تعداد نشریات | 161 |
تعداد شمارهها | 6,532 |
تعداد مقالات | 70,502 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 124,118,386 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 97,224,421 |
Effect of in ovo Injection of Nicotonic Acid, Pantothenic Acid or Folic Acid on Immune System and Growth of Broiler Chickens | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مقاله 8، دوره 13، شماره 4، دی 2019، صفحه 411-420 اصل مقاله (485.75 K) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نوع مقاله: Nutrition - Hygiene | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ijvm.2019.278345.1004976 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
نویسندگان | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asaad Parnian1؛ Bahman Navidshad* 2؛ Farzad Mirzaei2؛ Reza Behmaram2؛ Hamid Deldar3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Department of Animal Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2Department of Animal Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3Department of Animal Sciences, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University,Sari, Iran | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
چکیده | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BACKGROUND: In ovo injection of nutrients as an early feeding method in birds directly supplies the nu- trients to the developing embryo. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of in ovo injection of nicotonic acid, panto- thenic acid and folic acid on the performance and immune system of broilers. METHODS: 450 Ross 308 fertile eggs were divided into 5 groups and placed in a hatchery machine. Five experimental groups included in ovo injection of 0.121 mg of nicotonic acid, 0.052 mg of pantothenic acid, 0.007 mg of folic acid on the 14th day of incubation period, positive control or injection control (physiological serum injection) and negative control (non injecting control). RESULTS: At the age of 18 days of the rearing period, injection of pantothenic acid and nicotinic acid in- creased the antibody titre against Newcastle Virus and folic acid and pantothenic acid reduced the SRBC titer. At 35 days of age, nicotinic acid and folic acid had lower SRBC titer than the negative control group. The highest lymphocyte to heterophilia ratio was observed in the pantothenic acid group and the lowest levels were seen in the folic acid group. In ovo injection of nicotinic acid and pantothenic acid caused weight loss in chicks during the first and second weeks of rearing period compared to positive and negative controls groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated a positive effect of in ovo injection of pantothenic acid and nichotinic acid on some immune parameters of broiler chicks. In despite of the negative effect of in ovo injection of nicotinic acid and pantothenic acid on growth rate of chicks during the first and second week of age, there was a compensatory growth for the nicotinic acid group such that this treatment positively influenced the final weight of the broilers. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
کلیدواژهها | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
broiler؛ folic acid؛ In ovo injection؛ nicotonic acid؛ pantothenic acid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
اصل مقاله | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IntroductionThe nutrients needed by the chicken em- bryo are met by hen, so the embryo only has access to the egg nutrient resevours after lay- ing (Jha et al, 2019). In recent decades, the use of in ovo injection has been considered for early feeding in birds (Dal Pont et al., 2019). In this process, nutrients are fed to the embryo within the egg at various stages of the embryo’s development. Vitamins are nutrients, which are essential at very low levels. Pantothenic acid has an important role in coenzyme A, acyl carrier proteins synthesis (Lanska Douglas, 2012). Pantothenic acid is also involved in gener- al metabolism and the previous reports have confirmed its positive effect on the health and performance of birds (Wang et al., 2016). Folic acid has a critical role in one-carbon metabolism and is involved in DNA, RNA and protein methylation and DNA synthesis and maintenance (Leung et al., 2013). Folic acid also enhances the immunity (Delaney et al., 2013; Feng et al., 2011). Niacin is involved in electron transport for intracellular respiration and there are reports on the positive effects of niacin on growth of poultry (Jiang et al., 2014). This study was designed to evaluate the effects of in ovo in- jection of nicotonic acid, pantothenic acid or folic acid on the live weight, carcass param- eters and immune system of broilers. Materials and MethodsIn this study, 450 Ross 308 fertile eggs with 65 g average weight were obtained from breeder flock at 43 weeks of age. The eggs were individually weighed and divid- ed into five experimental groups including 4 replicates. The experimental treatments were the non-injected group, the group in- jected with 1 ml physiological serum and
