پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 154 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 5,837 |
| تعداد مقالات | 64,075 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 106,301,314 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 83,192,960 |
ارزیابی پایداری محلی با روش IUCN در زمان‌های پیش و پس از اجرای پروژه‌ی تغذیه مصنوعی ( مطالعه موردی: روستای کال/ استان فارس) | ||
| نشریه محیط زیست طبیعی | ||
| مقاله 8، دوره 72، شماره 4، اسفند 1398، صفحه 515-527 اصل مقاله (788.86 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/jne.2020.272136.1601 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| حنانه محمدی کنگرانی* 1؛ حسن مقیم2؛ ارشک حلی ساز3 | ||
| 1دانشگاه هرمزگان | ||
| 2گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری- دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی- دانشگاه هرمزگان- ایران | ||
| 3گروه مرتع و ابخیزداری، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران | ||
| چکیده | ||
| همواره نقش پروژه‌های تغذیه مصنوعی در پایداری توسعه مناطق مد نظر بوده است. در این پژوهش با ارزیابی پایداری روستای کال در دو زمان پیش و پس از اجرای پروژه تغذیه مصنوعی (1395-1385) با استفاده از روش IUCN و بر اساس روش دلفی کلاسیک( بر اساس تقسیم‌بندی وردنبرگ) و در سه گام و به صورت تکمیل فرم نظر خواهی و مصاحبه رودررو و با استفاده ازروش گلوله‌برفی به این نقش پرداخته شده است. این روش امکان مقایسه‌ی شرایط موجود منطقه را با وضعیت ایده‌آل خود یعنی توسعه ی کامل انسانی و یک اکوسیستم سالم و مولد فراهم می‌آورد. در این پژوهش در دو بخش اکوسیستم و رفاه انسانی از شش معیار و 14 شاخص) معیارهای آب و پوشش گیاهی هر کدام سه شاخص و معیارهای خاک، جمعیت، فقر و کاربری هر یک دو شاخص) استفاده شده است. در این تحقیق از نظرات 16 خبره استفاده شده است. نتایج نشان داد، میزان پایداری بخش اکوسیستم در پیش و پس از اجرای پروژه در وضعیت متوسط (07/50 و 03/51) می‌باشد که با شیب ملایم روند صعودی دارد. میزان پایداری بخش انسان در حالت پایداری متوسط در پیش از اجرا (47/50) به حالت تقریباً پایدار در پس از اجرا (13/61) ارتقاء پیدا کرده است. همچنین از میان شاخص‌ها، شاخص‌های EC (26 به 8/21)، تصرف اراضی (92 به 6/83) و تبدیل مراتع (80 به 65) از دیدگاه پایداری توسعه سیر نزولی پیدا کرده‌اند. در مجموع، محدوده‌ی روستای کال در پیش و پس از اجرای پروژه در وضعیت پایداری متوسط می‌باشد که با شیب ملایم روند صعودی دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| ارزیابی پایداری؛ شاخص؛ روش IUCN؛ تغذیه مصنوعی؛ استان فارس | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Assessment of local sustainability by IUCN method in both pre and post implementation of the artificial recharge project (Case study: Kal village / Fars province) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hassan Moghim2؛ arashk Holisaz3؛ | ||
| 2, Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Hormozgan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Associate Professor, Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Hormozgan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The role of artificial recharge projects has always been considered in the sustainability of the region development. In this study, this role has been indicated as sustainability evaluation of Kal project by IUCN method, Classic Delphi method (in classification Verdenburg, with 3 phases and questionnaire) and Snowball method in the pre and post implementation of the artificial recharge project (2009-2016). This method could compare the current and ideal situations of a region. In this research, 6 criteria and 14 indicators have been indicated for the ecosystem and human dimensions (3 indicators for both water and vegetation criteria, and 2 indicators for each of soil, population, poverty and land use criteria). In research, use 16 exports. The results showed that the ecosystem sustainability is in the moderate situation with a slight upward trend (50.07 – 51.03). And, the sustainability of human dimension has improved to relatively stable (50.47 – 61.13). Also, the trend of EC (26 to 21.8), national lands (92 to 83.6) grabbing and changing the land use of rangelands (80 to 65) have been decreased. In general, the study area has been in a moderate sustainability situation in both periods. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sustainability evaluation, Indicator, IUCN method, Artificial recharge, Fars | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abraham, M, Mohan, S., 2015. Effectiveness of artificial recharge structures in enhancing groundwater storage: A case study. Indian journal of science and technology 8(20), 123-132. Abuzeid, M., 1998. Water and sustainable development: the vision for world, life and the environment. Journal of water policy 1(1), 9-19. Asadinalivand, O., Mohseni Saravi, M., Zahedi Amiri, Gh., Nazari Samani, A. 2014. Comparison of two methods of IUCN and watershed, range and forest management in assessing watershed sustainability (Case study: Tallaghan – Zeidasht). Journal of Watershed Management Recharge 6(11),73-89 ( in Persian). Brown, G., Mitchaii, N., Beresford, M., 2005. The protected landscape approach, linking nature, culture and community. Publication IUCN, 270pp. Burns, N., S.K., Grove. 