الف) فارسی

1. ضیایی بیگدلی، محمدرضا (1395)، حقوق بین‌الملل عمومی، چ54 ، تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش.
2. ضیایی، یاسر (1393)، «جایگاهتعهداتزیست‌محیطیدرحقوقبین‌المللسرمایه‌گذاری»، پژوهش حقوق عمومی، سال پانزدهم، ش42، ص 224-191.
3. طلایی، فرهاد (1390)، حقوق بین‌الملل دریاها، چ1، تهران: انتشارات جنگل.
4. مشهدی، علی (1393)، «اساسی سازی ماهوی حق بر محیط زیست در حقوق ایران و فرانسه»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دورۀ 5، ص 580-559.

ب) خارجی

BOOKS

5. Armstrong, D., et al (eds)(2009), Routledge Handbook of International Law , Routledge.

6. Cordonier Segger,M.C, Khalfan,A.(2004), Sustainable Development law: Principles, Practices, and Prospects ,Oxford University Press.

7. Faure, M.( 2016), Elgar Encyclopedia of Environmental Law, Edward elgar publishing.

8. Fitzmaurice,Malgosia,Tamada,Dai(2016), Whaling in the Antarctic Significance and Implications of the ICJ Judgment , Brill.

9. Kiss,A., Shelton,D.(2007), Guide to International Environmental Law,Martinus Nijhoff .

10. Patel,Bimal N(2014), The World Court Reference Guide and Case-Law Digest,Brill Nijhoff.

11) Sands,Philippe (2003), Principles of International E$nvironmental Law,2^nd ed ,Cambridge.

12. Schrijver Nico,Weiss Friedel(eds)(2004), International Law and Sustainable Development Principles and  Practice, Martinus Nijhoff.

13. Schrijver,Nico(2008), The Evolution of Sustainable Development in International Law:Inception,Meaning and Status ,Hague Academy of International Law.

14. Tanaka,Yoshifumi(2012), The International Law of the Sea, cambridge.

15. World Commission on Environment and Development(1987), Our Common Future,Oxford University Press.

ARTICLES

16. Beham,Markus P(2012), «Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros as a ‘Mox Dam’? Thoughts on a Possible Solution by the European Court of Justice» Austrian Review of International and European Law, Vol. 17, pp. 117-136.

17. Boyle,A. ,Harrison,J.(2013), «Judicial Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: Current Problems» Journal of international dispute settlement, 4(2), p 245-276.

18. Cordonier Segger,M.C(2009), «The Role of International Forums in the Advancement of Sustainable Development Law»,sustainable development law and policy,10(1),pp.4-18.

19. Marr,Simon(2000), «The Southerrn Blufin Tuna Cases: the Precautinary Approach and Conservation of Fish Resources»,EJIL,2000,vol11.No.4,p.829-843

20. Zhu,X., and He,J.(2012), «International Court of Justice’s Impact on Internationa Environmental Law Focusing on the Pulp Mills Case» , Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 105-132.

CASES

21. Case concerning gabcíkovo-nagymaros project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997.

22. Case concerning gabcíkovo-nagymaros project, separate opinion of vice-president Weeramantry.

23. Case concerning pulp mills on the river uruguay (Argentina v.Uruguay),Judgment of 20 April 2010.

24. Case concerning pulp mills on the River Uruguay, separate opinion of judge Cançado Trindade.

25. Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan : New zealand intervening),judgment 31 march 2014.

26. Decision of the Council of the International Seabed Authority requesting

 an advisory opinion ,161th meeting,6 may 2010.

27. Responsibilities and obligations of States sponsoring persons and entities with respect to activities in the Area, advisory opinion of 1 february 2011.

28. Request for the prescription of provisional measures submitted by Australia,30 july 1999.

29. Southern bluefin tuna cases, (provisional measures),Order of 27 August 1999.

DOCUMENTS

30. Fifth Report on the Principles ofInternational Law relating to Sustainable Development, ILA, Committee on the Legal Aspects of Sustainable Development,  (London: ILA, 2002).

31. New Delhi Declaration Of Principles Of International Law Relating To Sustainable Development, ILA Resolution,3/2002.

32. Rio Declaration, United Nations "Conference on Environment and Development",1992.

.33. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,4 June 1992

WEB SITES

34. www. icj-cij.org/ last visited on:28/01/2017

35. www.itlos.org/ last visited on :20/01/2017