three groups injected with 1 cc of physio- logical saline solution containing 0.121 mg of nicotinic acid, 0.052 mg of pantothenic acid or 0.007 mg of folic acid. The select- ed vitamin levels were based 75% of the recommended level throughout the starter phase of the rearing period (Aviagen, 2014). To prepare injectable solutions, nicotonic acid (Merck, Swizerland, 99.9% purity), Pantothenic acid (LeSen, China, 99% puri- ty) and folic acid (DSM, Neiderland, 80% purity), in the amount of 0.211, 0.052 and 0.007 mg, were dissolved in 50 ml physio- logical serum, respectively. In ovo injection of vitamins was carried out in the air cell of eggs on the 14th day of incubation and after separation of broken eggs. Before injection, the broad end of the eggs was disinfected using 96% ethyl alco- hol. Disposable Insulin syringes with . 22 gauge needle were used for injection. In the wider part of the shell, eggs were pierced with a needle and the solutions were inject- ed into the air cell. The temperature of the hatchery was 37.8 °C and the humidity was 65%. After completion of injection, the place was disinfected with alcohol, blocked using melted paraffin, and then transferred to the incubation trays. At the end of the incubation period, the hatching chicks after counting and weighing were transferred to the poultry house. The hatchability of eggs in different groups was comparable, between 68 and 71 percent. The chicks were grown for 42-day experimental period under the same environmental condi- tions and diet formulated based on dietary re- quirements of the Ross 308 broiler (Aviagen, 2014). The mortality rate in all the experi- mental groups was less than 5%. Birds were vaccinated at 9 days old by injection of the
dual Newcastle and Avian influenza vaccine (Razi Institute, Karaj, Iran) and eye drop of dual bronchitis-B1 Newcastle virus vaccine, H120-B1 (bronchitis-B1 Newcastle virus ) (Razi Institute, Karaj, Iran). َ At 15 days old Gumboro Nobilis D78 vaccine (MSD, Neth- erlands) was administrated in drinking water. At 18 days of age, Newcastle VITAPEST L vaccine (Ceva Santé Animale, France) and at 25 days of age Newcastle Avinew (Boeh- ringer Ingelheim, Germany) were used in drinking water. At the end of the experiment, a chick was selected from each replicate and blood samples were taken from wing vein. Blood samples were placed in tubes containing 50 μl EDTA to count the lymphocytes and heterocytes. The counting of white blood cells was done by observation and counting by eye after gisma staining using an optical microscope (Olympus UK Ltd., Essex, UK) (Grass and Siegel., 1983). To determine the antibody titer of the bird against sheep red blood cells (SRBC), sheep blood was centrifuged for 10 min at a rate of 2500 rpm and each time the upper fluid was discarded and a same amount of chlo- ride solution 0.9% was added. The washed red blood cells were diluted with sodium chloride solution so that a solution of 5% red blood cells was obtained. Injection of 0.1 ml SRBC at 18 and 35 days of rearing period (injection in the chest muscle) was carried out (Grasman, 2010) and blood samples were collected from left wing vein at 22 and 42 days of age (Grasman, 2010). The hemag- glutination inhibition (HI) test using ELISA with a Newcastle virus (NDV) mono-spe- cific antiserum was used to detect the titer against NDV (OIE, 2012). To measure the immunoglobulin G, Mercaptoethanol was used to create sediment. Immunoglobulin M was obtained by subtracting immunoglobu- lin G from total immunoglobulin (Cheema et al., 2003). At the end of the rearing period, after re- cording live weight, 10 birds were slaugh- tered from each treatment and the weights of carcass, bursa of Fabricius, Thymus, Heart, Liver, Spleen and abdominal fat were re- corded. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.1 software and GLM proce- dure. The comparison of the meanings was done using Duncan's multiple range test and the 5% probability level was considered as a significant level. ResultsTables 2 and 3 show the effect of in ovo injection of Nicotonic acid, Pantothenic acid, and Folic acid vitamins on antibody titers against SRBC and Newcastle Virus (NDV), IgG and IgM in serum at 18 and 35 days of age. At 18 days of age, in ovo in- jection of pantothenic acid and nicotinic acid resulted in an increase in the antibody titre against Newcastle Virus (NDV) compared to the control group and the folic acid injected group (P<0.05), but this parameter was not affected by experimental treatments at age 35 days. Antibody titers against sheep red blood cells were also influenced by exper- imental treatments. At the age of 18 days, injection of folic acid and pantothenic acid reduced the titer in comparison with the neg- ative control group (P<0.05), and at 35 days of age, nicotinic acid and folic acid groups had a lower titer than the negative control group (P<0.05). At 18 days, the level of IgG in serum of chicks in ovo injected with vitamins was lower than the negative control group (P<0.05), and a similar relationship was ob- served for IgM in chickens of pantothenic
acid group (P<0.05). At 35 days of age, there was no significant difference in serum IgG levels in different groups, but the IgM lev- els in the nicotinic acid and folic acid groups were lower than the negative control group (P<0.05).
