پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 6,230 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,757 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 115,115,013 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,881,664 |
کاوشی در روش های مورد استفاده دانشجویان رشته طراحی صنعتی قبل و بعد از تاثیر آموزش های دانشگاهی | ||
| نشریه هنرهای زیبا: هنرهای تجسمی | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 25، شماره 1، خرداد 1399، صفحه 135-142 اصل مقاله (1.01 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jfava.2019.270482.666089 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| ونوس جلالی1؛ مهران فاطمی نیا* 2 | ||
| 1- | ||
| 2عضو هییت علمی/ دانشگاه تهران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| طراحی، فرایندی است که به منظور حل یک مسئله، در ذهن فرد طراح اتفاق میافتد. یکی از روشهایی که به منظور مکاشفه و تحلیل رفتار انسانی، توسعه یافته است، روش تحلیل پروتکل است. با استفاده از فرایند بلند فکر کردن در حین انجام عمل، میتوان تا حدی از آنچه در ذهن فرد مورد آزمایش میگذرد، آگاهی پیدا کرد. پی بردن به این نکته که «آموزشهای آکادمیک چه تاثیری بر روی این فرایند ذهنی پیچیده میتواند داشته باشد؟»، خاستگاه این پژوهش است. هدف از انجام تحقیق حاضر، کاوش در چگونگی روشی است که دانشجویان طراحی در طول دوره تحصیلات دانشگاهی خود میآموزند و به کار میگیرند. به این منظور، دو «نمونه ورودی» و دو «نمونه خروجی» تحت آزمایش تحلیل پروتکل قرار گرفتند. دو نمونه، مورد بررسی نهایی قرار گرفتند. تفاوتهای بین نمونهها در سه عامل «زمان»، «نحوه رویارویی با مسئله» و «فازهای طراحی» معرفی شد و مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. «نمونه ورودی» در خلاقیت، آزادی عمل بیشتری را تجربه کرد. حال، اینکه «نمونه خروجی» در حل مسئله به گونهای نظاممند، عمل کرد. نتایج حاصل برای گروهای مورد بررسی در قالب تشریح کامل فرایندهای طراحی مورد مطالعه و مجموعه ای از فرضیه ها به نمایش گذاشته شد و در پایان، پیشنهادهایی برای پژوهشهای آتی ارائه شد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| طراحی؛ روش شناسی؛ رفتار انسانی؛ حل مسئله؛ تحلیل پروتکل؛ بلند فکر کردن | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Exploration of the Design Methods Adopted by Industrial Design Students before and after Academic Educations | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| venus jalali1؛ Mehran Fateminia2 | ||
| 1- | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| “Design” is referred to the process in human`s mind that results in creating a concept from solving a problem. Nowadays, academic design education has been improved considerably and research in this area entered a new era. The necessity of training to help the designers understanding and then implementing systematic approaches in the process of design is now very well appreciated in academia. Therefore, scientifically approaching the design matter and training experts to address this shortcoming for a wide range of professions is urging. This paradigm shift has caused some sort of complexity in the thinking process of designers. As the result, this has become an attractive subject in design methodology researches. In the current study the impact of academic studies on the problem-solving process of a design student`s mind has been investigated. In order to cover all aspects of such impact, an experimental study was designed and conducted to explore the essence of the concepts and skills that design students in University of Tehran acquire during their studies. Due to the obscure stimuli and responses, the study of thinking can be very challenging or in some cases not feasible. Therefore, to achieve this goal, protocol analysis was adopted in this research to study the thinking process for a number of cases. According to the literature, protocol analysis is an empirical observational research method developed to explore and analyse human behaviour. This method can be used to make a comprehensive understanding of the processes taking place in a designer’s mind. A protocol is referred the subjects` behaviours recorded in the course of time. With advancements in psychology and developing psychologically methods, verbal and thinking behaviour became an interesting subject where preparing verbal reports was begun. Thinking aloud which is the basis of the verbal reports in the protocol analysis, reveals the processes taking place in the subject`s mind during design. In this case the experiment was then conducted using protocol analysis on two junior students and two recently graduates, followed by the final study on two subjects. The junior student`s problem-solving behaviour was compared with the one recorded for graduate student. The differences were then categorised into three factors including time, problem addressing, and design phases. The junior subject was found to be more creative and has a freer mind in developing ideas. However, addressing the problem and describing the details were difficult for him. He showed to be more concerned about the general idea while, the graduate acted more systematic in problem-solving. The graduate subject became so involved in details that lost her focus on creativity. The results were discussed and represented in more details in the latter sections. It was concluded that academic design education, may affect designer`s thinking resulting in concentration on methodology and process-driven approaches causing a loss in creativity. The hypotheses however need to be investigated further in future studies. At the end of the report, the research constraints and future suggestions were also presented. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Design, Human Behavior, Problem-Solving, Protocol Analysis, Think Aloud | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
لاوسون، برایان (۱۳۹۲)، طراحان چگونه میاندیشند: ابهام زدایی از فرایند طراحی. (حمید. ندیمی، مترجم)، ویرایش جدید، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، مرکز چاپ و انتشارات، تهران. ندیمی، حمید و شریعت راد، فرهاد (۱۳۹۱)، منابع ایده پردازی معماری جستاری در فرایند ایده پردازی چند معمار از جامعه حرفهای کشور، نشریه هنرهای زیبا- معماری و شهرسازی، ۱۷(۲)، صص ۵-۱۴. Akin, Omer (1984), An Exploration of the Design Process, In: Cross, Nigel (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, pp.189-207.
