پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 158 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 6,225 |
| تعداد مقالات | 67,685 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 114,964,805 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 89,638,876 |
The Tax and Petroleum Revenue Effect on Iran’s Public Expenditures (1994–2015), Employing Fiscal Illusion Approach | ||
| Iranian Economic Review | ||
| مقاله 12، دوره 22، شماره 3، آذر 2018، صفحه 833-866 اصل مقاله (587.38 K) | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22059/ier.2018.66646 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Majid Maddah* ؛ Fozieh Jeyhoon-Tabar | ||
| Department of Economics, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| I ncreased expenditures and the government size is an important issue in public sector economics. In this regard, various theories have been developed in order to justify the reasons for the public expenditure growth, and the theories have been empirically tested. One of the outlooks explaining the government expenditures growth and the economy size, is fiscal illusion approach. According to fiscal illusion theory and experiences, citizens generally do not have a correct perception of fiscal parameters systematically, so that they wrongly demand for more government expenditures. In this study, seasonal data for the period of 1994–2015 were used to test and analyze the fiscal illusion in Iran’s economy by applying autoregressive distributed lags model. Findings, obtained from the model estimation, indicate that the fiscal illusion in Iran’s economy can be explained from the variables of oil revenue and government debt in short-term and long-term, and indirect tax elasticity in short-term. Since the government uses oil revenue to finance its debt and budget deficit, the results may lead to fiscal illusion. In order to prevent fiscal illusion, using these sources should be gradually reduced as much as possible. As tax revenue itself generally does not result in fiscal illusion (based on the findings), the government should specify transparent fiscal rules by using tax revenues rather than oil revenues in order to prevent both the increasing government expenditures and fiscal fluctuations. According to the results, government should use more direct tax revenue. As government’s direct tax revenue, unlike other sources of revenue, does not create fiscal illusions, it does not result in excessive demand by citizens for public expenditures. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Keywords: Fiscal Illusion؛ Government expenditures؛ Iran’s Economy؛ Tax. JEL Classification: H41؛ H11 | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbott, A., & Jones, P. (2016). Fiscal Illusion and Cyclical Government Expenditure: State Government Expenditure in the United States. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 63(2), 177-193.
Afonso, W. B. (2014). Fiscal Illusion in State and Local Finances: A Hindrance to Transparency. State and Local Government Review, 46(3), 219-228.
Amusa, H., Mabunda, R. & Mabugu, R. (2008). Fiscal Illusion at the Local Sphere: An Empirical Test of the Flypaper Effect using South African Municipal Data. South African Journal of Economics, 76(3), 443-465.
Baekgaard, M., Serritzlew, S. & Blom-Hansen, J. (2016). Causes of Fiscal Illusion: Lack of Information or Lack of Attention? Public Financial Publications, 36(2), 26- 44.
Bergstrom, T. & Goodman, R. (1973). Private Demand for Public Goodman. The American Economic Review, 63, 280- 296.
Borcherding, T. E., & Deacon, R. T. (1972). The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Government. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 891-901.
Buchanan, J. M. (1967). Public Finance in Democratic Process. North Carolina: The University of North Carolina Press.
Buehn, A., Dell’Anno, R., & Schneider, F. (2015). Exploring the Dark Side of Tax Policy: An Analysis of the Interactions between Fiscal Illusion and the Shadow Economy. CESIFO Working, Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2643339.
---------- (2012). Fiscal Illusion and the Shadow Economy: Two Sides of the Same Coin? MPRA Paper, Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42531.
Carroll, D. A. (2009). Diversifying Municipal Government Revenue Structures: Fiscal Illusion or Instability? Public Financial Publications, 29(1), 27- 48.
---------- (2005). Are State Governments Prepared for Fiscal Crises? A Look at Revenue Diversification during the 1990s. Public Finance Review, 33, 603-633.
Craig, E. D., & Heins, A. J. (1980). The Effect of Tax Elasticity on Government Spending. Public Choice, 35(3), 267-275.
Deane, P., & Kuper, J. (1988). A Lexicon of Economics. New York: Routledge.
Dell’Anno, R., & Mourao, P. (2012). Fiscal Illusion around the World. An Analysis using the Structural Equation Approach. Public Finance Review, 40(2), 270-99.
Dell’Anno, R., & De Rosa, V. M. (2013). The Relevance of the Theory of Fiscal Illusion. The Case of the Italian Tax System. HETP, 2, 63-92.
Dell’Anno, R., & Dollery, B. (2012). Comparative Fiscal illusion: A fiscal Illusion Index for the European Union? MPRA Paper, Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/42537.
---------- (2014). Comparative Fiscal Illusion: A Fiscal Illusion Index for the European Union. Empir Econ, 46, 937-960.
Dell’Anno, R., & Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2013). A Behavioral Local Public Finance Perspective on the Renter Illusion Hypothesis. International Center for Public Policy, Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/icepp/34.
Deller, S. C., & Maher, C. S. (2006). A Model of Asymmetries in the Flypaper Effect. Publius, 36(2), 213-229.
Diallo, O. (2009). Tortuous Road toward Countercyclical Fiscal Policy: Lessons from Democratized Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 31, 36-50.
Diamond, J. (1989). A Note on the Public Choice Approach to the Growth in Government Expenditure. Public Finance Review, 17(4), 445- 461.
Dilorenzo, T. J. (1982). Utility Profits, Fiscal Illusion, and Local Public Expenditures. Public Choice, 38, 243-252.
Dollery, B. E, & Worthington, A. C. (1996). The Empirical Analysis of Fiscal Illusion. Journal of Economic Surveys, 10(3), 261-297.
---------- (1995a). State Expenditure and Fiscal Illusion in Australia: A Test of the Revenue Complexity, Revenue Elasticity and Flypaper Hypotheses. Economic Analysis and Policy, 25(2), 125-140.