1993. The practies of nursing research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders compony, 4. Canaves, D., Ortega, N., Queiros, M., 2014. The assessment of local sustainability using fuzzy logic: an expert opinion system to evaluate environmental sanitation in the Algarve region, Portugal. Ecological indicators36, 711-718. Chen, B., Chen, Z.M., Zhou, Y., Zhou, J.B., Chen, G.Q., 2009. Energy as embodied energy based assessment for local sustainability of constructed wetland in Beijing. Communications in nonlinear science and numerical simulation 14, 622-635. Forest, range and watershed management organization of Iran, 2010. Guideline for monitoring and evaluation of natural resources and watershed management plans, No. 505. (In Persian). Guijt, I., Moiseev, A., 2001. IUCN resource kit for sustainability assessment, part C: slides for facilitators. IUCN monitoring and evaluation initiative, 87pp. Hadi desige of Kal village, 2011. House institute of revolution Islamic- Fars province. Javedansharpars consulting engineers, 270pp. (In Persian). Hafezparast, M., Araghinejed, Sh., Sharifazari, S., 2015. Sustainability criteria in assessment of in the area basin based on DPSIR approach. Journal of water and soil conservation 22 (2),61-77 (in Persian). Huang, G., Ali, S., 2015. Local sustainability and gender ratio: evaluating the impacts of mining and tourism on sustainable development in Yunnan, Chain. International journal environmental research public health 12(1), 927-939. Jahanishakib, F., Malekmohammadi, B., Zebardast, L., Adeli, F., 2013. Investigate the Potential and Application of Ecosystem Services as Ecological Indicators in the DPSIR Model (Case Study: Choghakhor Wetland). Journal of environmental researches 5(10), 109-120. (In Persian). Kennedy, HP. 2004. Enhancing delphi research: methods and results. Journal of advance Nurs 45(5): 504-11. Kowsar, S.A., 2005. Abkhandari (aquifer management): a green path to the sustainable development of marginal dry lands. Journal of mountain science 2(3), 233-243. Li, B., Wu, Y., Zhao, B., 2013. Assessment on sustainability of groundwater resources in China southwestern Karst mountain area. Advanced materials research 726-731, 3381-3384. Mahmoudi, B., Faghhi, J., Makhdum, M., 2015. Evaluation sustainable process on local based IUCN method (case study: Manj- Lordegan). Journal of Natural Environmental 68(4), 653-663. (In Persian). Mascarenhas, A., Coelho, P., Subtil, E., Ramos, T.B., 2010. The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment. Ecological indicators 10,646-656. Mattas, Ch., Voudouris, k., Panagopoulos, A., 2014. Integrated groundwater resources management using the DPSIR approach in a GIS environment: a case study from the Gallikos river basin, north Greece. Journal water 692, 1043-1068. Mirlas, V., Antonenko, V., Kulagin, V., Kuldeeva, E., 2015. Assessing artificial groundwater recharge on irrigated land using the MODFLOW model, a case study from Karatal agricultural area, Kazakhstan. Pub. By Canadian center of science and education, earth science research (4)2,544-553. Moldan, B., Belharz, S., 2013. Sustainable development indicators, translated by Nashat hadad Tehrani and Naser Moharamnezhad, Department of Environment. Parimalarenganayaki, S., Elango, L., 2015. Assessment of effect of recharge from a check dam as a method of managed aquifer recharge by hydrogeological investigations. Environmental earth science 73, 5349-5361. Pires, A., Mortato, J., Peixoto, H., Botero,V., Zuluaga, L., Figuetoa, A., 2017. Sustainability assessment of indicators for integrated water resources management. Science of the total environment 578,100-110. Schlor, H., Fisher, W., Friedrich, J., 2013. Methods of measuring sustainable development of the German energy sector.Applied Energy (101), 172-181. Sdiri, A., Pinho, J., Ratanamskul, Ch., 2018. Water resource management for sustainable development. Arabian journal of Geosdences11, 123-124. Shi, W., Xia, P., 2011. Application of DPSIR model and improved entropy method in environmental impact assessment of land use planning in Tianshui region. Journal of coastal research 165(1), 1236-1241. Taherisaffar, M., Shahnooshi, N., Abolhasani, L., 2015. Evaluation effects of economic, social and environmental on Bar dam- Neyshaboor. Journal of geography and environmental hazards 5(1),127-146. (In Persian). Teymori, A., Seydiian, S.M., Rouhani, H., Amadi, R., 2017. Evaluation ecology sustainable used IUCN method (case study: Darouk watershed). Journal of Geography and sustainable Environmental 25, 81-93.(in Persian). Xing, Y., Liang, H., Xu. D., . 2013. Sustainable development evaluation of urban traffic system. Procardia- Social and behavioral sciences (96), 496-504. Yari Hesar, A., Badri, S.A., Pourtaheri, M., Sabokbar, H., 2013.Determination of sustainability criteria for rural settlements in Tehran. Journal of Geography and Development (32), 127-148. (In Persian). Zahedi Amiri, Gh., 2005. Required indices, criteria for forest sustainable management, final project report (2th stage) 264pp. (in Persian). Zhang, F., Zhang, J., Wu, R., Yang, J., 2016. Ecosystem health assessment based on DPSIRM framework and health distance model in Nansi Lake, China. Stoch. Environmental Research Risk Assessment 30, 1235-1247. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 499 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 382 |
||