
[16] Karlsrud. Control of water leakage when tunnelling under urban areas in the Oslo region. Planning and Engineering for the Cities of Tomorrow. Second International Conference on Soil Structure Interaction in Urban Civil EngineeringSwiss Federal Inst of Technology, Zurich; European Commission COST; Swiss Federal Office for Education and Sciences; Swiss Society for Soil and Rock Mechanics; Norwegian Geotechnical Inst; CDM Consult AG; Mott MacDonald; SKANSKA; Bilfinger Berger; Alpine. 2002: 27-33.
[17] Raymer J. Groundwater inflow into hard rock tunnels. T & T international. 2001; 33(9): 50-53.
[18] Bobet A. Numerical methods in geomechanics. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering. 2010; 35(1B): 27-48.
[19] Jing L, Hudson J. Numerical methods in rock mechanics. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2002; 39(4): 409-427.
[20] Jing L. A review of techniques, advances and outstanding issues in numerical modeling for rock mechanics and rock engineering. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 2003; 40(3): 283-353.
[21] Hassani AN, Farhadian H, Katibeh H. A comparative study on evaluation of steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular shallow tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2018 ;73: 15-25.
[22] Butscher C. Steady-state groundwater inflow into a circular tunnel. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2012; 32: 158-67.
[23] Singh R, Atkins A. Analytical techniques for the estimation of mine water inflow. International Journal of Mining Engineering. 1985; 3(1): 65-77.
[24] Singh R, Ngah S, Atkins A. Applicability of current groundwater theories for the prediction of water inflows to surface mining excavations. 2nd International Mine Water Congress of IMWA, Mine Water, Granada Spain1985. p. 553-69.
[25] Font-Capó J, Vázquez-Suñé E, Carrera J, Martí D, Carbonell R, Pérez-Estaun A. Groundwater inflow prediction in urban tunneling with a tunnel boring machine (TBM). Engineering Geology. 2011; 121(1-2): 46-54.
[26] Hassani AN, Katibeh H, Farhadian H. Numerical analysis of steady-state groundwater inflow into Tabriz line 2 metro tunnel, northwestern Iran, with special consideration of model dimensions. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2016; 75(4): 1617-1627. E. Ghorbani et al. / Int. J. Min. & Geo-Eng. (IJMGE), 55-1 (2021) 33-41 41
[27] Aryafar A, Ardejani FD, Singh R, Shokri BJ. Prediction of groundwater inflow and height of the seepage face in a deep open pit mine using numerical finite element model and analytical solutions. IMWA Symposium2007. p. e31st.
[28] Mikaeil R, Doulati AF. Prediction of groundwater inflow into tunnel using numerical model, a practical case: KUHIN Railway tunnel, QAZVIN-RASHT, IRAN. 2008.
[29] Bahrami S, Ardejani FD, Baafi E. Application of artificial neural network coupled with genetic algorithm and simulated annealing to solve groundwater inflow problem to an advancing open pit mine. Journal of Hydrology. 2016; 536: 471-484.
[30] Majdi A, Ghadernejad S, Azizi F. An Evaluation of the Influence of Geomechanical and Geometrical Parameters on Tunnel Inflow Rate (A Case Study: at KOHIN Tunnel). 6th Iranian Rock Mechanics Conference (IRMC6). Tehran, Iran2017.
[31] Office of Basic Studies of Water Resources; Iran Water Resources Management. http://wrbs.wrm.ir/, 2019.
[32] Anon O. Basic geotechnical description of rock masses. International Society of Rock Mechanics Commission on the Classification of Rocks and Rock Masses. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanical Abstracts1981. p. 85-110.
[33] Farhadian H, Aalianvari A, Katibeh H. Optimization of analytical equations of groundwater seepage into tunnels: A case study of Amirkabir tunnel. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 2012; 80(1): 96-100.
[34] Kong WK. Water ingress assessment for rock tunnels: a tool for risk planning. Rock mechanics and rock engineering. 2011;44(6):755. [35] Lombardi G. Quoted from: El Tani M (2003) Circular tunnel in a semi-infinite aquifer. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2002; 18: 49–55.
[36] Berkowitz B. Characterizing flow and transport in fractured geological media: A review. Advances in water resources. 2002; 25(8-12): 861-884.
[37] Samardzioska T, Popov V. Numerical comparison of the equivalent continuum, non-homogeneous and dual porosity models for flow and transport in fractured porous media. Advances in water resources. 2005; 28(3): 235-55.
[38] Li D, Li X, Li CC, Huang B, Gong F, Zhang W. Case studies of groundwater flow into tunnels and an innovative water[1]gathering system for water drainage. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 2009; 24(3): 260-268.
[39] Garzonio CA, Piccinini L, Gargini A. Groundwater modeling of fractured aquifers in mines: the case study of Gavorrano (Tuscany, Italy). Rock mechanics and rock engineering. 2014; 47(3): 905-921.
[40] Seep/w software pachage for finite element seepage analysis. Geo-Slope International Ltd., 2007. [41] Aalianvari A. Optimum depth of grout curtain around pumped storage power cavern based on geological conditions. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 2014; 73(3): 775- 780.
[42] Aalianvari A, Tehrani MM, Soltanimohammadi S. Application of geostatistical methods to estimation of water flow from upper reservoir of Azad pumped storage power plant. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2013; 6(7): 2571-2579.
[43] Aryafar A, Doulati Ardejani F, Singh R. Numerical modeling of groundwater inflow from a confined aquifer into Sangan open pit mine, northeast Iran. Geomechanics and Geoengineering: An International Journal. 2009; 4(3): 189-199.
[44] Bahrami S, Ardejani FD, Aslani S, Baafi E. Numerical modelling of the groundwater inflow to an advancing open pit mine: Kolahdarvazeh pit, Central Iran. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2014; 186(12): 8573-8585.
[45] Chapuis RP. Steady state groundwater seepage in sloping unconfined aquifers. Bulletin of engineering geology and the environment. 2011; 70(1): 89-99.
[46] Ardejani FD, Singh R, Baafi E, Porter I. A finite element model to: 1. predict groundwater inflow to surface mining excavations. Mine Water and the Environment. 2003; 22(1): 31-38.
[47] Ardejani FD, Singh R, Baafi E, Porter I. A finite element model to: 2. Simulate groundwater rebound problems in backfilled open cut mines. Mine Water and the Environment. 2003; 22(1): 39-44.
[48] Soni A, Manwatkar B. Seepage modeling for a large open pit coal mine in India. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2015; 33(4): 997-1007. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 881 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 922 |
||