نقش لیسانس فرند فناوری در تسهیل فرایند تعیین استانداردهای فنی

1. صادقی، محسن (1388). «مبحثی از مباحث حقوق اقتصادی: استانداردسازی محصولات و چالش‌های حقوق مالکیت فکری»، پژوهشنامة بازرگانی، د 14، ش 53، صص 50 ـ 91.
2. محقق داماد، مصطفی (1375). «تعهد به نفع شخص ثالث از نظر شیخ انصاری و دکترین‌های حقوقی»، تحقیقات حقوقی، ش 16 ـ 17، صص 9 ـ 36.
   1. Amundson, S. (2013). ‘Recent Decisions Provide Some Clarity on How Courts and Government Agencies Will Likely Resolve Issues Involving Standard-Essential Patents’, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 13, pp. 91-110.
   2. Arsego, D. (2015). ‘The Problem with FRAND: How the Licensing Commitments of Standard-Setting Organizations Result in the Misvaluing of Patents’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, pp. 257-257.
   3. Beach, J. (2015). ‘Transatlantic (F) RANDs and Converging Standards: Finding Balance between Jurisdictions in International Standard Setting’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 54, pp. 454-501.
   4. Biddle, B. et al (2012). ‘The expanding role and importance of standards in the information and communications technology industry’, Jurimetrics, Vol. 52, pp. 177-208.
   5. Carlton, D. & Shampine, A. (2013). ‘An economic interpretation of FRAND’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 531-552.
   6. Carlton, D. & Shampine, A. (2014). ‘Patent Litigation, Standard-Setting Organizations, Antitrust, and FRAND’, Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 223-234.
   7. Cary, G. et al (2010). ‘The Case for Antitrust Law to Police the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 77, pp. 913-946.

10. Contreras, J. (2013). ‘Fixing FRAND: a Pseudo-Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent Licensing’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 79, pp. 47-98.

11. Contreras, J. (2013). ‘technical standards and ex ante disclosure: results and analysis of an empirical study’, jurimetrics, vol. 53, pp. 163-212.

12. Contreras, J. (2015). ‘A brief history of FRAND: analyzing current debates in standard setting and antitrust through a historical lens’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 80, pp. 39-120.

13. Cotter, T. (2014). ‘Comparative law and economics of standard-essential patents and FRAND royalties’,Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 311-364.

14. Cowie, M. & Lavelle, J. (2002). ‘Patents Covering Industry Standards: The Risks to Enforceability Due to Conduct Before Standard-Setting Organizations’, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 30, pp. 95-160.

15. Craig, A. (2014). ‘How to Fix FRAND? An Analysis of Transnational Enforcement and Legal Legitimacy’, Virginia Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 18, pp. 580-634.

16. Curran, P. (2003). ‘Standard-Setting Organizations: Patents, Price Fixing, and Per Se Legality’, University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 70, pp. 983-1010.

17. De Vellis, J. (2003). ‘Patenting Industry Standards: Balancing the Rights of Patent Holders with the Need for Industry-Wide Standards’,AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 301-352.

18. Devlin, A. (2009). ‘Standard-setting and the failure of price competition’, New York University Annual Survey of American Law, Vol. 65, pp. 217-268.

19. Dolmans, M. (2002). ‘Standards for standards’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 163-208.

20. Geradian, D. (2009). ‘Pricing Abuses by Essential Patent Holders in a Standard-Setting Context: A view from Europe’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 76, pp. 329-358.

21. Geradin, D. & Rato, M. (2007). ‘Can standard-setting lead to exploitative abuse? A dissonant view on patent hold-up, royalty stacking and the meaning of FRAND’, European Competition Journal, Vol. 3, pp. 101-162.

22. Gifford, D. (2003). ‘Developing Models for a Coherent Treatment of Standard-Setting Issues Under the Patent, Copyright, and Antitrust Laws’, IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 43, pp. 331-394.

23. Glader, M. (2010). ‘Open standards: public policy aspects and competition law requirements’, European Competition Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 611-648.

24. Hovenkamp, H. (2016). ‘Antitrust and Information Technologies’, Florida Law Review, Vol. 68, pp. 419-466.

25. Hurwitz, J. (2008). ‘The value of patents in industry standards: Avoiding license arbitrage with voluntary rules’, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 1-42.

26. Jacobsen, K. (2009). ‘Intellectual Property in Standards: Does Antitrust Law Impose a Duty to Disclose (Even if the Standards-Setting Organization Does Not)’, Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 459-486.

27. Jakobsen, K. (2004). ‘Revisiting standard-setting organizations patent policies’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 3, pp. 43-60.

