پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,971,528 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,642,886 |
تأثیر تحریک جریان مستقیم جمجمه‌ای بر اجرای مهارت پرتاب منطقه‌ای در بسکتبالیست‌های ماهر | ||
| نشریه رشد و یادگیری حرکتی ورزشی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 12، شماره 3، آذر 1399، صفحه 293-312 اصل مقاله (521.31 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی Released under CC BY-NC 4.0 license I Open Access I | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jmlm.2020.294648.1478 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا نقی زاده1؛ احمدرضا موحدی* 2؛ مهدی نمازی زاده3؛ مطهره میردامادی4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکترای رفتار حرکتی، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 2استاد، گروه رفتار حرکتی و مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه تربیت بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اصفهان (خوراسگان)، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| 4پزشک متخصص مغز و اعصاب، گروه روان پزشکی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| استفاده از تحریک جریان مستقیم جمجمه‌ای (tDCS) برای بهبود حالات خلقی، یادگیری دروس، بازتوانی همواره سال‌ها مورد توجه بوده و آزمایش کاربرد آن در اجرای مهارت‌های واقعی ورزشی در مرحلۀ ابتدایی است. در این مطالعه تأثیر tDCS آندی بر اجرای مهارت پرتاب منطقه‌ای در بسکتبالیست‌های ماهر بررسی شد. این پژوهش از نوع نیمه‌تجربی است و با طرح تکرار سنجش با دو گروه کنترل و شم انجام گرفت. 26 بازیکن بسکتبالیست مرد ماهر به‌طور تصادفی در دو گروه تجربی و شم قرار گرفتند و به مدت 3 جلسه در 3 روز متوالی تحت مداخلۀ tDCS قرار گرفتند. شرکت‌کنندگان الگوی نورانی مهارت پرتاب منطقه‌ای بسکتبال مربوط به دو بازیکن نخبه را مشاهده کردند. بعد از آن، شرکت‌کنندگان گروه تجربی به مدت 20 دقیقه tDCS با شدت یک و نیم میلی‌آمپر در محل قشر پیش‌حرکتی دریافت کردند، درحالی‌که برای گروه شم تحریک ساختگی ایجاد شد. پس از مداخله، شرکت‌کنندگان هر دو گروه به اجرای مهارت پرتاب منطقه‌ای پرداختند. پس‌آزمون و پیگیری به‌ترتیب یک و هفت روز پس از مداخله اخذ شد. از آزمون تحلیل واریانس مختلط دوعاملی، t مستقل و t همبسته برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که tDCS تفاوتی در اجرای مهارت بین دو گروه در مرحلۀ مداخله ایجاد نکرد، ولی در مرحلۀ آزمون موجب بهبود چشمگیر مهارت در گروه تجربی در برابر گروه شم شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که tDCS این پتانسیل را دارد که به‌عنوان مداخلۀ مفید برای بهبود اجرای مهارت پرتاب منطقه‌ای در بسکتبال مورد توجه قرار گیرد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| بسکتبال؛ پرتاب منطقه‌ای؛ تحریک جریان مستقیم الکتریکی از روی جمجمه؛ مهارت؛ نقاط روشن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Performance of Basketball two Point Field Throws in Skilled Basketball Players | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Naghizadeh1؛ Ahmadreza Movahedi2؛ Mahdi Namazizadeh3؛ Motahareh Mirdamadi4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. of Motor Behavior, College of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Management, Facuty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 3. Associate Professor, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 4Neurologist, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied in descriptive and laboratory tasks in the field of motor and sport skills. It is necessary that tDCS effects on real sport skills are investigated. The aim of the current study was to examine the Effect of tDCS on performance of basketball two point field throws (BFT) in skilled basketball players. In this quasi- experimental study, we used a repeated measure design including a pretest, intervention, posttest and follow. A total of 26 male basketball players were randomly divided into either an experimental or a sham group. Both groups watched the point light model of the performance of two elite basketball players. Then, the participants of the exercise group received tDCS over their pre-motor cortex for 20 minutes. The participants of the sham group underwent identical tasks performance except that tDCS was artificially applied for them. BFT was assessed at baseline (pre-intervention), one day post-intervention and 7 days post-intervention. For analyzing data, two factor Mixed model ANOVA, independent and paired t-tests were used. Results showed that anodal tDCS created no between group's differences in BFT in the intervention phase while tDCS lead to significant improvement of BFT in experimental group skills compared to sham group in test phase. Results showed that tDCS could be considered as a useful intervention for the improvement of BFT in skilled basketball players. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Basketball, point light, skill, two point field throws, Transcranial direct current stimulation | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance: A situation-based learning approach: Human kinetics; 2008. 2. Lane AM. Sport and exercise psychology: Routledge; 2015. 3. Kalhornia Golkar MS, A. transcranial direct current stimulation. Tehran: Science and Culture publication. 2017. 4. Andrews SC, Hoy KE, Enticott PG, Daskalakis ZJ, Fitzgerald PB. Improving working memory: the effect of combining cognitive activity and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain stimulation. 2011;4(2):84-9. 5. Manenti R, Brambilla M, Petesi M, Ferrari C, Cotelli M. Enhancing verbal episodic memory in older and young subjects after non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2013;5:49. 6. Antal A, Nitsche MA, Kincses TZ, Kruse W, Hoffmann KP, Paulus W. Facilitation of visuo‐motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;19(10):2888-92. 7. Vines BW, Nair DG, Schlaug G. Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroreport. 2006;17(6):671-4. 8. D’Urso G, Bruzzese D, Ferrucci R, Priori A, Pascotto A, Galderisi S, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for hyperactivity and noncompliance in autistic disorder. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2015;16(5):361-6. 9. Schneider HD, Hopp JP. The use of the Bilingual Aphasia Test for assessment and transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate language acquisition in minimally verbal children with autism. Clinical linguistics & phonetics. 2011;25(6-7):640-54. 10. Mahmoodifar E, Sotoodeh MS. Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Selective Motor Training Enhances Balance in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2020;127(1):113-25. 