Table 1. Ingredients and nutrient composition of basal diets fed (as-fed)
1 Provided the following (per kg of diet): vitamin A 8,800 IU; vitamin D3 2,500 IU; vitamin E 11 IU; vitamin K3 2.2 mg; thiamine 1.5 mg; riboflavin 4 mg; pyridoxine 2.5 mg; pantothenic acid 8 mg; nicotinic acid 35 mg; folate 0.48 mg; cyanocobalamin, 0.01 mg; choline chloride 200 mg. 2 Provided the following (per kg of diet): Mn (MnSO4, H2O) 75 mg; Zn (ZnO) 64 mg; Fe (FeSO4, H2O) 75 mg; Cu (CuSO4, 5H2O) 6 mg; I (KI) 0.86 mg; and Se (Na2SeO3) 0.2 mg.
Table 2. Effect of in ovo injection of Nicotonic acid, Pantothenic acid, and Folic acid on serum antibody titers and at 18 days of age (log2)
a-bMeans in the same column without a common superscript differ significantly (P <0.05). 1 The titers are for SRBC injected birds.
Table 3. Effect of in ovo injection of Nicotonic acid, Pantothenic acid, and Fo- lic acid on serum’s antibody titers and at 35 days of age (log2)
a-cMeans in the same column without a common superscript differ significantly (P <0.05) 1 The titers are for SRBC injected birds.
Table 4 shows the effect of in ovo injection of vitamins on white blood cells. The high- est heterphils to lymphocytes (H/L) ratio was observed in the pantothenic acid group and the lowest levels were seen in the folic acid group (P<0.05). The highest levels of lym- phocyte and heterophile were recorded in folic acid and nicotinic acid groups, respec- tively (P<0.05). The total number of white blood cells counted in the folic acid group was higher than the negative control group (P<0.05). The only carcass and organs parameter affected by experimental treatments was the relative weight of the liver that increased in the nicotinic acid group compared with the control groups (P <0.05) (Table 5). In ovo in- jection of nicotinic acid and pantothenic acid
caused weight loss in chicks during the first and second weeks of rearing period com- pared to the positive and negative control groups (P<0.05) (Fig. 1). However, the body weight at the 6th week of rearing period in the nicotinic acid injected group was signifi- cantly higher than other groups (P<0.05) ex- cept for the negative control group (Fig. 1).
Table 4. Effect of in ovo injection of Nicotonic acid, Pantothenic acid, and Folic acid on white blood cells
a-dMeans in the same column without a common superscript differ significantly (P <0.05)
Table 5. Effect of in ovo injection of Nicotonic acid, Pantothenic acid, and Folic acid on the relative weights of organs of broilers
a-bMeans in the same column without a common superscript differ significantly (P <0.05)
Figure 1. Effect of in ovo injection of water-soluble vitamins on the live weight of broilers chickens.
DiscuusionThe Heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (H/L) is known as an index to stress (Stefaniak et al., 2019). Stressors, such as fasting or water deprivation and environmental extremes in- crease the H/L ratio (McFarlane et al., 1989). Then the lower H/L ratio in birds from eggs in ovo injected with folic acid could be a pos- itive indicator of bird’s health. There are not many reports on the effects of in ovo injec- tion of B-complex vitamins on the immune system of poultry. One of the few reports is available from Li et al. (2016) who showed that in ovo injection of folate injection im- proved immunity by increasing plasma lyso- zyme activity and plasma IgG and IgM con- centrations, and changes in the expression of immune-linked genes. These researchers reported the best effects within ovo injection of 150 ng folic acid. In the present study, the reduction of blood immunoglobulin levels was observed by vitamins injection, which seems inconsistent with the previous report and further studies need to clearify the mech- anism of the observerd effects. In this study, the relative weight of the liv- er that increased in the nicotinic acid group was compared with the control groups. Liver is the main source of lipid synthesis in birds and changes in the liver weight could be due to increased fat content. Folic acid is a co- factor of coenzyme A that plays a vital role in lipid metabolism and fatty acid synthesis (Feng et al., 2011). The liver, as the main source of metabolism in the body, plays an important role in the production of IGF-2 in the bloodstream (Liu et al., 2016). There are also reports that there is a positive relation- ship between liver weight and IGF-2 gene expression in ducks (Jianmin et al., 2014). The finding of this study showed a neg- ative effect of in ovo injection of nicotinic acid and pantothenic acid on weight gain in chicks during the first and second weeks of rearing period compared to the positive and negative control groups. However, the body