28. Kattan, J. (2012). ‘FRAND Wars and Section 2’, Antitrust, Vol. 27, pp. 30-35.

29. Keeler, R. (2013). ‘Why Can't We Be (F) rands: The Effect of Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Commitments on Standard-Essential Patent Li

30. censing’, Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 32, pp. 317-346.Kesan, J. & Hayes, C. (2014). ‘FRAND's Forever: Standards, Patent Transfers, and Licensing Commitments’, Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 89, pp. 231-314.

31. Kochuk, M. (2014). ‘In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices: Apple, Samsung, Patent Holdup, and the Public Interest’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, Vol. 40, pp. 849-875.

32. Lemley, M. & Shapiro C. (2013). ‘A simple approach to setting reasonable royalties for standard-essential patents’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 1135-1166.

33. Lemley, M. (2002). ‘Intellectual property rights and standard-setting organizations’, California Law Review, Vol. 90, pp. 1889-1980.

34. Leonard, R. & Stiles, A. (2012). The Importance of Standard-Essential and Implementation Patents. NEW JERSEY LAWYER, pp. 35-39.

35. Leveque, F. & Meniere, Y. (2008). ‘Technology standards, patents and antitrust’, Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Vol. 9, pp. 29-48.

36. Li, B. (2016). ‘The Global Convergence of FRAND Licensing Practices: Towards Interoperable Legal Standards’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 429-466.

37. Li, R. & wang, r. (2017). reforming and specifying intellectual property rights policies of standard-setting organizations: towards fair and efficient patent licensing and dispute resolution. university of illinois journal of law, technology & policy, vol. 2017, pp. 1-48.

38. Lim, D. (2014). ‘Standard essential patents, trolls and the smartphone wars: triangulating the end game’, Penn State Law Review, Vol. 119, pp. 1-92.

39. Maldonado, K. (2014). ‘Breaching RAND and reaching for reasonable: Microsoft v. Motorola and standard-essential patent litigation’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 419-464.

40. Michel, S. (2010). ‘Bargaining for RAND Royalties in the Shadow of Patent Remedies Law’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 77, pp. 889-912.

41. Miller, B. (2014). ‘FRAND-Encumbered SEPs and Injunctions: Why Section 5 of the FTC Is an Inappropriate Remedy’, Columbia Science and Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, pp. 452-493.

42. Miller, J. (2007). ‘Standard Setting, Patents, and a Access Lock-In: RAND Licensing and the Theory of the Firm’, Indiana Law Review, Vol. 40, pp. 351-396.

43. Newman, D. (2012). ‘Going Once... Going Twice... Licensed under the Most Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory Bidding Terms’, Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, pp. 139-161.

44. Nimmer, R. (1998). ‘Breaking Barriers: The Relation Between Contract and Intellectual Property Law’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 13, pp. 827-890.

45. Ragavan, S. et al (2016).‘Frand v. Compulsory Licensing: The Lesser of the Two Evils’, Duke Law & Technology Review, Vol. 14, pp. 83-120.

46. Ratliff, J. & Rubinfeld, D. (2013). ‘The Use and Threat of Injunctions in the RAND Context’, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 1-22.

47. Rubin, J. (2006). ‘Patents, Antitrust, and Rivalry in Standard-Setting’, Rutgers Law Journal, Vol. 38, pp. 509-538.

48. Schallop, M. (2000). ‘The IPR Paradox: Leveraging Intellectual Property Rights to Encourage Interoperability in the Network Computing Age’, AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 195-306.

49. Schneck, D. (1997). ‘Setting the standard: problems presented to patent holders participating in the creation of industry uniformity standards’, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal (Comm/Ent), Vol. 20, pp. 641-664.

50. Sidak, J. (2016). Apportionment, FRAND Royalites, and Comparable Licenses after Ericsson v. D-Link. University of Illinois Law Review. Vol. 2016, pp. 1809-1870.

51. Stadheim, T. (2009). ‘Rambus, N-Data, and the FTC: Creating Efficient Incentives in Patent Holders and Optimizing Consumer Welfare in Standards-Setting Organizations’, Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology, Vol. 19, pp. 483-518.

52. Swanson, D. & Baumol, W. (2005). ‘Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (RAND) Royalties, Standard Selection, and Control of Market Power’, Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 73, pp. 1-58.

53. Takenaka, T. (2009). Patent Law and Theory, Edward Elgar Publishing.

54. United states Department of Justice & United states Federal Trade Commission (2007). Antitrust enforcement & intellectual property rights: promoting innovation & competition, DIANE Publishing.

55. Von Hipple, E. (1987). Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading. Research policy, 16.6, pp. 291-302.

56. Wright, J. (2014). ‘SSOs, FRAND, and antitrust: lessons from the economics of incomplete Contracts’, George Mason Law Review, Vol. 21, pp. 791-810.

57. Zhange, L. (2012). Standardization and Patent Licensing in the European Union. IPR University Centerin JulkaisujaThe Role of FRAND License in Facilitating Technical Standards-setting Process