11. Kaski D, Dominguez RO, Allum JH, Bronstein AM. Improving gait and balance in patients with leukoaraiosis using transcranial direct current stimulation and physical training: an exploratory study. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2013;27(9):864-71. 12. Duarte NdAC, Grecco LAC, Galli M, Fregni F, Oliveira CS. Effect of transcranial direct-current stimulation combined with treadmill training on balance and functional performance in children with cerebral palsy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2014;9(8):e105777. 13. Reis J, Fritsch B. Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. Current opinion in neurology. 2011;24(6):590-6. 14. Tanaka S, Sandrini M, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor learning and memory formation by non-invasive cortical stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Neuropsychological rehabilitation. 2011;21(5):650-75. 15. Galea JM, Celnik P. Brain polarization enhances the formation and retention of motor memories. Journal of neurophysiology. 2009;102(1):294-301. 16. Reis J, Schambra HM, Cohen LG, Buch ER, Fritsch B, Zarahn E, et al. Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(5):1590-5. 17. Kaski D, Quadir S, Patel M, Yousif N, Bronstein AM. Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the “broken escalator” phenomenon using anodal tDCS. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012;107(9):2493-505. 18. Wade S, Hammond G. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;41(12):1597-602. 19. Arias P, Corral-Bergantiños Y, Robles-García V, Madrid A, Oliviero A, Cudeiro J. Bilateral tDCS on primary motor cortex: effects on fast arm reaching tasks. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160063. 20. Kwon YH, Cho JS. Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on movement variability in repetitive-simple tapping task. Journal of Korean Physical Therapy. 2015;27(1):38-42. 21. Grèzes J, Armony JL, Rowe J, Passingham RE. Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2003;18(4):928-37. 22. Pirmoradian M, Movahedi A, ABBASI B. A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of Video Modeling and Video Self–modeling on Interventions on Learning of Basketball Free Throws in Children with Intellectual Disabilities. 2014. 23. Flöel A, Suttorp W, Kohl O, Kürten J, Lohmann H, Breitenstein C, et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation improves object-location learning in the elderly. Neurobiology of aging. 2012;33(8):1682-9. 24. Kang EK, Paik N-J. Effect of a tDCS electrode montage on implicit motor sequence learning in healthy subjects. Experimental & translational stroke medicine. 2011;3(1):4. 25. Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS): principles and emerging applications in children. Pediatric Brain Stimulation: Elsevier; 2016. p. 85-115. 26. Abdelmoula A, Baudry S, Duchateau J. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation enhances time to task failure of a submaximal contraction of elbow flexors without changing corticospinal excitability. Neuroscience. 2016;322:94-103. 27. Beauchamp MS, Lee KE, Haxby JV, Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2003;15(7):991-1001. 28. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & psychophysics. 1973;14(2):201-11. 29. Bandura A. Self-self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997. 30. Brown LE, Wilson ET, Obhi SS, Gribble PL. Effect of trial order and error magnitude on motor learning by observing. Journal of neurophysiology. 2010;104(3):1409-16. 31. Cross ES, Kraemer DJ, Hamilton AFdC, Kelley WM, Grafton ST. Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral cortex. 2009;19(2):315-26. 32. Dushanova J, Donoghue J. Neurons in primary motor cortex engaged during action observation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;31(2):386-98. 33. Grezes J, Fonlupt P, Bertenthal B, Delon-Martin C, Segebarth C, Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage. 2001;13(5):775-85. 34. Vaina LM, Solomon J, Chowdhury S, Sinha P, Belliveau JW. Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98(20):11656-61. 35. Puce A, Perrett D. Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003;358(1431):435-45. 36. Saygin AP, Wilson SM, Hagler DJ, Bates E, Sereno MI. Point-light biological motion perception activates human premotor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;24(27):6181-8. 37. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. European journal of neuroscience. 2001;13(2):400-4. 38. Shirazi S. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Performance of Sport Skill: Isfahan; 2018. 39. Waters-Metenier S, Husain M, Wiestler T, Diedrichsen J. Bihemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation enhances effector-independent representations of motor synergy and sequence learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 2014;34(3):1037-50. 40. Koyama S, Tanaka S, Tanabe S, Sadato N. Dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex enhances consolidation of a ballistic thumb movement. Neuroscience letters. 2015;588:49-53. 41. Cantarero G, Spampinato D, Reis J, Ajagbe L, Thompson T, Kulkarni K, et al. Cerebellar direct current stimulation enhances on-line motor skill acquisition through an effect on accuracy. Journal of Neuroscience. 2015;35(7):3285-90. 42. Doppelmayr M, Pixa NH, Steinberg F. Cerebellar, but not motor or parietal, high-density anodal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor adaptation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 2016;22(9):928-36. 43. de Xivry J-JO, Marko MK, Pekny SE, Pastor D, Izawa J, Celnik P, et al. Stimulation of the human motor cortex alters generalization patterns of motor learning. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011;31(19):7102-10. 44. Stagg C, O’shea J, Kincses Z, Woolrich M, Matthews P, Johansen‐Berg H. Modulation of movement‐associated cortical activation by transcranial direct current stimulation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;30(7):1412-23. 45. Ranieri F, Podda MV, Riccardi E, Frisullo G, Dileone M, Profice P, et al. Modulation of LTP at rat hippocampal CA3-CA1 synapses by direct current stimulation. Journal of neurophysiology. 2012;107(7):1868-80. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 542 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 236 |
||