weight at the 6th week of rearing pe- riod in the nicotinic acid injected group was increased. In a study by Wang et al. (2016), consumption of about 26 mg of pantothen- ic acid improved the weight gain of geese. Bootwalla and Harms (1991) indicated that the level of 4.8 mg of pantothenic acid in the diet was the best level to increase the weight of broiler chicks. Qi et al. (1998) reported that dietary supplementation with pantothen- ic acid increased the metabolism of calci- um and phosphorus, which results in higher body weight gain. The researchers suggested 10 mg / kg pantothenic acid for best perfor- mance. Positive effects of in ovo injection of folic acid on the weight gain of chicks have also been reported. Liu et al. (2016) reported that in ovo in- jection of 150 μg folic acid increased the weight of the chicks compared to the control group. In that study, IGF-2 expression was increased. The correlation between plasma IGF-2 levels and chick embryo weight has already been reported (Lu et al., 2007). Fo- lic acid is a potent antioxidant agent (Lete- lier et al., 2010) and plays a major role in the immune system (Duthie et al., 2010) and this can help the bird to cope with oxidative stress. In the study of Jiang et al. (2014), the body weight of broiler chickens fed 60 mg/ kg nicotinic acid was improved, an observa- tion in line with the higher final body weight of chickens in the nicotinic acid in ovo in- jected group in the present study. In the pres- ent study, the in ovo injection of folic acid had the highest effect on the weight of the chicks.
Although the broiler breeder diets contain enough vitamin supplements, it does not seem that the level of vitamins in the diet is a limiting factor for the development of the fetus. However,in ovo injection of nutrients provides nutrients and vitamins directly to the growing fetus, which can affect the ef- ficiency of nutrient uptake for developing fetus (Jha et al., 2019). The results of this study indicated a positive effect of in ovo injection of pantothenic acid and nicotinic acid on some immune parameters of broiler chicks, and in particular, in ovo injection of nicotinic acid positively influenced the fi- nal weight of the broilers. Actually the final body weight is a more important economical trait than any effect on body weight loss in earlier steps of growth and could suggest a compensatory growth. AcknowledgmentsThe Authors wish to acknowledge the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili for finan- cial support to complete this research. Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that there is no con- flict of interest. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
مراجع | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviagen. (2014) Ross 308broiler: Nutrition Speci- fication. Aviagen, Scotland, UK.
Bootwalla, S.M., Harms, R.H. (1991) Reassess- ment of pantothenic acid requirement for sin- gle comb White Leghorn pullets from 0 to 6 weeks of age and its subsequent effect on sex- ual maturity. Poult Sci. 70: 80e4. https://doi. org/10.3382/ps.0700080. PMID: 2017421.
Cheema., M.A., Qureshiand., M.A. Havenstein,
G.B. (2003). A comparison of the immune response of a 2001commercial broiler with a1957random bred broiler strain when fed rep- resentative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult Sci, 82,1519-1529. https://doi.org/10.1093/
ps/82.10.1519. PMID:14601727.
Dal Pont, G.C., Goes, E.C., Araujo, R.A., Ol- iveira, S.G., Rocha, C., Maiorka, A. (2019) Glycerol inoculation in eggs of young broiler breeders at different embryonic periods. Poult Sci, 0,1-5. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez141.
PMID: 30953069.
Delaney, C., Garg, S.K., Fernandes, C, Hoeltzel, M., Allen, R.H., Stabler, S., Yung, R. (2013) Maternal diet supplemented with methyl-do- nors protects against atherosclerosis in F1 ApoE (-/-) mice. PLOS ONE, 8, e56253.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056253. PMID: 23437105.
Duthie, S.J., Horgan, G., de Roos, B., Rucklidge, G., Reid, M., Duncan, G., Pirie, L., Basten, G.P., Powers, H.J. (2010) Blood folate status and expression of proteins involved in immune function, inflammation, and coagulation: bio- chemical and proteomic changes in the plas- ma of humans in response to long-term syn- thetic folic acid supplementation. J Proteome Res, 9, 1941–1950. https://doi.org/10.1021/
pr901103n. PMID: 20143872.
Feng, D., Zhou, Y., Xia, M., Ma, J. (2011) Folic acid inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced in- flammatory response in RAW264.7 macro- phages by suppressing MAPKs and NFkap- pa B activation. Inflamm Res, 60, 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-011-0337-2. PMID: 21528358.