---------- (1995b). Federal Expenditure and Fiscal Illusion: An Australian Test of the Flypaper Hypothesis. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 25(1), 23-34.
---------- (1995c). The Impact of Fiscal Illusion on Housing Values: An Australian, Test of the Debt Illusion Hypothesis. Public Budgeting and Finance, 15, 63-70.
Durevall, D., & Henrekson, M. (2011). The Futile Quest for a Grand Explanation of Long-Run Government Expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 708-722.
Floyd, J. E., & Hynes, J. A. (1978). Debt Illusion and Imperfect Information. European Economic Review, II, 379-386.
Fujii, E. T., & Hawley, C. B. (1988). On the Accuracy of Tax Perceptions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2), 344-347.
Garrett, T. A., & Rhine, R. M. (2006). On the Size and Growth of Government. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 88(1), 13-30.
Gemmell, N., Morrissey, O., & Pinar, A. (2002). Fiscal Illusion and Political Accountability: Theory and Evidence from Two Local Tax Regimes in Britain. Public Choice, 110, 199-224.
---------- (1999). Fiscal Illusion and the Demand for Government Expenditures in the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 15, 687-704.
Greene, K. V., & Hawley, B. K. (1991). Personal Income Taxes, Elasticities and Fiscal Illusion. Public Choice, 72(2/3), 101-109.
Guillamón, M .D., Albaladeio, F. J. B., & Benito, B. (2011). The Determinants of Local Government's Financial Transparency. Local Government Studies, 37(4), 391-406.
Haug, P. (2009). Shadow Budgets, Fiscal Illusion and Municipal Spending: The Case of Germany. IWH-Discussion Papers, Retrieved from
https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/zbwiwhdps/iwh-9-09.htm
Heyndels, B., & Smolders, C. (1994). Fiscal Illusion at the Local Level: Empirical Evidence for the Flemish municipalities. Public Choice, 80, 325-338.
---------- (1995). Tax Complexity and Fiscal Illusion. Public Choice, 85, 127-141.
Hunter, W. J., & Scott, C. E. (1987). Statutory Changes in State Income Taxes: An Indirect Test of Fiscal Illusion. Public Choice, 53, 41-51.
Islam, M. N. (1998). Fiscal Illusion, Inter-governmental Grants and Local Spending. Regional Studies, 32(1), 63-71.
Landers, J. R., & Byrnes, P. E. (2000). Debt Illusion among Local Taxpayers: An Empirical Investigation. The National Tax Association, 93, 187-194.
Maher, C. S., & Johnson, T. (2008). Testing for Fiscal Illusion in Wisconsin Towns. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(14), 1513-1531.
Marshall, L. (1991). New Evidence on Fiscal Illusion: The 1986 Tax "Windfalls". The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1336-1344.
Mitias, P. M., & Turnbull, G. K. (2001). Grant Illusion, Tax Illusion, and Local Government Spending. Public Finance Review, 29, 347-368.
Mourão, P. R. (2008). Towards a Fiscal Illusion Index. MPRA Paper, Retrieved from
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/9760/1/Towards_a_Fiscal_Illusion_Index_jun08.pdf.
Mourão, P. R., & Cabral, J. P. (2015). Periodograms on Fiscal Illusion: Discussing the Cycle Lengths of Public Finances in European Countries. Applied Economics, 47(16), 1698-1709.
Mourão, P. R. (2010). Debate: The Dangers of Fiscal Illusion. Public Money & Management, 30(5), 267-268.
Mukherjee, D. (2010). Essentials of Micro and Macroeconomics (3rd Ed.). Mumbai: New Central Book Agency.
Munley, V. G., & Greene, K. V. (1978). Fiscal Illusion, the Nature of Public Goods and Equation Specification. Public Choice, 33(1), 95-100.
Oates, W. E. (2005). Property Taxation and Local Public Spending: the Renter Effect. Journal of Urban Economics, 57, 419–431.
---------- (1988). On the Nature and Measurement of Fiscal Illusion: A Survey, Taxation and Fiscal Federalism: Essays in Honor of Russell Mathews (Sydney), Retrieved from
http://econserver.umd.edu/~oates/research/On%20the%20Nature%20and%20Measurement%20of%20Fiscal%20Illusion.pdf.
Pinar, A. (1998). Essays on Fiscal Illusion. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Retrieved from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/11496.
Rodrik, D. (1998). Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? The Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997-1032.
Royed, T. J., & Borrelli, S. A. (1999). The Impact of Tax Structures on Deficits: Tax Elasticity and Fiscal Illusion in Sixteen OECD Countries. International Journal of Public Administration, 22(11-12), 1721-1745.
Sausgruber, R., & Tyran, J. (2005). Testing the Mill Hypothesis of Fiscal Illusion. Public Choice, 122(1), 39-68. Sloan, H. Z., & Zurcher, A. (1970). Dictionary of Economics. California: Barnes and Noble.
Thamae, R. I. (2013). The Growth of Government Spending in Lesotho. Economic an Alysis & Policy, 43 (3), 339- 352.
Tovmo, P., & Falch, T. (2002). The Flypaper Effect and Political Strength. Economics of Governance, 3, 153-170.
Turnbull, G. K. (1992). Fiscal Illusion, Uncertainty, and the Flypaper Effect. Journal of Public Economics, 18, 207-223.
West, E. G., & Winter, S. L. (1980). Optimal Fiscal Illusion and the Size of Government. Public Choice, 35, 607-622.
Winter, S., & Mouritzen, P. E. (2001). Why People Want Something for Nothing: The Role of Asymmetrical Illusions. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 109-143. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 581 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 473 |
||