انتظارات گفتمانی و پردازش خوانداری بندهای موصولی فاعلی و مفعولی در زبان فارسی

دبیرمقدم، محمد (1392). رده‌شناسی زبان‌های ایرانی، جلد 2، تهران، سمت.

راسخ‌مهند، محمد (1393). توالی نامتقارن هسته و بند موصولی در زبان فارسی، در مجموعه مقالات همایش نهم زبان‌شناسی، به کوشش محمد دبیرمقدم، 545-552، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

غفاری، مهرداد (1392). بررسی سطوح پیچیدگی بندهای موصولی در کودکان فارسی‌زبان 3 تا 7 ساله، رساله دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران.

ماهوتیان، شهرزاد (1387). دستور زبان فارسی از دیدگاه رده‌شناختی، ترجمۀ مهدی سمائی. تهران، مرکز.

هادی‌پورفرد، احسان (1386). نقش مؤلفه معنایی در پردازش بندهای موصولی مفعولی در زبان فارسی، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه تهران.

Aaronson, D., and H. S. Scarborough. 1976. Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 56-70.

Cohen, J. W. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2^nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 2001. Word order typology of Iranian Languages. The Journal of Humanities, 2 (8), 17 -23.

Dabir-Moghaddam, M. 2013. Radešenâsi-ye zabânhâ-ye Irâni, Vol 2, Tehran, Samt. [In Persian]

Forster, K. I., and J. C. Forster. 1999. DMDX [Computer software]. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona, Department of Psychology.

Fox, B. A., and S. A. Thompson. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language, 66, 297–316.

Gennari, S. P., and M. C. MacDonald. 2009. Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses. Cognition, 111, 1–23.

Ghaffari, M. 2013. Barresi-ye sotuh-e pičidegi-ye bandhâ-ye mosuli dar kudakân-e Fârsi zabân-e 3 tâ 7 sâl-e, PhD thesis in Linguistics, Payame Noor University, Tehran. [In Persian]

Gibson, E. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1–76.

ـــــــــــــــــ. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. Marantz, and W. O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gibson, E., and H. H. Iris Wu. 2011. Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 125-155.

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, H. 2005. Relativization, ergativity, and corpus frequency. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 456–63.

Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., and M. Johnson. 2001. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1411- 1423.

Gundel, J., Hedberg, H., and R. Zacharski. 1993. Referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 274–307.

Hadipoorfard, E. 2007. Naqš-e moalefe-ye ma’nâ-yi dar pardâzeš-e bandhâ-ye mosuli-ye maf’uli dar zabân-e Fârsi. MA thesis in Teaching English, Tehran University. [In Persian]

Holmes, V. M., and J. K. O’Regan. 1981. Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative- clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 417–430.

Hsu, Ch. N. 2006. Issues in head-final relative clauses in Chinese: derivation, processing and acquisition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware, Newark: United States.

Ishizuka, T. 2005. Processing relative clauses in Japanese. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, 13,135-157.

King, J. W., and M. A. Just. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580- 602.

Kwon, N., Lee, Y., Gordon, P. C. and R, Kluender. 2010. Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: an eye-tracking study of prenominal relative clauses in Korean. Language, Vol. 86, No. 3, 1-37.

Lin, C. J. C. 2014. Effect of thematic order on the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses. Lingua, 140, 180-206.

Macwhinney, B., and C. Pleh. 1988. The processing of relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95-141.

Mahootiyan, Sh. 2008. Dastur-e zabân-e Fârsi az didgâh-e radešenâxti, Translated by Mahdi Samayi, Tehran, Markaz. [In Persian]

Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., and H. Schriefers. 2006. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466–490.

ـــــــــــــــــــــــ. 2008. Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition, 36, 170–181.

Mitchell, D. C., and D. W. Green. 1978. The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(4), 609-636.

O’Grady, W., Lee, M., and M. Choo. 2003. A subject–object asymmetry in the acquisition of relative clauses in Korean as a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 433–448.

Rahmany, R., Ma'refat, H., and E. Kidd. 2011. Persian Speaking Children’s Acquisition of Relative Clauses. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8 (3), 367-388.

Rasekhmahand, M. 2014. Tavâli-ye nâmoteqâren-e haste va band-e mosuli dar zabân-e Fârsi, In M. Dabir-Moghaddam (ed.), Proceedings of the 9^th conference of Linguistics, 545-552, Tehran, Allameh Tabataba’i University Publication. [In Persian]

Ronald, D., Mauner, G., O’Meara, C., and H. Yun. 2012. Discourse expectations and relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 479-508.

Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., and K. Kühn. 1995. The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 499–520.

Warren, T., and E. Gibson. 2002. The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition, 85, 79–112.

Wu, Zh. 2015. Processing relative clauses in context: what kind of priming from the preceding context is most effective?. Unpublished M. A. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.