Akin, Omer & Lin, Chengtah (1995), Design protocol data and novel design decisions, Design Studies, 16(2), pp.211-236.
Austin, John & Delaney, F. Peter (1998), Protocol Analysis as a Tool for Behavior Analysis, The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 41-56.
Craig, David Latch (2001), Stalking Homo Faber: a comparison of research strategies for studying design behavior, In: Eastman, C. M., McCracken, W. M., & Newstetter., W. C. (Ed), Design Knowing and Learning: cognition in design education, Oxford: Elsevier Science, pp.13-36.
Cross, Nigel (2003), The Expertise of Exceptional Designers, In: Cross, N. & Edmonds, E. (Ed), Expertise in Design. Sydney, Australia: Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology, Sydney, pp.23-35.
Cross, Nigel (2004), Expertise in design: an overview, Design Studies, 25, pp.427-441.
Cross, Nigel (2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, Springer, London.
Darke, Jane (1984), The Primary Generator and the Design Process, In: Cross, N. (Ed), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, pp.175-188.
Eastman, M. Charles (1969), Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design, Proceedings of the First Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, MA: MITRE, Bedford.
Eastman, M. Charles (1970), On the analysis of intuitive design processes, In: Moore, Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, pp.21-37.
Ericsson, K. Anders (2002), Towards a procedure for eliciting verbal expression of non-verbal experience without reactivity: interpreting the verbal overshadowing effect within the theoretical framework for protocol analysis, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16(8), pp.981-987.
Ericsson, K. Anders & Simon, A. Herbert (1993), Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, US.
Gilhooly, Kenneth & Green, Caroline (1996), Protocol analysis: theoretical background, In: Richardson, J. T. E (Ed), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for psychology and the social sciences, Leicester: BPS Books, pp.43-54.
Günther, Joachim & Ehrlenspiel, Klaus (2007),Comparing designers from practice and designers with systematic design education, In: Badke-Schaub, P., Cardoso, C., Lauche, K., & Roozenburg, N., (Ed), Design Theory and Methodology, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, pp.7-81.
Hay, L; Teague C. M; Duffy, A. H. B; Pidgeon, L. M ; Vuletic, T & Grealy, M (2017), A systematic review of protocol studies on conceptual design cognition, Design Computing and Cognition DCC’16. J.S. Gero
Jiang, Hao & Yen, Ching-Chiuan (2009), Protocol Analysis in Design Research: a review, IASDR, International Association of Societies of Design Research????
Kan, W.T. Jeff & Gero, S. John (2017), Quantitative Methods for Studying Design Protocols, Springer, ????.
Lawson, Bryan (2004), What Designers Know, Elsevier/Architectural Press, Oxford, Burlington.
Lawson, Bryan & Dorst, Kees (2009), Design Expertise, Architectural Press, ??????.
Lauche, Kristina (2007), Overview of approaches on design research, In: Badke-Schaub, P., Cardoso, C., Lauche, Kristina ; Roozenburg, Norbert (Ed), Design Theory and Methodology, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, pp.39-43.
Lee, S.Won; Lee, J; JO,N & Kim, Y.S (2013),Design activity and team interaction characteristics: a case study of protocol analysis on team-based product-service systems design process, international conference on engineering design ,ICED13.
Newell, Allen (1966), On the Analysis of the Human Problem Solving Protocols, International Symposium on Mathematical and Computational Methods in the Social Sciences, Rome, Italy, pp.145-185.
Newell, Allen & Simon, A. Herbert (1972), Human problem solving, Englewood Cliffs, N. J., Prentice Hall.
Sarkar, Prabir & Chakrabarti, Amaresh (2013), A Support for Protocol Analysis for Design Research, DesignIssues, Volume 29, Number 4, pp.?????????.
Schön, A. Donald (1992), Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation, knowledge based systems, Vol.5, No.1 , pp.154-156.
Schön, A. Donald & Wiggins, Glenn (1992), Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing, Design Studies, 13(2), pp.135-156.
Watson, B. Johan (1920), Is thinking merely the action of language mechanisms?, British Journal of Psychology, 11(2), pp.87- 104.
Yu, Rongrong; Gero, John & Gu, Ning (2015), Architects’ Cognitive Behaviour in Parametric Design, International Journal of Architectural Computing, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp.???????.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 651 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 625 |
||