Grasman, K.A. (2010) In vivo functional tests for assessing immunotoxicity in birds. Methods Mol Biol, 598,387-398. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-401-2_25. PMID: 19967526.
Grass, W. B., Siegel H.S. (1983). Evaluation of the heterophile/lymphocyte ratio as a mea- sure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis, 27, 927-979. https://doi.org/10.2307/1590198.
PMID: 6360120.
Jha, R., Singh, A.K., Yadav, S., Berrocoso, J.F.D., Mishra, B. (2019) Early nutrition programming (in ovo and Post-hatch Feeding) as a strategy to modulate gut health of poultry. Front Vet Sci, 21, 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00082.
PMID: 30949488.
Jiang, R.R., Zhao, G.P., Zhao, J.P., Chen, J.L.,
Zheng, M.Q., Liu, R.R., Wen J. (2014) In-
fluence of dietary nicotinic acid supplemen- tation on lipid metabolism and related gene expression in two distinct broiler breeds of fe- male chickens. J Anim Physiol Anim Nut, 98, 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12138.
PMID: 25356484
Jianmin, Z., Jingting, S., Yanju, S., Yan, H., Chi, S., Wenqi, Z. (2014) Expression of insulin- like Growth factor system genes in liver tissue during embryonic and early post-hatch devel- opment in duck (Anas platyrhynchos domes- tica). Anim Biotechnol, 25, 73–84. https:// doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2013.812560. PMID: 24555793.
Lanska Douglas, J. (2012) The discovery of nia- cin,biotinand pantothenic acid.Ann Nutr Metab, 61, 246e53. https://doi.org/10.1159/000343115.
PMID: 23183297.
Letelier, M.E., Jara-Sandoval, J., Molina-Berríos, A., Faúndez, M., Aracena-Parks, P., Aguilera,
F. (2010) Melatonin protects the cytochrome P450 system through a novel antioxidant mechanism. Chem Biol Interact, 185, 208– 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2010.03.020. PMID: 20302852.
Leung, K.Y., De, Castro S.C., Cabreiro, F., Gus- tavsson, P., Copp, A.J., Greene, N.D. (2013) Folate metabolite profiling of different cell types and embryos suggests variation in fo- late one-carbon metabolism, including devel- opmental changes in human embryonic brain. Mol Cell Biochem, 378, 229–36. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11010-013-1613-y.
PMID: 23483428.
Li, S., Zhi, L., Liu, Y., Shen, J., Liu, L., Yao, J.,
Yang, X. (2016) Effect of in ovo feeding of folic acid on the folate metabolism, immune function and epigenetic modification of immune effector molecules of broiler. Br J Nut, 115, 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515004511. PMID: 26586196.
Liu, Y., Zhi, L., Shen, J., Li, S., Yao, J., Yang, X. (2016) Effect of in ovo folic acid injection on hepatic IGF2 expression and embryo growth of broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 7, 40. https:// doi.org/10.1186/s40104-016-0099-3.
Liu, Y., Guo, W., Pu, Z., Li, X., Lei, X., Yao, J.,
Yang, X. (2016) Developmental changes of In- sulin-like growth factors in the liver and mus- cle of chick embryos. Poult Sci, 95, 1396-402. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew043. Epub 2016
Mar 4. PMID: 26944971
Lu, J.W., McMurtry, J.P., Coon, C.N. (2007) De-
velopmental changes of plasma insulin, gluca- gon, insulin-like growth factors, thyroid hor- mones, and glucose concentrations in chick embryos and hatched chicks. Poult Sci, 86, 673-83. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.4.673.
PMID: 17369538.
OIE (2012). Newcastle disease. Manual of diag- nostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial an- imals. Chapter 2.3.14.http://www.oie.int/ in- ternational-standard- etting/terrestrial-manual/ access-online.
Stefaniak, T., Madej, J.P., Graczyk, S., Siwek, M., Łukaszewicz, E., Kowalczyk, A., Sieńczyk, M., Bednarczyk, M. (2019) Selected prebiotics and synbiotics administered in ovo can modify innate immunity in chicken broilers. BMC Vet Res, 15, 105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-
019-1850-8. PMID: 30943971.
Wang, B., Zhang, X., Yue, B., Ge, W., Zhang, M., Ma, C., Kong, M. (2016) Effects of pan- tothenic acid on growth performance, slaugh- ter performance, lipid metabolism, and an- tioxidant function of Wulong geese aged one to four weeks. Anim Nut, 2, 312e317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2016.07.005. PMID: 29767019.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,135 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 452 |