فهم عرفی و اثر رهایی‌بخش قضاوت

الف) فارسی و عربی

1. جعفری تبار، حسن (1397). دیو در شیشه: فلسفۀ رویۀ قضایی، چ دوم، تهران: نگاه معاصر.
2. الطوسی، محمد بن الحسن (۱۳۸۹). العدة فی الاصول الفقه، قم: بوستان کتاب.
3. کیوانفر، شهرام (۱۳۸۶). «پراگماتسیم حقوقی»، مجلۀ تحقیقات حقوقی، ش ۴۶، ص 147- 167.
4. نجفی، محمدحسن (1362). جواهر الکلام، بیروت: دار الاحیاء.

ب) انگلیسی

1. Arendt, Hannah (1982). Lectures on Kant’sPoliticalPhilosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Arendt, Hannah & Ronald Beiner (1999). Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
3. Balkin, J. M. (1993). "Understanding Legal Understanding: The Legal Subject and the Problem of Legal Coherence", The Yale Law Journa,l Vol. 103 No.1, p. 105-176.
4. Boaventura de Sousa Santos lecture on “Spaces of Transformation: Epistemologies of the South at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UzecpSzXZOY.
5. Beiner, Ronald & Jennfier Nedelsky (2001). Judgement, Imagination and Politics, Lanham: Maryland Rowman &‌ Littlefield.
6. Cover, Robert (1985 – 1986). “Violence and the Word” Yale Law Journal, Vol. 95, iss8, 1601-1629.
7. Derrida, Jacques (1990). “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority”, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 1, No. 5, p. 449-454.
8. Finnis, John (2000). “On the Incoherence of Legal Positivism” Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 75, iss. 5, p. 1597-1612.
9. Dworkin, Ronald (1996). A Matter of Principle, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. --------------------- (1986). Law’s Empire, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
11. Derrida, Jaques (1986). "Declarations of Independence", New Political Science, Vol. 7, No.1, p. 7-15.
12. Fish, Stanley (1989). Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory In Literary and Legal Studies. London: Duke University Press.
13. Gramsci, Antonio (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, translated by Quentin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith, New York: International Publishers.
14. Hart, H L. A. & Penelope A. Bulloch (1997). The Concept of Law, Oxfort: Oxford.
15. Herman, Gilbert (2006). Sanjeev Kulkarni, “The Problem of Induction”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 72, No. 3, p. 559-575.
16. Hunt, Alan (1985). “The Ideology of Law: Advances and Problems in Recent Applications of the Concept of Ideology to the Analysis of Law”, Law&Society, Vo. 19, No. 11, p. 11-38.
17. Montesquieu, Charles de Secondat, Thomas Nugent, Jean Le Rond d'Alembert, and Walter Bagehot (1900), The spirit of laws, New York: Colonial Press.
18. Nedelsky, Jennifer (2011). "Receptivity and Judgment", Ethics & Global Politics, Vo. 4, No. 4, p. 231-254.
19. Kennedy, Duncan (1986). “Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology”, Journal of Legal Education, Vo. 36, No. 4, p. 518-562.
20. MacCormick, Neil and Ota Weinberger (1986). An Institutional Theory of Law: New Approaches to Legal Positivism, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
21. MacKinnon, Catharine A (1991). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
22. Minda, Gary (1996). Postmodern Legal Movements: Law and Jurisprudence at Century's End, New York: NYU Press.

1. Minor v. Happersett (1874) 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162.
2. Moore, G. E. A Defence of Common Sense, Allen & Unwin, 1925.
3. Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2^nd Edition.
4. Reid, Thomas (2002). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
5. Quine, V. O. Willard (1951). “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, The Philosophical Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, p. 20-34.
6. Raz, Joseph (1992). “The Relevance of Coherence”, B. U. L. Rev., Vol. 72, No. 2, p 273-321. .
7. Reich, Charles A. (1963). “Mr. Justice Black and the Living Constitution”, Harv. L. Rev., Vol. 76, No. 4, p. 673-754.
8. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (2002). Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation, London: Butterworths.
9. Sartre, Jean-Paul (1993). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology, London: Routledge.
10. Walt, Johan W. G. (2005). Law and Sacrifice: Towards a Post-Apartheid Theory of Law, London: Birkbeck law Press.
11. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
12. Wells, Catharine P. (1995). “Pragmatism, Feminism and the Problem of Bad Coherence”, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 93, p. 1645-1666.